Matematik Eğitiminde Ters Yüz Edilmiş Sınıf Modeli Araştırma Eğilimleri: Bir Bibliyometrik Haritalama Analizi

Abstract

COVID-19 küresel salgını, acil uzaktan öğretime geçiş yoluyla teknolojinin eğitim uygulamalarına entegrasyonunu hızlandırdı. Ters yüz edilmiş sınıf bu süreçte öne çıkan modeller arasında en dikkat çekici olanıdır. Ters yüz edilmiş sınıf modeli, öğretmenin rolünü geleneksel uygulamalar yerine, sınıf dışında bireyselleştirilmiş öğrenmeyi kolaylaştırmaya kaydırarak üretkenliği artırmak için teknolojik fırsatlardan yararlanır. Alandaki mevcut araştırmalara dayanan bu makale, seçilen verileri kapsamlı bir şekilde analiz etmek ve çeşitlendirmek için üç bilgi grafiği yazılım aracını (CiteSpace, VOSviewer ve R Bibliometrix) kullanmıştır. Web of Science veritabanı sorgulanarak matematik eğitiminde ters yüz sınıf modeli ile ilgili 226 makaleye ulaşılmıştır. Elde edilen makaleler üzerinde performans analizi, bilimsel haritalama ve ağ analizi yapılmıştır. Bu konudaki ilk yayınlar 2014 yılına dayanmaktadır ve yayın sayısı istikrarlı bir şekilde artmıştır. Bu çalışma, en çok yayın yapan yazarlara, bu konudaki en etkili dergilere, en çok alıntı yapılan yayınlara, en çok yayın yapan yazarların kurumlarına, uluslararası işbirliklerine ve matematik eğitiminde ters yüz edilmiş sınıfla ilgili yeni ortaya çıkan anahtar terimlere ilişkin veriler ortaya konulmuştur. Bulgulara dayalı olarak matematik eğitimcileri için ters yüz edilmiş sınıf modeline ilişkin teorik bilgi ve pratik rehberlik sunulmuştur.

Keywords

• bibliyometrik analiz
• eğitim teknolojisi
• ters yüz edilmiş sınıf
• matematik eğitimi

Research Trends of Flipped Classroom Model in Mathematics Education: A Bibliometric Mapping Analysis

Abstract

The COVID-19 pandemic has expedited the integration of technology into instructional practices through the transition to emergency distance education. The flipped classroom has emerged as a prominent approach among the notable models in this process. The flipped classroom leverages technological opportunities to enhance productivity by shifting the teacher's role from in-person explanations to facilitating individualized learning outside the classroom. CiteSpace, VOSviewer, and R Bibliometrix are three knowledge graph software tools used in this work to carefully look over, evaluate, and diversify the selected data, drawing on previous research on the subject. By querying the Web of Science database, 226 articles on the flipped classroom model in mathematics education were accessed. Performance analysis, science mapping, and network analysis were performed on the obtained articles. The earliest publications on this subject date back to 2014, and the number of publications has grown steadily. Lo is the author who ranks first in productivity due to his most publications on flipped classrooms in mathematics education. The countries that show the most interest in flipped classroom in mathematics education and have publications on this subject are the USA, China, and Spain. In addition, international co-authorship results of 21.7% of the publications were reached. Also, future research implications based on the findings were discussed.

Keywords

• bibliometric analysis
• educational technology
• flipped classroom
• mathematics education

