Digital Gastrodiplomacy in the Construction of National Image: The Case of TasteAtlas and Turkish Cuisine

Mehmet Can Tokmak

doi:10.31123/ajcs.2049977

Digital Gastrodiplomacy in the Construction of National Image: The Case of TasteAtlas and Turkish Cuisine

Abstract

Purpose: This study examines how Turkish cuisine is represented in the international public sphere and how this representation may contribute to national image and nation branding through Instagram posts shared by TasteAtlas, a global digital gastronomy platform. It aims to reveal how gastrodiplomacy functions within digital media and how it may offer representational support for Türkiye's soft power. Design/methodology/approach: The study adopts a content analysis method. A total of 94 Instagram posts related to Turkish cuisine, shared on the TasteAtlas account between January 1 and December 31, 2025 were analyzed. The data were categorized into five themes: gastronomic diversity, geographical and cultural representations, digital narrative forms, nation branding, and sociocultural rituals. Findings: Results show that Turkish cuisine is consistently represented throughout the year and generates high engagement, reaching approximately 1.5 million likes. Meat dishes and desserts attract more attention than other food categories, while Gaziantep stands out as the most frequently highlighted gastronomic destination. Additionally, several Turkish dishes received awards in different categories in 2025, indicating strong global recognition. Research limitations/implications: The study is limited to a single Instagram account and does not include other platforms or detailed user interaction analysis. Future studies may adopt comparative and qualitative approaches. Practical implications: Digital platforms serve as effective tools for gastrodiplomacy, offering representational opportunities that may contribute to national image through cultural and gastronomic content. Originality/value: The study offers a digital perspective on gastrodiplomacy, contributing to the literature through its focus on social media representation.

Keywords

References

Akçay, E. (2024). “Halkla ilişkilerin en lezzetli hali: ‘Gastro halkla ilişkiler’”. Aydın Gastronomy, 8(1), 215-230.
Anholt, S. (2002). “Nation-brands and the value of provenance. in Destination branding: Creating the unique destination proposition. (Eds. N. Morgan, A. Pritchard & R. Pride). Elsevier.
Anholt, S. (2006). Brand new justice. (2nd ed.). Taylor and Francis.
Aslan, Z. & Çevik, A. (2020). Dünyada ve Türkiye'de gastrodiplomasi uygulamaları üzerine bir araştırma. Journal of Tourism and Gastronomy Studies, 8(3), 2298-2317.
Bjola, C. & Holmes, M. (2015). Digital diplomacy: Theory and practice. Routledge.
Bucak, T. & Yiğit, S. (2019). Gastromilliyetçilik ve gastrodiplomasi kavramları üzerine bir değerlendirme. Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 21(4), 1305-1320.
Cebeci, E. (2020). Neslihan Kul, mutfak, kimlik, diplomasi - Türkiye’de gastro diplomasi. Uluslararası İlişkiler Dergisi, 17(67), 123-126.
Cengiz, A. K. (2021). Gastrodiplomasi (Kitap incelemesi). Anadolu Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 21(3), 889-892.

