Türkiye'de Sanat Eğitimi Araştırmaları: 2009'dan 2021'e Seçilmiş Makalelerin Analizi

Yıl 2022, Cilt: 12 Sayı: 2, 520 - 536, 01.07.2022

Evrim Çağlayan

https://doi.org/10.18039/ajesi.1084499

Öz

Bir alandaki araştırmaları incelemek, önemli noktaların keşfedilmesini ve uzmanlaşmayı sağlar. Geçmiş araştırmaları gözden geçirmek, araştırmacılara araştırma eğilimlerini değerlendirme ve öğrenme fırsatı verir. Bu araştırma 2009-2021 yılları arasında Türkiye'de sanat eğitimi ile ilgili makaleleri incelemeyi amaçlamaktadır. Bu araştırma nitel araştırma yaklaşımına göre yapılandırılmıştır. Araştırma için gerekli veriler, araştırma sorularına paralel olarak hazırlanan “makale analiz formu” ile toplanmıştır. Tam metin olarak elektronik ortamda erişilebilen 886 sayıdaki 13093 makale araştırmacı tarafından ayrıntılı olarak incelenmiş ve sanat eğitimi ile ilgili 156 makale belirlenmiştir. Elde edilen bulgulara göre toplam makale sayısının yüzde 1,19'unun sanat eğitimi ile ilgili olduğu tespit edildi. Ayrıca sanat eğitimi ile ilgili makalelerin yüzde 58,4'ünün tek yazarlı olduğu tespit edildi. Elde edilen bulgulara göre sanat eğitimi araştırmalarında çeşitli konuların 43 farklı kategoride ele alındığı anlaşılmıştır. 2009-2021 tarihleri, öğretme/öğrenme süreçleri, müfredatlar, görsel kültür ve yaratıcılık konuları diğer konulara göre daha sık tartışılmıştır. Sonuçlar, makalelerin yüzde 44,87'sinin önlisans ve lisans düzeyinde sanat eğitimi sürecini incelediğini gösterdi.

Anahtar Kelimeler

bibliyometrik analiz, içerik analizi, sanat eğitimi, Türkiye

Art Education Research in Turkiye: Analysis of Selected Articles from 2009 to 2021

Öz

Research carried out in a field makes it possible to identify problems, find out what needs to be done to solve problems, and discover important points. Reviewing past research allows researchers the opportunity to evaluate and learn about research trends. This research aims to examine the articles on art education in Turkiye from 2009 to 2021. This research was structured according to the qualitative research approach. The required data for the research were collected with ‘article analysis form’ which was prepared in parallel with the research questions. 13093 articles in 886 issues, which are accessible electronically in full text, were examined in detail by the researcher and 156 articles related to art education were determined. According to the findings, it was found that 1.19 percent of the total number of articles were related to art education. It was also found that 58.4 percent of the articles related to art education were written by single authors. According to the findings, it was understood that various subjects were handled in 43 various categories in art education research. The dates between 2009-2021, teaching/learning processes, curriculums, visual culture, and creativity subjects were discussed more frequently than other subjects. Results showed that 44.87 percent of the articles were examined the process of art education at the associate and undergraduate levels.