References

1. Abdi, A., Idris, N., Alguliyev, R. M. & Aliguliyev, R. M. (2018). Bibliometric Analysis of IP&M Journal (1980–2015), Journal of Scientometric Research, 7 (1), 54-62.
2. Adriaanse, L.S & Rensleigh, C. (2011). Comparing web of science, scopus and google scholar from an environmental sciences perspective. The South African Journal of Libraries and Information Science, 77(2), 169-178.
3. Agarwal,A., Durairajanayagam, D., Tatagari, S., Esteves,S. C., Harlev,A., Henkel,R., Roychoudhury,S., Homa,S., Puchalt,N. G., Ramasamy,R., Majzoub,A., Ly,K. D., Tvrda,E., Assidi,M., Kesari,K., Sharma,R., Banihani,S., Ko,E., Abu-
4. Elmagd,M., Gosalvez,J., & Bashiri, A. (2016). Bibliometrics: Tracking research impact by selecting the appropriate metrics. Asian Journal of Andrology, 18(2), 296-309. Retrieved February 2, 2023, from https://doi.org/10.4103/1008-682X.171582
5. Al, U. (2012). Publication and citation performances of European Union Countries and Turkey. Bilig, 14(62), 1-20.
6. Al, U., & Coştur, R. (2007). Bibliometric profile of Turkish journal of psychology. Turkish Librarianship, 21(2), 142-163. Retrieved January 12, 2023, from https://dergipark.org.tr/en/pub/tk/issue/48938/624262
7. Albert, L. R., & Kim, R. (2013). Developing Creativity Through Collaborative Problem Solving. Journal of Mathematics Education at Teachers College, 4(2). Retrieved February 1, 2023, from https://doi.org/10.7916/jmetc.v4i2.627
8. Aria, M., & Cuccurullo, C. (2017). bibliometrix: An R-tool for comprehensive science mapping analysis. Journal of Informetrics, 11, 959–975. Retrieved February 3, 2023, from http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2017.08.007

