Role of Social Innovation in Alleviating Poverty and Achieving Sustainable Development

Year 2023, , 617 - 638, 18.09.2023

Muradiye Ates

https://doi.org/10.26745/ahbvuibfd.1259836

Cited By: 1

Abstract

Combating poverty and sustaining development is one of the most significant challenges humanity needs to overcome. Governments, local institutions, non-profit organizations, academia, and companies are making great efforts to alleviate poverty and ensure sustainable development. However, these efforts cannot be reached the desired level in changing and transforming the world. Therefore, these problems, which were addressed in conventional ways, must be considered and resolved through “innovative approaches”.
The aim of this study is to address the concept of social innovation, which can be used as a solution to social problems in general, and as a tool in combating poverty and regional development in particular, with examples of successful applications. In this sense, firstly, the concept of social innovation is discussed in the context of poverty alleviation and sustainable development through qualitative research. This study also evaluates the role of social innovation practices and solutions in poverty reduction and sustainable rural development by analyzing two cases such as the KIVA microcredit system and community-supported agriculture.
These cases have been examined in terms of innovativeness, sustainability, social impact, target audience, and institutional structure. As a result, it revealed that the cases mentioned above contribute to poverty reduction and regional development in terms of innovation, target audience, sustainability and social impact.

Keywords

Social innovation, poverty, sustainable development, KIVA microcredit, community-supported agriculture

Yoksullukla Mücadele Etmede ve Sürdürülebilir Kalkınmaya Ulaşmada Sosyal İnovatif Uygulamaların Rolü

Abstract

Günümüzde yoksullukla mücadele ve sürdürülebilir kalkınma konuları çözülmesi gereken en önemli sorunların başında gelmektedir. Başta devletler olmak üzere, yerel kurum ve kuruluşlar, sivil toplum kuruluşları, akademi ve şirketler yoksulluğun azaltılması ve sürdürülebilir kalkınmanın sağlanmasında çaba göstermektedirler. Her anlamda değişen ve gelişen dünyada, tüm bu çabaların istenilen seviyeye çıkamadığı görülmektedir. Dolayısıyla geleneksel yollarla çözülmeye çalışılan bu meselenin “yenilikçi bakış açıları ile” değerlendirilmesi ve çözüme kavuşturulması gerekliliği ortaya çıkmıştır. Bu kapsamda ülkeler, en geniş manada “toplumsal sorunların çözümünde yeni yollar” şeklinde tanımlanan sosyal inovasyonu yoksulluğun azaltılması ve sürdürülebilir kalkınma hedeflerine ulaşmada bir araç olarak kullanılmaya başlanmıştır.
Bu çalışmanın amacı, genelde toplumsal sorunlara çözüm üreten bir bakış açısı, özel de ise yoksullukla mücadele ve bölgesel kalkınmada bir araç olarak kullanılabilecek sosyal inovasyon konseptini başarılı uygulama örnekleri ile ele almaktadır. Nitel araştırma yönteminin kullanıldığı bu araştırmada, öncelikle sosyal inovasyonun yoksulluk ve kalkınmada alanında ne anlama geldiği, özellikleri ve süreçleri değerlendirilmiştir. Bu çalışmada ayrıca sosyal inovasyon uygulama ve çözümlerinin yoksulluğun azaltılması ve sürdürülebilir kırsal kalkınmadaki rolünü iki iyi uygulama vakası analiz ederek değerlendirmektedir. Bu kapsamda yoksul veya düşük gelirli kişilere küçük ölçekli kredi sağlayan “KİVA Mikrokredi” sistemi ve çiftçilere ürettiklerini önceden alım garantisi imkânı sunan “Toplum Destekli Tarım” uygulamaları ayrıntılı olarak ele alınmıştır. Bu iki iyi uygulama örneği yenilikçilik, sürdürülebilirlik, sosyal etki, hedef kitle ve kurumsal yapı açısından incelenmiş ve analiz edilmiştir. Sonuç olarak bahsekonu vaka örneklerinin hem yenilikçilik, hedef kitle hem de sürdürülebilirlik ve sosyal etki açısından yoksulluğun azaltılmasına ve bölgesel gelişime katkı sundukları söylenebilir.

