Psychological Distance in Climate Change: The Role of Climate Change Denial, Contact with Nature and Political Opinion

Yıl 2023, , 1202 - 1217, 30.09.2023

Gökhan Şahin

https://doi.org/10.35341/afet.1295230

Öz

This study was designed to investigate the psychological distance perception of Turkish people and the role of their political views on climate change. Descriptive data were obtained on different aspects of psychological distance such as temporal, social, geographical and uncertainty. The study also evaluated the relationship between contact with nature through climate change and climate denial. The research is a descriptive study. Climate change denial scale and nature contact scales were used to measure the levels of climate change denial and contact with nature. Data were collected online from 123 people living in different geographical regions of Turkey. Group comparison findings based on individuals' assessments of their political views (left/right) are consistent with the literature. Significant differences in denial of climate change were observed among groups separated by political views. In addition, a significant relationship was found between age and denial of climate change. Our findings are important in terms of revealing some social and cognitive factors in the perception of the climate change problem in our country and helping to develop more effective strategies in combating climate change.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Climate Change, Climate Change Denial, Contact with Nature, Political Opinion, Psychological Distance

Proje Numarası

Yok

Kaynakça

• Climate change and human behaviour - Nature Human Behaviour. (2022, November 16). Nature. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-022-01490-9.
• Gifford, R. (2011). The dragons of inaction: psychological barriers that limit climate change mitigation and adaptation. Am. Psychol. 66, 290–302. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0023566.
• Faul, F., Erdfelder, E., Lang, A. G., & Buchner, A. (2007). G*Power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behavior Research Methods, 39(2), 175–191. https://doi.org/10.3758/ BF03193146.
• Haines, A., Ebi, K. (2019). The Imperative for Climate Action to Protect Health. N Engl J Med. Jan 17;380(3):263-273. doi: 10.1056/NEJMra1807873. PMID: 30650330.
• Herzog, T. R. & Strevey S. J. (2008). “Contact with Nature, Sense of Humor, and Psychological Well-Being”. Environment and Behavior 40(6)747-776.
• Hornsey, M. J., Harris, E. A., Bain, P. G., & Fielding, K. S. (2018). Meta-analyses of the determinants and outcomes of belief in climate change. Nature Climate Change, 8(7), 614-620.
• IPCC, 2022: Climate Change 2022: Impacts, Adaptation, and Vulnerability. Contribution of Working Group II to the Sixth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change [H.-O. Pörtner, D.C. Roberts, M. Tignor, E.S. Poloczanska, K. Mintenbeck, A. Alegría, M. Craig, S. Langsdorf, S. Löschke, V. Möller, A. Okem, B. Rama (eds.)]. Cambridge University Press. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK and New York, NY, USA, 3056 pp., doi:10.1017/9781009325844.
• JASP Team, (2023). JASP (Version 0.17.3) [Computer software].
• Kahan, D. M., Peters, E., Dawson, E. C., & Slovic, P. (2011). Motivated numeracy and enlightened self-government. Cultural Cognition Project, Yale Law School. https://doi.org/10.1017/bpp.2016.2
• Kahan, D. M., Jenkins-Smith, H., & Braman, D. (2012). Cultural cognition of scientific consensus. Journal of Risk Research, 15(2), 139-147. Doi: 10.1080/13669877.2010.511246.
• Keller, E., Marsh, J.E., Richardson, B.H., and Ball, L.J. (2022). A systematic review of the psychological distance of climate change: Towards the development of an evidence-based construct. J. Environ. Psychol. 81, 101822. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2022.101822.
• Kıral Uçar, G. (2019). Kent kimliği, doğayla temas ve öznel iyi oluş. Akdeniz İnsani Bilimler Dergisi/Mediterranean Journal of Humanities, 9(2), 419-430. 10.13114/MJH.2019.499
• Leiserowitz, A., Maibach, E., & Roser-Renouf, C. (2010) Climate change in the AmericanMind: Americans’ global warming beliefs and attitudes in January 2010. Yale University and GeorgeMason University. New Haven, CT: Yale Project on Climate Change. http://environment.yale.edu/uploads/AmericansGlobalWarmingBeliefs2010.pdf
