BibTex RIS Cite

Somali Sahilleri ve Açıklarında İşlenen Deniz Haydutluğu Fiillerine Karşı Yürütülen Mücadelenin Hukuki Dayanakları Vetürkiye’nin Durumu

Year 2011, Volume: 15 Issue: 1, 125 - 162, 01.01.2011

Uğur Bayıllıoğlu

Abstract

Somali sahillerinde gerçekleşen deniz haydutluğu fi illeri, bölgedeki seyrüseferi ve uluslararası ticareti tehdit etmektedir. Somali sahillerinde işlenen fi iller, her zaman deniz haydutluğu ile ilgili örf ve adet hukuku niteliğindeki kurallarda yer alan şartları karşılamamaktadır. Bu da deniz haydutluğu ile etkin mücadeleye engel olmaktadır. Bu nedenle Güvenlik Konseyi, Somali sahillerinde gerçekleşen deniz haydutluğu fi illeri ile ilgili bazı kararlar almıştır. Söz konusu kararlar ile devletlere, Somali Geçici Federal Hükümeti’nin izniyle Somali karasuları içinde de deniz haydutluğu ile mücadele yetkisi verilmiştir. Bu çerçevede deniz haydutluğu ile mücadele için çeşitli çok uluslu güçler görev yapmaya başlamıştır. Türkiye’de Somali sahillerindeki deniz haydutluğu fi illerine karşı yürütülen operasyonlara aktif şekilde katılmaktadır. Bu çalışmada deniz haydutluğu ile mücadelenin hukuki dayanakları ve Türkiye’nin durumu incelenecektir

Keywords

Deniz haydutluğu deniz haydutluğu ile mücadele Deniz Hukuku Sözleşmesi BM Güvenlik Konseyi kararları Türkiye’nin katkısı

