BABA KATILIMI ÖLÇÜMÜNDE YORUMSAMACI YAKLAŞIMIN YERİ

Yıl 2020, Cilt: 7 Sayı: 13, 407 - 430, 31.05.2020

Sezgin Erdem

Öz

Çocuk ile kurulan biyolojik bir bağ neticesinde ortaya çıkan bir rol olarak kavramsallaştırılan babalık bu bağlama sıkıştırılamayacak kadar pek çok farklı ve karmaşık ögeyi içinde barındırmaktadır. Toplumsal, kültürel, tarihsel, ırksal, etnik gibi pek çok alanda farklı formları olan bu olgunun biyolojik bir bağdan çok sosyal bir inşa sürecinin neticesi olması daha anlamlı durmaktadır. Babalık olgusuna dair kavramsal tanımlamaların doğru olarak yapılması bu olgunun keşfedilmesine ve ona ait kavramların ölçümlenmesine imkân sağlayacaktır. Bu çalışmada babalık olgusu ve ona ait alt kavramların kavramsal düzeyde tanımlamaları ele alınmış ve bu olgunun pratik yaşamdaki yansıması olarak gösterilen babalık katılımının ölçümüne dair yaklaşımlar ele alınarak tartışılmıştır. Daha fazla katılım kavramı pek çok çalışmada farklı kavramsal yaklaşımlara karşılık gelmekle birlikte babalık katılımı en çok annelik katılımı ile karşılaştırılmıştır. Babalık rolünün içinde bulunduğu bağlamın annelik rolünden farklı olması bu iki rolün karşılaştırılmasının yanlışlığını da beraberinde getirmektedir. Babalık katılımında yapılan ölçüm ve değerlendirmelerin pozitivist gelenek merkeze alınarak yapılmakta olduğu sonuçlarına ulaşılmış olup babalık davranışlarının niteliksel bağlamda tartışılmasının gerekliliği bu alanda yapılan tartışmalarda yerini almıştır.

Anahtar Kelimeler

BABALIK, BABA KATILIMI, BABALIK KÜLTÜRÜ, YORUMSAMACI YAKLAŞIM

PLACE OF HERMENEUTIC APPROACH IN MEASUREMENT OF FATHER INVOLVEMENT

Öz

Conceptualized as a role resulting from a biological bond with the child, paternity contains many different and complex elements that cannot be compressed. It is more meaningful that this phenomenon, which has different forms in many fields such as social, cultural, historical, racial and ethnic, is the result of a social construction process rather than a biological bond. Accurate definitions of the concept of paternity will allow the discovery of this phenomenon and the measurement of its concepts. In this study, the conceptual definitions of paternity phenomenon and its sub-concepts are discussed and the approaches about the measurement of paternity involvement which are shown as the reflection of this phenomenon in practical life are discussed. Although the concept of more involvement corresponds to different conceptual approaches in many studies, paternity involvement is most often compared to motherhood involvement. The fact that the context in which the role of paternity is different from the role of motherhood brings with it the mistake of comparing these two roles. It has been concluded that the measurements and evaluations made in the involvement of paternity are made by taking the positivist tradition as the center and the necessity to discuss the paternity behaviors in a qualitative context has taken its place in the discussions in this field.