Chapple-Sokol, S. (2013). Culinary diplomacy: Breaking bread to win hearts and minds. The Hague Journal of Diplomacy, 8(2), 161-183.
Chon, K.‐S. (1992). The role of destination image in tourism: An extension. The Tourist Review, 47(1), 2-8.
Cull, N. J. (2009). Public diplomacy: Lessons from the past. in C. 12. Figueroa Press.
Çaycı, A. E. & Aktaş, C. (2018). Dijitalden tatmak: Yemeğin ‘yeni’ gastro mekanlardaki seyirlik gösterisinin kültürel yansımaları. TRT Akademi, 3(6), 710-727.
Demirkıran, D. & Demir, A. F. (2023). Re-thinking gastronomy as a foreign policy instrument: Turkish cuisine and Turkey’s gastrodiplomacy activism. Üsküdar Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 9(17), 1-19.
Dinnie, K. (2007). Competitive identity: The new brand management for nations, cities and regions. Journal of Brand Management, 14(6), 474-475.
İşçimen, B. (2021). Kamu diplomasisi aracı olarak ‘gastro diplomasi’: Yunus Emre Enstitüsü’nün gastro diplomasi alanındaki faaliyetleri. Ankara Uluslararası Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 4(7), 75-83.
Karaosmanoğlu, N. D. (2017). Yemekle devrialem: Küreselleşme, kimlik, teknoloji. Kitap Yayınevi.
Kaya, F. (2023). Yabancı öğrencilerin gastrodiplomasi aracı olarak Türk mutfağı haftasına ilişkin deneyimleri. GSI Journals Serie A: Advancements in Tourism Recreation and Sports Sciences, 6(1), 152-167.
Kodaz, Ö. & Açıkalın, Ş. N. (2024). Yeni bir kamu diplomasisi uygulama alanı olarak gastrodiplomasi. Akademik Hassasiyetler, 11(25), 268-293.
Kotler, P. & Gertner, D. (2002). Country as brand, product, and beyond: A place marketing and brand management perspective. Journal of Brand Management, 9(4), 249-261.
Krippendorff, K. (2018). Content analysis: An introduction to its methodology. Sage Publications.
Manor, I. (2019). The digital diplomatic communication: Toward a digital public diplomacy. Palgrave Macmillan.
Metin, O. & Ünal, Ş. (2022). İçerik analizi tekniği: İletişim bilimlerinde ve sosyolojide doktora tezlerinde kullanımı. Anadolu Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 22(Özel Sayı 2), 273-294.
Neuendorf, K. A. (2017). The content analysis guidebook. Sage Publications.
Nirwandy, N. & Awang, A. A. (2014). Conceptualizing public diplomacy social convention culinary: Engaging gastro diplomacy warfare for economic branding. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 130, 325-332.
Nye, J. S. (2005). Dünya siyasetinde başarının yolu: Yumuşak güç, (Çev. R. İ. Aydın). Elips Kitap Yayınları.
Nye, J. S. (2008). Public diplomacy and soft power. The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 616(1), 94-109.
Öztürk, B. & Eroğlu, P. (2023). A study on the concept of gastrodiplomacy: The case of Turkish Breakfast Day. Journal of Travel and Tourism Research, 23(23), 84-102.
Pamment, J. (2020). New public diplomacy in the information age: A comparative perspective. Routledge.
Pham, M. J. (2013). Food as communication: A case study of South Korea’s gastrodiplomacy. Journal of International Service, 22(1), 1-22.
Pulluk, E. & Örnek, E. (2021). Gastrodiplomasi ve gastromilliyetçilik, (Ed. Y. Oğan). içinde Gastronomi Araştırmaları, s.55-63. Çizgi Kitabevi.
Rockower, P. S. (2012). Recipes for gastrodiplomacy. Place Branding and Public Diplomacy, 8(3), 235-46.
Sallan Gül, S. & Kahya Ni̇zam, Ö. (2020). Sosyal bilimlerde içerik ve söylem analizi. Pamukkale University Journal of Social Sciences Institute, (42), 181-198.
Spence, C. (2016). Gastrodiplomacy: Assessing the role of food in decision-making. Flavour, 5(1), 1-16.
Suntikul, W. (2019). Gastrodiplomacy in tourism. Current Issues in Tourism, 22(9), 1076-1094.
TasteAtlas. (2026). Official Instagram Account Database of Posts Related to Türkiye and Turkish Cuisine (January 1-December 31, 2025). Retrieved from https://www.instagram.com/tasteatlas/
Tokmak, M. C. (2024). Dijital diplomasi politikaları. Nobel Bilimsel Eserler.
Türker, N. (2018). Gastrodiplomasi Türk mutfağının tanıtımında bir araç olabilir mi?” Güncel Turizm Araştırmaları Dergisi, 2(Ek1), 14-29.
Wilson, R. (2013). Cocina peruana para el mundo: Gastrodiplomacy, the culinary nation brand, and the context of national cuisine in Peru”. Exchange: The Journal of Public Diplomacy, 2(1), 13-20.
Yıldırım, E. (2020). Gastromilliyetçilik ve gastrodiplomasi arasındaki ilişki üzerine teoriden pratiğe bir bakış. Kapadokya Akademik Bakış, 4(1), 76-99.
Zaharna, R. S. (2016). Battling soft power: A relational approach to rising powers in global diplomacy. The University of Chicago Press.

Details

Primary Language

English

Subjects

Media Industry Studies, Communication and Media Studies (Other)

Journal Section

Research Article

Authors

Mehmet Can Tokmak ^*
0000-0002-8441-8716
Türkiye

Publication Date

September 29, 2026

Submission Date

April 9, 2026

Acceptance Date

September 14, 2026

Published in Issue

Year 2026 Volume: 53

DOI

https://doi.org/10.31123/ajcs.2049977

IZ

https://izlik.org/JA68XT65EH

Cite

RIS / Bibtex

APA

Tokmak, M. C. (2026). Digital Gastrodiplomacy in the Construction of National Image: The Case of TasteAtlas and Turkish Cuisine. Akdeniz Journal of Communication Studies, 53, 58-84. https://doi.org/10.31123/ajcs.2049977

AMA

1.Tokmak MC. Digital Gastrodiplomacy in the Construction of National Image: The Case of TasteAtlas and Turkish Cuisine. AJCS. 2026;53:58-84. doi:10.31123/ajcs.2049977

Chicago

Tokmak, Mehmet Can. 2026. “Digital Gastrodiplomacy in the Construction of National Image: The Case of TasteAtlas and Turkish Cuisine”. Akdeniz Journal of Communication Studies 53 (September): 58-84. https://doi.org/10.31123/ajcs.2049977.

EndNote

Tokmak MC (September 1, 2026) Digital Gastrodiplomacy in the Construction of National Image: The Case of TasteAtlas and Turkish Cuisine. Akdeniz Journal of Communication Studies 53 58–84.

IEEE

[1]M. C. Tokmak, “Digital Gastrodiplomacy in the Construction of National Image: The Case of TasteAtlas and Turkish Cuisine”, AJCS, vol. 53, pp. 58–84, Sept. 2026, doi: 10.31123/ajcs.2049977.

ISNAD

Tokmak, Mehmet Can. “Digital Gastrodiplomacy in the Construction of National Image: The Case of TasteAtlas and Turkish Cuisine”. Akdeniz Journal of Communication Studies 53 (September 1, 2026): 58-84. https://doi.org/10.31123/ajcs.2049977.

JAMA

1.Tokmak MC. Digital Gastrodiplomacy in the Construction of National Image: The Case of TasteAtlas and Turkish Cuisine. AJCS. 2026;53:58–84.

MLA

Tokmak, Mehmet Can. “Digital Gastrodiplomacy in the Construction of National Image: The Case of TasteAtlas and Turkish Cuisine”. Akdeniz Journal of Communication Studies, vol. 53, Sept. 2026, pp. 58-84, doi:10.31123/ajcs.2049977.

Vancouver

1.Mehmet Can Tokmak. Digital Gastrodiplomacy in the Construction of National Image: The Case of TasteAtlas and Turkish Cuisine. AJCS. 2026 Sep. 1;53:58-84. doi:10.31123/ajcs.2049977