Research Article
BibTex RIS Cite

İLETİŞİMSEL YAKLAŞIMIN ONUNCU SINIF İNGİLİZCE DERSİNDE SINIF İÇİ UYGULAMALARA YANSIMASI

Year 2018, , 468 - 492, 30.03.2018
https://doi.org/10.17240/aibuefd.2018..-363881

Abstract

Bu araştırmada, 2011 Ortaöğretim
Kurumları İngilizce Dersi Öğretim Programı’nda temel alınan iletişimsel
yaklaşımın 10. sınıf İngilizce dersindeki sınıf içi uygulamalara nasıl
yansıdığının belirlenmesi amaçlanmıştır. Araştırma, sınıf içi uygulamalarda
kullanılan etkinlikler ve etkileşimin iletişimsel özelliklerini konu alan ve
etkileşim çözümlemesinin kullanıldığı bir sınıf araştırması biçiminde
desenlenmiştir. Araştırma grubunu, 2011-2012 eğitim-öğretim yılında Ankara ili
merkez ilçelerindeki üç anadolu lisesinde öğrenim gören 85 10. sınıf öğrencisi
ve bu sınıflarda derse giren üç İngilizce öğretmeni oluşturmaktadır. Araştırma
verileri doküman incelemesi ve gözlem yoluyla toplanmıştır. Araştırmada elde
edilen bulgular, öğretim programında öğrencilerin hedef dilde iletişimsel
gereksinimlerini karşılamalarının amaçlanmasına ve iletişimsel bir öğrenme
ortamı oluşturulmasına yönelik uygulamaların önerilmesine karşın, sınıf içi
uygulamaların bunları sağlamaya yönelik olmadığını göstermiştir. Bu kapsamda,
öğretim programının iletişimsel yaklaşım bağlamında sınıf içi uygulamalara
etkili biçimde yansıtılamadığı sonucuna varılmıştır.

