BibTex RIS Cite

Testing Methods for Mulberry Pekmez Adulterated with Different Sugar Syrups

Year 2012, Volume: 10 Issue: 1, 17 - 23, 01.03.2012

Abstract

In order to predict the adulteration in mulberry pekmez, pure mulberry pekmez samples were intentionally adulterated with sugar syrups sucrose syrups SS , glucose syrup GS and high fructose corn syrup HFCS at four different levels 0, 20, 30 and 50% . Adding sucrose syrups increased moisture and sucrose contents of mulberry pekmez samples whereas invert and total sugars, HMF hydroxymethyl furaldehyde and ash contents, ºBrix, pH, specific weight, viscosity and conductivity values decreased. While GS specifically increased HMF and viscosity values, there was a decrease in moisture, sucrose, invert and total sugars and ash contents, pH, specific weight and conductivity values. HFCS adulteration increased moisture, invert sugar and HMF levels while decreasing sucrose and ash contents, °Brix, pH, specific weight, viscosity and conductivity values. In conclusion, these analytical changes in adulterated mulberry pekmez may be used to predict adulteration with sugar syrups

References

  • Anonymous,1996. Dut Pekmezi (Made From Mulberry) Standard. Standard No: TS 12001/T1, Turkish Standard Institute, Ankara, Turkey.
  • Batu, A., 2005. Production of liquid and white solid pekmez in Turkey. Journal of Food Quality 28: 417- 427.
  • Aksu, I., Nas, S., 1996. Dut pekmezi üretim tekniği ve çeşitli fiziksel-kimyasal özellikleri. Gıda 21(2): 83-88.
  • Simsek, A., Artik, N., 2002. Degişik meyvelerden üretilen pekmezlerin bileşim unsurlari üzerine araştirma. Gida 27(6): 459-467.
  • Tosun, M., Keles, F., 2005. Erzurum’un bazı ilçelerinde üretilen dut pekmezlerinin bileşimlerinin belirlenmesi. Gıda Kongresi 2005, 19-21 Nisan, Bornova, Izmir.
  • Yogurtçu, H., Kamişli, F., 2006. Determination of rheological properties of some pekmez samples in Turkey. Journal of Food Engineering 77: 1064- 1068.
  • Sengül, M., Ertugay, M.F., Sengül M., 2005. Rheological, physical and chemical characteristics of mulberry pekmez. Food Control 16: 73-76.
  • Kelly, J.F.D., Downey, G., Fouratier, V., 2004. Initial study of honey by sugar solutions using Midinfrared (MIR) spectroscopy and chemometrics. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry 52: 33-39.
  • Cordella, C., Moussa, I., Martel, A.C., Sbirrazzuoli, N., Cuvelier, L.L., 2002. Recent developments in food characterization and adulteration detection: technique-oriented Agricultural and Food Chemistry 50:1751-1764.
  • Cotte, J.F., Casabianca, H., Chardon, S., Lheritier, Journal of J., Grenier-Loustalot, M.F., 2003. Application of carbohydrates analysis to verify honey authenticity. Journal of Chromatography A 1021: 145-155.
  • AOAC., 1995. Offical Methods of Analysis. AOAC International 16 th. Ed. Edited By Patrica Cunniff. Published By AOAC Intenational, Arlington, Virginia.
  • Cemeroglu, B., 2007., Gida Analizleri. Gida Teknolojisi Dernegi Yayinlari No:34, Ankara.
  • Anonymous, 2008. Üzüm Pekmezi (Traditional Turkish grape juice concentrate) Standard. Standard No: TS 3792, Turkish Standard Institute, Ankara, Turkey.
  • FAO, 1986., Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO) of the United Nations. Food and nutritiens paper. Sugars and honey. Rome, Italy.
  • Martin, I.G., Macias, E. M., Sanches, J.S., Rivera, B.G., 1998. Detection of honey adulteration with beet sugar using stable isotope methodology. Food Chemistry 61(3): 281-286.
  • Yildiz, N., Bircan, H., 1991. Uygulamali Istatistik. Atatürk Üniversitesi Ziraat Fakültesi Yayinlari, No:308, Erzurum.
  • Bogdanov, S., et al., 1999. Honey quality and international regulatory standars: review by the International Honey Comission. Bee World 80(2) 61-69.
  • Bogdanov, S., et al., 2000. Honey quality, methods of analysis and international regulatory standarts: Review of the work of the international honey commission. http://www.apis.admin.ch/english/host/pdf/honey/ho neyQualMeth.pdf
  • Terrab, A., Gonzales, A. G., Diez, M.J., Heredia, F.J., 2003. Mineral content and electrical conductivity of the honeys produced in Northwest Morocco characterisation of unifloral honeys. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture 83: 637-643.
  • Simsek, A., Artik, N., Baspinar, E., 2004. Detection of raisin concentrate (Pekmez) adulteration by regression analysis method. Journal of Food Composition and Analysis 17: 155-163.
  • White, J.W., J.R.,1980. Detection of honey adulteration by carbohydrate analysis. Journal Association of Official Analytical Chemists 63:1.
  • Abdel-Aal, E-SM., Ziena, H.M., Youussef, M.M., 1993. Adulteration of honey with high-fructose corn syrup, Detection by different methods. Food Chemistry 48: 209-212.
  • Goodall, I., Dennis, M.J., Parker, I., and Sharman, M.,1995. Contribution of high-performance liquid chromatographic analysis of carbohydrates to authenticity testing of honey. Journal of Chromatography A, 706: 353-359.
  • Tosun, M., 2004. Balda Yapılan Hileleri Belirleme Yöntemlerinin Doktora Tezi. Atatürk Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü, Erzurum. Araştırılması.
  • Saldamli, I., 2005. Gıda Kimyası. Hacettepe Üniversitesi Yayınları, Ankara.

