A Research on the Role of Municipalities in Tourism Development of Rural Areas: The Case of Turkey

Abstract

The local community in the process of association sees the municipalities as leader, strategist, mentor, coordinator, sponsor, and the closest stakeholder institutions to themselves. However, municipalities do not engage enough in organizations that have tourism purposes. Hence, the main purpose of the research is to determine the main reasons for the lack of municipalities’ interest in tourism. To that end, the interview method was used in the collection of data in this research as a qualitative study. Between the regions that are in priority for tourism development, research sample has formed by 11 county municipalities in the province of Tokat, Turkey. Research findings are limited to the opinions of mayors. The results have shown that the studies of rural county authorities towards the development of tourism are formed due to the individual, short-term, and quick income expectations as well as political concerns for the future. Municipalities want tourism development just for their own areas and stay away from cooperation and partnerships for the creation of a regional tourism destination. Local community stakeholders are slightly included in tourism activities. Inadequacies of financial resources have been shown as a main obstructive reason in participation in tourism activities

Keywords

• Rural Tourism,Municipalities,Turkey,Rural Development

References

1. Bertucci, G. (2002). “Strengthening Local Governance in Tourism-Driven Economies” in International Colloquium on Regional Governance and Sustainable Development in Tourism-driven Economies, Cancun, Q.R., Mexico, 20- 22 February.
2. Boyd, S. W. and Singh, S. (2003). Destination communities: structures, resources and types. in S. Singh, D. J. Timothy and R. K. Dowling (Eds.), Tourism in Destination Communities. (p.19-33). London: CABI Publishing.
3. Briedenhann, J. (2007). The role of the public sector in rural tourism: Respondents’ views. Current Issues in Tourism.10(6), 584-607.
4. Diaz-Pérez, F.M., Férnandez-Hernández, C., Alvarez González, J. A. and Jiménez González, V. (2008). Innovation among tourism entrepreneurs and the implications for rural development: The case of rural tourism in La Palma. In A. D. Ramos and P. S. Jimenez (eds).
5. Tourism Development: Economics, Management and Strategy. (p.171-189). New York: Nova Science Publishers, Inc.
6. DPT, (2007). Dokuzuncu Kalkınma Planı 2007-2013, Turizm Özel İhtisas Komisyonu Raporu, Ankara.
7. Elliot, J. (1997). Politics of Tourism, Routledge, UK: London.
8. Emrealp, S. (2005). Yerel Gündem 21 Uygulamalarına Yönelik Kolaylaştırıcı Bilgiler Elkitabı, İstanbul: IULA-EMME (UCLG-MEWA) Yayını.

9. George, E. W., Mair, H and Reid, D. G. (2009). Rural Tourism Development Localism and Cultural Change. Bristol-Buffalo-Toronto: Channel View Publications.
10. Hall, C. M. (1994). Tourism and Politics: Policy, Power and Place, John Wiley & Sons, Chichester.
11. Ishikawa, N. and Fukushige, M. (2007). Who expects the municipalities to take the initiative in tourism development? Residents’ attitudes of Amami Oshima Island in Japan. Tourism Management, (28), 461- 475.
12. Jeffries, D. (2001). Governments and Tourism, Butterworth-Heinemann, Oxford.
13. Komppula, R. (2004). Success and growth in rural tourism micro-businesses in Finland: Financial or life-style objectives? R. Thomas (Ed). Small Firms in Tourism: International Perspectives. (p.115-138). UK, Elsevier Ltd.
14. Lesley, R. (2001). Rural Tourism and Recreation: Principles and Practice. Cambridge: CABI Publishing.
15. Negiz, N. ve Yıldız, Z. (2009). Yerel yönetimler için bir kalkınma dinamiği: Turizm (Isparta incelemesi). Ulusal Kalkınma ve Yerel Yönetimler 2. (s.993-1008). Ankara: TODAİE Yayınları.
16. Prentice, R. (1993). Community-driven tourism planning and residents’ preferences. Tourism Management, (14). 218-227.
17. Öztürk, Y. ve Ayaz, N. (2010). Turizm olgusunda Yerel Gündem 21 uygulamaları üzerine bir araştırma. O. E. Çolakoğlu (Editör). 11. Ulusal Turizm Kongresi (s.324-333). Ankara: Detay Yayıncılık.
18. Sautter, E. T. and Leisen, B. (1999). Managing stakeholders: A tourism planning model. Annal of Tourism Research, 26(2), 312-328.
19. Semerciöz, F., Dönmez D. ve Dursun, M. (2008). Relationships between destination management organizations and destination stakeholders a research in regions of Marmara, Aegean and Mediterranean in Turkey. Gazi Üniversitesi Ticaret ve Turizm Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 2008(1), 87-101. South Australian Tourism Commission and Local Government Association (2006). Local Government’s Engagement in Tourism, Final Report, Web: http://www.tourism.sa.gov.au/webfiles/tourismpolicy/LGEIT_Final_Report.pdf [February, 20, 2010].
20. Tao, L. and Fuying, X. (2009). A study on community participation in rural tourism based on stakeholder theory. Web: http://www.seiofbluemountain.com/upload/product/200910/2009glhy14a9. pdf [June, 7, 2010].
21. Tarım ve Köy İşleri Bakanlığı (2008). (Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs). Katılım Öncesi Yardım Aracı Kırsal Kalkınma Programı (IPARD 2007-2013), Ankara: Tarım ve Köy İşleri Bakanlığı Yayınları.