9. Artigue, M. (2002). Learning Mathematics in a CAS Environment: The Genesis of a Reflection about Instrumentation and the Dialectics between Technicaland Conceptual work. International Journal of Computers for Mathematical Learning, 7(3), 245-274. Retrieved February 7, 2023, from https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022103903080
10. Baker, J. (2000). The “classroom flip”: Using web course management tools to become the guide by the side. 11th International Conference on College Teaching and Learning, Jacksonville, FL.
11. Barca, M. & Hızıroğlu, M. (2009). The Intellectual Structure of Strategic Man‐ agement Area in the Years of 2000 in Turkey. Eskişehir Osmangazi University Journal of Economics and Administrative Sciences, 4 (1) , 113-148 . Retrieved February 3, 2023, from https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/pub/oguiibf/issue/56499/785688
12. Başer, N. (1996). Design of a mathematics achievement test and examination of its applicability for high school students in subject promotion and credit system. [Unpublished doctoral dissertation], Dokuz Eylül University.
13. Bates, S., & Galloway, R. (2012). The inverted classroom in a large enrolment introductory physics course: a case study. In Proceedings of the HEA STEM Learning and Teaching Conference. Retrieved from, London, United Kingdom.
14. Bergmann, J., & Sams, A. (2012). Flip your classroom: reach every student in every class every day. Washington: International Society for Technology in Education (ISTE).
15. Bergmann, J. & Sams, A. (2014). Flipped learning: gateway to student engagement. Washington: International Society for Technology in Education.
16. Bergmann, J. & Sams, A. (2015). Flipped learning for math instruction. Washington: International Society for Technology in Education (ISTE).
17. Bishop, J. L. & Verleger, M. A. (2013). The flipped classroom: A survey of the research. 120th ASEE Annual Conference& Exposition, Atlanta, GA.
18. Borgman, C. L. (1999). Books, bytes, and behavior: Rethinking scholarly communication for a global information infrastructure. Information Services & Use, 19, 117-121.
19. Bradford, S. C. (1985). Sources of information on specific subjects. Journal of Information Science, 10(4), 17-180.
20. Bray, A., & Tangney, B. (2013). Mathematics, pedagogy, and technology - seeing the wood from the trees. In 5th international conference on computer supported education (CSEDU 2013) (pp. 57-63).
21. Broadus, R. N. (1987). Toward a definition of “bibliometrics”. Scientometrics,12(5–6),373–379. Retrieved January 15, 2023, from https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02016680
22. Brown, A. F. (2012). A phenomenological study of undergraduate instructors using the inverted or flipped classroom model. [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. Pepperdine University.
23. Bulut, N. (1998). İnsan ve Matematik [Human and mathematics]. Delta Bilim Publishing, İzmir.
24. Butt, A. (2014). Student views on the use of a flipped classroom approach: evidence from Australia. Business Education & Accreditation, 6(1), 33-43.
25. Calabretta, G., Durisin, B., & Ogliengo, M. (2011). Uncovering the intellectual structure of research in business ethics: A journey through the history, the classics, and the pillars of Journal of Business Ethics. Journal of Business Ethics, 104(4), 499-524. Retrieved February 5, 2023, from https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-011-0924-8
26. Caulfield, J. (2011). How to design and teach a hybrid course. Stylus Publishing, LLC.
27. Chen, C., (2006). CiteSpace II: detecting and visualizing emerging trends and transient patterns in scientific literature. J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci. Technol. 57, 359–377. Retrieved January 2, 2023, from https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.20317
28. Chen, C. (2014). The citespace manual. College of Computing and Informatics, 1, 1-84.
29. Chen, L., Chen, T. L., & Chen, N. S. (2015). Students’ perspectives of using cooperative learning in a flipped statistics classroom. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 31(6), 621–640. Retrieved January 14, 2023, from https://doi.org/10.14742/ajet.1876
30. *Cheng, L., Ritzhaupt, A.D. & Antonenko, P. (2019). Effects of the flipped classroom instructional strategy on students’ learning outcomes: a meta-analysis. Education Tech Research Dev, 67, 793–824. Retrieved January 6, 2023, from https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-018-9633-7
31. Chuang, Kun-Yang, Chuang, Ying-Chih, Ho, Meng, & Ho, Yuh-Shan. (2011). Bibliometric analysis of public health research in Africa: the overall trend and regional comparisons. South African Journal of Science, 107(5-6), 54-59. Retrieved February 2, 2023, from https://dx.doi.org/10.4102/sajs.v107i5/6.309
32. Civil, M., & Bernier, E. (2006). Exploring images of parental participation in mathematics education: Challenges and possibilities. Mathematical Thinking and Learning., 8, 309–330. Retrieved January 14, 2023, from https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327833mtl0803_6
