ALMANYA'DAKİ TÜRK TOPLUMUNDA DİASPORA GELİŞİMİ: TÜRKİYE'NİN MEVCUT DİASPORA POLİTİKASI ÜZERİNDEKİ ETKİSİ

Öz

The term "diaspora" has been used more often in recent years to describe communities living far from their homeland. Considering today's influential diasporas in the context of international relations, recently this definition is not enough to describe it. It is necessary for the concept to contain various elements as content. According to some definitions, the structure of Turkish society in Germany, which partially shows diaspora characteristics, is shaped by factors such as immigration history and loyalty to on homeland, which is a form the basis of identity in diaspora societies. Turkish society in Germany, which should be examined in a transnational dimension, also significantly influences Turkish-German relations within the framework of international relations. Turkey supports the diaspora structures of the German-Turks, with which it is linked within the framework of transnational relations. In this context, Turkey supports the integration of Turkish society in Germany, into diaspora policy, apart from lobbying activities, which is loyal to its homeland. Dealing with the diaspora structures and the development of Turkish society in Germany has emerged as an area in which various factors are included. This study consists of different sections that examine the development status of the Turkish diaspora in Germany and the resulting theoretical and methodological problems. For this reason, the Turkish diaspora searches in Germany, their difficulties and advantages were evaluated together and an attempt was made to draw a conclusion. The subject of the study is an analysis of the current situation of the Turkish diaspora, which has developed depending on Turkish society in Germany.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Almnanya
• Diaspora
• Kimlik
• Türkiye
• Ulusaşırı İlişkiler

DIASPORA DEVELOPMENT IN THE TURKISH COMMUNITY IN GERMANY: ITS IMPACT ON TURKEY'S CURRENT DIASPORA POLICY

Abstract

The term "diaspora" has been used more often in recent years to describe communities living far from their homeland. Considering today's influential diasporas in the context of international relations, recently this definition is not enough to describe it. It is necessary for the concept to contain various elements as content. According to some definitions, the structure of Turkish society in Germany, which partially shows diaspora characteristics, is shaped by factors such as immigration history and loyalty to on homeland, which is a form the basis of identity in diaspora societies. Turkish society in Germany, which should be examined in a transnational dimension, also significantly influences Turkish-German relations within the framework of international relations. Turkey supports the diaspora structures of the German-Turks, with which it is linked within the framework of transnational relations. In this context, Turkey supports the integration of Turkish society in Germany, into diaspora policy, apart from lobbying activities, which is loyal to its homeland. Dealing with the diaspora structures and the development of Turkish society in Germany has emerged as an area in which various factors are included. This study consists of different sections that examine the development status of the Turkish diaspora in Germany and the resulting theoretical and methodological problems. For this reason, the Turkish diaspora searches in Germany, their difficulties and advantages were evaluated together and an attempt was made to draw a conclusion. The subject of the study is an analysis of the current situation of the Turkish diaspora, which has developed depending on Turkish society in Germany. Germany, Diaspora, Identity, Türkiye, Transnational Relations

Keywords

• Germany
• Diaspora
• Identity
• Türkiye
• Transnational Relations

References

1. Albert, M. (2009). Transnational Political Spaces. Main: Campus Verlag.
2. Ariely G. (2021). National Identity and Globalization: Findings from Cross-National Surveys, Zajda J., & Majhanovich S (Eds) Globalization Cultural Identity and Nation Building. Springer Nature.
3. Aydın, Y. (2011). Politisierter Fern-Nationalismus am Beispiel der türkeistämmigen Diaspora in Deutschland, Caroline Y. & Robertson-von Trotha (Eds), Diaspora: Netzwerke globaler Gemeinschaften. Scientific Publishing.
4. Becker, M. (2001). Das hetereogene Demos: Multikulturalität als Wertepluralismus und das Problem der Verrechtlichung, (Editörler: Hartmut Behr ve Siegmar Schmidt), Multikulturelle Demokratien im Vergleich. Westdeutscher Verlag.
5. Ben-Rafael, E. (2002). Transnationalism: Diasporas and the Advent of a New (Dis)order. Brill Press.
6. Bozdag, C. (2013). Aneignung von Diasporawebsites. Springer Verlag.
7. Breakwell, G., (2015). Identity Process Theory, (Edited by: Sammut G., Andreouli, E., Gaskell G. Valsiner G.), The Cambridge Handbook of Social Represations. Cambridge University Press.
8. Clifford, J. (1994). Diasporas In Cultural Anthpyrology. University of California Press.