References

  • ARI, Bülent, Akdeniz’de Korsanlık ve Osmanlı Deniz Hukuku, Türkler ve Deniz, KUMRULAR, Özlem (ed.), Kitap Yayınevi, İstanbul, 2007, s. 265–318.
  • AZUBUIKE, Lawrence, International Law Regime Against Piracy, Annual Survey of International & Comparative Law, Vol: 15, 2009, s. 43–59.
  • BANIELA, Santiago Iglesias, Piracy at Sea: Somalia an Area of Great Concern, The Journal of Navigation, Vol: 63, 2010, s. 191–206.
  • BAYILLIOĞLU, Uğur, Uluslararası Adalet Divanı’nın Tutuklama Müzekkeresi Davası Hakkındaki Kararına İlişkin Bir Değerlendirme, Ankara Üniversitesi Hukuk Fakültesi Dergisi, Cilt: 55, Sayı: 2, 2006, s. 27–63.
  • BERG, Jarret, You’re Gonna Need a Bigger Boat: Somali Piracy and the Erosion of Customary Piracy Suppression, New England Law Review, Vol: 44, 2009–2010, s. 343–385.
  • BROWNLIE, Ian, Principles of Public International Law, Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2003.
  • CASSESE, Antonio, International Criminal Law, Oxford University Press, Second Edition, Oxford, 2008.
  • CHURCHİLL, R.R.–LOWE, A.V., The Law of the Sea, Manchester University Press, Manchester, 1983.
  • COLOMBOS, John C, The International Law of the Sea, sixth revised edition, Longmans, London, 1968.
  • DAVEY, Michael, A Pirate Looks at the Twenty–First Century: The Legal Status of Somali Pirates in an Age of Sovereign Seas and Human Rights, Notre Dame Law Review, Vol: 85, 2009–2010, s. 1197–1230.
  • DUPUY, Rene Jean–VIGNES, Daniel (ed.), A Handbook on the New Law of the Sea 1, Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, Dordrecht/Boston/Lancaster, 1991.
  • DUPUY, Rene Jean–VIGNES, Daniel (ed.), A Handbook on the New Law of the Sea 2, Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, Dordrecht/Boston/Lancaster, 1991.
  • FINK, M. D.–GALVIN, R. J., Combating Pirates off the Coast of Somalia: Current Legal Challenges, Netherlands International Law Review, Vol: LVI, 2009, s. 367–395.
  • GUILFOYLE, Douglas, Piracy off Somalia: UN Security Council Resolution 1816 and IMO Counter–Piracy Efforts, International & Comparative Law Quarterly, Vol: 57, July 2008, s. 690–699.
  • GÜNDÜZ, Aslan, Milletlerarası Hukuk, Temel Belgeler, Örnek Kararlar, 5. Bası, Beta, İstanbul, 2003.
  • HOUGHTON, Matthew C., Walking the Plank: How United Nations Security Council Resolution 1816, While Progressive, Fails to Provide A Comprehensive Solution to Somalia Piracy, Tulane Journal of Comparative & Internationa Law., Vol: 16, s. 253–286.
  • KING Jr Michael G., Modern Piracy and Regional Security Cooperation in the Maritime Domain: The Middle East and Southeast Asia, Naval Postgraduate School Thesis, Monterey, California 2010.
  • http://edocs.nps.edu/npspubs/scholarly/theses/2010/Mar/10Mar_King.pdf (11.11.2010)
  • LÜTEM, İlhan, Deniz Hukukunda Gelişmeler: Birleşmiş Milletler Deniz Hukuku Konferansı, Balkanoğlu Matbaacılık, Ankara, 1959.
  • MERAY, Seha L., Bazı Türk Andlaşmalarına Göre Korsanlık ve Deniz Haydutluğunun Yasaklanması, Ankara Üniversitesi Siyasal Bilgiler Fakültesi Dergisi, Cilt: 18, Sayı: 3, 1963, s. 105–188.
  • MERAY, Seha L., Devletler Hukukuna Giriş, Birinci Cilt, Üçüncü Bası, Ankara Üniversitesi Basımevi, Ankara, 1968.
  • MIDDLETON, Roger, Piracy in Somalia: Threatining Global Trade, Feedind Local Wars, Chatham House Briefi ng Paper, October, 2008.
  • http://www.chathamhouse.org.uk/files/12203_1008piracysomalia.pdf (21.12.2010)
  • NANDAN, Satya N.–ROSENNE, Shabtai–GRANDY, Neal R. (ed.), United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea 1982, A Commentary, Vol: III, Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, The Hague/London/Boston, 1995.
  • ÖZMAN, Aydoğan (çev.), Birleşmiş Milletler Deniz Hukuku Sözleşmesi, İstanbul Ticaret Odası, İstanbul, 1984.
  • SILVA, Mario, Somalia: State Failure, Piracy, and the Challenge to International Law, Virginia Journal of International Law, Vol: 50, 2009–2010, s. 553–578.
  • STERIO, Milena, Fighting Piracy in Somalia (and elsewhere): Why More is Needed, Fordham International Law Journal, Vol: 33, 2009–2010, s. 372–408.
  • TOPAL, Ahmet Hamdi, Uluslararası Hukukta Deniz Haydutluğu ve Mücadele Yöntemleri, Ankara Üniversitesi Hukuk Fakültesi Dergisi, Cilt: 59, Sayı: 1, 2010, s. 99–130.
  • TREVES, Tullio, Piracy, Law of the Sea, and Use of Force: Developments off the Coast of Somalia, The European Journal of International Law, Vol: 20, No: 2, 2009, s. 399–414.