33. Contreras, J. (2014). Where is the Treasure? Ask Interactive Geometry Software!. Journal of Mathematics Education at Teachers College, 5(1). Retrieved January 27, 2023, from https://doi.org/10.7916/jmetc.v5i1.641
34. Culnan, M. J. (1987). Mapping the Intellectual Structure of MIS, 1980-1985: A Co-Citation Analysis. MIS Quarterly, 11(3), 341–353. Retrieved January 11, 2023, from https://doi.org/10.2307/248680
35. Dove, A. (2013). Students’ perceptions of learning in a flipped statistics class. Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference, Chesapeake, VA.
36. Dove, A., & Dove, E. (2015). Examining the influence of a flipped mathematics course on preservice elementary teachers' mathematics anxiety and achievement. Electronic Journal of Mathematics & Technology, 9(2), 166–179.
37. Donthu, N., Kumar, S., Mukherjee, D., Pandey, N., & Lim, W. M. (2021). How to conduct a bibliometric analysis: An overview and guidelines. Journal of Business Research, 133, 285–296. Retrieved January 8, 2023, from https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JBUSRES.2021.04.070
38. Dove, A. (2013). Students’ perceptions of learning in a flipped statistics class. Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference, Chesapeake, VA.
39. Drijvers, P., Mariotti, M. A., Olive, J., & Sacristan, A. I. (2010). Introduction to section 2. In C. Hoyles, & J. B. Lagrange (Eds.), Mathematics Education and Technology - rethinking the Terrain: The 17th ICMI Study (Vol. 13, pp. 81-88). Springer
40. Effield, J. (2013). Looking at the impact of the flipped classroom model of instruction on undergraduate multimedia students at CSUN. TechTrends, 57(6), 14-27. Retrieved January 5, 2023, from https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-013-0698-1
41. Estes, M., Ingram, R., & Liu, J. C. (2014). A review of flipped classroom research, practice, and technologies. International HETL Review, 4, Retrieved January 5, 2023, https://www.hetl. org/a-review-of-flippedclassroom-research-practice-and-technologies/
42. Fraenkel, J. R., & Wallen, N. E. (2006). How to design and evaluate research in education (6th ed.). New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
43. Freeman, L.C., (1979). Centrality in social networks conceptual clarification. Soc. Networks 1, 215–239. Retrieved January 5, 2023, from https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-8733(78)90021-7
44. Foster, C. (2013). Resisting reductionism in mathematics pedagogy. The Curriculum Journal, 24(4), 563-585. Retrieved January 5, 2023, from https://doi.org/10.1080/09585176.2013.828630
45. Garcia, J. A., Rodriguez-Sanchez, R., & Fdez-Valdivia, J. (2017). STRATEGY: A tool for the formulation of peer-review strategies. Scientometrics, 113 (1), 45–60. Retrieved January 17, 2023, from https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-017-2470-3
46. Garfield, E. (1955). Citation indices for science. Science,122, 109–110.
47. Gaughan, J.E. (2014). The Flipped Classroom in World History. History Teacher, 47(2), 221-244. Retrieved March 12, 2023, from https://www.learntechlib.org/p/155700/.
48. Geiger, V., Faragher, R., & Goos, M. (2010). CAS-enabled technologies as‘agents provocateurs’in teaching and learning mathematical modelling in secondary school classrooms. Mathematics Education Research Journal, 22(2), 48-68. Retrieved January 5, from 2023, https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03217565
49. Gläser, J., & Laudel, G. (2015). A bibliometric reconstruction of research trails for qualitative investigations of scientific innovations. Historical Social Research, 40(3), 299-330. Retrieved February 5, 2023, from https://doi.org/10.12759/hsr.40.2015.3.299-330
50. Gravetter, F.J., & Forzano, L.A.B. (2018). Research methods for the behavioral sciences. Wadsworth : Cengage Learning.
51. Hassan, S. U. & Haddawy, P. (2015). Analyzing knowledge flows of scientific literature through semantic links: a case study in the field of energy. Scientometrics, 103(1), 33-46. Retrieved February 5, 2023, https:// doi.org/10.1007/s11192-015-1528-3.
52. Hawkins, D. T. (2001). Bibliometrics of electronic journals in information science. Information Research, 7(1), Retrieved February 12, 2023, from http://informationr.net/ir/7-1/paper120.html
53. Heterick, C. 1993. Higher education product companion, Higher Education Technology News, 3(3), 6.
54. Hill, A., & Solent, M. (2007). Geography on the web: Changing the learning paradigm?. Journal of Geography. 98(3), 100-107. Retrieved January 15, 2023, from https://doi.org/10.1080/00221349908978868
55. Hirsch, J. E. (2005). An Index to Quantify an Individual’s Scientific Research Output. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 102, 16569-16572. http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1073/pnas.0507655102
56. Hood, W., & Wilson, C. (2001). The literature of bibliometrics, scientometrics, and informetrics. Scientometrics, 52 (2), 291-314. Retrieved January 5, 2023, from https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1017919924342