Anahtar Kelimeler

art education, bibliometric analysis, content analysis, Turkiye

Kaynakça

• Al, U., Sezen, U. & Soydal, I. (2012). The evaluation of scientific publications of Hacettepe University using social network analysis method. Hacettepe University Journal of Faculty of Letters, 29(1), 53-71. Retrieved September 11, 2019, from https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/download/article-file/623555
• Alper, A. & Gülbahar, A. (2009). Trends and ıssues in educational technologies: A review of recent research in TOJET. The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 8(2), 124-135. Retrieved September 11, 2019, from http://www.tojet.net/articles/v8i2/8212.pdf
• Anderson, T. (2003). Art Education for Life. International Journal of Art & Design Education, 22, 58-66. Retrieved August 19, 2021, from https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-5949.00339
• Aydın, A.; Erdağ, C. & Sarıer, Y (2010). A comparison of articles published in the field of educational administration in terms of topics, methodologies and results. Eurasian Journal of Educational Research, 39(39). 59-77. Retrieved September 22, 2020, from https://ejer.com.tr/wp-content/uploads/2021/01/ejer_2010_issue_39.pdf
• Balcı, A. (2007). Sosyal bilimlerde arastırma yontem, teknik ve ilkeler. Pegem A Publishing.
• Boughton, D. (2015). The curriculum as a work of art: conceptualizing change in the context of social transformation. Anadolu Journal of Educational Sciences International, 5(3), 11-26. Retrieved April 17, 2017, from https://doi.org/10.18039/ajesi.26054
• Bulut, D. & Gülsoy, Y. (2016). An investigation on the reseraches for art education. Journal of Research in Education and Teaching, 5(4), 75-85. Retrieved March 10, 2020, from http://www.jret.org/FileUpload/ks281142/File/09a..damla_bulut.pdf
• Creswell, J.W. (2014). Research design: qualitative, quantitative and mixed methods approaches (4th ed.). Sage.
• Çağlayan, N. (2018). The examination of the postgraduate thesis written on the art education in mentally retarded in Turkey. Anadolu Journal of Educational Sciences International, 8(2), 403-418. Retrieved December 6, 2018, from https://doi.org/10.18039/ajesi.454586
• Dilmaç, S. (2020). Research and approaches in visual arts education in Turkey: 2000-2018 term content analysis of articles. Balıkesir University The Journal of Social Sciences Institute, 23(44), 727-746. Retrieved February 6, 2021, from https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/download/article-file/1051254
• Doğan H. & Tok, T.N. (2018). Analysis of the articles published in the field of educational sciences in Turkey: an example of Education and Science Journal. Current Research in Education 4(2), 94-109. Retrieved September 19, 2021, from https://atif.sobiad.com/index.jsp?modul=makale-goruntule&id=AWY_IX9uHDbCZb_mQzvX
• Eça, T. (2015). Hybrid habitats: understanding the self and the other through performance based pedagogy. Anadolu Journal of Educational Sciences International 5(3), 1-10. Retrieved January 22, 2016, from https://doi.org/10.18039/ajesi.52029
• Freedman, K. (2015). Images that transform: analyzing visual culture that changes people's minds. Anadolu Journal of Educational Sciences International, 5(3), 27-32. Retrieved January 22, 2016, from https://doi.org/10.18039/ajesi.36404
• Göktaş, Y., Hasançebi, F., Varışoğlu, B., Akçay, A., Bayrak, N., Baran, M. & Sözbilir, M. (2012). Trends in educational research in Turkey: a content analysis. Educational Sciences: Theory & Practice, 12(1), 455-460. Retrieved May 18, 2020, from https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ978453.pdf
• González-Zamar, M.D. & Abad-Segura, E. (2021). Emotional creativity in art education: an exploratory analysis and research trends. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 18(12), 6209. Retrieved January 4, 2022, from https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18126209
• Güven, B. & Dündar, A. (2017). Ilkogretim gorsel sanatlar dersi kapsaminda gerceklestirilen arastirmalara iliskin bir inceleme. Journal of Awareness 2(Special 1), 267-284. Retrieved March 15, 2020, from https://journals.gen.tr/joa/article/view/253/203
• Hallinger, P. (2013). A conceptual framework for systematic reviews of research in educational leadership and management. Journal of Educational Administration, 51(2), 126-149. Retrieved April 14, 2019, from https://doi.org/10.1108/09578231311304670
• Karamustafaoğlu, O., Boz, O. & Değirmenci, S. (2020). Science education papers published in TR Indexed journals: method analysis since 2015. Ondokuz Mayis University Journal of Education Faculty, 39(1), 185-201. Retrieved January 26, 2021, from https://doi.org/10.7822/omuefd.636488