  • ULUŞAHİN, Nur, Savaş Hali İlânı ve Silahlı Kuvvet Kullanılmasına İzin Verme Yetkisi ve Anayasa Mahkemesi’nin 24.9.1990 Tarihli Kararı, Prof. Dr. Turgut Kalpsüz’e Armağan, Ankara, 2003, s. 1039–1065.
  • WEITZ, Richard, Countering the Somali Pirates: Harmonizing the International Response, Journal of Strategic Security, Vol: 2, No: 4, 2009, ss. 1–11.
  • ZOU, Keyuan, New Developments in the International Law of Piracy, Chinese Journal of International Law, Vol: 8, No: 2, 2009, s. 323–345.
  • -http://daccess-dds
  • ny.un.org/doc/UNDOC/GEN/N06/343/85/PDF/N0634385.pdf?OpenElement (27.10.2010).
  • -http://daccess-dds-ny.un.org/doc/UNDOC/GEN/N07/485/62/PDF/ N0748562.pdf?OpenElement (27.10.2010).
  • -http://daccess-dds-ny.un.org/doc/UNDOC/GEN/N08/343/79/PDF/ N0834379.pdf?OpenElement (27.10.2010).
  • -http://daccess-dds-ny.un.org/doc/UNDOC/GEN/N08/361/77/PDF/ N0836177.pdf?OpenElement (27.10.2010).
  • -http://daccess-dds-ny.un.org/doc/UNDOC/GEN/N08/538/84/PDF/ N0853884.pdf?OpenElement (27.10.2010).
  • -http://daccess-dds-ny.un.org/doc/UNDOC/GEN/N08/611/31/PDF/ N0861131.pdf?OpenElement (27.10.2010).
  • -http://daccess-dds-ny.un.org/doc/UNDOC/GEN/N08/630/29/PDF/ N0863029.pdf?OpenElement (27.10.2010).
  • -http://daccess-dds-ny.un.org/doc/UNDOC/GEN/N08/655/01/PDF/ N0865501.pdf?OpenElement (27.10.2010).
  • -http://daccess-dds-ny.un.org/doc/UNDOC/GEN/N09/624/65/PDF/ N0962465.pdf?OpenElement (27.10.2010).
  • -http://daccess-dds-ny.un.org/doc/UNDOC/GEN/N10/331/39/PDF/ N1033139.pdf?OpenElement (27.10.2010).
  • -http://daccess-dds-ny.un.org/doc/UNDOC/GEN/N10/649/02/PDF/ N1064902.pdf?OpenElement (20.12.2010).
  • RG, 31 Aralık 2009, 27449 (7. Mükerrer)
  • RG, 13 Şubat 2009, 27140.
  • RG, 5 Şubat 2010, 27484.
  • TBMM Kanunlar Dergisi, Cilt: 74, 1991.
  • http://www.tbmm.gov.tr/tutanak/donem23/yil3/bas/b055m.htm (01.12.2010).
  • http://www.tbmm.gov.tr/tutanak/donem23/yil4/ham/b05501h.htm (01.12.2010).
  • RG, 10 Şubat 2011, 27842.
  • Council Joint Action 2008/851/CFSP of 10 November 2008, Offi cial Journal of European Union, 12.11.2010, L 301/33–37.
  • http://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=OJ:L:2008:301:003 3:0037:EN:PDF (21.12.2010)
  • Council Decision 2008/918/CFSP of 8 December 2008, Offi cial Journal of European Union, L 330/19–20.
  • http://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=OJ:L:2008:330:001 9:0020:EN:PDF (21.12.2010)
  • Council Decision 2009/907/CFSP of 8 December 2009, Offi cial Journal of the European Union, 9.12.2009, L 322/27
  • http://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=OJ:L:2009:322:002 7:0027:EN:PDF (21.12.2010)
  • Council Decision 2010/766/CFSP of 7 December 2010, Offi cial Journal of the European Union, 11.12.2010, L 327/49–50
  • http://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=OJ:L:2010:327:004 9:0050:EN:PDF (21.12.2010)
  • Publications of the Permanent Court of International Justice, Collection of Judgments, Series A.–No. 10 September 7th, 1927, The Case of the S.S. “Lotus”, http://www.icj-cij.org/pcij/serie_A/A_10/30_Lotus_Arret. pdf (3.11. 2010)
  • Dissenting Opinion by Mr. Moore, http://www.icj-cij.org/pcij/serie_A/A_10/30_Lotus_Opinion_Moore_pdf, (3. 11. 2010).
  • Case Concerning the Arrest Warrant of 11 April 2000 (Democratic Republic of the Congo v. Belgium), Judgment of 14 February 2002, http://www. icj-cij.org/docket/fi les/121/8126.pdf (28.10.2010).
  • Seperate Opinion of President Guillaume, http://www.icj-cij.org/docket/ fi les/121/8126.pdf (28.10.2010).
  • http://www.nti.org/e_research/offi cial_docs/inventory/pdfs/aptmaritime.pdf (01.12.2010).
  • http://www.manp.nato.int/operations/allied_provider/backround.html (21.12.2010).
  • http://www.nato.int/cps/en/natolive/topics_48815.htm (21.12.2010).
  • http://www.manp.nato.int/operations/allied_provider/backround.html (21.12.2010).
  • http://www.nato.int/cps/en/natolive/topics_48815.htm (21.12.2010).
  • http://www.nato.int/cps/en/natolive/topics_48815.htm (21.12.2010).
  • http://www.nato.int/shape/news/2009/08/090825a.html (24.12.2010).
  • http://www.nato.int/cps/en/natolive/topics_48815.htm (21.12.2010).
  • http://www.nato.int/cps/en/natolive/topics_48815.htm (21.12.2010).
  • http://www.cusnc.navy.mil/articles/2009/004.html (21.12.2010).
  • http://www.dzkk.tsk.tr/turkce/FAALIYETLER.php?strAnaFrame=duyurular/ mucadele_faaaliyetleri (25.12.2010)
  • Foreign Policy Bulletin, March 2009.
  • Third United Nations Conference on the Law of the Sea, Offi cial Records, Vol: XVII, United Nations, New York, 1984.

