ABD Kanunlar İhtilâfı Hukukuna Kuramsal ve Metodolojik Bir Bakış: Çeşitli Teori ve Metotlar, II. Restatement ve Sözleşmeye Uygulanacak Hukuk

Year 2016, Volume: 20 Issue: 2, 129 - 170, 01.04.2016

Mesut Aygün

Abstract

Bu çalışma, ABD kanunlar ihtilâfı hukukunu etkileyen bazı kuramsal ve metodolojik gelişmeler ile II. Restatement’ta sözleşmeye uygulanacak hukuk üzerine odaklanmıştır. I. Restatement’a karakteristik özelliğini yansıtan (klâsik sistem olarak da ifade edilen) kazanılmış haklar kuramı incelendikten sonra, klâsik ABD kanunlar ihtilâfı hukukuna yöneltilen eleştiriler ve bu alandaki çağdaş eğilimler ile II. Restatement üzerinde durulacaktır. Sözleşmeden doğan borç ilişkilerine uygulanacak hukuka ilişkin II. Restatement’ta yer alan düzenlemelerin, son dönem kanunlar ihtilâfı hukuku kuram ve metodolojisi açısından devrim niteliğinde olduğu söylenebilir

Keywords

Kanunlar ihtilâfı, Kanunlar ihtilâfı kuram ve metodolojisi, Kanunlar ihtilâfı hukukuna ilişkin II. Restatement, Sözleşmeye uygulanacak hukuk, Milletlerarası özel hukuk

A THEORETICAL AND METHODOLOGICAL OVERVIEW OF THE USA CONFLICT OF LAWS: VARIOUS THEORY AND METHODS, II. RESTATEMENT AND THE LAW TO BE APPLIED TO CONTRACTS

Abstract

This study has focused on some theoretic and methodological advancements having infl uences on the USA confl ict of laws and applicable law to contract in II. Restatement. After the vested rights theory refl ecting the characteristic features of I. Restatement (which is also called as classical system) is examined, the criticism directed to the USA classical confl ict of laws and contemporary trends in the fi eld and II. Restatement will be discussed. The regulations in the II. Restatement regarding the governing law of obligation relationships arisen from contracts can be suggested to be revolutionary with regards to the recent confl ict of laws theory and methodology

Keywords

Confl ict of laws, Theory and methodology of confl ict of laws, II. Restatement of the confl ict of laws, The applicable law to contract, Private international law

