Research Article

Evaluation of Intraoperative Fluid Management

Volume: 8 Number: 1 January 1, 2022
  • Hakan Temel
  • Bilge Karslı *
  • Nurten Kayacan
  • Yesim Cetintas
  • Zekiye Bigat
TR EN

Evaluation of Intraoperative Fluid Management

Abstract

ABSTRACT Objective:Especially in large surgical procedures, it is recommended that the fluid treatment be performed according to the needs of the patient in the presence of hemodynamic monitoring during the operation. We aimed to review intraoperative fluid treatments and to increase awareness of intraoperative fluid management. Methods:The patients (393) who underwent general anesthesia were included in the study. According to the information of intraoperative fluid applications, the demographic characteristics of the patients and the amount and type of fluid that should be given according to the type of operation performed were determined. Results:In our study, the mean amount of fluid given to patients was found to be 2677.61 ml. The mean intraoperative fluid volume was higher in patients who were treated with IV vasopressors than in untreated patients (3477.27 ml). When compared with patients with ASA 1-2 group, the amount of fluid given to the patients in the ASA-3 group was high (2795 ml). Comparing the type of surgery and the amount of fluid given intraoperatively, we observed that the amount of intraoperative fluid was significantly higher in the high-risk surgical group (3601.65 ml). We can say that we are close to liberal practices as a liquid strategy. The use of balanced crystalloid with the closest content to plasma is the most preferred liquid type in our clinical practice. Conclusion:Due to the variability of the concepts of liberal and restrictive fluid regimen and the lack of standardized targeted clinical and physiological parameters, no specific evidence-based guideline or procedure specific fluid treatment could be demonstrated. In our study, we see that fluid replacement is performed under standard fluid treatment, which still can be considered liberal. We think that it can be useful to use hemodynamic monitoring methods more frequently in patients who need them, also in selected patient groups. Key Words: Fluid, Liberal, Restrictive, Perioperative, Crystalloid, Colloid

Keywords

References

  1. 1.Yeager MP, Spence BC. Perioperative Fluid Management: Current consensus and controversies. Semin Dial 2006; 19: 472-9.
  2. 2.Kaye AD, Riopelle JM. Intravasculer Fluid and Electrolyte Physiology. In: Miller RD. Miller’s Anesthesia (7th ed). Elsevier Churchill Livingstone: Philadelphia 2010; 1728-30.
  3. 3.Holte K, Sharrock NE, Kehlet H. Pathophysiology and clinical implications of perioperative fluid excess. Br J Anaesth 2002; 89: 622-32.
  4. 4.Chappel D, Jacob M, Hofmann-Kiefer K, Conzen P, Rehm M. A Rational Approach to Perioperative Fluid Management. Anesthesiology 2008; 109: 723-40.
  5. 5.Nisanevich V, Felsenstein I, Almogy G, Weissman C, Einav S, Matot I. Effect of intraoperative fluid management on outcome after intraabdominal surgery. Anesthesiology 2005; 103: 25-32.
  6. 6.Arkilic CF, Taguchi A, Sharma N, Ratnaraj J, Sessler DI, Read TE, Fleshman JW, Kurz A. Supplemental perioperative fluid administration increases tissue oxygen pressure. Surgery 2003; 133(1): 49-55.
  7. 7.Kimberger O, Fleischmann E, Brandt S, Kugener A, Kabon B, Hiltebrand L, Krejci V, Kurz A. Supplemental oxygen, but not supplemental crystalloid fluid, increases tissue oxygen tension in healthy and anastomotic colon in pigs. Anesth Analg 2007; 105(3):773-9.
  8. 8.Doherty M, Buggy D. Intraoperative fluids: how much is too much? J British Journal of Anaesthesia 2012; 109(1): 69-79.

Details

Primary Language

English

Subjects

Clinical Sciences

Journal Section

Research Article

Authors

Bilge Karslı * This is me
0000-0003-4231-8300
Türkiye

Nurten Kayacan This is me
0000-0003-3542-4375
Türkiye

Yesim Cetintas This is me
0000-0002-1742-9204
Kuzey Kıbrıs Türk Cumhuriyeti

Publication Date

January 1, 2022

Submission Date

February 8, 2021

Acceptance Date

April 6, 2021

Published in Issue

Year 2022 Volume: 8 Number: 1

Vancouver
1.Hakan Temel, Bilge Karslı, Nurten Kayacan, Yesim Cetintas, Zekiye Bigat. Evaluation of Intraoperative Fluid Management. Akd Med J. 2022 Jan. 1;8(1):33-41. doi:10.53394/akd.1037455