THE LEGAL BASIS OF STRUGGLING AGAINST PIRATICAL ACTS COMMITTED IN AND OFF SOMALI COAST AND TURKEY’S POSITION

Year 2011, Volume: 15 Issue: 1, 125 - 162, 01.01.2011

Uğur Bayıllıoğlu

Abstract

Piratical acts that take place in Somalia coasts are threating navigation and international trade in the region. Acts committed off Somali coasts do not meet requirements of existing customary rules on piracy, every time. This prevents effective struggle against piracy. Therefore, Security Council has adopted some resolutions concerning piratical acts take place coast off Somalia. Aforementioned resolutions authorize states to struggle with piracy in the Somali territorial sea with the consent of Transitional Federal Government (TFG). In this context different multinational forces has began to duty in order to struggle with piracy. Turkey is participating this operations, which struggle with piracy off Somalia coast, actively. In this paper, legal basis of struggling piracy and Turkey’s position will be discussed

Keywords

Piracy struggling against piracy Convention on the Law of the Sea UN Security Council resolutions Turkey’s contribution

References

  • ARI, Bülent, Akdeniz’de Korsanlık ve Osmanlı Deniz Hukuku, Türkler ve Deniz, KUMRULAR, Özlem (ed.), Kitap Yayınevi, İstanbul, 2007, s. 265–318.
  • AZUBUIKE, Lawrence, International Law Regime Against Piracy, Annual Survey of International & Comparative Law, Vol: 15, 2009, s. 43–59.
  • BANIELA, Santiago Iglesias, Piracy at Sea: Somalia an Area of Great Concern, The Journal of Navigation, Vol: 63, 2010, s. 191–206.
  • BAYILLIOĞLU, Uğur, Uluslararası Adalet Divanı’nın Tutuklama Müzekkeresi Davası Hakkındaki Kararına İlişkin Bir Değerlendirme, Ankara Üniversitesi Hukuk Fakültesi Dergisi, Cilt: 55, Sayı: 2, 2006, s. 27–63.
  • BERG, Jarret, You’re Gonna Need a Bigger Boat: Somali Piracy and the Erosion of Customary Piracy Suppression, New England Law Review, Vol: 44, 2009–2010, s. 343–385.
  • BROWNLIE, Ian, Principles of Public International Law, Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2003.
  • CASSESE, Antonio, International Criminal Law, Oxford University Press, Second Edition, Oxford, 2008.
  • CHURCHİLL, R.R.–LOWE, A.V., The Law of the Sea, Manchester University Press, Manchester, 1983.
  • COLOMBOS, John C, The International Law of the Sea, sixth revised edition, Longmans, London, 1968.
  • DAVEY, Michael, A Pirate Looks at the Twenty–First Century: The Legal Status of Somali Pirates in an Age of Sovereign Seas and Human Rights, Notre Dame Law Review, Vol: 85, 2009–2010, s. 1197–1230.
  • DUPUY, Rene Jean–VIGNES, Daniel (ed.), A Handbook on the New Law of the Sea 1, Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, Dordrecht/Boston/Lancaster, 1991.
  • DUPUY, Rene Jean–VIGNES, Daniel (ed.), A Handbook on the New Law of the Sea 2, Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, Dordrecht/Boston/Lancaster, 1991.
  • FINK, M. D.–GALVIN, R. J., Combating Pirates off the Coast of Somalia: Current Legal Challenges, Netherlands International Law Review, Vol: LVI, 2009, s. 367–395.
  • GUILFOYLE, Douglas, Piracy off Somalia: UN Security Council Resolution 1816 and IMO Counter–Piracy Efforts, International & Comparative Law Quarterly, Vol: 57, July 2008, s. 690–699.
  • GÜNDÜZ, Aslan, Milletlerarası Hukuk, Temel Belgeler, Örnek Kararlar, 5. Bası, Beta, İstanbul, 2003.
