BibTex RIS Cite

Tıp Fakültesi Dönem 6 Öğrencilerinin Hasta Güvenlik Kültürüne İlişkin Bilgi ve Tutumları

Year 2020, Volume: 6 Issue: 3, 357 - 363, 01.01.2020

Abstract

Amaç: Hasta güvenlik kültürünün geliştirilmesi, tıbbi hatalardan korunmak ve bu hataları en aza indirmek açısından önemlidir. Hasta güvenliği ilkeleri ve kavramları, tıp eğitim ve öğretiminin de önemli bir parçasıdır. Çalışmada tıp fakültesi dönem 6 öğrencilerinin hasta güvenlik kültürüne ilişkin bilgi ve tutumları incelenmiştir.Gereç ve Yöntemler: Araştırma kesitsel tiptedir. Tıp fakültesi dönem 6 öğrencilerinden 245 kişiye “Hasta Güvenliğine Yönelik Tutum Ölçeği” uygulanmıştır. Bu ölçekten alınan puan bağımlı değişken olarak, öğrencilerin özellikleri ise bağımsız değişkenler olarak tanımlanmıştır. Hasta güvenliğine yönelik tutum ile ilişkili bağımsız değişkenler t test ve varyans analizi ile test edilmiştir. Bulgular: Çalışmamızda, öğrencilerin hasta güvenliğine yönelik tutumları olumludur. Öğrencilerin %53,5’i “hasta güvenliği” tanımını, %38,4’ü ise “tıbbi hata” tanımını verilen seçenekler arasından doğru olarak yanıtlamıştır. Öğrenciler sıklıkla uzun çalışma saatleri nedeniyle oluşan yorgunluk ve stresin %84,1 ; iletişim bozukluklarının %58,8 ve ekip çalışmasının olmamasının %49,0 tıbbi hataların sebebi olduğunu düşünmektedirler. Yapılan bir tıbbi hatayla karşılaştığını ya da şahit olduğunu ifade eden katılımcıların oranı %11,8’dir. En sık karşılaştıkları ve/veya şahit oldukları tıbbi hata ise eksik ya da yetersiz tıbbi tedavidir %27,5 . Katılımcılar arasından; hastanede daha fazla süre geçirenlerin Tutum Ölçeği puanları 87,30±8,66 ve hasta güvenliği kavramının tanımını doğru yapanların Tutum Ölçeği puanları 86,82±8,17 diğerlerinden daha yüksektir sırası ile p=0,007 ve p=0,020 . Sonuç: Tıp fakültesi öğrencileri arasında hasta güvenliği kültürü ile ilgili tutumlar pek çok faktörden etkilenmekte ve farklılıklar göstermektedir. Öğrencilerin hasta güvenliği ile ilgili temel tutum ve algılarını anlamak, etkili eğitim programlarının tasarımı için kritik öneme sahiptir