Dut Pekmezine Değişik Şeker Şurupları Katılarak Yapılan Hileleri Belirleme Yöntemleri

Year 2012, Volume: 10 Issue: 1, 17 - 23, 01.03.2012

Abstract

Tağşiş şeklindeki hileleri belirlemek amacıyla üç farklı saf dut pekmezine, SŞ Sakaroz Şurubu , GŞ Glikoz Şurubu ve YFMŞ Yüksek Früktozlu Mısır Şurubu , %0, 10, 30 ve 50 oranlarında katılarak hazırlanan model örnekler analize tabi tutulmuştur. Örneklerde, SŞ katım oranına bağlı olarak rutubet ve sakaroz miktarlarında artma, ºBriks, invert şeker, toplam şeker, kül, pH, HMF Hidroksimetil furfural , özgül ağırlık, iletkenlik ve viskozite değerlerinde azalma belirlenmiştir. GŞ katılan örneklerde ise briks, HMF ve viskozite değerlerinde artma; rutubet, invert şeker, sakaroz, toplam şeker, kül, pH, özgül ağırlık ve iletkenlik değerlerinde de azalma tespit edilmiştir. YFMŞ katılan örneklerde de rutubet, invert şeker ve HMF’de artış, briks, sakaroz, kül, pH, özgül ağırlık, iletkenlik ve viskozite değerlerinde azalma belirlenmiştir. Dut pekmezinin analitik değerlerindeki bu değişmeler şeker şurubu ile yapılan tağşişin belirtileri olabilir