  • HOUGHTON, Matthew C., Walking the Plank: How United Nations Security Council Resolution 1816, While Progressive, Fails to Provide A Comprehensive Solution to Somalia Piracy, Tulane Journal of Comparative & Internationa Law., Vol: 16, s. 253–286.
  • KING Jr Michael G., Modern Piracy and Regional Security Cooperation in the Maritime Domain: The Middle East and Southeast Asia, Naval Postgraduate School Thesis, Monterey, California 2010.
  • http://edocs.nps.edu/npspubs/scholarly/theses/2010/Mar/10Mar_King.pdf (11.11.2010)
  • LÜTEM, İlhan, Deniz Hukukunda Gelişmeler: Birleşmiş Milletler Deniz Hukuku Konferansı, Balkanoğlu Matbaacılık, Ankara, 1959.
  • MERAY, Seha L., Bazı Türk Andlaşmalarına Göre Korsanlık ve Deniz Haydutluğunun Yasaklanması, Ankara Üniversitesi Siyasal Bilgiler Fakültesi Dergisi, Cilt: 18, Sayı: 3, 1963, s. 105–188.
  • MERAY, Seha L., Devletler Hukukuna Giriş, Birinci Cilt, Üçüncü Bası, Ankara Üniversitesi Basımevi, Ankara, 1968.
  • MIDDLETON, Roger, Piracy in Somalia: Threatining Global Trade, Feedind Local Wars, Chatham House Briefi ng Paper, October, 2008.
  • http://www.chathamhouse.org.uk/files/12203_1008piracysomalia.pdf (21.12.2010)
  • NANDAN, Satya N.–ROSENNE, Shabtai–GRANDY, Neal R. (ed.), United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea 1982, A Commentary, Vol: III, Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, The Hague/London/Boston, 1995.
  • ÖZMAN, Aydoğan (çev.), Birleşmiş Milletler Deniz Hukuku Sözleşmesi, İstanbul Ticaret Odası, İstanbul, 1984.
  • SILVA, Mario, Somalia: State Failure, Piracy, and the Challenge to International Law, Virginia Journal of International Law, Vol: 50, 2009–2010, s. 553–578.
  • STERIO, Milena, Fighting Piracy in Somalia (and elsewhere): Why More is Needed, Fordham International Law Journal, Vol: 33, 2009–2010, s. 372–408.
  • TOPAL, Ahmet Hamdi, Uluslararası Hukukta Deniz Haydutluğu ve Mücadele Yöntemleri, Ankara Üniversitesi Hukuk Fakültesi Dergisi, Cilt: 59, Sayı: 1, 2010, s. 99–130.
  • TREVES, Tullio, Piracy, Law of the Sea, and Use of Force: Developments off the Coast of Somalia, The European Journal of International Law, Vol: 20, No: 2, 2009, s. 399–414.
  • ULUŞAHİN, Nur, Savaş Hali İlânı ve Silahlı Kuvvet Kullanılmasına İzin Verme Yetkisi ve Anayasa Mahkemesi’nin 24.9.1990 Tarihli Kararı, Prof. Dr. Turgut Kalpsüz’e Armağan, Ankara, 2003, s. 1039–1065.
  • WEITZ, Richard, Countering the Somali Pirates: Harmonizing the International Response, Journal of Strategic Security, Vol: 2, No: 4, 2009, ss. 1–11.
  • ZOU, Keyuan, New Developments in the International Law of Piracy, Chinese Journal of International Law, Vol: 8, No: 2, 2009, s. 323–345.
  • -http://daccess-dds
  • ny.un.org/doc/UNDOC/GEN/N06/343/85/PDF/N0634385.pdf?OpenElement (27.10.2010).
  • -http://daccess-dds-ny.un.org/doc/UNDOC/GEN/N07/485/62/PDF/ N0748562.pdf?OpenElement (27.10.2010).
  • -http://daccess-dds-ny.un.org/doc/UNDOC/GEN/N08/343/79/PDF/ N0834379.pdf?OpenElement (27.10.2010).
  • -http://daccess-dds-ny.un.org/doc/UNDOC/GEN/N08/361/77/PDF/ N0836177.pdf?OpenElement (27.10.2010).
  • -http://daccess-dds-ny.un.org/doc/UNDOC/GEN/N08/538/84/PDF/ N0853884.pdf?OpenElement (27.10.2010).
  • -http://daccess-dds-ny.un.org/doc/UNDOC/GEN/N08/611/31/PDF/ N0861131.pdf?OpenElement (27.10.2010).
  • -http://daccess-dds-ny.un.org/doc/UNDOC/GEN/N08/630/29/PDF/ N0863029.pdf?OpenElement (27.10.2010).