Keywords

sosyal inovasyon, yoksulluk, sürdürülebilir kalkınma, KİVA mikrokredi, toplum destekli tarım

References

• Allen, P., & Kovach, M. (2000). The capitalist composition of organic: The potential of markets in fulfilling the promise of organic agriculture. Agriculture and human values, 17(3), 221-232.
• Ates, M. (2020). Social Innovation as a New Social Policy Tool for Regional Government Institutions in Smart Territories. İçinde Handbook of Research on Smart Territories and Entrepreneurial Ecosystems for Social Innovation and Sustainable Growth (ss. 53-66). IGI Global.
• Ates, S. A., Ateş, M., & Yülek, M. A. (2019). Going Beyond GDP: The Role of Social Innovation in Building a Welfare State. İçinde Handbook of Research on Digital Marketing Innovations in Social Entrepreneurship and Solidarity Economics (ss. 241-258). IGI Global.
• Ateş, M. (2019). Türkiye’de Sosyal İnovasyon ve Kamu Kurumlarında Sosyal İnovasyonun Bilinirliği. Research Journal of Politics, Economics & Management/Siyaset, Ekonomi ve Yönetim Arastirmalari Dergisi, 7(3).
• Brown, C., & Miller, S. (2008). The impacts of local markets: A review of research on farmers markets and community supported agriculture (CSA). American journal of agricultural economics, 90(5), 1298-1302.
• Carew, A. L., & Mitchell, C. A. (2008). Teaching sustainability as a contested concept: Capitalizing on variation in engineering educators’ conceptions of environmental, social and economic sustainability. Journal of Cleaner Production, 16(1), 105-115.
• Christensen, J. F. (2006). Wither core competency for the large corporation in an open innovation world. Open innovation: Researching a new paradigm, 35-61.
• Cone, C., & Myhre, A. (2000). Community-supported agriculture: A sustainable alternative to industrial agriculture? Human organization, 59(2), 187-197.
• Cooperrider, D. L., & Pasmore, W. A. (1991). Global social change: A new agenda for social science? Human Relations, 44(10), 1037–1055.
• Dodgson, M., Gann, D. M., & Phillips, N. (2013). The Oxford handbook of innovation management. OUP Oxford.
• Eriksson, M., Einarsson, T., & Wijkström, F. (2014). Report on the European social innovation policy framework in light of third sector and civil society actors. A deliverable of the project: ‘Impact of the Third Sector as Social Innovation’(ITSSOIN).
• Ernst, M., & Woods, T. (2013). Community Supported Agriculture. UK Department of Agricultural Economics: Lexington, KY, USA.
• Flannery, M. (2009). Kiva at Four (Innovations Case Narrative: Kiva). Innovations: Technology, Governance, Globalization, 4(2), 31-49.
• Fujisawa, Y., Ishida, Y., Nagatomi, S., & Iwasaki, K. (2015). A study of social innovation concepts: A Japanese perspective. Japan Social Innovation Journal, 5(1), 1-13.
• Heiskala, R. (2007). Social innovations: structural and power perspectives. Social innovations, institutional change and economic performance, 52-79.
• Henderson, E., & Van En, R. (2007). Sharing the harvest: A citizen’s guide to Community Supported Agriculture. Chelsea Green Publishing.
• Hochgerner, J. (2012). New combinations of social practices in the knowledge society. In Challenge Social Innovation (pp. 87-104). Berlin: Springer-Verlag. doi:10.1007/978-3-642-32879-4_6
• Howaldt, J., & Schwarz, M. (2010). Social Innovation: Concepts, research fields, and international trends. Sozialforschungsstelle Dortmund.