9. Cohen, B. J. (2005). International Political Economy. Routledge Press.
10. Cohen, R. (2019). Global Diaspora: An Introduction. Routledge Press.
11. Cohen, R, & Fischer, C. (2019). Routledge Handbook of Diaspora Studies. Routledge Press.
12. DW (2021). Retrieved from https://www.dw.com/de/ampelkoalition-einwanderung-wird-leichter-gemacht/a-59946490 .
13. Gamlen, A. (2019). Human Geopolitics: States, Emigrants, and the Rise of Diaspora Institutions, Oxford University Press.
14. Hall, S. (1992). Formations of Modernity. Sage Publications.
15. Hall, S. (1996). Questions of Cultural Identity: Community, Culture, Difference. Sage Publications.
16. Hollis, M. (1994). The Philosophy of Social Science. Cambridge University Press.
17. Kapur, D. (2010). Diaspora, Development, and Democracy: The Domestic Impact of International Migration from India. Princeton University Press.
18. Kennedy, L. (2018). Diaspora and Diplomacy, (Editörler: Nancyy S. ve Nicholas J.C.), Routledge Handbook of Public Diplomacy. Routledge Press.
19. Koslowski, R. (2005). International Migration and Globalization of Domestic Politics. Routledge Press.
20. Ladilova, A. (2001). Kollektive Identitätskonstruktion in der Migration. Peter Lang Verlag.
21. Miccoli D. (2018). “Because our path has no end”: Diaspora and Land of Israel in the Novels of Haim Sabato, (Edited by: Miccoli D., Simoni M., Foscarini G.), Homelands and Diaspora: Perspectives on Jewish Culture in Mediterranean and beyond. Cambridge Scholars Publishing.
22. Mück, K. (2017). “Wir schaffen das! Hat die Persönlichkeit Angela Merkels Einfluss auf die Flüchtlingspolitik, Xuewu Gu,& Hendrik W.Ohnesorge (Eds), Politische Persönlichkeiten und ihre Weltpolitische Gestaltung, Springer Verlag. 51
23. Müssig, S. (2020). Politische Partizipation von Menschen mit Migrationshintergrung in Deutschland. Springer Verlag.
24. Ninh, T.T. (2017). Race, Gender, and Religion in the Vietnamese Diaspora: The New Chosen People. Palgrave Macmillan.
25. Nye, J. (2004). Power in the Global Information Age: From Realism to Globalization. Public Affairs.
26. Safran, W. (1991). Diaspora in Modern Societies: Myths of Homeland and Return. University of Toronto Press.
27. Schiller, N.G.,& Darieva, T., Gruner-Domic S. (2012). Defining cosmopolitan sociability in a transnational age. An introduction, Schiller, N.G., & Darieva, T.,& Gruner-Domic S. (Eds), Cosmopolitan Sociability: Locating Transnational Religious and Diasporic Networks. Routledge Press.
28. Shooman, Y. (2010). “…weil ihre Kultur so ist”, (Editor Sir Peter Ustinoc Enstitüsü), “Rasse” eine soziale und politische Konstruktion. Strukturen und Phänomene des Vorurteils Rassismus. Braumüller Verlag.
29. Shooman, Y. (2012). İslamfeindlichkeit und Antisemitismus, Diskursive Analogien und Unterschiede. JMB Verlag. Schultes, F. (2013). Mediale Verbindungen – antimuslimische Effekte, Zu den gegenwärtigen Verschränkungen des Islamdiskurses, 21(1).
30. Sheffer, G. (2003). Diaspora Politics at Home Abroad. Cambridge University Press.
31. STATISTA (2019). Anzahl der Ausländer aus der Türkei in Deutschland von 2001 bis 2018, retrieved from https://de.statista.com/statistik/daten/studie/152911/umfrage/tuerken-in- deutschland-seit-2001/.
32. Swp (2021). Retrieved from https://www.swp.de/politik/koalitionsvertrag-2021-einbuergerung-migration-staatsangehoerigkeit-doppelte-staatsbuergerschaft-bundesregierung-ampel-sdp-fdp-gruene-61072241.html .
33. Thussu, D. (2013). Communicating India’s Soft Power. Palgrave Macmillan.
34. Tröster, I. (2003). Wann ist man integriert? Eine empirische Analyse zum Integrationsverständnis Rußlanddeutscher. Peter Lang Verlag.
35. Welt (2020). https://www.welt.de/regionales/hamburg/article224068238/Uelkuecue-Bewegung-CDU-Innenpolitiker-will-keine-Grauen-Woelfe-in-der-eigenen-Partei.html .
36. Wendt, A. (1992). Anarchy Is What States Make of It. Cambridge Press.
37. Wetzlmaier, M. (2019). Die Macht des Diyanet: Das Türkische Präsidium für Religionsangelegenheiten. Lit Verlag. Zinn-Thomas, S. (2010). Fremde vor Ort: Selbstbild und regionale Identität in Integrationsprozessen. Transcrip Verlag.
38. Zajda J., & Majhanovich S. (2021). Globalization Cultural Identity and Nation Building. Springer Nature.