Güncel Kompozitlerin Farklı Tabakalama Teknikleriyle Uygulanmasının Mikro-sızıntı Üzerine Etkilerinin İncelenmesi

Öz

Amaç: Bu in vitro çalışmanın amacı, boya penetrasyon yöntemini kullanarak inkremental veya bulkfill tekniği ile uygulanan güncel kompozit materyallerin mikro-sızıntı potansiyelini değerlendirmektir. Gereç ve Yöntemler: Yeni çekilmiş 120 adet büyük azı dişe standart Black I kaviteler 3mm x 3mm x 4mm hazırlandı. Çalışmada bir nanohybrid Filtek™ Z550 , bir bulk-fill X-tra fil ve bir seramik içerikli bulk-fill kompozit Admira Fusion X-tra kullanıldı. Restorasyon yöntemi olarak bulk-fill ve inkremental uygulama teknikleri kullanıldı. Örnekler rastgele 6 gruba n = 20 ayrıldı. Restorasyon yapıldıktan sonra numuneler 1000 çevrimlik termal döngüye 5ºC-55ºC tabi tutuldu. Mikro-sızıntı testi, %1’lik metilen mavisi boyası kullanılarak uygulandı. Dişlerin kesitleri, boya penetrasyon derecesi açısından stereo mikroskop altında değerlendirildi. İstatistiksel analizler Kruskal-Wallis ve MannWhitney-U testleri ile gerçekleştirildi p=0,05 . Bulgular: Kompozit rezin grupları ile mikro-sızıntı sonuçları arasındaki ilişki istatistiksel olarak anlamlı bulunmuştur p

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Mikro-sızıntı, Bulk-fill, c-faktör, İnkremental, Ormoser

Investigation of the Effects of Novel Composites Applied with Different Layering Techniques on Microleakage

Abstract

Objective:The aim of this in vitro study was to evaluate the microleakage potential of novel composite materials applied with either the incremental or bulk fill technique using the dye penetration method. Material and Methods: Standard Black I cavities were prepared 3mm x 3mm x 4mm in 120 freshly extracted molar teeth. A nanohybrid Filtek™ Z550 , a bulk-fill X-tra fil and a ceramic reinforced bulk-fill composite Admira Fusion X-tra were tested. Bulk-fill and incremental application techniques were used as the restoration method. The specimens were randomly separated in 6 groups n=20 and the samples were thermal cycled for 1000 cycles 5ºC-55ºC after the restorative procedures. The microleakage test was applied using 1% methylene blue dye. Sections of the teeth were evaluated under a stereo microscope in terms of the degree of dye penetration. Statistical analyses were conducted with the Kruskal-Wallis and Mann-Whitney U tests p=0.05 . Results: The relationship between composite resin groups and microleakage results was statistically significant p

Keywords

• Microleakage, Bulk-fill, c-factor, Incremental, Ormocer

References

1. Sakaguchi RL, Peters MC, Nelson SR, Douglas WH, Poort HW. Effects of polymerization contraction in composite restorations. J Dent 1992; 20:178-82.
2. Eick JD, Welch FH. Polymerization shrinkage of posterior composite resins and its possible influence on postoperative sensitivity. Quintessence Int 1986; 17:103-11.
3. Bergenholtz G, Cox CF, Loesche WJ, Syed SA. Bacterial leakage around dental restorations: its effect on the dental pulp. J Oral Pathol 1982; 11:439-50.
4. Braga RR, Boaro LC, Kuroe T, Azevedo CL, Singer JM. Influence of cavity dimensions and their derivatives (volume and ‘C’ factor) on shrinkage stress development and microleakage of composite restorations. Dent Mater 2006; 22:818-23.
5. Kidd EA. Microleakage in relation to amalgam and composite restorations. A laboratory study. Br Dent J 1976; 141:305-10.
6. Going RE. Microleakage around dental restorations: A summarizing review. J Am Dent Assoc 1972; 84:1349-57.
7. El-Safty S, Silikas N, Watts DC. Creep deformation of restorative resin-composites intended for bulk-fill placement. Dent Mater 2012; 28:928-35.
8. Ruiz JL. Dental technique-restorations with resin-based, bulk-fill composites. Inside Dentistry 2010; 31.

9. Tagtekin DA, Yanikoglu FC, Bozkurt FO, Kologlu B, Sur H. Selected characteristics of an Ormocer and a conventional hybrid resin composite. Dent Mater 2004; 20:487-97.
10. M R, Sajjan GS, B NK, Mittal N. Effect of different placement techniques on marginal microleakage of deep class-II cavities restored with two composite resin formulations. J Conserv Dent 2010; 13:9-15.
11. Taylor MJ , Lynch E. Marginal adaptation. J Dent 1993; 21:265-73.
12. Versluis A, Douglas WH, Cross M, Sakaguchi RL. Does an incremental filling technique reduce polymerization shrinkage stresses? J Dent Res 1996; 75:871-8.
13. Bedran-de-Castro AK, Pereira PN, Pimenta LA, Thompson JY. Effect of thermal and mechanical load cycling on microtensile bond strength of a total-etch adhesive system. Oper Dent 2004; 29:150-6.
14. Garg N, Garg A. Textbook of Operative Dentistry, Bonding to Enamel and Dentin. 2nd ed. New Delhi: Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) Ltd., 2010:237-254
15. Yazici AR, Ozgunaltay G, Dayangac B. The effect of different types of flowable restorative resins on microleakage of Class V cavities. Oper Dent 2003; 28: 773-8.
16. Yadav G, Rehani U, Rana V. A comparative evaluation of marginal leakage of different restorative materials in deciduous molars: An in vitro study. Int J Clin Pediatr Dent 2012; 5:101-7.
17. Gamarra VSS, Borges GA, Junior LHB, Spohr AM. Marginal adaptation and microleakage of a bulk- fill composite resin photopolymerized with different techniques. Odontology 2018; 106:56-63.
18. Han SH, Park SH. Incremental and bulk filling techniques in different cavity configurations. Dental Materials 2016; 32:e23-e24.
19. Tomaszewska IM, Kearns JO, Ilie N, Fleming GJ. Bulk fill restoratives: To cap or not to cap--that is the question? J Dent 2015; 43:309-16.