References

  • World Health Organization. Patient Safety: Making health care safer. Geneva: World Health Organization, 2017.
  • Rafter N, Hickey A, Condell S, Conroy R, O’connor P, Vaughan D, Williams D. Adverse events in healthcare: Learning from mistakes. Q J Med 2015; 108:273-7.
  • World Health Organization. Human factors in patient safety review of topics and tools. Report for methods and measures working group of who patient safety. Geneva: 2009.
  • Institute of Medicine Committee on Data Standards for Patient Safety. Achieving a New Standard for Care. In: Aspden P, Corrigan JM, Wolcott J, Erickson SM, eds. Washington D.C: National Academies Press, 2004.
  • Leotsakos A, Ardolino A, Cheung R, Zheng H, Barraclough B, Walton M. Educating future leaders in patient safety. Journal of Multidisciplinary Healthcare 2014; 7:381-8.
  • World Health Organization. Patient safety curriculum guide: Multi-professional edition. Geneva: World Health Organization, 2011.
  • Patey R, Flin R, Cuthbertson BH, MacDonald L, Mearns K, Cleland J, Williams D. Patient safety: Helping medical students understand error in healthcare. Qual Saf Health Care 2007; 16:256-9.
  • Carruthers S, Lawton R, Sandars J, Howe A, Perry M. Attitudes to patient safety amongst medical students and tutors: Developing a reliable and valid measure. Medical Teacher 2009; 31:370-6.
  • Torun N, Dinçer M, Öztaş D, Demir P, Sanisoğlu SY. Tıp Fakültesi öğrencilerinin hasta güvenliği kültürüne ilişkin tutum ölçeği’nin Türkçe’ye uyarlanması. Journal of Contemporary Medicine 2018; 31(1):1-6.
  • Kohn LT, Corrigan JM, Donaldson MS. To err is human: Building a safer health system. In: Committee on Quality of Health Care in America eds. Why do errors happen. Institute of Medicine, Washington D.C: National Academy Press, 2000; 49-69.
  • Cooper JB, Gaba DM, Woods D, Blum LN. The National Patient Safety Foundation agenda for research and development in patient safety. Medscape General Medicine 2000; 2(3):38.
  • World Health Organization. World alliance for patient safety. WHO patient safety curriculum guide for medical schools. Geneva: 2009.
  • Liao JM, Etchegaray JM, Williams ST, Berger DH, Bell SK, Thomas EJ. Assessing medical students’ perceptions of patient safety: The medical student safety attitudes and professionalism survey. Academic Medicine 2014; 89(2):343-51.
  • Association of American Medical Colleges (AAMC). Report V Contemporary Issues in Medicine: Quality of Care. Medical School Objectives Project August 2001.
  • Liu H, Li Y, Zhao S, Jiao M, Lu Y, Liu J. Perceptions of patient safety culture among medical students: A crosssectional investigation in Heilongjiang Province, China. BMJ Open 2018; 8:1-9.
  • Leung GKK, Ang SBL, Lau TC, Neo HJ, Patil NG, Ti LK. Patient safety culture among medical students in Singapore and Hong Kong. Singapore Med J 2013; 54(9):501-5.
  • Leung GKK, Patil NG, Ip MSM. Introducing patient safety to undergraduate medical students. A pilot program delivered by health care administrators. Med Teach 2010; 32:547-51.
  • Myung SJ, Shin JS, Kim JH. The patient safety curriculum for undergraduate medical students as a first step toward improving patient safety. J Surg Educ 2012; 69:659-64.
  • World Health Organization. Regional Office for Europe. Data and statistics. ww.euro.who.int/en/health-topics/ Health-systems/patient-safety/data-and-statistics erişim tarihi: 27.03.2019
  • Gorgich EAC, Barfroshan S, Ghoreishi G, Yaghoobi M. Investigating the causes of medication errors and strategies to prevention of them from nurses and nursing student viewpoint. Global Journal of Health Science 2016; 8(8):220-7.
  • Woods A, Doan-Johnson S. Executive summary: Toward a taxonomy of nursing practice errors. Nurse Manage 2002; 33(10):45-8.
  • Ünal A, Seren S. Medical error reporting attitudes of healthcare personnel, barriers and solutions: A literature review. J Nurs Care 2016; 5(6):1-8.
  • Noble DJ, Pronovost PJ. Underreporting of patient safety ıncidents reduces health care’s ability to quantify and accurately measure harm reduction. J Patient Saf 2010;6(4): 247-50.
  • Dursun S,Bayram N, Aytaç S. Hasta güvenliği kültürü üzerine bir uygulama. Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi 2010; 8(1):1 -14.
  • Şerifoğlu UK, Sungur E. Kazaların Habercileri: Kaza habercisi olayların yönetimi ve Sağlık & Güvenlik Kültürü İlişkisi. IV. İş Sağlığı ve Güvenliği Kongresi Bildirileri. 20-21 Nisan 2007. Adana: MMO. Yayın No: E/2007/424, 2007.
  • Wu Y, Fujita S, Seto K, Ito S, Matsumoto K, Huang CC, Hasegawa T. The impact of nurse working hours on patient safety culture: A cross-national survey including Japan, the United States and Chinese Taiwan using the Hospital Survey on Patient Safety Culture. BMC Health Services Research 2013; 13:394.
  • Rogers AE, Hwang W, Scott LD, Aiken LH, Dinges DF. The working hours of hospital staff nurses and patient safety. Health Affairs 2004; 23(4):202-12.