References

  • Allen, J. P., Fröhlich, M., & Spada, N. (1984). The Communicative orientation of language teaching: An observation scheme. J. Handscombe, R. A. Orem, & B. Taylor (Ed.) içinde, On TESOL '83: The question of control (s. 231-252). Washington, DC: TESOL.
  • Allen, P., Swain, M., Harley, B., & Cummins, J. (1990). Aspects of classroom treatment: Toward a more comprehensive view of second language acquisition. P. Allen, M. Swain, B. Harley, & J. Cummins (Ed.) içinde, The development of second language proficiency (s. 57-81). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Allwright, D. (1988). Observation in the language classroom. Essex: Longman.
  • Avrupa Konseyi. (2001). Common European framework of reference for languages: Learning, teaching, assessment – a guide for users. Strasbourg: Language Policy Division.
  • Bachman, L. (1990). Fundamental considerations in language testing. New York: Oxford University Press.
  • Bailey, K. M. (1985). Classroom-centered research on language teaching and learning. M. Celce-Murcia (Ed.) içinde, Beyond basics: Issues and research in TESOL (s. 96-121). Rowley, Mass.: Newbury House.
  • Bayyurt, Y. (2013). Current perspectives on sociolinguistics and English language education. The Journal of Language Teaching and Learning, 1, 69–78.
  • Benson, P. (2001). Teaching and researching autonomy in language learning. Essex: Pearson.
  • Breen, M. P., & Candlin, C. N. (1980). The essentials of a communicative curriculum in language teaching. Applied Linguistics, 1(2), 89-111.
  • Brown, D. H. (2007). Principles of language learning and teaching. White Plains, NY: Pearson Education.
  • Brumfit, C. (1984). Communicative methodology in language teaching: The roles of fluency and accuracy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Büyükkantarcıoğlu, N. 2004. A sociolinguistic analysis of the present dimensions of the sociology of language. International Journal of the Sociology of Language, 165, 33–58.
  • Byram, M. (Ed.). (2001). Routledge encyclopedia of language teaching and learning. London: Routledge.
  • Canale, M., & Swain, M. (1980). Theoretical bases of communicative approaches to second language teaching and testing. Applied Linguistics 1(1), 1-47.
  • Chaudron, C. (1988). Second language classrooms: Research on teaching and learning. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Cohen, J. (1960). A coefficient of agreement for nominal scales. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 20(1), 37-46.
  • Coleman, H. (2010). The English language in development. London: British Council.
  • Cook, G. (2003). Applied linguistics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Coulthard, M. (1985). An introduction to discourse analysis. Harlow: Pearson Education.
  • Devitt, S. M. (1989). Classroom discourse: Its nature and its potential for language learning. Dublin: Trinity College, Centre for Language and Communication Studies.
  • Doğançay Aktuna, S., & Kızıltepe, Z. (2005). English in Turkey. World Englishes, 24(2), 253–265.
  • Doğançay Aktuna, S. (1998). The spread of English in Turkey and its current sociolinguistic profile. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development, 19(1), 24-39.
  • Dönmez, Ö. (2010). Implementation of the new eighth grade English language curriculum from the perspectives of teachers and students. Yayımlanmamış Yüksek Lisans Tezi, Orta Doğu Teknik Üniversitesi, Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü, Ankara.
  • Er, K. O. (2006). İlköğretim 4. ve 5. sınıf İngilizce Öğretim programlarının değerlendirilmesi. Yayımlamamış Doktora Tezi, Ankara Üniversitesi, Eğitim Bilimleri Enstitüsü, Ankara.
  • Ersen-Yanık, A. (2007). A study of English language curriculum implementation in 6th, 7th and 8th grades of public primary schools through teachers' and students' perceptions. Yayımlanmamış Doktora Tezi, Orta Doğu Teknik Üniversitesi, Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü, Ankara.
  • Ersen Yanık, A. (2008). Primary school English teachers’ perceptions of the English language curriculum of 6th, 7th and 8th grades. Hacettepe University Journal of Education, 35, 123–134.
  • Eurydice. (2012). Key data on teaching languages at school in Europe 2012. Brussels: European Commission.
  • Fraenkel, J. R., & Wallen, N. E. (2003). How to design and evaluate research in education. Boston: McGraw-Hill.
  • Gall, M. D., Gall, J. P., & Borg, W. R. (2007). Educational research: An introduction. Boston: Pearson.
