Y Neslinin Örgüt Ortamındaki Davranış Farklılıklarının Analizi

Yıl 2014, , 57 - 74, 01.04.2014

Murat Çemberci Melike Kıvanç Sudak Saim Aşçı Mustafa Emre Civelek Sabri Öz

https://doi.org/10.5824/1309-1581.2014.2.004.x

Öz

Dijital Kuşak olarak bilinen Y neslinin son yıllarda örgütlerdeki etkinliği giderek artmaktadır. Birçok sektörde faaliyet gösteren farklı ölçeklerdeki örgütlerde yönetsel pozisyonlarda görev almaya başlamışlardır. Bu durum, örgüt içindeki Y neslinin diğerlerinden iş görme anlayışı açısından farklı olduklarına dair bir algıya sebep olmuştur. Bu araştırmada, öncelikle Y neslinin örgüt ortamında diğer çalışanlardan farklılaştığı boyutların belirlenmesi ve bu boyutların hangi yönde farklılaştıklarının analizi amaçlanmıştır. Yapılan analiz sonucunda, Y neslinin çoklu görev, sosyal medya kullanımı, takım çalışmasına yatkınlık, eğlenerek çalışma ve çalışan bağlılığı boyutlarında diğerlerinden farklı oldukları bilimsel olarak ispatlanmıştır.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Dijital Kuşak, Y Nesli, İş Görme Anlayışı

Analysis of Behavior Differences of Generation Y in Organizational Environment

Öz

Effectiveness of generation Y that is known as digital generation is continuously increasing in recent years. They have begun to take responsibilities in the managerial positions of the organizations in different scales and sectors. This situation has led to the perception that generation Y working in organizations is different from others in terms of business behaviors. In this study, primarily, it is aimed that the determinations of the dimensions that generation Y differentiate from others in organization environment and analysis the differentiation in the direction of these dimensions. According to the result of analysis, it has been scientifically proven that generation Y is different from others in these dimensions: multi-tasking, use of social media, ability to team work, working joyfully and employee commitments.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Digital Generation, Generation Y, Business Behavior