Knowledge and Attitudes Towards Patient Safety Culture among Sixth Year Medical Students

Year 2020, Volume: 6 Issue: 3, 357 - 363, 01.01.2020

Abstract

Objective: Improving the patient safety culture in health care is important to prevent and minimize medical errors. Patient safety principles and concepts are also an important part of medical education and training. The aim of the study was to examine the knowledge, attitudes and related factors of patient safety culture among sixth year medical students.Material and Methods: “The Attitudes toward Patient Safety Questionnaire” was answered by 245 sixth year medical students in this cross-sectional study. The points obtained from the scale were defined as dependent variables and the students' characteristics were defined as independent variables. The relationship between the independent variables and the scales was analyzed using the t test and variance analysis.Results: The students' attitudes towards patient safety were positive with 53.5% of the students answering the definition of “patient safety” and 38.4% the definition of “medical error” correctly. Students often thought that fatigue and stress due to long working hours 84.1% ; communication disorders 58.8% and the lack of teamwork 49.0% were the cause of medical errors. The rate of participants who encountered or witnessed a medical error was 11.8%. The most common medical error that the participants encountered and/or witnessed was incomplete or inadequate medical treatment 27.5% . Among the participants, the Attitude Scale scores of those who had spent more time in the hospital 87.30 ± 8.66 and who had correctly defined the concept of “patient safety” 86.82 ± 8.17 were higher than the others p = 0.007 and p = 0.020, respectively .Conclusion: Attitudes about patient safety culture among the medical faculty students are affected by many factors and show differences. Understanding the students' basic attitudes and perceptions about patient safety is critical to the design of effective training programs