• Leiserowitz, A, Maibach, E., Rosenthal, S., Kotcher, J., Carman, J., Wang, X.[X.], … Marlon, J. (2021). Public support for international climate action, March 2021. Yale University and George Mason University. https://www.climatechangecommunication.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/04/public-support-international-climate-action-march-2021.pdf.
• Loy, L. S., & Spence, A. (2020). Reducing, and bridging, the psychological distance of climate change. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 67, 101388. https://doi.org/ 10.1016/j.jenvp.2020.101388.
• Luo, Y. and Zhao, J. (2019) Motivated Attention in Climate Change Perception and Action. Front. Psychol. 10:1541. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01541.
• Manning, C. et al. (2018). Psychological Distance and Response to Human Versus Non-Human Victims of Climate Change. In: Leal Filho, W., Marans, R., Callewaert, J. (eds) Handbook of Sustainability and Social Science Research. World Sustainability Series. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-67122-2_8.
• McMahan, E. A. & Estes, D. (2015) “The Effect of Contact with Natural Environments on Positive and Negative Affect: A Meta-Analysis”. The Journal of Positive Psychology 10(6) 507-519.
• McCright, A. M, & Dunlap, R. E. (2011). Cool dudes: The denial of climate change among conservative white males in the United States. Global Environmental Change, 21(4), 1163–1172.
• McCright, A. M., Dunlap, R. E., & Marquart-Pyatt, S. T. (2015). Political ideology and views about climate change in the European Union. Environmental Politics, 24(5), 562-583.
• Nartova-Bochaver, S.K.; Donat, M.; Ucar, G.K.; Korneev, A.A.; Heidmets, M.E.; Kamble, S.; Khachatryan, N.; Kryazh, I.V.; Larionow, P.; Rodríguez-González, D.; et al. (2022) The role of environmental identity and individualism/collectivism in predicting climate change denial: Evidence from nine countries. J. Environ. Psychol. 84, 101899.
• Nielsen, K. S., Clayton, S., Stern, P. C., Dietz, T., Capstick, S., & Whitmarsh, L. (2021). How psychology can help limit climate change. American Psychologist, 76(1), 130–144. https://doi.org/10.1037/amp0000624
• Nisbet, E. K. & Zelenski, J. M. (2011). “Underestimating Nearby Nature: Affective Forecasting Errors Obscure the Happy Path to Sustainability”. Psychological Science 22(9) 1101-1106.
• Özdemir A. & Semin-Fenkçi M. (2016). “The Role of Aural and Visual Landscape Perception in Patient Psychology”. Journal of Human Sciences 13(2) 3022-3032.
• Sörqvist, P., Marsh, J. E., eds. (2019). The Cognitive Psychology of Climate Change. Lausanne: Frontiers Media. Doi: 10.3389/978-2-88963-013-4.
• Spence, A., Poortinga, W., and Pidgeon, N. (2012). The psychological distance of climate change. Risk Anal. 32, 957–972. https://doi.org/10. 1111/j.1539-6924.2011.01695.x.
• Trope, Y., Liberman, N. (2010). Construal-level theory of psychological distance. Psychol. Rev. 117, 440–463. https://doi.org/10.1037/ a0018963.
• Uçar, G. (2019). Kent Kimliği, Doğayla Temas ve Öznel İyi Oluş. Akdeniz İnsani Bilimler Dergisi, 9(2), 419 - 430. 10.13114/MJH.2019.499
• UNFCCC, 1992: Birleşmiş Milletler İklim Değişikliği Çerçeve Sözleşmesi. Birleşmiş Milletler, FCCC/INFORMAL/84 GE. 05-62220 (E) 200705, Birleşmiş Milletler İklim Değişikliği Çerçeve Sözleşmesi Sekretaryası, Bonn, Almanya, 24 s., unfccc.int/resource/docs/convkp/conveng.pdf.
• URL1, https://pewrsr.ch/2UpGcq7. (Last Date: 10.03.2023)
• Van Lange, P.A.M., and Huckelba, A.L. (2021). Psychological distance: how to make climate change less abstract and closer to the self. Curr.Opin. Psychol. 42, 49–53. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copsyc.2021.03.011.
• van Valkengoed, A. M., Steg, L., & Perlaviciute, G. (2023). The psychological distance of climate change is overestimated. One Earth, 6(4), 362–391. https://doi.org/ 10.1016/j.oneear.2023.03.006
• Wong-Parodi, G., & Feygina, I. (2020). Understanding and countering the motivated roots of climate change denial. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, 42, 60–64. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cosust.2019.11.008
• Van Lange, P.A.M., and Huckelba, A.L. (2021). Psychological distance: how to make climate change less abstract and closer to the self. Curr.Opin. Psychol. 42, 49–53. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copsyc.2021.03.011.