  • -http://daccess-dds-ny.un.org/doc/UNDOC/GEN/N08/655/01/PDF/ N0865501.pdf?OpenElement (27.10.2010).
  • -http://daccess-dds-ny.un.org/doc/UNDOC/GEN/N09/624/65/PDF/ N0962465.pdf?OpenElement (27.10.2010).
  • -http://daccess-dds-ny.un.org/doc/UNDOC/GEN/N10/331/39/PDF/ N1033139.pdf?OpenElement (27.10.2010).
  • -http://daccess-dds-ny.un.org/doc/UNDOC/GEN/N10/649/02/PDF/ N1064902.pdf?OpenElement (20.12.2010).
  • RG, 31 Aralık 2009, 27449 (7. Mükerrer)
  • RG, 13 Şubat 2009, 27140.
  • RG, 5 Şubat 2010, 27484.
  • TBMM Kanunlar Dergisi, Cilt: 74, 1991.
  • http://www.tbmm.gov.tr/tutanak/donem23/yil3/bas/b055m.htm (01.12.2010).
  • http://www.tbmm.gov.tr/tutanak/donem23/yil4/ham/b05501h.htm (01.12.2010).
  • RG, 10 Şubat 2011, 27842.
  • Council Joint Action 2008/851/CFSP of 10 November 2008, Offi cial Journal of European Union, 12.11.2010, L 301/33–37.
  • http://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=OJ:L:2008:301:003 3:0037:EN:PDF (21.12.2010)
  • Council Decision 2008/918/CFSP of 8 December 2008, Offi cial Journal of European Union, L 330/19–20.
  • http://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=OJ:L:2008:330:001 9:0020:EN:PDF (21.12.2010)
  • Council Decision 2009/907/CFSP of 8 December 2009, Offi cial Journal of the European Union, 9.12.2009, L 322/27
  • http://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=OJ:L:2009:322:002 7:0027:EN:PDF (21.12.2010)
  • Council Decision 2010/766/CFSP of 7 December 2010, Offi cial Journal of the European Union, 11.12.2010, L 327/49–50
  • http://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=OJ:L:2010:327:004 9:0050:EN:PDF (21.12.2010)
  • Publications of the Permanent Court of International Justice, Collection of Judgments, Series A.–No. 10 September 7th, 1927, The Case of the S.S. “Lotus”, http://www.icj-cij.org/pcij/serie_A/A_10/30_Lotus_Arret. pdf (3.11. 2010)
  • Dissenting Opinion by Mr. Moore, http://www.icj-cij.org/pcij/serie_A/A_10/30_Lotus_Opinion_Moore_pdf, (3. 11. 2010).
  • Case Concerning the Arrest Warrant of 11 April 2000 (Democratic Republic of the Congo v. Belgium), Judgment of 14 February 2002, http://www. icj-cij.org/docket/fi les/121/8126.pdf (28.10.2010).
  • Seperate Opinion of President Guillaume, http://www.icj-cij.org/docket/ fi les/121/8126.pdf (28.10.2010).
  • http://www.nti.org/e_research/offi cial_docs/inventory/pdfs/aptmaritime.pdf (01.12.2010).
  • http://www.manp.nato.int/operations/allied_provider/backround.html (21.12.2010).
  • http://www.nato.int/cps/en/natolive/topics_48815.htm (21.12.2010).
  • http://www.manp.nato.int/operations/allied_provider/backround.html (21.12.2010).
  • http://www.nato.int/cps/en/natolive/topics_48815.htm (21.12.2010).
  • http://www.nato.int/cps/en/natolive/topics_48815.htm (21.12.2010).
  • http://www.nato.int/shape/news/2009/08/090825a.html (24.12.2010).
  • http://www.nato.int/cps/en/natolive/topics_48815.htm (21.12.2010).
  • http://www.nato.int/cps/en/natolive/topics_48815.htm (21.12.2010).
  • http://www.cusnc.navy.mil/articles/2009/004.html (21.12.2010).
  • http://www.dzkk.tsk.tr/turkce/FAALIYETLER.php?strAnaFrame=duyurular/ mucadele_faaaliyetleri (25.12.2010)
  • Foreign Policy Bulletin, March 2009.
  • Third United Nations Conference on the Law of the Sea, Offi cial Records, Vol: XVII, United Nations, New York, 1984.
There are 76 citations in total.

