Ortak Kimlik Olarak Vatandaşlık ve İlişkisel Otonomi

Yıl 2013, Cilt: 8 Sayı: 2, 181 - 204, 23.07.2014

Özge Çelik

Öz

Kişisel otonomi ve vatandaşlık yakın dönemde önemli ölçüde araştırılmış olmakla beraber aralarındaki bağıntı yeterince incelenmemiştir. Birincisi, kişisel otonomi vatandaşlığa dair olan haklar ve özgürlüklerden yararlanmanın ve görevleri üstlenmenin zeminini oluşturan öz-yönetim kapasitesini ifade eder. İkincisi, vatandaşlığın yasal, siyasal ve kimlik boyutlarının beslediği farklı ve bazen örtüşen aidiyet hisleri pratik bakımdan bireylerin kişisel otonomilerinin gördüğü saygıya ve tanınmasına bağlıdır. Bu makalede usule ilişkin, esasa ilişkin ve ilişkisel kişisel otonomi yaklaşımları incelenmiş ve ilişkisel yaklaşımın kimlik ve adalet taleplerinin sorunsallaştırdığı vatandaşlığın ortak kimlik boyutunun içerici potansiyeli üzerine tartışmalara yeni anlayışlar katacağı öne sürülmüştür.

Anahtar Kelimeler

kişisel otonomi, vatandaşlık, ilişkisel, usule ilişkin, esasa ilişkin, kimlik, adalet

Citizenship as Common Identity and Relational Autonomy

Öz

Personal autonomy and citizenship have recently separately received substantial scholarly attention, but the relationship between them is relatively unexplored. First, personal autonomy conveys the capacity for self-rule that constitutes the ground for enjoying the rights and freedoms and assuming the duties associated with citizenship. Second, different and sometimes overlapping feelings of belonging fostered by the legal, political, and identity dimensions of citizenship practically depend on the respect and recognition individuals receive for their personal autonomy. This article analyzes the procedural, substantive, and relational approaches to personal autonomy and argues that the relational approach contributes new insights into debates on the inclusive potential of the common identity dimension of citizenship, which has been challenged by identity and justice claims.

Anahtar Kelimeler

personal autonomy, citizenship, relational, procedural, substantive, identity, justice

Kaynakça

• BALIBAR, É. (1995) “Ambiguous Universality”, Differences, Vol. 7, No. 1, p.48-74.
• BARCLAY, L. (2000) “Autonomy and the Social Self”, Editors: MACKENZIE, C., and N. STOLJAR, Relational Autonomy: Feminist Perspectives on Autonomy, Agency, and the Social Self, Oxford University Press, New York, p. 52-71.
• BENSON, P. (1990) “Feminist Second Thoughts about Free Agency”, Hypatia, Vol. 5, No. 3, p. 47-64.
• BRISON, Susan J. (2000) “Relational Autonomy and Freedom of Expression”, Editors: MACKENZIE, C., and N. STOLJAR, Relational Autonomy: Feminist Perspectives on Autonomy, Agency, and the Social Self, Oxford University Press, New York, p. 280-299.
• BRUBAKER, William R. (1989) Immigration and the Politics of Citizenship in Europe and North America, University Press of America, Lanham.
• CARENS, Joseph H. (2000) Culture, Citizenship, and Community: A Contextual Exploration of Justice as Evenhandedness, Oxford University Press, New York.
• CHRISTMAN, J. (1989) The Inner Citadel: Essays on Individual Autonomy, Oxford University Press, New York.
• CHRISTMAN, John (1991), “Autonomy and Personal History”, Canadian Journal of Philosophy, Vol. 21, No. 1, p. 1-24.
• CHRISTMAN, J. (2002) Social and Political Philosophy, Routledge, New York.
• CONNOLLY, William E. (1991) Identity\Difference: Democratic Negotiations of Political Paradox, University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis.
• DAGGER, R. (2002) “Republican Citizenship”, Editors: ISIN, E. F., and B. S. TURNER, Handbook of Citizenship Studies, Sage, London, p. 145-158.
• DELANTY, Gerard (1997), “Models of Citizenship: Defining European Identity and Citizenship”, Citizenship Studies, Vol. 1, No. 3, p. 285-30
• GAUSS, Gerald F. (2005) “The Place of Autonomy within Liberalism”, Editors: CHRISTMAN, J., and J. ANDERSON, Autonomy and the Challenges to Liberalism, Cambridge University Press, New York, p. 272-306.
• HEYES, C. (2012) “Identity Politics”, Editor: ZALTA, E. N., The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Spring 2012 Edition), http://plato. stanford.edu/archives/spr2012/entries/identity-politics/.
• JOPPKE, C., and E. Morawska (2002) Toward Assimilation and Citizenship: Immigrants in Liberal Nation-States, Palgrave Macmillan, Hampshire. 203
• TULLY, J. (2002) “Reimagining Belonging in Circumstances of Cultural Diversity: A Citizen Approach”, Editors: HEDETOFT, U., and M. HJORT, Postnational Self: Belonging and Identity, University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis, p. 152-177. van den BRINK, Bert (2005) “Liberalism without Agreement: Political Autonomy and Agonistic Citizenship”, Editors: CHRISTMAN, J., and J. ANDERSON, Autonomy and the Challenges to Liberalism, Cambridge University Press, New York, p. 245-271.
• WALDRON, J. (2005) “Moral Autonomy and Personal Autonomy”, Editors: CHRISTMAN, J., and J. ANDERSON, Autonomy and the Challenges to Liberalism, Cambridge University Press, New York, p. 307-3
• YOUNG, Iris M. (1989) “Polity and Group Difference: A Critique of the Ideal of Universal Citizenship”, Ethics, Vol. 99, No. 2, p. 25027
• YOUNG, Iris M. (1990) Justice and the Politics of Difference, Princeton University Press, Princeton.