Endoscopic treatment of Dieulafoy’s lesion
Öz
Background and Aims: This study describes the demographic features
of patients with Dieulafoy’s lesion, their endoscopic findings, endoscopic
treatments, and their response to therapy. Materials and Methods:
Endoscopy reports were screened for Dieulafoy’s lesion between 2008
and 2016. Patients with this diagnosis were also screened to determine
initial laboratory findings, endoscopic treatments, and response to therapy.
Results: A total of 18 patients were diagnosed with Dieulafoy’s lesion.
The most frequent presentation was melena. Seven patients died
during the follow-up period. Clip was the most frequent endoscopic
treatment method either alone or in combination with other endoscopic
modalities. There was no difference in mortality between patients
who were treated with clip alone and those treated with the combined
modality (p=0.9). When patients treated with adrenalin and heater
were excluded, no difference in mortality was observed between the
clip group and the clip combined with other endoscopic treatment
group (p=0.6). Conclusion: This study demonstrated that additional
endoscopic methods such as adrenalin and/or heater did not reduce
mortality compared with clip monotherapy.
Anahtar Kelimeler
Kaynakça
- KAYNAKLAR 1. Rotondano G. Epidemiology and diagnosis of acute nonvariceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding. Gastroenterol Clin North Am 2014;43:643-63. 2. Marangoni G, Cresswell AB, Faraj W, et al. An uncommon cause of life-threatening gastrointestinal bleeding: 2 synchronous Dieulafoy lesions. J Paediatr Surg 2009;44:441-3. 3. Joarder AI, Faruque MS, Nur-E-Elahi M, et al. Dieulafoy’s lesion: an overview. Mymensingh Med J 2014;23:186-94. 4. Chaer R, Helton WS. Dieulafoy’s disease. Am Coll Surg 2003;196:290-6. 5. Chung IK, Kim EJ, Lee MS et al. Bleeding Dieulafoy’s lesions and the choice of endoscopic method: comparing the hemostatic efficacy of mechanical and injection methods. Gastrointest Endosc 2000;52:721-4. 6. Alis H, Oner OZ, Kalayci MU, et al. Is endoscopic band ligation superior to injection therapy for Dieulafoy lesion? Surg Endosc 2009;23:1465-9. 7. Park CH, Joo YE, Kim HS, et al. A prospective, randomized trial of endoscopic band ligation versus endoscopic hemoclip placement for bleeding gastric Dieulafoy’s lesions. Endoscopy 2004;36:677- 81. 8. Valera JM, Pino RQ, Poniachik J, et al. Endoscopic band ligation of bleeding Dieulafoy lesions: the best therapeutic strategy. Endoscopy 2006;38:193-4. 9. Yamaguchi Y, Yamato T, Katsumi N, et al. Short-term and longterm benefits of endoscopic hemoclip application for Dieulafoy’s lesion in the upper GI tract. Gastrointest Endosc 2003;57:653-6. 10. Parra-Blanco A, Takahashi H, Méndez Jerez PV et al. Endoscopic management of Dieulafoy lesions of the stomach: a case study of 26 patients. Endoscopy 1997;29:834-9. 11. Park CH, Sohn YH, Lee WS et al. The usefulness of endoscopic hemoclipping for bleeding Dieulafoy lesions. Endoscopy 2003;35:388-92. 12. Lara LF, Sreenarasimhaiah J, Tang SJ et al. Dieulafoy lesions of the GI tract: localization and therapeutic outcomes. Dig Dis Sci 2010;55:3436-41. 13. Nikolaidis N, Zezos P, Giouleme O, et al. Endoscopic band ligation of Dieulafoy-like lesions in the upper gastrointestinal tract. Endoscopy 2001;33:754-60. 14. Nojkov B, Cappell MS. Gastrointestinal bleeding from Dieulafoy’s lesion: Clinical presentation, endoscopicfindings, and endoscopic therapy. World J Gastrointest Endosc 2015;7:295-307.
Ayrıntılar
Birincil Dil
Türkçe
Konular
Sağlık Kurumları Yönetimi
Bölüm
Araştırma Makalesi
Yazarlar
Muhammet Yener Akpınar
*
Türkiye Yüksek İhtisas Eğitim ve Araştırma Hastanesi, Gastroenteroloji Kliniği, Ankara, Türkiye
0000-0003-0903-4664
Türkiye
Erkin Öztaş
Türkiye Yüksek İhtisas Eğitim ve Araştırma Hastanesi, Gastroenteroloji Kliniği, Ankara, Türkiye
0000-0002-3160-7492
Türkiye
Derya Aras
Bu kişi benim
Türkiye Yüksek İhtisas Eğitim ve Araştırma Hastanesi, Gastroenteroloji Kliniği, Ankara, Türkiye
Türkiye
İsmail Hakkı Kalkan
Türkiye Yüksek İhtisas Eğitim ve Araştırma Hastanesi, Gastroenteroloji Kliniği, Ankara, Türkiye
0000-0003-3871-9814
Türkiye
Meral Akdoğan
Bu kişi benim
Türkiye Yüksek İhtisas Eğitim ve Araştırma Hastanesi, Gastroenteroloji Kliniği, Ankara, Türkiye
0000-0003-4624-2542
Türkiye
Sabite Kaçar
Türkiye Yüksek İhtisas Eğitim ve Araştırma Hastanesi, Gastroenteroloji Kliniği, Ankara, Türkiye
0000-0002-3257-3546
Türkiye
Yasemin Özderin Özin
Bu kişi benim
Türkiye Yüksek İhtisas Eğitim ve Araştırma Hastanesi, Gastroenteroloji Kliniği, Ankara, Türkiye
0000-0002-8744-4936
Türkiye
Zeki Mesut Yalın Kılıç
Bu kişi benim
Türkiye Yüksek İhtisas Eğitim ve Araştırma Hastanesi, Gastroenteroloji Kliniği, Ankara, Türkiye
0000-0001-7295-9227
Türkiye
Bülent Ödemiş
Bu kişi benim
Türkiye Yüksek İhtisas Eğitim ve Araştırma Hastanesi, Gastroenteroloji Kliniği, Ankara, Türkiye
0000-0001-6763-791X
Türkiye
Selçuk Dişibeyaz
Türkiye Yüksek İhtisas Eğitim ve Araştırma Hastanesi, Gastroenteroloji Kliniği, Ankara, Türkiye
0000-0002-1637-7684
Türkiye
Ertuğrul Kayaçetin
Bu kişi benim
Türkiye Yüksek İhtisas Eğitim ve Araştırma Hastanesi, Gastroenteroloji Kliniği, Ankara, Türkiye
0000-0002-8822-3991
Türkiye
Yayımlanma Tarihi
2 Ocak 2017
Gönderilme Tarihi
10 Nisan 2016
Kabul Tarihi
13 Ağustos 2016
Yayımlandığı Sayı
Yıl 2016 Cilt: 15 Sayı: 3
Cited By
Dieulafoy lezyonu tanılı hastalarda endoskopik tedavi başarısı ve takip sonuçları
Akademik Gastroenteroloji Dergisi
https://doi.org/10.17941/agd.836616