  • Gilmore, A. (2007). Authentic materials and authenticity in foreign language learning. Language Teaching, 40, 97-118.
  • Graddol, D. (2007). Global English, global culture? S. Goodman, & D. Graddol (Ed.) içinde, Redesigning English (s. 242-271). New York: Routhledge.
  • Hymes, D. (2001). On Communicative Competence. A. Duranti (Ed.) içinde, Linguistic anthropology (s. 53-73). Oxford: Blackwell.
  • Işık, A. (2008). Yabancı dil eğitimimizdeki yanlışlar nereden kaynaklanıyor? Journal of Language and Linguistic Studies, 4(2), 15–26.
  • Karcı, C. (2012). Ortaöğretim dokuzuncu sınıf İngilizce öğretim programının öğretmen görüşlerine göre değerlendirilmesi. Yayımlanmamış Yüksek Lisans Tezi, Adnan Menderes Üniversitesi, Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü, Aydın.
  • Kefeli, H. (2008). Exploring the perceptions of teachers, students and parents about the new 4 year anatolian high school English program. Yayımlanmamış Yüksek Lisans Tezi, Orta Doğu Teknik Üniversitesi, Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü, Ankara.
  • Kırkgöz, Y. (2006). Teaching EFL at the primary level in Turkey. M. McCloskey, M. Dolitsky & J. Orr (Ed.) içinde, Teaching English as a foreign language in primary school (s. 85-99). Alexandria, VA: TESOL.
  • Kırkgöz, Y. (2009). Globalization and English language policy in Turkey. Educational Policy, 23(5), 663-684.
  • Kızıldağ, A. (2009). Teaching English in Turkey: Dialogues with teachers about the challenges in public primary schools. International Electronic Journal of Elementary Education, 1(3), 188–201.
  • König, G. (1990). The place of English in Turkey. D. Bozer (Ed.) içinde, The Birth and growth of a department: Department of English Language and Literature: 25th anniversary (s. 157-167). Ankara: Hacettepe University.
  • Landis, R. J., & Koch, G. G. (1977). The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics, 33, 159-174.
  • Little, D. (1991). Learner autonomy: Definitions, issues and problems. Dublin: Authentik.
  • Littlewood, W., & Yu, B. (2011). First Language and target language in the foreign language classroom. Language Teaching, 44(1), 64-77.
  • Littlewood, W. (1983). Communicative language teaching. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Long, M. H. (1980). Inside the "black box": Methodological issues in classroom research on language learning. Language Learning, 30, 1-42.
  • McGarry, D. (1995). Learner autonomy: The role of authentic texts. Dublin: Authentik.
  • McHugh, M. L. (2012). Interrater reliability: The Kappa statistic. Biochemia Medica, 22(3), 276-282.
  • McKay, S. L. (2008). Researching second language classrooms. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
  • Nunan, D. (1989). Understanding language classrooms: Guide for teacher-ınitiated action. New York: Prentice Hall.
  • Nunan, D. (1999). Designing tasks for the communicative classroom. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Paker, T. (2012). Türkiye'de neden yabancı dil (İngilizce) öğretemiyoruz ve neden öğrencilerimiz iletişim kurabilecek düzeyde İngilizce öğrenemiyor? Pamukkale University Journal of Education, 32(2), 89-94.
  • Richards, J. C., & Rodgers, T. S. (2001). Approaches and methods in language teaching. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Spada, N., & Fröhlich, M. (1995). The communicative orientation of language teaching (COLT) observation scheme: Coding conventions and applications. Sydney: National Centre for English Language Teaching and Research.
  • Yıldırım, A., & Şimşek, H. (2011). Sosyal bilimlerde nitel araştırma yöntemleri. Ankara: Seçkin Yayıncılık.
  • Tekin-Özel, R. (2011). İlköğretim İngilizce dersi öğretim programlarının uygulanmasında karşılaşılan güçlüklerin belirlenmesi (Ankara ili örneği). Yayımlanmamış Yüksek Lisans Tezi, Ankara Üniversitesi, Eğitim Bilimleri Enstitüsü, Ankara.
  • Truchot, C. (2002). Key aspects of the use of English in Europe. Strasbourg: Council of Europe.
  • Widdowson, H. G. (1978). Teaching language as communication. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Wright, T. (1987). Roles of teachers and learners. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Yel, A. (2009). Evaluation of the effectiveness of English courses in Sivas Anatolian High School. Yayımlanmamış Yüksek Lisans Tezi, Orta Doğu Teknik Üniversitesi, Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü, Ankara.
Year 2018, , 468 - 492, 30.03.2018
https://doi.org/10.17240/aibuefd.2018..-363881