References

  • Anonymous,1996. Dut Pekmezi (Made From Mulberry) Standard. Standard No: TS 12001/T1, Turkish Standard Institute, Ankara, Turkey.
  • Batu, A., 2005. Production of liquid and white solid pekmez in Turkey. Journal of Food Quality 28: 417- 427.
  • Aksu, I., Nas, S., 1996. Dut pekmezi üretim tekniği ve çeşitli fiziksel-kimyasal özellikleri. Gıda 21(2): 83-88.
  • Simsek, A., Artik, N., 2002. Degişik meyvelerden üretilen pekmezlerin bileşim unsurlari üzerine araştirma. Gida 27(6): 459-467.
  • Tosun, M., Keles, F., 2005. Erzurum’un bazı ilçelerinde üretilen dut pekmezlerinin bileşimlerinin belirlenmesi. Gıda Kongresi 2005, 19-21 Nisan, Bornova, Izmir.
  • Yogurtçu, H., Kamişli, F., 2006. Determination of rheological properties of some pekmez samples in Turkey. Journal of Food Engineering 77: 1064- 1068.
  • Sengül, M., Ertugay, M.F., Sengül M., 2005. Rheological, physical and chemical characteristics of mulberry pekmez. Food Control 16: 73-76.
  • Kelly, J.F.D., Downey, G., Fouratier, V., 2004. Initial study of honey by sugar solutions using Midinfrared (MIR) spectroscopy and chemometrics. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry 52: 33-39.
  • Cordella, C., Moussa, I., Martel, A.C., Sbirrazzuoli, N., Cuvelier, L.L., 2002. Recent developments in food characterization and adulteration detection: technique-oriented Agricultural and Food Chemistry 50:1751-1764.
  • Cotte, J.F., Casabianca, H., Chardon, S., Lheritier, Journal of J., Grenier-Loustalot, M.F., 2003. Application of carbohydrates analysis to verify honey authenticity. Journal of Chromatography A 1021: 145-155.
  • AOAC., 1995. Offical Methods of Analysis. AOAC International 16 th. Ed. Edited By Patrica Cunniff. Published By AOAC Intenational, Arlington, Virginia.
  • Cemeroglu, B., 2007., Gida Analizleri. Gida Teknolojisi Dernegi Yayinlari No:34, Ankara.
  • Anonymous, 2008. Üzüm Pekmezi (Traditional Turkish grape juice concentrate) Standard. Standard No: TS 3792, Turkish Standard Institute, Ankara, Turkey.
  • FAO, 1986., Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO) of the United Nations. Food and nutritiens paper. Sugars and honey. Rome, Italy.
  • Martin, I.G., Macias, E. M., Sanches, J.S., Rivera, B.G., 1998. Detection of honey adulteration with beet sugar using stable isotope methodology. Food Chemistry 61(3): 281-286.
  • Yildiz, N., Bircan, H., 1991. Uygulamali Istatistik. Atatürk Üniversitesi Ziraat Fakültesi Yayinlari, No:308, Erzurum.
  • Bogdanov, S., et al., 1999. Honey quality and international regulatory standars: review by the International Honey Comission. Bee World 80(2) 61-69.
  • Bogdanov, S., et al., 2000. Honey quality, methods of analysis and international regulatory standarts: Review of the work of the international honey commission. http://www.apis.admin.ch/english/host/pdf/honey/ho neyQualMeth.pdf
  • Terrab, A., Gonzales, A. G., Diez, M.J., Heredia, F.J., 2003. Mineral content and electrical conductivity of the honeys produced in Northwest Morocco characterisation of unifloral honeys. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture 83: 637-643.
  • Simsek, A., Artik, N., Baspinar, E., 2004. Detection of raisin concentrate (Pekmez) adulteration by regression analysis method. Journal of Food Composition and Analysis 17: 155-163.
  • White, J.W., J.R.,1980. Detection of honey adulteration by carbohydrate analysis. Journal Association of Official Analytical Chemists 63:1.
  • Abdel-Aal, E-SM., Ziena, H.M., Youussef, M.M., 1993. Adulteration of honey with high-fructose corn syrup, Detection by different methods. Food Chemistry 48: 209-212.
  • Goodall, I., Dennis, M.J., Parker, I., and Sharman, M.,1995. Contribution of high-performance liquid chromatographic analysis of carbohydrates to authenticity testing of honey. Journal of Chromatography A, 706: 353-359.
  • Tosun, M., 2004. Balda Yapılan Hileleri Belirleme Yöntemlerinin Doktora Tezi. Atatürk Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü, Erzurum. Araştırılması.
  • Saldamli, I., 2005. Gıda Kimyası. Hacettepe Üniversitesi Yayınları, Ankara.
There are 25 citations in total.

Details

Primary Language English
Journal Section Research Article
Authors

Murat Tosun This is me

Fevzi Keles This is me

Publication Date March 1, 2012
Published in Issue Year 2012 Volume: 10 Issue: 1

Cite

APA Tosun, M., & Keles, F. (2012). Testing Methods for Mulberry Pekmez Adulterated with Different Sugar Syrups. Akademik Gıda, 10(1), 17-23.
AMA Tosun M, Keles F. Testing Methods for Mulberry Pekmez Adulterated with Different Sugar Syrups. Akademik Gıda. March 2012;10(1):17-23.
Chicago Tosun, Murat, and Fevzi Keles. “Testing Methods for Mulberry Pekmez Adulterated With Different Sugar Syrups”. Akademik Gıda 10, no. 1 (March 2012): 17-23.
EndNote Tosun M, Keles F (March 1, 2012) Testing Methods for Mulberry Pekmez Adulterated with Different Sugar Syrups. Akademik Gıda 10 1 17–23.
IEEE M. Tosun and F. Keles, “Testing Methods for Mulberry Pekmez Adulterated with Different Sugar Syrups”, Akademik Gıda, vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 17–23, 2012.
ISNAD Tosun, Murat - Keles, Fevzi. “Testing Methods for Mulberry Pekmez Adulterated With Different Sugar Syrups”. Akademik Gıda 10/1 (March 2012), 17-23.
JAMA Tosun M, Keles F. Testing Methods for Mulberry Pekmez Adulterated with Different Sugar Syrups. Akademik Gıda. 2012;10:17–23.
MLA Tosun, Murat and Fevzi Keles. “Testing Methods for Mulberry Pekmez Adulterated With Different Sugar Syrups”. Akademik Gıda, vol. 10, no. 1, 2012, pp. 17-23.
Vancouver Tosun M, Keles F. Testing Methods for Mulberry Pekmez Adulterated with Different Sugar Syrups. Akademik Gıda. 2012;10(1):17-23.

25964   25965    25966      25968   25967


88x31.png

Bu eser Creative Commons Atıf-GayriTicari 4.0 (CC BY-NC 4.0) Uluslararası Lisansı ile lisanslanmıştır.

Akademik Gıda (Academic Food Journal) is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0).