Kaynakça

• Allen, S. and Daly, K. (2007). The Effects of Father Involvement: An Updated Research Summary of The Evidence. University of Guelph: Centre for Families, Work and Well-Being.
• Baxter, J. A. (2012). “Fathering Across Families: How Father Involvement Varies For Children When Their Father Has Children Living Elsewhere”. Journal of Family Studies.18(2-3), pp.187–201. DOI: 10.5172/jfs.2012.18.2-3.187
• Biller, H. B. and Kimpton, J. L. (1997). The Father and The School-Aged Child. (Ed. M. E. Lamb). In The Role Of The Father In Child Development. New York: Wiley. pp.143–161.
• Blair, S. L. and Hardesty, C. (1994). “Paternal Involvement and The Well-Being of Fathers and Mothers of Young Children”. Journal of Men’s Studies.3(1). pp.49–68. DOI: 10.1177/106082659400300103
• Cabrera, N. J., Shannon, J. D. and Tamis-Le Monda, C. (2007). “Fathers Influence on Their Children’s Cognitive and Emotional Development: From Toddlers to Pre-K”. Applied Development Science.11(4). pp.208-213. DOI: 10.1080/10888690701762100
• Cabrera, N., Tamis-LeMonda, C. S., Bradley, R. H., Hofferth, S. and Lamb, M. E. (2000). “Fatherhood in The 21st Century. Child Development”. Child Development.71(1). pp.127–136. DOI: 10.1111/1467-8624.00126
• Carlson, M. (2006). “Family Structure, Father Involvement, and Adolescent Behavioral Outcomes”. Journal of Marriage and Family.68(1). pp.137–154. DOI: 10.1111/j.1741-3737.2006.00239.x.
• Clarke-Stewart, K. A. (1978). “And Daddy Makes Three: The Father’s Impact on Mother and Young Child”. Child Development.49(2). pp.466–478. DOI: 10.2307/1128712
• Cohen, T. F. and Dolgin, K. G. (1997). Both Sides Now: A Two-Generational Assessment of Emotional and Psychological Dimensions of Father Involvement. Arlington, VA: Paper presented at the National Council on Family Relations.
• Coltrane, S., Melzer, S.A., Vega, E. and Parke, R. (2005). Mexican American Fathering in Neighboorhood Context. (Eds. W. Marsiglio, K. Roy and G. L. Fox). In Situated Fathering: A Focus on Physical and Social Spaces. NY: Rowman, Littlefield Publishers. pp.277-298.
• Daly, K. (1993). “Reshaping Fatherhood: Finding the Models”. Journal of Family Issues.14(4). pp.510-530. DOI: 10.1177/019251393014004003
• Day, R. D. and Mackey, W. C. (1986). “The Role Image of The American Father”. Journal of Comparative Family Studies.17(3). pp.371-388.
• Doherty, W. J., Kouneski, E. F.and Erickson, M. F. (1998). “Responsible Fathering: An Overview and Conceptual Framework”. Journal of Marriage and The Family.60(2). pp.277–292. DOI: 10.2307/353848
• Dollahite, D. C., Hawkins, A. J. and Brotherson, S. E. (1997). Fatherwork: A Conceptual Ethic of Fathering As Generative Work. (Eds. A. J. Hawkins and D. Dollahite). In Generative Fathering: Beyond Deficit Perspectives. pp.17–35. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
• Easterbrooks, A. and Goldberg, W. (1984). “Toddler Development In The Family: Impact Of Father Involvement And Parenting Characteristics”. Child Development. 55(3). pp. 740-752. DOI: 10.2307/1130126
• Field, T. (1978). “Interaction Behaviors of Primary Versus Secondary Caretaker Fathers”. Developmental Psychology.14(2). pp.183–184. DOI: 10.1037/0012-1649.14.2.183
• Haas, L. (1993). “Nurturing Fathers and Working Mothers: Changing Gender Roles in Sweden”. (Ed. J C. Hood). In Men, Work and Family. Newbury Park, CA: Sage. pp. 238–261.
• Hofferth, S. (2003). “Race/Ethnic Differences in Father Involvement in Two-Parent Families: Culture, Context, Or Economy?”. Journal of Family Issues, 24(2), pp.185–216. DOI: 10.1177/0192513X02250087
• Ihinger-Tallman, M., Pasley, K. and Buehler, C. (1993). “Developing a Middle-Range Theory of Father Involvement Postdivorce”. Journal of Family Issues.14(4). pp.550–571. DOI: 10.1177/019251393014004005
• Juster, F. T. (1985). A Note on Recent Changes in Time Use. (Eds. F. T. Juster and F. Stafford). Time, Goods, and Well-Being. Ann Arbor, MI: Institute for Social Research. pp. 313-332.
• Lamb, M. (2000). “The History of Research on Father Involvement”. Marriage and Family Review.29(2-3). pp.23-42. DOI: 10.1300/J002v29n02_03.
• Lamb, M. (2010). How Do Fathers Influence Children’s Development? Let Me Count the Ways. (Ed. M. Lamb). In The Role of the Father in Child Development. NJ: John Wiley and Sons, Inc. pp.1-26.
• Lamb, M., Pleck, J., Charnov, E., Levine and J. (1985). “Paternal Behaviour In Humans”. American Zoologist.25(3). pp.883-894. DOI: 10.1093/icb/25.3.883.
• Lieberman, M., Doyle, A. and Markiewicz, D. (1999). “Developmental Patterns In Security Of Attachment To Mother And Father In Late Childhood And Early Adolescence: Associations With Peer Relations”. Child Development.70(1). pp.202-213. DOI: 10.1111/1467-8624.00015
• MacDonald, K. and Parke, R. D. (1986). “Parent–Child Physical Play: The Effects of Sex and Age of Children and Parents”. Sex Roles.7–8. pp.367–379. DOI: 10.1007/BF00287978
• Magnusson, D. and Cairns, R. B. (1996). Developmental Science: Toward a Unified Framework. (Eds. R. B. Cairns, G. H. Elder and E. J. Costello). In Developmental Science. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. pp. 1–22.