Abstract

References

  • Allen, J. P., Fröhlich, M., & Spada, N. (1984). The Communicative orientation of language teaching: An observation scheme. J. Handscombe, R. A. Orem, & B. Taylor (Ed.) içinde, On TESOL '83: The question of control (s. 231-252). Washington, DC: TESOL.
  • Allen, P., Swain, M., Harley, B., & Cummins, J. (1990). Aspects of classroom treatment: Toward a more comprehensive view of second language acquisition. P. Allen, M. Swain, B. Harley, & J. Cummins (Ed.) içinde, The development of second language proficiency (s. 57-81). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Allwright, D. (1988). Observation in the language classroom. Essex: Longman.
  • Avrupa Konseyi. (2001). Common European framework of reference for languages: Learning, teaching, assessment – a guide for users. Strasbourg: Language Policy Division.
  • Bachman, L. (1990). Fundamental considerations in language testing. New York: Oxford University Press.
  • Bailey, K. M. (1985). Classroom-centered research on language teaching and learning. M. Celce-Murcia (Ed.) içinde, Beyond basics: Issues and research in TESOL (s. 96-121). Rowley, Mass.: Newbury House.
  • Bayyurt, Y. (2013). Current perspectives on sociolinguistics and English language education. The Journal of Language Teaching and Learning, 1, 69–78.
  • Benson, P. (2001). Teaching and researching autonomy in language learning. Essex: Pearson.
  • Breen, M. P., & Candlin, C. N. (1980). The essentials of a communicative curriculum in language teaching. Applied Linguistics, 1(2), 89-111.
  • Brown, D. H. (2007). Principles of language learning and teaching. White Plains, NY: Pearson Education.
  • Brumfit, C. (1984). Communicative methodology in language teaching: The roles of fluency and accuracy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Büyükkantarcıoğlu, N. 2004. A sociolinguistic analysis of the present dimensions of the sociology of language. International Journal of the Sociology of Language, 165, 33–58.
  • Byram, M. (Ed.). (2001). Routledge encyclopedia of language teaching and learning. London: Routledge.
  • Canale, M., & Swain, M. (1980). Theoretical bases of communicative approaches to second language teaching and testing. Applied Linguistics 1(1), 1-47.
  • Chaudron, C. (1988). Second language classrooms: Research on teaching and learning. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Cohen, J. (1960). A coefficient of agreement for nominal scales. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 20(1), 37-46.
  • Coleman, H. (2010). The English language in development. London: British Council.
  • Cook, G. (2003). Applied linguistics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Coulthard, M. (1985). An introduction to discourse analysis. Harlow: Pearson Education.
  • Devitt, S. M. (1989). Classroom discourse: Its nature and its potential for language learning. Dublin: Trinity College, Centre for Language and Communication Studies.
  • Doğançay Aktuna, S., & Kızıltepe, Z. (2005). English in Turkey. World Englishes, 24(2), 253–265.
  • Doğançay Aktuna, S. (1998). The spread of English in Turkey and its current sociolinguistic profile. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development, 19(1), 24-39.
  • Dönmez, Ö. (2010). Implementation of the new eighth grade English language curriculum from the perspectives of teachers and students. Yayımlanmamış Yüksek Lisans Tezi, Orta Doğu Teknik Üniversitesi, Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü, Ankara.
  • Er, K. O. (2006). İlköğretim 4. ve 5. sınıf İngilizce Öğretim programlarının değerlendirilmesi. Yayımlamamış Doktora Tezi, Ankara Üniversitesi, Eğitim Bilimleri Enstitüsü, Ankara.
  • Ersen-Yanık, A. (2007). A study of English language curriculum implementation in 6th, 7th and 8th grades of public primary schools through teachers' and students' perceptions. Yayımlanmamış Doktora Tezi, Orta Doğu Teknik Üniversitesi, Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü, Ankara.
  • Ersen Yanık, A. (2008). Primary school English teachers’ perceptions of the English language curriculum of 6th, 7th and 8th grades. Hacettepe University Journal of Education, 35, 123–134.
  • Eurydice. (2012). Key data on teaching languages at school in Europe 2012. Brussels: European Commission.
  • Fraenkel, J. R., & Wallen, N. E. (2003). How to design and evaluate research in education. Boston: McGraw-Hill.
  • Gall, M. D., Gall, J. P., & Borg, W. R. (2007). Educational research: An introduction. Boston: Pearson.
  • Gilmore, A. (2007). Authentic materials and authenticity in foreign language learning. Language Teaching, 40, 97-118.
  • Graddol, D. (2007). Global English, global culture? S. Goodman, & D. Graddol (Ed.) içinde, Redesigning English (s. 242-271). New York: Routhledge.
