Need Satisfaction, Partner Attachment, and Romantic Relationship Quality: A Multiple Mediation Model

Abstract

Research findings underscore the importance of need satisfaction on romantic relationship quality. However, there is a need for research to explore the mechanism that account for the relationship between need satisfaction and relationship quality. The present study examines direct and indirect effects of need satisfaction on romantic relationship quality through partner attachment avoidance and anxiety. Data were collected from 309 emerging adults (Mage = 20.91 years, SD = 1.96; 81.6% female) currently being in a romantic relationship. Participants completed a battery of measures assessing need satisfaction, partner attachment, and relationship quality. After removing missing values and outliers, a total of 290 cases were retained for the analyses. Consistent with self-determination theory, results indicated that need satisfaction was associated with relationship quality and that this association was partially mediated through partner attachment avoidance. Counter to expectations, partner attachment anxiety did not mediate the relationship between need satisfaction and relationship quality. Findings highlight the role of need satisfaction and partner attachment avoidance in contributing to emerging adults’ relationship quality. Limitations, implications, and future directions are discussed.

Keywords

• Need satisfaction
• partner attachment
• romantic relationship quality
• emerging adults

References

1. Bowlby, J. (1973). Attachment and loss: Vol. 2. Separation: Anxiety and anger. New York, NY: Basic Books.
2. Bowlby, J. (1980). Attachment and loss: Vol. 3. Loss. New York, NY: Basic Books.
3. Byrne, B. M. (2010). Structural equation modeling with AMOS: Basic concepts, applications, and programming (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Routledge.
4. Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2015). Self-determination theory. In J. D. Wright (Ed.), International Encyclopedia of the Social & Behavioral Sciences (2nd ed.) (pp. 486-491). Rochester, NY: Elsevier.
5. Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2000). The “What” and “Why” of goal pursuits: Human needs and the self-determination of behavior. Psychological Inquiry, 11(4), 227-268. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327965PLI1104_01.
6. Fletcher, G. J. O., Simpson, J. A., & Thomas, G. (2000). The measurement of perceived relationship quality components: A confirmatory factor analytic approach. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 26(3), 340-354. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0146167200265007.
7. Fraley, R. C., Heffernan, M. E., Vicary, A. M., & Brumbaugh, C. C. (2011). The Experiences in Close Relationships-Relationship Structures Questionnaire: A method for assessing attachment orientations across relationships. Psychological Assessment, 23(3), 615–625. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/ a0022898.
8. Hadden, B. W., Smith, C. V., & Webster, G. D. (2014). Relationship duration moderates associations between attachment and relationship quality: Meta-analytic support for the temporal adult romantic attachment model. Personality and Social Psychology, 18(1), 42-58. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1088868313501885.

9. Hayes, A. F. (2013). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regression-based approach. New York, NY: Guilford Press.
10. Kline, R. B. (2011). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling (3rd ed.). New York, NY: The Guilford Press.
11. Knee, C. R., Hadden, B. W., Porter, B., & Rodriguez, L. M. (2013). Self-determination theory and romantic relationship processes. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 17(4), 307-324. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1088868313498000.
12. La Guardia, J. G., & Patrick, H. (2008). Self-determination theory as a fundamental theory of close relationships. Canadian Psychology, 49(3), 201-209. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/a0012760.
13. La Guardia, J. G., Ryan, R. M., Couchman, C. E., & Deci, E. L. (2000). Within-person variation in security of attachment: A self-determination theory perspective on attachment, need fulfillment, and well-being. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79(3), 367-384. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.79.3.367.
14. Leak, G. K., & Cooney, R. R. (2001). Self-determination, attachment styles, and well-being in adult romantic relationships. Representative Research in Social Psychology, 25, 55-62.
15. Li, T., & Chan, D. K-S. (2012). How anxious and avoidant attachment affect romantic relationship quality differently: A meta-analytic review. European Journal of Social Psychology, 42(4), 406-419. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.1842.
16. Özdemir, Y., & Sağkal, A. S. (2017, October). Turkish adaptation of the Need Satisfaction in Romantic Relationship Scale. Paper presented at the meeting of II. International Youth Researches Congress, Fethiye, Muğla.
17. Patrick, H., Knee, C. R., Canevello, A., & Lonsbary, C. (2007). The role of need fulfillment in relationship functioning and well-being: A self-determination theory perspective. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 92(3), 434-457. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.92.3.434.
18. Preacher, K. J., & Hayes, A. F. (2008). Asymptotic and resampling strategies for assessing and comparing indirect effects in multiple mediator models. Behavior Research Methods, 40(3), 879–891. http://dx.doi.org/10.3758/BRM.40.3.879.
19. Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000). Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. American Psychologist, 55(1), 68-78. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037110003-066X.55.1.68.
20. Sağkal, A. S., & Özdemir, Y. (2018). Algılanan Romantik İlişki Kalitesi Ölçeği’nin (ARİKÖ) Türkçe’ye uyarlanması: Geçerlik ve güvenirlik çalışması [Turkish adaptation of Perceived Romantic Relationship Quality Scale (PRRQS): Validity and reliability study. Mehmet Akif Ersoy Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 42, 22-40. http://dx.doi.org/10.21764/ maeuefd.329888.
21. Shaver, P. R., Schachner, D. A., & Mikulincer, M. (2005). Attachment style, excessive reassurance seeking, relationship processes, and depression. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 31(3), 343-359. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0146167204271709.
22. Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (2007). Using multivariate statistics (5th ed.). Boston, MA: Pearson Education, Inc.