Kaynakça

• ALLEN N., MEYER J. (1993),Commitment to organizations and occupations: Extension and test of a three-component conceptualization’, Journal of Occupational Psychology,78,538-551.
• ARSENAULT, P., M.: 2004 ‘Validating Generational Differences’ The Leadership and Organizational Development Journal, Vol.25/2, pp.315.
• BERG D. H., (2011). The power of a playful spirit at work. The Journal for Quality and Participation, 24, 57-62.
• ELKIND, D. (1978). Understanding the young adolescent. Adolescence, 13, 127-134.
• ERIKSON, E.H. (1980). Identity and the Life Cycle.NewYork:W.W. Norton&Company,Inc.
• FAMILIES AND WORK INSTITUTE: Generation and Gender in the Workplace, 2002, www.familiesandwork.org
• GARDNER S.F. (2006). ‘Preparing for the Nexters’. American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education 70 (4), 1.
• GERKE M.L. (2001). “Understanding and leading the quad matrix: four generations in the workplace: the Traditional Generation, Boomers, Gen X, Nexters”. Seminars for Nurse Managers 9 (3), 173–181.
• GOLDBERG (1990), L.R; An Alternative ‘Description of Personality’ The Big Five Factor Structure, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, Vol.59, pp. 213-227.
• HayGroup, (2012). Üçüncü bin yılda Y nesli işbaşında: Gençler “İş’ e El Koydu. Hay Group Danışmanlık Ltd. Şti.
• HILLS C., RYAN S., SMITH D.R. and WARREN H. (2012). “The Impact of Generation Y Occupational Therapy Students on Practice Education”. Australian Occupational Therapy Journal. Vol. 59, pp. 156-163.
• HOGG, D. (2012). ‘Application of Groupthink to Generation Y Decision Making Processes within a Professional Services Context in New Zealand’. International Journal of Business and Management. Vol. 8, No. 8, pp. 69-79.
• HOWE, N., STRAUSS, W, (1992). The New Generation Gap, The Atlantic Monthly, sf:67-89.
• HOWE, N.,andSTRAUSS, B. (2000). ‘Millennials rising: The next greatest generation’. New York: Vintage Books.
• HUTCHINSON, D. (2012). ‘Attracting and Maintaining the Y Generation in Nursing: A Literature Review’. Journal of Nursing Management, pp. 444–450.
• KELAN, E.L.,GRATTON, L., MAH, A. and WALKER, L., (2009). ‘The Reflexive Generation: Young Professionals’ Perspectives on Work’, Career and Gender. London Business School.
• KUPPERSCHMDTH, B. (2000). “Multigeneration employees: Strategies for effective management”. The Health Care Manager, 19, pp. 65–76.
• LEVID. and SLEMC.(1995).Team work in R&D organizations: The characteristics of successful teams, International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics, 16, pp.29-42.
• LOWER J. (2008). ‘Brace yourself here comes generation Y’. Critical Care Nurse 28 (5), pp. 80–85.
• Mc CREA and COSTA,(2003).Personality in Adulthood, New York: Guilford Press.
• McEWAN, A.M., (2009). ‘Generation Y: Coming to A Workplace Near You.’The Smart Work Company Ltd.
• MENGI, Z. (2011)Yazan: Zeynep Mengi Kaynak: www.yenibiris.com/Hürriyet)
• MORGAN, C. N. (2011).Generational Differences in the Workplace.
• NOTTER J., 2005. ‘WhyGenerationsMatter, andWhyTheyDont: The Business Realitiesof Diversity in theWorkplace’. Financial Management Symposiu
• PEKALA, N. :2001 Conqueringthegenerationaldivide. Journalof Property Management. November/December,30-38
• QUINN, S. (2010). “Generationalchallenges at theworkplace”, Ventus Publishing Aps, www.bookboon.com.
• REEVES,T.C.&OH, E., 2008. ‘Generationaldifferences, in handbook of research on educationalcommunicationsandtechnology’, . Spector, M.D.Merrill, J.V.Merrienboer, M.P.Driscoll, (Eds.). 3th ed. Athens, Georgia.
• SHEAHAN P. (2005). ‘Generation Y: ThrivingandSurvivingWithGeneration Y at Work’. Hardie Grant' Melbourne.
• SMALL G.and VORGAN G., ‘Modern Beynin Evrimi’. (Merve Duygun, Çev.). İstanbul: Omega Yayınları. 2009, 1 b, ss. 39-41.
• SCHWARTZ, S. H., MELECH, G., LEHMANN, A., BURGESS, S., HARIS, M. and OWENS, V. (2001). Extendingthecross-culturalvalidity of thetheory of basichumanwith a differentmethod of measurement.Journal of Cross-CulturalPsychology, 32 (5), 519-542.
• TWENGE J.M. andCAMPBELL S.M. (2008). “Generationaldifferences in psychologicaltraitsandtheirimpact on theworkplace”. Journal of ManagerialPsychology. Vol. 23, pp. 862-877.
• WESTON M. (2006). ‘Integratinggenerationalperspectives in nursing’. Online Journal of Issues in Nursing. 11 (2).
• WOOD, J., BAGHURST, T., Waugh, L. &Lancaster, J. (2008). ‘Engagingstudents in theacademicadvisingprocess’. TheMentor: An AcademicAdvisingJournal.
• YASA E., BOZYIĞIT S. (2012). ‘Y Nesli Tüketicilerinin Cep Telefonu ve GSM Operatörleri Tercihi: Mersin İlindeki Üniversite Öğrencilerinin Tercihlerini Belirlemeye Yönelik Pilot Bir Araştırma’. CagUniversityJournal of SocialSciences, 9(1), s. 33.
• YÜKSEKBİLGİLİ Z. 2013 ‘Türk Tipi YNesli’, Elektronik Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, Vol:12 No:45.