• Kartopu, S. (2016). Investigation of post graduate dissertation workouts made in visual arts in Turkey. The Journal of Limitless Education and Research, 1(1), 81-98. Retrieved April 9, 2020, from https://doi.org/10.29250/sead.285526
• Kayhan, M. & Koca, S.A.O. (2004). Research subjects in mathematics education: 2000-2002. Hacettepe University Journal of Education, 26(26), 72-81. Retrieved June 8, 2019, from http://www.efdergi.hacettepe.edu.tr/yonetim/icerik/makaleler/1076-published.pdf
• Keser, S.C. (2009). The issue of educating prospective artists in faculties of arts in state universities [Unpublished Dissertation]. Ankara University. Retrieved June 1, 2012, from, https://tez.yok.gov.tr/UlusalTezMerkezi
• Kırışoğlu, O.T. (2009). Sanat, kultur, yaraticilik. Pegem A Publishing.
• Lee, M.H., Wu, Y.T. & Tsai, C.C. (2009). Research trends in science education from 2003 to 2007: A content analysis of publications in selected journals. International Journal of Science Education, 31(15), 1999-2020. Retrieved October 12, 2019, from, Taylor&Francis database: https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690802314876
• Liu, Q., Chen, H., Crabbe, M.J. (2021). Interactive study of multimedia and virtual technology in art education. International Journal of Emerging Technology in Learning, 16(1), 80-93. Retrieved September 7, 2021, from, https://doi.org/10.3991/ijet.v16i01.18227
• Milbrandt, M.K., Miraglia, K.M. & Zimmerman, E. (2018) An analysis of current research in Studies in Art Education and the International Journal of Education Through Art. Studies in Art Education, 59(1), 39-54. Retrieved August 28, 2020, from, https://doi.org/10.1080/00393541.2017.1401882
• Neuman, L.W. (2007). Toplumsal arastırma yontemleri: Nitel ve nicel yaklasimlar 2 (Ozge S trans.). Yayınodası.
• O’Donoghue, D. (2020). Contemplating art education. Studies in Art Education, 61(2), 99-105. Retrieved August 28, 2020, from, https://doi.org/10.1080/00393541.2020.1753452
• Ozan, C. & Köse, E. (2014). Research trends in curriculum and instruction. Sakarya University Journal of Education, 4(1), 116-136. Retrieved April 16, 2019, from, https://doi.org/10.19126/suje.76547
• Özer, B., Yazar, T. & Eren, A. (2013). Analysis of graduate thesis papers in Turkey in the field of fine arts education between 1992 and 2012. Journal of Theory and Practice in Education, 9(4), 497-510. Retrieved May 20, 2019, from, https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/download/article-file/63379
• Resmî Gazete (2015). Akademik Tesvik Odenegi Yonetmeligi. Retrieved January 6, 2016, from, http://www.mevzuat.gov.tr/MevzuatMetin/3.5.20158305.pdf
• Sadik, R. I. (2021). A promise of practice: community-based art education in Pakistan. Art Education, 74(4), 44-50. Retrieved January 8, 2022, from, Taylor&Francis database: https://doi.org/10.1080/00043125.2021.1905451
• Sarıer, Y. (2011). Turkiye’de yayinlanan hakemli egitim bilimleri dergilerinin degerlendirilmesi. Milli Egitim Dergisi, 41(189), 201-218. Retrieved April 29, 2019, from, https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/download/article-file/442628
• Selçuk, Z., Palancı, M., Kandemir, M. & Dündar, H. (2014). Tendencies of the researches published in education and science journal: content analysis. Education & Science, 39(173), 430-453. Retrieved July 17, 2019, from, https://doi.org/10.15390/eb.v39i173.3278
• Sözbilir, M., Kutu, H. & Yaşar, M. D. (2012). Science education research in Turkey. In Jorde D, Dillon J (Eds.), Science education research and practice in Europe (pp 341-374). Rotterdam Sense Publishers. Retrieved July 16, 2019, from, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6091-900-8_14
• Tseng, Y.H., Chang, C.Y., Tutwiler, M.S., Lin, M.C. & Barufaldi, J.P. (2013). A scientometric analysis of the effectiveness of Taiwan’s educational research projects. Scientometrics, 95(3), 1141-1166. Retrieved July 16, 2019, from, Springer database: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-013-0966-z
• UAK [Inter-universities Board] (2016). Docentlik basvuru kriterleri (aralık 2016 donemi). Retrieved December 26, 2016, from, http://www.uak.gov.tr/temelalan/TA_Tablo1_2016A_030316.pdf
• Ulutaş, F. & Ubuz, B. (2008). Research and trends in mathematics education: 2000 to 2006. Elementary Education Online, 7(3), 614-626. Retrieved April 14, 2019, from http://www.ilkogretim-online.org/fulltext/218-1596682871.pdf?1646725052
• Yolcu, E. (2018). Sanat egitimi kuramlari ve yontemleri (3rd ed.). Pegem Akademi.
• Yıldırım, A. & Şimşek, H. (2006). Sosyal bilimlerde nitel arastirma yontemleri (6th ed.). Seçkin Publishing.