Laparoscopic appendectomy is a reliable alternative for open procedure

Yıl 2007, Cilt: 6 Sayı: 1, 20 - 24, 01.04.2007

Hakan Erpek Nazmi Sayım Pars Tunçyürek Ahmet Ender Demirkıran Hedef Özgün Mehmet Hakan Çevikel

Öz

Laparoscopic appendectomy has progressed to become a reliable surgical procedure in recent years. However, there are some pros and cons comparable with open appendectomy. Materials and methods: The results of 91 patients with acute appendicitis who were operated either with laparoscopic or open technique were retrospectively evaluated. Results: Laparoscopic appendectomy was performed in 28 (30.7%) patients, whereas 63 (69.3%) cases underwent open procedure. Two (6.6%) laparoscopic procedures were converted to open because of perforation and anatomical problems. The duration of operation, hospital stay, and rate of complications did not differ among groups (p>0.05). One patient in each group developed intraabdominal abscess. Conclusions: Laparoscopic appendectomy does not increase postoperative complications as previously speculated, and therefore is a reliable alternative for open appendectomy.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Laparoscopic appendectomy, open appendectomy

Laparoskopik appendektomi açık girişimin güvenilir bir alternatifidir

Öz

Giriş ve amaç: Laparoskopik appendektomi güvenilirliğini kanıtlamış cerrahi tekniklerden biri haline gelmiştir. Ancak açık appendektomi ile
kıyaslanabilen avantaj ve dezavantajlar barındırmaktadır. Gereç ve yöntem: Kliniğimizde laparoskopik ve açık yöntemle ameliyat edilmiş
91 akut apandisit olgusu retrospektif olarak değerlendirildi. Bulgular: Olguların 28’ine (%30.7) laparoskopik appendektomi, 63’üne (%69.3)
açık appendektomi yapılmıştı. Laparoskopik olarak işleme başlanan 2 (%6.6) olguda perforasyon ve anatomik problemler nedeni ile açığa geçilmişti. Ameliyat süresi, hastanede kalış süresi ve komplikasyonlar açısından gruplar arasında fark yoktu (p > 0.05). Her iki grupta da birer hastada intraabdominal apse gelişmişti. Sonuç: Laparoskopik appendektomi varsayılanın aksine postoperatif komplikasyon riskini arttırmamıştır.
Her yönü ile açık appendektominin güvenilir bir alternatifidir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Laparoskopik appendektomi, açık appendektomi

