Results of surgical treatment of cholelithiasis by laparotomic and minimally invasive accesses

Year 2014, Volume: 13 Issue: 3, 96 - 100, 01.12.2014

F.s. Kurbanov Y.g. Alıyev M.a. Chinikov - İ.s. Panteleeva S.r. Dobrovolsky L.r. Alvendova -

Abstract

This article presents the results of surgical treatment of 1038 patients with cholelithiasis, acute and chronic calculous cholecystitis and other complicated forms of the disease. Traditional laparotomic, laparoscopic and minimally invasive approaches were performed. Indications for choosing access, as well as the advantages and disadvantages of various surgical options in cholelithiasis patients are discussed.

Keywords

Chronic cholecystitis, acute cholecystitis, laparoscopic cholecystectomy, cholecystectomy by mini-laparotomy access

Laparotomik ve minimal invaziv yaklaşımla cerrahi kolelitiazis tedavisinin sonuçları

Abstract

Bu çalışmada kolelitiazis, akut ve kronik taşlı kolesistit ve safra yolları hastalıklaının diğer karmaşık formlarını içeren 1038 hastanın cerrahi tedavi sonuçları tartışılmaktadır. Tedavide geleneksel laparotomik, laparoskopik ve minimal invaziv yaklaşım sergilenmiştir. Yazıda seçim için endikasyonların yanı sıra safra taşı hastalarında çeşitli cerrahi seçeneklerin avantajları ve dezavantajları tartışılmıştır.

Keywords

Kronik kolesistit, akut kolesistit, laparoskopik kolesistektomi, mini-laparotomi ile kolesistektomi

References

• Amelina MA. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy in patients with 3rd and 4th grade obesity: Author’s abstract ... Candidate of Medicine, Moscow. 2005;24.
• Gallinger YI, Karpenkova VI. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy: Experi- ence of 3165 operations Endoscopic surgery 2007;2:3-7.
• Dobrovolsky SR, Bogopolski PM, Nagai IV, et al. Advantages and disadvantages of different methods of cholecystectomy. Surgery 2004;7:56-61.
• Potashev LV, Vasilyev VV, Savranski VM, Semyonov DY. Capabili- ties of minimally invasive surgery in the treatment of choledocholi- thiasis (Notes of the international conference “New capabilities and prospects for the development of endoscopic surgery.) Saint-Pe- tersburg 1995;43-44.
• Prudkov MI, Beburishvili AG, Shulutko AM. Minilaparotomy with el- ements of open laparoscopy in the surgical treatment of calculous cholecystitis. Endoscopic surgery 1996;2:12-6.
• Prudkov MI, Karmatskikh AY, Nishnevich EV. Experience of using cholecystectomy from minilaparotomic access in the treatment of acute calculous cholecystitis. Collection of scientific works of the All-Russian Scientific Conference “Current problems of sur- gery” dedicated to the 130th anniversary of the birth of professor N.N.Napalkov. Rostov-on-Don. 1998;56.
• Timoshin AD, Shestakov AL, Yurasov AV. Indications for interven- tions from minilaparotomic access in cholelithiasis. International conference “New technologies in the diagnostics and surgery of organs of the biliopancreatoduodenal zone”. Moscow. 1995;101-2.
• Timoshin AD, Shestakov AL, Yurasov AV. Cholecystectomy from minilaparotomic access. Russian Journal of Gastroenterology, Hepatology, Coloproctology. Materials of the 1st Russian Gastro- enterological week. Saint Petersburg. 1995;3:231.
• Shulutko AM, Danilov AI, Markov ZS, Kornev LV. Minilaparot- omy in the surgical treatment of calculous cholecystitis. Surgery 1997;1:36-7.
• Daou R. Cholecystectomy using a minilaparotomy. Ann.Chir 1998;52:625-8.
• Horvath OP. Minimal invasive surgery. Acta Chir Hung 1997;36:130-1.
• Lengyel BI, Panizales MT, Steinberg J, Ashley SW, Tavakkoli A. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy: What is the price of conversion? / Surgery 2012;152:173-8.