Research Article

Comparative Analysis of PZT Piezoelectric Material Types for Energy Harvesting in Water Pipeline Pressure Fluctuations

Volume: 13 Number: 1 May 7, 2026
EN TR

Comparative Analysis of PZT Piezoelectric Material Types for Energy Harvesting in Water Pipeline Pressure Fluctuations

Abstract

The increasing energy demand and the dwindling fossil fuel reserves are leading to a shift towards alternative energy sources. In this context, the conversion of pressure or vibration-induced irregularities in the environment into electrical energy through piezoelectric materials that generate an electric charge under mechanical stress has been considered. In this study, the possibility of generating electrical energy from transient pressure fluctuations in municipal water distribution lines was investigated using an experimental setup. For this purpose, a laboratory-scale experimental setup consisting of 1-inch diameter pipe elements was created to simulate similar hydraulic conditions observed in urban water networks. PZT-5 and PZT-8 type piezoelectric ceramics were used in a pipeline, electrically isolated from the fluid, and subjected to pressure variations controlled by a ball valve in the range of 1–6 bar. Analysis of the results shows that the highest voltage value is reached at 3 bar with PZT-5 material. With PZT-8 material, a stepped voltage value up to 6 bar is observed. It has been shown that the use of PZT material can provide energy recovery from pressure fluctuations and can be used in water distribution lines.

Keywords

Piezoelectric Materials, PZT 5-8, Pressurized Fluid Systems, Alternative Voltage Generation

References

  1. Li Z, Roscow J, Khanbareh H, Haswell G, Bowen C. Energy harvesting from water flow using piezoelectric materials. Adv Energy Sustain Res 2024;5(5):2300235. doi:10.1002/aesr.202300235.
  2. Zhu D, Beeby S, Tudor J, Harris N, White N. Vibration energy harvesting using PZT membranes. Smart Mater Struct 2010;19:055003. doi:10.1088/0964-1726/19/5/055003.
  3. Maurya D, Yan Y, Priya S. Piezoelectric materials for energy harvesting. Boca Raton: CRC Press; 2015. p. 143.
  4. Erturk A, Inman DJ. Piezoelectric energy harvesting. Hoboken: John Wiley & Sons; 2011. doi:10.1002/9781119991151.
  5. Lin X, Gu C, Wang J, Cai Y, Zhang G, Zhang T. Experimental study on road energy harvesting using piezoelectric ceramics. Acta Geotech 2022;17(10):4599–4625.
  6. Beeby SP, Tudor MJ, White NM. Energy harvesting vibration sources for microsystems applications. Meas Sci Technol 2006;17:R175–R195. doi:10.1088/0957-0233/17/12/R01.
  7. Li S, Lipson H. Vertical water wave energy harvesting using piezoelectric materials. Appl Phys Lett 2009;95:134102. doi:10.1063/1.3245330.
  8. Lu ZQ, Chen J, Ding H, Chen LQ. Energy harvesting of a fluid-conveying piezoelectric pipe. Appl Math Model 2022;107:165–181. doi:10.1016/j.apm.2022.03.021.
  9. Naqvi A, Ali A, Altabey WA, Kouritem SA. Energy harvesting from fluid flow using piezoelectric materials: a review. Energies 2022;15(19):7424. doi:10.3390/en15197424.
  10. Cao DX, Duan XJ, Guo XY, Lai SK. Design and performance enhancement of a force-amplified piezoelectric stack energy harvester under pressure fluctuations in hydraulic pipeline systems. Sens Actuators A Phys 2020;309:112031. doi:10.1016/j.sna.2020.112031.
APA
Uyar, M. M., Çıtlak, A., Vural, H., & Saylık, A. (2026). Comparative Analysis of PZT Piezoelectric Material Types for Energy Harvesting in Water Pipeline Pressure Fluctuations. Adıyaman Üniversitesi Mühendislik Bilimleri Dergisi, 13(1), 1-17. https://doi.org/10.54365/adyumbd.1866012
AMA
1.Uyar MM, Çıtlak A, Vural H, Saylık A. Comparative Analysis of PZT Piezoelectric Material Types for Energy Harvesting in Water Pipeline Pressure Fluctuations. Adıyaman Üniversitesi Mühendislik Bilimleri Dergisi. 2026;13(1):1-17. doi:10.54365/adyumbd.1866012
Chicago
Uyar, Muhammed Mustafa, Aydın Çıtlak, Hakan Vural, and Ahmet Saylık. 2026. “Comparative Analysis of PZT Piezoelectric Material Types for Energy Harvesting in Water Pipeline Pressure Fluctuations”. Adıyaman Üniversitesi Mühendislik Bilimleri Dergisi 13 (1): 1-17. https://doi.org/10.54365/adyumbd.1866012.
EndNote
Uyar MM, Çıtlak A, Vural H, Saylık A (May 1, 2026) Comparative Analysis of PZT Piezoelectric Material Types for Energy Harvesting in Water Pipeline Pressure Fluctuations. Adıyaman Üniversitesi Mühendislik Bilimleri Dergisi 13 1 1–17.
IEEE
[1]M. M. Uyar, A. Çıtlak, H. Vural, and A. Saylık, “Comparative Analysis of PZT Piezoelectric Material Types for Energy Harvesting in Water Pipeline Pressure Fluctuations”, Adıyaman Üniversitesi Mühendislik Bilimleri Dergisi, vol. 13, no. 1, pp. 1–17, May 2026, doi: 10.54365/adyumbd.1866012.
ISNAD
Uyar, Muhammed Mustafa - Çıtlak, Aydın - Vural, Hakan - Saylık, Ahmet. “Comparative Analysis of PZT Piezoelectric Material Types for Energy Harvesting in Water Pipeline Pressure Fluctuations”. Adıyaman Üniversitesi Mühendislik Bilimleri Dergisi 13/1 (May 1, 2026): 1-17. https://doi.org/10.54365/adyumbd.1866012.
JAMA
1.Uyar MM, Çıtlak A, Vural H, Saylık A. Comparative Analysis of PZT Piezoelectric Material Types for Energy Harvesting in Water Pipeline Pressure Fluctuations. Adıyaman Üniversitesi Mühendislik Bilimleri Dergisi. 2026;13:1–17.
MLA
Uyar, Muhammed Mustafa, et al. “Comparative Analysis of PZT Piezoelectric Material Types for Energy Harvesting in Water Pipeline Pressure Fluctuations”. Adıyaman Üniversitesi Mühendislik Bilimleri Dergisi, vol. 13, no. 1, May 2026, pp. 1-17, doi:10.54365/adyumbd.1866012.
Vancouver
1.Muhammed Mustafa Uyar, Aydın Çıtlak, Hakan Vural, Ahmet Saylık. Comparative Analysis of PZT Piezoelectric Material Types for Energy Harvesting in Water Pipeline Pressure Fluctuations. Adıyaman Üniversitesi Mühendislik Bilimleri Dergisi. 2026 May 1;13(1):1-17. doi:10.54365/adyumbd.1866012