Kaynakça

• Mancini GJ, Mancini ML, Nelson HS Jr. Efficacy of laparoscopic ap- pendectomy in appendicitis with peritonitis. Am Surg 2005; 71: 1-4.
• Roviaro GC, Vergani C, Varoli F, et al. Videolaparoscopic appen- dectomy: the current outlook. Surg Endosc 2006; 20: 1526-30.
• Demirbaş S, Erenoğlu C, Atay V et al. Laparoskopik ve laparosko- pi yardımlı apendektomi ameliyatlarının erken dönem sonuçlarının karşılaştırılması. Endoskopik Laparoskopik & Minimal İnvaziv Cerrahi Dergisi 2004; 11: 70-75.
• Sweeney KJ, Dillon M, Johnston SM, et al. Training in laparoscopic appendectomy. World J Surg 2006; 30: 358-63.
• Welter HF, Wendland S. Laparoscopic appendectomy--a lot of effort for a minor operation? MMW Fortschr Med 2006; 148: 46-7.
• Bedirli A, Sözüer M, Keçeli M, ve ark. Laparoskopik ve açık appen- dektominin karşılaştırılması. Endoskopik Laparoskopik & Minimal İnvaziv Cerrahi Dergisi 1999; 6: 222-6.
• Pirro N, Berdah SV. Appendicitis: yes or no to laparoscopic appro- ach? J Chir (Paris) 2006; 143: 155-9.
• Bresciani C, Perez RO, Habr-Gama A, et al. Laparoscopic versus standard appendectomy outcomes and cost comparisons in the pri- vate sector. J Gastrointest Surg 2005; 9: 1174-80.
• Moore DE, Speroff T, Grogan E, et al. Cost perspectives of laparos- copic and open appendectomy. Surg Endosc 2005; 19: 374-8.
• Ng WT, Lee YK, Hui SK, et al. An optimal, cost-effective laparosco- pic appendectomy technique for our surgical residents. Surg Lapa- rosc Endosc Percutan Tech 2004; 14: 125-9.
• Nguyen NT, Zainabadi K, Mavandadi S, et al. Trends in utilization and outcomes of laparoscopic versus open appendectomy. Am J Surg 2004; 188: 813-20.
• Carbonell AM, Burns JM, Lincourt, AE et al. Outcomes of laparos- copic versus open appendectomy. Am Surg 2004; 70: 759-65.
• Katkhouda N, Mason RJ, Towfigh S, et al. Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy: a prospective randomized double-blind study. Ann Surg 2005; 242: 439-48.
• Olmi S, Magnone S, Bertolini A, et al. Laparoscopic versus open ap- pendectomy in acute appendicitis: a randomized prospective study. Surg Endosc 2005; 19: 1193-5.
• Chiu CC, Wei PL, Wang W, et al. Role of appendectomy in laparos- copic training. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 2006; 16: 113-8.
• Temple LK, Litwin DE, McLeod RS. A meta-analysis of laparosco- pic versus open appendectomy in patients suspected of having acu- te appendicitis. Can J Surg 1999; 42: 377-83.
• Liu SI, Siewert B, Raptopoulos V, et al. Factors associated with con- version to laparotomy in patients undergoing laparoscopic appen- dectomy. J Am Coll Surg 2002; 194: 298-305.
• Croce E, Olmi S, Azzola M, et al. Laparoscopic appendectomy and minilaparoscopic approach: a retrospective review after 8-years' experience. JSLS 1999; 3: 285-92.
• Wu JM, Lin HF, Chen KH, et al. Impact of previous abdominal sur- gery on laparoscopic appendectomy for acute appendicitis. Surg Endosc 2007; 21: 570-3.
• Berker B, Lashay N, Davarpanah R, et al. Laparoscopic appendec- tomy in patients with endometriosis. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 2005; 12: 206-9.
• Harris RS, Foster WG, Surrey MW, et al. Appendiceal disease in women with endometriosis and right lower quadrant pain. J Am As- soc Gynecol Laparosc 2001; 8: 536-41.
• AlSalilli M, Vilos GA. Prospective evaluation of laparoscopic ap- pendectomy in women with chronic right lower quadrant pain. J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc 1995; 2: 139-42.
• Halkic N, Tempia-Caliera AA, Ksontini R, et al. Laparoscopic ma- nagement of appendicitis and symptomatic cholelithiasis during pregnancy. Langenbecks Arch Surg 2006; 391: 467-71.
• de Perrot M, Jenny A, Morales M, et al. Laparoscopic appendec- tomy during pregnancy. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 2000; 10: 368-71.
• Lam L, Acosta J. Abdominal pain after uncomplicated laparoscopic appendectomy. J Am Coll Surg 2007; 204: 177-8.
• Martin LC, Puente I, Sosa JL, et al. Open versus laparoscopic ap- pendectomy. A prospective randomized comparison. Ann Surg 1995; 222: 256-61.
• Krisher SL, Browne A, Dibbins A, et al. Intra-abdominal abscess af- ter laparoscopic appendectomy for perforated appendicitis. Arch Surg 2001; 136: 438-41.
• Wullstein C, Barkhausen S, Gross E. Results of laparoscopic vs. conventional appendectomy in complicated appendicitis. Dis Colon Rectum 2001; 44: 1700-5.
• Piskun G, Kozik D, Rajpal S, et al. Comparison of laparoscopic, open, and converted appendectomy for perforated appendicitis. Surg Endosc 2001; 15: 660-2.
• Tang E, Ortega AE, Anthone GJ, et al. Intraabdominal abscesses following laparoscopic and open appendectomies. Surg Endosc 1996; 10: 327-8.
• Kouwenhoven EA, Repelaer van Driel OJ, van Erp WF. Fear for the intraabdominal abscess after laparoscopic appendectomy: not re- alistic. Surg Endosc 2005; 19: 923-6.
• So JB, Chiong EC, Chiong E, et al. Laparoscopic appendectomy for perforated appendicitis. World J Surg 2002; 26: 1485-8.
• Wang YC, Yang HR, Chung PK, et al. Laparoscopic appendectomy in the elderly. Surg Endosc 2006. (internet yayın, yazılı metin baskı- da)
• Fukami Y, Hasegawa H, Sakamoto E, et al. Value of laparoscopic appendectomy in perforated appendicitis. World J Surg 2007; 31: 93-7.
• Zinaman MJ, Russell A, Sukhani R, et al. Laparoscopic appendec- tomy in an outpatient setting. J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc 2003; 10: 478-80.