  • Hymes, D. (2001). On Communicative Competence. A. Duranti (Ed.) içinde, Linguistic anthropology (s. 53-73). Oxford: Blackwell.
  • Işık, A. (2008). Yabancı dil eğitimimizdeki yanlışlar nereden kaynaklanıyor? Journal of Language and Linguistic Studies, 4(2), 15–26.
  • Karcı, C. (2012). Ortaöğretim dokuzuncu sınıf İngilizce öğretim programının öğretmen görüşlerine göre değerlendirilmesi. Yayımlanmamış Yüksek Lisans Tezi, Adnan Menderes Üniversitesi, Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü, Aydın.
  • Kefeli, H. (2008). Exploring the perceptions of teachers, students and parents about the new 4 year anatolian high school English program. Yayımlanmamış Yüksek Lisans Tezi, Orta Doğu Teknik Üniversitesi, Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü, Ankara.
  • Kırkgöz, Y. (2006). Teaching EFL at the primary level in Turkey. M. McCloskey, M. Dolitsky & J. Orr (Ed.) içinde, Teaching English as a foreign language in primary school (s. 85-99). Alexandria, VA: TESOL.
  • Kırkgöz, Y. (2009). Globalization and English language policy in Turkey. Educational Policy, 23(5), 663-684.
  • Kızıldağ, A. (2009). Teaching English in Turkey: Dialogues with teachers about the challenges in public primary schools. International Electronic Journal of Elementary Education, 1(3), 188–201.
  • König, G. (1990). The place of English in Turkey. D. Bozer (Ed.) içinde, The Birth and growth of a department: Department of English Language and Literature: 25th anniversary (s. 157-167). Ankara: Hacettepe University.
  • Landis, R. J., & Koch, G. G. (1977). The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics, 33, 159-174.
  • Little, D. (1991). Learner autonomy: Definitions, issues and problems. Dublin: Authentik.
  • Littlewood, W., & Yu, B. (2011). First Language and target language in the foreign language classroom. Language Teaching, 44(1), 64-77.
  • Littlewood, W. (1983). Communicative language teaching. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Long, M. H. (1980). Inside the "black box": Methodological issues in classroom research on language learning. Language Learning, 30, 1-42.
  • McGarry, D. (1995). Learner autonomy: The role of authentic texts. Dublin: Authentik.
  • McHugh, M. L. (2012). Interrater reliability: The Kappa statistic. Biochemia Medica, 22(3), 276-282.
  • McKay, S. L. (2008). Researching second language classrooms. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
  • Nunan, D. (1989). Understanding language classrooms: Guide for teacher-ınitiated action. New York: Prentice Hall.
  • Nunan, D. (1999). Designing tasks for the communicative classroom. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Paker, T. (2012). Türkiye'de neden yabancı dil (İngilizce) öğretemiyoruz ve neden öğrencilerimiz iletişim kurabilecek düzeyde İngilizce öğrenemiyor? Pamukkale University Journal of Education, 32(2), 89-94.
  • Richards, J. C., & Rodgers, T. S. (2001). Approaches and methods in language teaching. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Spada, N., & Fröhlich, M. (1995). The communicative orientation of language teaching (COLT) observation scheme: Coding conventions and applications. Sydney: National Centre for English Language Teaching and Research.
  • Yıldırım, A., & Şimşek, H. (2011). Sosyal bilimlerde nitel araştırma yöntemleri. Ankara: Seçkin Yayıncılık.
  • Tekin-Özel, R. (2011). İlköğretim İngilizce dersi öğretim programlarının uygulanmasında karşılaşılan güçlüklerin belirlenmesi (Ankara ili örneği). Yayımlanmamış Yüksek Lisans Tezi, Ankara Üniversitesi, Eğitim Bilimleri Enstitüsü, Ankara.
  • Truchot, C. (2002). Key aspects of the use of English in Europe. Strasbourg: Council of Europe.
  • Widdowson, H. G. (1978). Teaching language as communication. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Wright, T. (1987). Roles of teachers and learners. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Yel, A. (2009). Evaluation of the effectiveness of English courses in Sivas Anatolian High School. Yayımlanmamış Yüksek Lisans Tezi, Orta Doğu Teknik Üniversitesi, Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü, Ankara.
There are 58 citations in total.

Details

Primary Language Turkish
Journal Section Articles
Authors

Fulya Soğuksu This is me

Berna Aslan

Publication Date March 30, 2018
Submission Date November 23, 2017
Published in Issue Year 2018

Cite

APA Soğuksu, F., & Aslan, B. (2018). İLETİŞİMSEL YAKLAŞIMIN ONUNCU SINIF İNGİLİZCE DERSİNDE SINIF İÇİ UYGULAMALARA YANSIMASI. Abant İzzet Baysal Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 18(1), 468-492. https://doi.org/10.17240/aibuefd.2018..-363881