57. Horn, M. B., & Staker, H. (2015). Blended using disruptive innovation to improve schools. Jossey Bass A Wiley Brand.
58. Hwang, G. J., Lai, C. L., & Wang, S. Y. (2015). Seamless flipped learning: A mobile technology enhanced flipped classroom with effective learning strategies. Journal of Computers in Education, 2(4), 449-473. Retrieved January 12, 2023, from https://doi.org/10.1007/s40692-015-0043-0
59. Jain, S., Basavaraj, P., Singla, A., Singh, K., Kundu, H., & Vashishtha, V. (2015). Bibliometric analysis of Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (Dentistry Section; 2007-2014). Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research. 9 (4), 47-51. Retrieved January 17, 2023, from https://doi.org/10.7860/JCDR/2015/11994.5834
60. Johnson, L., Adams Becker, S., Estrada, V. & Freeman, A. (2014). NMC horizon report: 2014 k-12 edition. Austin, Texas: The New Media Consortium. Retrieved March 10, 2023 from https://www.learntechlib.org/p/147472/
61. Kessler, M. M. (1963a). Bibliographic coupling between scientific papers. American Documentation, 14(1), 10-25.
62. Kessler, M. M. (1963b). Bibliographic coupling extended in time: ten case histories. Information Storage and Retrieval, 1(4), 169-187.
63. Kleinberg, J., (2003). Bursty and hierarchical structure in streams. Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery, 7, 3 73–397. Retrieved January 17, 2023, from https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1024940629314
64. Koehler, W. (2001). Information science as "Little Science":The implications of a bibliometric analysis of theJournal of the American Society for Information Science. Scientometrics, 51, 117–132. Retrieved March 10, 2023 from https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1010516712215
65. Lage, M. J., Platt, G. J., and Treglia, M. (2000). Inverting the classroom: A gateway to creating an inclusive learning environment. The Journal of Economic Education, 31(1), 30-43. Retrieved January 4, 2023, from https://doi.org/10.2307/1183338
66. *Lai, C.L. & Hwang, G.J. (2016). A self-regulated flipped classroom approach to improving students’ learning performance in a mathematics course. Computers & Education, 100(1), 126-140. Elsevier Ltd. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2016.05.006
67. Liao, H., Tang, M., Luo, L., Li, C., Chiclana, F. & Zeng, X.J. (2018). A bibliometric analysis and visualization of medical big data research, Sustainability, 10 (166), 1-18. Retrieved February 3, 2023, from https://doi.org/10.3390/su10010166
68. Lo, C. K. & Hew, K. F. (2021) Student engagement in mathematics flipped classrooms: ımplications of journal publications from 2011 to 2020. Front. Psychol. 12:672610. Retrieved January 21, 2023, from https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.672610
69. *Lo, C. K., Hew, K. F., & Chen, G. (2017). Toward a set of design principles for mathematics flipped classrooms: A synthesis of research in mathematics education. Educational Research Review, 22, 50–73. Retrieved February 15, 2023, from https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2017.08.002
70. *Love, B., Hodge, A., Grandgenett, N., & Swift, A. W. (2014). Student learning and perceptions in a flipped linear algebra course. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 45(3), 317–324. Retrieved February 9, 2023, from https://doi.org/10.1080/0020739X.2013.822582
71. Maaß, K., & Artigue, M. (2013). Implementation of inquiry-based learning in day-to-day teaching: A synthesis. ZDM, 45(6), 779-795. Retrieved January 5, 2023, from https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-013-0528-0
72. Martyn, J. (1964). Bibliographic coupling. Journal of Documentation, 20(4), 236. Retrieved January 9, 2023, from https://doi.org/10.1108/eb026352
73. Menges,R. J. (1994). Teaching in the age of electronic information, in: W.l. MCKEACHIE(Ed.) Teaching Tips: strategies, research, and theory for college and university teachers, pp. 183-193 (Lexington, MA, D.C. Heath).
74. Merigo, J. M., Mas-Tur, A., Roig-Tierno, N., & Ribeiro-Soriano, D. (2015). A bibliometric overview of the Journal of Business Research between 1973 and 2014. Journal of Business Research, 68 (12), 2645–2653. Retrieved January 12, 2023, Retrieved February 17, 2023, from https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2015.04.006
75. Moroney, S. P. (2013). Flipped teaching in a college algebra classroom: an action research project. Proceedings of the 18th Annual TCC Worldwide Online Conference. Retrieved March 10, 2023, from https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/10600388.pdf
76. Noyons, E. C. M., Moed, H. F., & Luwel, M. (1999). Combining mapping and citation analysis for evaluative bibliometric purposes: A bibliometric study. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 50(2), 115–131. Retrieved January 5, 2023, from https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-4571(1999)50:2<115::AID-ASI3>3.0.CO;2-J