• Hubert, A. (2010). Empowering people, driving change: Social innovation in the European Union. Bureau of European Policy Advisors (BEPA). Retrieved from http://ec.europa. eu/bepa/pdf/publications_pdf/ social_innovation. pdf
• Huddart, S. (2010). Patterns, principles, and practices in social innovation. The philanthropist, 23(3), 221-234.
• Krul, K., & Ho, P. (2017). Alternative approaches to food: Community supported agriculture in urban China. Sustainability, 9(5), 844.
• Ly, P., & Mason, G. (2012). Competition between microfinance NGOs: Evidence from Kiva. World Development, 40(3), 643-655.
• Marcy, R. T., & Mumford, M. D. (2007). Social innovation: Enhancing creative performance through causal analysis. Creativity Research Journal, 19(2-3), 123–140. doi:10.1080/10400410701397180
• Matzembacher, D. E., & Meira, F. B. (2019a). Sustainability as business strategy in community supported agriculture. British Food Journal.
• Matzembacher, D. E., & Meira, F. B. (2019b). Sustainability as business strategy in community supported agriculture. British Food Journal.
• Millard, J. (2017). Social Innovation in Poverty Reduction and Sustainable Development: Case Study Results. SI-DRIVE Deliverable, 10.
• Millard, Jeremy, Weerakkody, V., Missi, F., Kapoor, K., & Fernando, G. (2016). Social innovation for poverty reduction and sustainable development: Some governance and policy perspectives. Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Theory and Practice of Electronic Governance, 153-162.
• Mulgan, G., Tucker, S., Ali, R., & Sanders, B. (2007). Social innovation: What it is, why it matters and how it can be accelerated. http://eureka.sbs.ox.ac.uk/761/
• Mumford, M. D. (2002). Social innovation: Ten cases from Benjamin Franklin. Creativity Research Journal, 14(2), 253–266. doi:10.1207/S15326934CRJ1402_11
• Murray, R., Mulgan, G., & Caulier-Grice, J. (2009). How to innovate: The tools for Social Innovation. London: NESTA and the Young Foundation.
• Nicholls, A., & Ziegler, R. (2014). An extended social grid model for the study of marginalization processes and social innovation. CRESSI Working Paper published in: C. Houghton Budd, CWM Naastepad, and CP van Beers (eds.) Report on Institutions, Social Innovation & System Dynamics from the Perspective of the Marginalised. Deliverable.
• Ostrom, M. R. (2007). Community supported agriculture as an agent of change. Remaking the North American food system, ed. C. Hinrichs, and T. Lyson, 99120.
• O’Sullivan, D., & Dooley, L. (2008). Applying innovation. Sage publications.
• Phills, J. A., Deiglmeier, K., & Miller, D. T. (2008). Rediscovering social innovation. Stanford Social Innovation Review, 6(4), 34-43.
• Plank, C., Hafner, R., & Stotten, R. (2020). Die Analyse von wertebasierten Produktions-und Konsumweisen: Solidarische Landwirtschaft in Österreichs Drittem Food Regime. Österreichische Zeitschrift für Soziologie, 45, 49-68.
• Pol, E., & Ville, S. (2009). Social innovation: Buzz word or enduring term? Journal of Socio-Economics, 38(6), 878–885. doi:10.1016/j.socec.2009.02.011
• Sharp, J., Imerman, E., & Peters, G. (2002). Community supported agriculture (CSA): Building community among farmers and non-farmers. Journal of extension, 40(3), 1-6.
• Volz, P., Weckenbrock, P., Nicolas, C., Jocelyn, P., & Dezsény, Z. (2016). Overview of community supported agriculture in Europe. European CSA Research Group.
• Westley, F. (2008). The social innovation dynamic. Frances Westley, SiG@ Waterloo. Retrieved from http://www.sosyalinovasyonmerkezi.com.tr/yayin/1020080009.pdf