References

• ALTUĞ, Yılmaz, “Anglo-Amerikan Âleminin İlk Önemli Devletler Hususî Hukukçusu Joseph Story”, İÜHFM., 1959, C. XXIV, S. 1-4, s. 63-75 (Story).
• ALTUĞ, Yılmaz (1973), Devletler Hususî Hukuku, İstanbul (DHH).
• AUDIT, Bernard, “A Continental Lawyer Looks at Contemporary American Choice-of-Law Principles”, 27 The American Journal of Comparative Law (1979), S. 4, s. 589-603.
• AYGÜN, Mesut, “ABD Kanunlar İhtilâfı Hukukunda Akde Uygulanacak Hukuka İlişkin Currie’nin Devlet Menfaatinin Tahlili Teorisi ve En Sıkı İrtibatlı Hukuk”, Mahmut Tevfik Birsel’e Armağan, İzmir 2001, s. 443-460.
• BATIFFOL, Henri (1955), Traité Élémentaire de Droit International Privé, Deuxieme Edition, Paris.
• BERKİ, Osman Fazıl (1966), Devletler Hususî Hukuku, C. II: Kanun İhtilâfl arı, 6. Baskı, Ankara.
• BLOM, Joost, “Choice of Law Methods in the Private International Law of Contract (Part II)”, The Canadian Yearbook of International Law, 1979, s. 206-246.
• BRILMAYER, Lea (1995), Confl ict of Laws, Second Edition, USA: Little, Brown and Company (Confl ict).
• BRILMAYER, Lea/ GOLDSMITH, Jack (2002), Confl ict of Laws: Cases and Materials, Fifth Edition, New York: Aspen Law & Business (Cases and Materials)
• CAVERS, David F., “Contemporary Confl icts Law in American Perspective”, 131 Rec. des Cours, (1970/III), s. 75-307.
• CHEATHAM, E. E., “American Theories of Confl ict of Laws: Their Role and Utility”, Harvard Law Review, 1944-45, s. 361-394.
• CHEATHAM, E. E./ GOODRICH, H. F./GRISWOLD, E. N./ REESE, W.L.M. (1957), Confl ict of Laws Cases and Materials and 1961 Supplement, Fourth Edition, Brooklyn: The Foundation Inc.
• CHESHIRE, G. C. (1961) Private International Law, Sixth Edition, London.
• CLARKSON, Christopher M. V./ HILL, Jonathan (2011), The Confl ict of Laws, Fourth Edition, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
• COLLIER, J. G. (2001), Confl ict of Laws, Third Edition, London: Cambridge University Press.
• COLLINS, Lawrance, “Comity in Modern Private International Law”, Essays in Honour of Sir Peter North: Reform and Development o Private International Law, (Edited by James Fawcett), New York: Oxford University Press 2002, s. 89-110 (“Comity”).
• COLLINS, Lawrance (2006), Dicey, Morris and Collins on The Confl ict of Laws, Fourteenth Edition, London: Sweet & Maxwell (Dicey, Morris and Collins).
• COOK, Walter Wheeler (1949), The Logical and the Legal Bases of the Confl ict of Laws, Second Edition, California: Harvard University Press.
• CRAWFORD, E. B./ CARRUTHERS, J. M. (2010), Private International Law: A Scots Perspective, Third Edition, London: W Green.
• CURRIE, Brainerd (1963), Selected Essays on The Confl ict of Laws, Durham, North Carolina (Selected).
• CURRIE, Brainerd, “Comments on Babcock v. Jackson”, Col. L. Rev., Vol. 63, 1963, s. 1233-1243 (“Comments”).
• CURRIE, David P./ KAY, Herma Hill/ KRAMER, Larry/ ROOSEVELT, Kermit (2006), Confl ict of Laws: Cases-CommentsQuestions, Seventh Edition, USA: Thomson/West.
• ÇELİKEL, Aysel, “Devletler Hususî Hukukunda Bağlama Kaidelerinin Tespitinde Uygulanan Yeni Bir Metod”, İÜHFM, 1970, C. XXXV, S. 1-4, s. 231-248 (“Metot”).
• ÇELİKEL, Aysel/ ERDEM, B. Bahadır (2014), Milletlerarası Özel Hukuk, Yenilenmiş 13. Baskı, İstanbul: Beta Yayınevi (MÖH).
• DE NOVA, Rodolfo, “Historical and Comparative Introduction to Confl ict of Laws”, 118 Rec. des Cours (1966/II), s. 443-622.
• EHRENZWEIG, Albert A., “The Lex Fori, Basic Rule in The Confl ict of Laws”, 58 Mich. L. Rev., 1960, s. 637-688 (“Basic Rule”).
• EHRENZWEIG, Albert A. (1962), A Treatise on The Confl ict of Laws, St. Paul, Minn.: West Publishing Com. (Treatise).
• FAWCETT, J. J./ CARRUTHERS, J. M. (2008), Cheshire, North & Fawcett Private International Law, Fourth Edition, New York: Oxford University Press.
• FELIX, Robert L./ WHITTEN, Ralph U. (2011), American Confl icts Law, Sixth Edition, Durham, North Carolina: Carolina Academic Press.
• GÖĞER, Erdoğan (1971), Devletler Hususî Hukukunda Çağdaş Akımlar, Ankara (Çağdaş Akımlar).
• GÖĞER, Erdoğan (1977), Devletler Hususî Hukuku (Kanunlar İhtilâfı Hukuku), 4. Baskı, Ankara (Kanunlar İhtilâfı).