Details

Primary Language Turkish
Journal Section Research Article
Authors

Uğur Bayıllıoğlu This is me

Publication Date January 1, 2011
Published in Issue Year 2011 Volume: 15 Issue: 1

Cite

APA Bayıllıoğlu, U. (2011). Somali Sahilleri ve Açıklarında İşlenen Deniz Haydutluğu Fiillerine Karşı Yürütülen Mücadelenin Hukuki Dayanakları Vetürkiye’nin Durumu. Ankara Hacı Bayram Veli Üniversitesi Hukuk Fakültesi Dergisi, 15(1), 125-162.
AMA Bayıllıoğlu U. Somali Sahilleri ve Açıklarında İşlenen Deniz Haydutluğu Fiillerine Karşı Yürütülen Mücadelenin Hukuki Dayanakları Vetürkiye’nin Durumu. AHBVU-FLJ. January 2011;15(1):125-162.
Chicago Bayıllıoğlu, Uğur. “Somali Sahilleri Ve Açıklarında İşlenen Deniz Haydutluğu Fiillerine Karşı Yürütülen Mücadelenin Hukuki Dayanakları Vetürkiye’nin Durumu”. Ankara Hacı Bayram Veli Üniversitesi Hukuk Fakültesi Dergisi 15, no. 1 (January 2011): 125-62.
EndNote Bayıllıoğlu U (January 1, 2011) Somali Sahilleri ve Açıklarında İşlenen Deniz Haydutluğu Fiillerine Karşı Yürütülen Mücadelenin Hukuki Dayanakları Vetürkiye’nin Durumu. Ankara Hacı Bayram Veli Üniversitesi Hukuk Fakültesi Dergisi 15 1 125–162.
IEEE U. Bayıllıoğlu, “Somali Sahilleri ve Açıklarında İşlenen Deniz Haydutluğu Fiillerine Karşı Yürütülen Mücadelenin Hukuki Dayanakları Vetürkiye’nin Durumu”, AHBVU-FLJ, vol. 15, no. 1, pp. 125–162, 2011.
ISNAD Bayıllıoğlu, Uğur. “Somali Sahilleri Ve Açıklarında İşlenen Deniz Haydutluğu Fiillerine Karşı Yürütülen Mücadelenin Hukuki Dayanakları Vetürkiye’nin Durumu”. Ankara Hacı Bayram Veli Üniversitesi Hukuk Fakültesi Dergisi 15/1 (January 2011), 125-162.
JAMA Bayıllıoğlu U. Somali Sahilleri ve Açıklarında İşlenen Deniz Haydutluğu Fiillerine Karşı Yürütülen Mücadelenin Hukuki Dayanakları Vetürkiye’nin Durumu. AHBVU-FLJ. 2011;15:125–162.
MLA Bayıllıoğlu, Uğur. “Somali Sahilleri Ve Açıklarında İşlenen Deniz Haydutluğu Fiillerine Karşı Yürütülen Mücadelenin Hukuki Dayanakları Vetürkiye’nin Durumu”. Ankara Hacı Bayram Veli Üniversitesi Hukuk Fakültesi Dergisi, vol. 15, no. 1, 2011, pp. 125-62.
Vancouver Bayıllıoğlu U. Somali Sahilleri ve Açıklarında İşlenen Deniz Haydutluğu Fiillerine Karşı Yürütülen Mücadelenin Hukuki Dayanakları Vetürkiye’nin Durumu. AHBVU-FLJ. 2011;15(1):125-62.