• McBride, B. A. (1990). “The Effects of a Parent Education/Play Group Program on Father Involvement in Child Rearing”. Family Relations.39(3). pp.250–256. DOI: 10.1177/1049731507309828.
• McKeown, K., Ferguson, H. and Rooney, D. (1998). Changing Fathers?. Ireland: Collins Press.
• Marsiglio, W. (1991). “Paternal Engagement Activities With Minor Children”. Journal of Marriage and the Family.53(4). pp.973–986. DOI: 10.2307/353001
• Marsiglio, W., Amato, P., Day, R. and Lamb, M. (2000) “Scholarship on Fatherhood in the 1990s and Beyond”. Journal Of Marriage And Family.62(4). pp.1173-1191.
• Meah, A. and Jackson, P. (2016). “The Complex Landscape of Contemporary Fathering in the UK”. Social and Cultural Geography.17(4). pp.491-510. DOI: 10.1080/14649365.2015.1089586
• Minton, C. and Pasley, K. (1996). “Fathers’ Parenting Role Identity and Father Involvement: A Comparison of Nondivorced and Divorced Nonresident Fathers”. Journal of Family Issues.17(1). pp.26–45. DOI: 10.1177/019251396017001003
• Nash, S. C. and Feldman, S. S. (1981). Sex Role and Sex-Related Attributions: Constancy and Change Across the Family Life Cycle. (Eds. M. E. Lamb and A. L. Brown). In Advances in Developmental Psychology. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. pp. 1–35.
• Palkovitz, R. (1980). Predictors of Involvement in First-Time Fathers. Dissertation Abstracts International, 40, 3603B-3604B. (University Microforms No. 8105035).
• Palkovitz, R. (1996). “Parenting as a Generator of Adult Development: Conceptual Issues and Implications”. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships.13(4). pp.571–592. DOI: 10.1177/0265407596134006
• Palkovitz, R. (1997). Reconstructing “involvement”: Expanding conceptualizations of men’s caring in contemporary families. In A. J. Hawkins & D. C. Dollahite (Eds.), Generative fathering: Beyond deficit perspectives (pp. 200–216). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
• Palkovitz, R. (2002). Involved Fathering and Child Development: Advancing Our Understanding of Good Fathering. (Eds. , C. S. Tamis-LeMonda and N. Cabrera). In Handbook of Father Involvement: Multidisciplinary Perspectives. NJ, London: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers. pp.119-140.
• Parke, R. D. (2000). “Father Involvement: A Developmental Perspective”. Marriage and Family Review.29(2-3). pp.43–58. DOI: 10.1300/J002v29n02_04
• Parke, R. D. and Brott, A. A. (1999). Throwaway Dads: The Myths and Barriers That Keep Men From Being the Fathers They Want to Be. Boston: Houghton Mifflin Company.
• Parke, R., McDowell, D., Kim, M., Killian, C., Dennis, J., Flyr, M. and Wild, M. (2004). Fathers’ Contributions to Children’s Peer Relationships. R. Day and M. E. Lamb (Eds.). In Conceptualizing and Measuring Paternal Involvement. Mahway, NJ: Erlbaum. pp.141–168. Pedersen, F. A., Rubenstein, J. L. and Yarrow, L. J. (1979). “Infant Development in Father-Absent Families”. Journal of Genetic Psychology.135(1). pp.51–61. DOI: 10.1080/00221325.1979.10533416
• Plantin, L., Mansson, s. V. and Kearney, J. (2003). “Talking and Doing Fatherhood: On Fatherhood and Masculinity in Sweden and England”. Fathering: A Journal of Theory, Research, and Practice about Men as Fathers.1(1). pp.3–26. http://dx.doi.org/10.3149/fth.0101.3
• Pleck, J. H. (2010) “Paternal Involvement”. The Role of the Father in Child Development. (Ed. M. E. Lamb). In The Role of The Father in Child Development. pp.58-93
• Pleck, J. H. (2012). “Integrating Father Involvement in Parenting Research”. Parenting.12(2-3). pp.243-253. DOI: 10.1080/15295192.2012.683365
• Pleck, J. H. and Hofferth, S. (2008). “Mother Involvement as an Influence on Father Involvement With Early Adolescents”. Fathering.6(3). pp.267–286. DOI: 10.3149/fth.0603.267
• Radin, N. (1994). Primary-Caregiving Fathers in Intact Families. (Eds. A. E. Gottfried and A. W. Gottfied). In Redefining Families: Implications for Children’s Development. Boston: Springer. pp.11-54.
• Rossi, A. S. (1984). “Gender and Parenthood”. American Sociological Review.49(1). pp.1-19. DOI: 10.2307/2095554
• Tamis-LeMonda, C. and Cabrera, N. (1999). “Perspectives on Father Involvement: Research and Policy”. Social Policy Report. Society for Research in Child Development.13(2). pp.1–26.
• Tamis-LeMonda, C. S. and Cabrera, N. (2002). Cross-Disciplinary Challenges to the Study of Father Involvement. (Eds. C.S. Tamis-LeMonda and N. Cabrera). In Handbook Of Father Involvement: Multidisciplinary Perspectives. NJ, London: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers. pp.599-620.
• Tanfer, K. and Mott, F., “Meaning of Fatherhood For Men”. Report to the NICHD Workshop on Improving Data on Male Fertility and Family Formation, The Urban Institute, Washington D.C., 16-17 January, 1997.
• Verschueren, K. and Marcoen, A. (1999). “Representation of Self and Socioemotional Competence in Kindergartners: Differential and Combined Effects of Attachment to Mother and to Father”. Child Development. 70(1). pp.183-201. DOI: 10.1080/03004430214550
• Walzer, S. (1996). “Thinking About the Baby: Gender and Divisions of Infant Care”. Social Problems.43(2). pp.219–234. DOI: 10.2307/3096999.
• Williams, S. (2003). “What is Fatherhood?: Searching for the Reflexive Father”, Sociology, 42(3), pp.487-502.