• GÖĞER, Erdoğan, “Kanunlar İhtilâfını Etkileyen Kuramsal Akımlar”, Osman Fazıl Berki’ye Armağan, Ankara 1977, s. 397-413 (“Kuramsal Akımlar”).
• GRAVESON, R. H. (1960), The Confl ict of Laws, Fourth Edition, London: Sweet & Maxwell Limited.
• GÜNGÖR, Gülin (2000), Milletlerarası Özel Hukukta Tüketicinin Korunması, Ankara: Yetkin Yayınları (Tüketici).
• GÜNGÖR, Gülin (2007), Temel Milletlerarası Özel Hukuk Metinlerinin Sözleşmeden Doğan Borç İlişkilerine Uygulanacak Hukuk Konusunda Yakınlık Yaklaşımı, Ankara: Yetkin Yayınları (Yakınlık Yaklaşımı).
• GÜRKAN, Ülker (1967), Hukuki Realizm Akımı, Ankara.
• HAY, Peter (2005), Confl ict of Laws (Black Letter Outlines), Fifth Edition, St. Paul, Minn.: Thomson/West.
• KOCASAKAL, Hatice Özdemir (2001), Doğrudan Uygulanan Kurallar ve Sözleşmeler Üzerindeki Etkileri, İstanbul: Galatasaray Üniversitesi Yayınları.
• KEGEL, Gerhard, “The Crises of Confl ict of Laws”, 112 Rec. des Cours (1964/II), s. 95-263.
• LANDO, Ole, “On Some Writers on The Confl ict of Laws of Contracts”, Essays in Honour of Sir Peter North: Reform and Development on Private International Law, (Edited by James Fawcett), New York: Oxford University Press 2002, s. 237-253.
• LITTLE, Laura E. (2013), Confl ict of Laws: Cases, Materials and Problems, New York: Wolters Kluwer Law & Business.
• MENEKŞE, Ayhan M., “Devlet Menfaatinin Tahlili Metodu (Haksız Fiiller Alanından Örneklerle)”, Ernst E. Hirsch’in Hatırasına Armağan, Ankara 1986, s. 501-561.
• MORRİS, J. H. C./ MCCLEAN, D./ ABOU-NIGM, V. R. (2012), The Confl ict of Laws, Eighth Edition, London: Sweet & Maxwell.
• NOMER, Ergin (2015), Devletler Hususî Hukuku, 21. Baskı, İstanbul: Beta Yayınevi.
• NYGH, Peter (1999), Autonomy in International Contracts, Oxford: Clarendon Press.
• O’BRIEN, J. (1999), Confl ict of Laws, Second Edition, London: Cavendish Publishing Limited.
• ÖKÇÜN, A. Gündüz (1997), Devletler Hususi Hukukunun Kaynakları ve Kamu Düzeni, 2. Baskı, Ankara.
• PILLET, Antoine, “Kara Avrupası Hukukunda Kanunlar İhtilâfı Nazariyesi (Çeviren: Hicri Fişek)”, AÜHFD., 1950, C. VII, S. 1-2, s. 250-281.
• RABEL, Ernst (1958), The Confl ict of Laws: A Comparative Study (Volume: I), Second Edition, Ann Arbor: Michigan Legal Studies.
• REESE, Willis L.M., “Confl ict of Laws and the Restatement Second”, 28 Law and Contemporary Proplems (1963), s. 679-699 (“Restatement Second”).
• REESE, Willis L.M., “Discussion of Major Areas of Choice of Law”, 111 Rec. des Cours, (1964/I), s. 315-417 (“Discussion”).
• REESE, Willis L.M., “General Course on Private International Law”, 150 Rec. des Cours, (1976/II), s. 1-193 (“General Course”).
• RICHMAN, William M./ REYNOLDS, William (2002), Understanding Confl ict of Laws, Third Edition, USA: LexisNexis.
• SCHMITTHOFF, Clive M. (1954), The English Confl ict of Laws, Third Edition, London: Stevens & Sons Limited.
• SEVİĞ, M. R./SEVİĞ, V.R. (1962), Devletler Hususi Hukuku, 3. Baskı, İstanbul.
• SEVİĞ, V. R. (1974), Kanunlar İhtilâfı (Yasama ve Yargılama Çatışmaları), 2. Baskı, İstanbul (Kanunlar İhtilâfı).
• STORY, Joseph (1834), Commentaries on The Confl ict of Laws: Foreign and Domestic in Regard to Contracts, Rights and Remedies and Especially in Regard to Marriages, Divorces, Wills, Successions and Judgements, Boston: Hilliard, Gray and Company.
• SYMEONIDES, Symeon C., “General Report”, Private International Law at the End of the 20th Century: Progress or Regress?, London: Kluwer Law International 1998, s. 3-79 (“General Report”).
• SYMEONIDES, Symeon C. (2008), American Private International Law, The Netherlands: Kluwer Law International (American PIL).
• TURHAN, Turgut (1989), Haksız Fiilden Doğan Kanunlar İhtilâfı Alanında İka Yeri Kuralı, Ankara: Dayınlarlı Hukuk Yayınları.
• WHINCOP, Michael J./ KEYES, Mary (2001), Policy and Pragmatism in the Confl ict of Laws, Aldershot: Ashgate.
• WOLFF, Martin (1950), Private International Law, Second Edition, Oxford: The Clarendon Press.
• YNTEMA, Hessel E., “The Historical Bases of Private International Law”, Selected Readings Confl ict of Laws, St. Paul Minn. 1956, s. 30-46.
• YÖRÜK, Abdülhak Kemal (1950), Nazarî ve Amelî Devletler Hususî Hukuku, 2. Baskı, İstanbul.
• ____________ “About ALI and Publications”, American Law Institute (ALI): , (23.11. 2015).