References

  • World Health Organization. Patient Safety: Making health care safer. Geneva: World Health Organization, 2017.
  • Rafter N, Hickey A, Condell S, Conroy R, O’connor P, Vaughan D, Williams D. Adverse events in healthcare: Learning from mistakes. Q J Med 2015; 108:273-7.
  • World Health Organization. Human factors in patient safety review of topics and tools. Report for methods and measures working group of who patient safety. Geneva: 2009.
  • Institute of Medicine Committee on Data Standards for Patient Safety. Achieving a New Standard for Care. In: Aspden P, Corrigan JM, Wolcott J, Erickson SM, eds. Washington D.C: National Academies Press, 2004.
  • Leotsakos A, Ardolino A, Cheung R, Zheng H, Barraclough B, Walton M. Educating future leaders in patient safety. Journal of Multidisciplinary Healthcare 2014; 7:381-8.
  • World Health Organization. Patient safety curriculum guide: Multi-professional edition. Geneva: World Health Organization, 2011.
  • Patey R, Flin R, Cuthbertson BH, MacDonald L, Mearns K, Cleland J, Williams D. Patient safety: Helping medical students understand error in healthcare. Qual Saf Health Care 2007; 16:256-9.
  • Carruthers S, Lawton R, Sandars J, Howe A, Perry M. Attitudes to patient safety amongst medical students and tutors: Developing a reliable and valid measure. Medical Teacher 2009; 31:370-6.
  • Torun N, Dinçer M, Öztaş D, Demir P, Sanisoğlu SY. Tıp Fakültesi öğrencilerinin hasta güvenliği kültürüne ilişkin tutum ölçeği’nin Türkçe’ye uyarlanması. Journal of Contemporary Medicine 2018; 31(1):1-6.
  • Kohn LT, Corrigan JM, Donaldson MS. To err is human: Building a safer health system. In: Committee on Quality of Health Care in America eds. Why do errors happen. Institute of Medicine, Washington D.C: National Academy Press, 2000; 49-69.
  • Cooper JB, Gaba DM, Woods D, Blum LN. The National Patient Safety Foundation agenda for research and development in patient safety. Medscape General Medicine 2000; 2(3):38.
  • World Health Organization. World alliance for patient safety. WHO patient safety curriculum guide for medical schools. Geneva: 2009.
  • Liao JM, Etchegaray JM, Williams ST, Berger DH, Bell SK, Thomas EJ. Assessing medical students’ perceptions of patient safety: The medical student safety attitudes and professionalism survey. Academic Medicine 2014; 89(2):343-51.
  • Association of American Medical Colleges (AAMC). Report V Contemporary Issues in Medicine: Quality of Care. Medical School Objectives Project August 2001.
  • Liu H, Li Y, Zhao S, Jiao M, Lu Y, Liu J. Perceptions of patient safety culture among medical students: A crosssectional investigation in Heilongjiang Province, China. BMJ Open 2018; 8:1-9.
  • Leung GKK, Ang SBL, Lau TC, Neo HJ, Patil NG, Ti LK. Patient safety culture among medical students in Singapore and Hong Kong. Singapore Med J 2013; 54(9):501-5.
  • Leung GKK, Patil NG, Ip MSM. Introducing patient safety to undergraduate medical students. A pilot program delivered by health care administrators. Med Teach 2010; 32:547-51.
  • Myung SJ, Shin JS, Kim JH. The patient safety curriculum for undergraduate medical students as a first step toward improving patient safety. J Surg Educ 2012; 69:659-64.
  • World Health Organization. Regional Office for Europe. Data and statistics. ww.euro.who.int/en/health-topics/ Health-systems/patient-safety/data-and-statistics erişim tarihi: 27.03.2019
  • Gorgich EAC, Barfroshan S, Ghoreishi G, Yaghoobi M. Investigating the causes of medication errors and strategies to prevention of them from nurses and nursing student viewpoint. Global Journal of Health Science 2016; 8(8):220-7.
  • Woods A, Doan-Johnson S. Executive summary: Toward a taxonomy of nursing practice errors. Nurse Manage 2002; 33(10):45-8.
  • Ünal A, Seren S. Medical error reporting attitudes of healthcare personnel, barriers and solutions: A literature review. J Nurs Care 2016; 5(6):1-8.
  • Noble DJ, Pronovost PJ. Underreporting of patient safety ıncidents reduces health care’s ability to quantify and accurately measure harm reduction. J Patient Saf 2010;6(4): 247-50.
  • Dursun S,Bayram N, Aytaç S. Hasta güvenliği kültürü üzerine bir uygulama. Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi 2010; 8(1):1 -14.
  • Şerifoğlu UK, Sungur E. Kazaların Habercileri: Kaza habercisi olayların yönetimi ve Sağlık & Güvenlik Kültürü İlişkisi. IV. İş Sağlığı ve Güvenliği Kongresi Bildirileri. 20-21 Nisan 2007. Adana: MMO. Yayın No: E/2007/424, 2007.
  • Wu Y, Fujita S, Seto K, Ito S, Matsumoto K, Huang CC, Hasegawa T. The impact of nurse working hours on patient safety culture: A cross-national survey including Japan, the United States and Chinese Taiwan using the Hospital Survey on Patient Safety Culture. BMC Health Services Research 2013; 13:394.
  • Rogers AE, Hwang W, Scott LD, Aiken LH, Dinges DF. The working hours of hospital staff nurses and patient safety. Health Affairs 2004; 23(4):202-12.
There are 27 citations in total.

Details

Primary Language Turkish
Journal Section Research Article
Authors

Emine Gülçin Ay This is me

Publication Date January 1, 2020
Published in Issue Year 2020 Volume: 6 Issue: 3

Cite

APA Ay, E. G. (2020). Tıp Fakültesi Dönem 6 Öğrencilerinin Hasta Güvenlik Kültürüne İlişkin Bilgi ve Tutumları. Akdeniz Tıp Dergisi, 6(3), 357-363.