77. Oblinger, D.G., & Maruyama, M.K., (1996). Transforming Instruction in Preparation for a High Bandwidth. NII, “Monterey Conference Proceedings: September 1195. Higher Education and the NII-From Vision to Reality, Wahington, D.C., Educom.
78. Ojennus, D. D. (2016). Assessment of learning gains in a flipped Biochemistry classroom. Biochemistry and Molecular Biology Education, 44(1), 20–27. Retrieved January 5, 2023, from https://doi.org/10.1002/bmb.20926
79. Olive, J., Makar, K., Hoyos, V., Kor, L. K., Kosheleva, O., & Sträßer, R. (2010). Mathematical knowledge and practices resulting from access to digital technologies. Mathematics Education and Technology - rethinking the Terrain: The 17th ICMI Study(Vol. 13, pp. 133-177). Springer.
80. Özdemir, A., & Şentürk, M. L. (2021). The Effect of Flipped Classroom Model on Students' Academic Achievement in Science and Mathematics Education: A Meta-Analysis Study . i-manager's Journal of Educational Technology, 18(3), 22-41. Retrieved January 5, 2023, from https://doi.org/10.26634/jet.18.3.18071
81. Price, D.J. DeSolla (1965). Networks of scientifc papers. Science 149 (3683), 510. Pritchard, A. (1969). Statistical Bibliography or Bibliometrics. Journal of Documentation, 25(4), 348–349.
82. Rousseeuw, P. J. (1987). Silhouettes: a graphical aid to the interpretation and validation of cluster analysis. Journal of Computational and Applied Mathematics, 20, 53-65. Retrieved February 17, 2023, from https://doi.org/10.1016/0377-0427(87)90125-7
83. Sengupta, I. N. (1992). Bibliometrics, informetrics, scientometrics and librametrics: An overview. International Journal of Libraries and Information Studies. 42(2), 75-98. Retrieved February 17, 2023, from https://doi.org/10.1515/libr.1992.42.2.75
84. Silva, B. N., Khan, M., & Han, K. (2018). Towards sustainable smart cities: A review of trends, architectures, components, and open challenges in smart cities. Sustainable Cities and Society, 38, 697-713. Retrieved March 13, 2023, from https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2018.01.053
85. Sinclair, N., Arzarello, F., Gaisman, M. T., Lozano, M. D., Dagiene, V., Behrooz, E., & Jackiw, N. (2010). Implementing digital technologies at a national scale. In mathematics education and technology-rethinking the terrain: The 17th ICMI study(Vol. 13, pp. 61-78). Springer
86. Small, H. (1973). Co-citation in scientific literature: A new measure of the relationship between two documents. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 24(4),265–269. Retrieved March 4, 2023, from https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.4630240406
87. Song, J., Zhang, H., & Dong, W. (2016). A review of emerging trends in global PPP research: analysis and visualization. Scientometrics, 107, 1111–1147. Retrieved February 17, 2023, from https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-016-1918-1
88. *Sun, Z., Xie, K., & Anderman, L. H. (2018). The role of self-regulated learning in students’ success in flipped undergraduate math courses. The Internet and Higher Education, 36, 41–53. Retrieved January 4, 2023, from https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2017.09.003
89. Talbert, R. (2012). "Inverted Classroom". Colleagues. 9(1), 7. https://scholarworks.gvsu.edu/colleagues/vol9/iss1/7
90. Tsay, M. Y. (2011). A bibliometric analysis on the journal of information science. Journal of Library and Information Science Research, 5 (2), 1-28.
91. van Eck, N. J., & Waltman, L. (2010). Software survey: VOSviewer, a computer program for bibliometric mapping. Scientometrics, 84(2), 523–538. Retrieved January 4, 2023, from https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-009-0146-3
92. van Eck, N. J., & Waltman, L. (2021). VOSviewer manual. Leiden: Univeristeit Leiden, 1(1), 1-54.
93. van Leeuwen, T. N. (2004). Second generation bibliometric indicators: the improvement of existing and development of new bibliometric indicators for research and journal performance assessment procedures. [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. Leiden.
94. Van Vliet, E. A., Winnips, J. C., & Brouwer, N. (2015). Flipped-class pedagogy enhances student metacognition and collaborative-learning strategies in higher education, but effect does not persist. CBE—Life Sciences. Education, 14(3), ar26.
95. Yığ, K. G. (2022). Research trends in mathematics education: A quantitative content analysis of major journals 2017-2021. Journal of Pedagogical Research, 6(3), 137-153. Retrieved April 19, 2023, from https://doi.org/10.33902/JPR.202215529
96. Zan, B. U. (2019). Evolution of research subjects based on direct citation, co-citation and bibliographical coupling approaches. The Journal of Social Sciences Research, 14(2), 501-516.
97. Zupic, I., & Cater, T. (2015). Bibliometric methods in management and organization. Organizational Research Methods, 18, 429-472. Retrieved March 17, 2023, from https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428114562629