Ortodontide Güncel Pekiştirme Uygulamaları: Literatür Derlemesi

Year 2021, Volume: 7 Issue: 1, 27 - 35, 01.01.2021

Fatih Bayır Esra Bolat

Abstract

Pekiştirme dönemi uzun zaman alan ortodontik tedavinin son ve önemli bir aşamasıdır. Pekiştirme dönemi malokluzyonun tipine, hastanın yaşına, uygulanan tedavi planına ve diğer faktölere göre farklılıklar göstermekle birlikte genel olarak sabit ve hareketli olarak sınıflandırılabilir. Pekiştirme dönemi, son yıllarda tedavi sonrası hasta takip sürelerinin uzaması ve hastaların sosyokültürel seviyelerinin artmasıyla birlikte ortodontik tedavinin daha fazla önem verilen bir aşaması olmuştur. Günümüzde kullanıma yeni sunulan ürünlerle hem hasta uyumu artırılmaya hem de daha etkin pekiştirme sağlanmaya çalışılmaktadır. Çalışmamızda pekiştirme aşamasına genel bir bakış ve güncel birkaç pekiştirme tipinin özelliklerine değinilecektir

Keywords

Ortodontik pekiştirme apareyleri, Nüks, Pekiştirme programı

Current Retention Applications in Orthodontics: Literature Review

Abstract

The retention period is the last and important stage of long-term orthodontic treatment. Although the ideal retention appliance decision for the patient differs according to the initial malocclusion, the patient’s age, treatment planning, and other factors, the retention appliances can generally be classified as removable and fixed appliances. The retention period has given increased attention recently with the increased follow-up period after orthodontic treatments and esthetic awareness and expectations of the patients. There are recent studies on new methods or new materials for the most reliable and efficient retention type for orthodontic patients in the literature. In this review, an overview of the retention period, and the features, advantages, disadvantages, and indications of the current retention types will be discussed

Keywords

Orthodontic retainers, Recurrence, Reinforcement schedule

References

• Ülgen M. Ortodontik tedavi prensipleri. 1993.
• Melrose C, Millett DT. Toward a perspective on ortho- dontic retention? Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1998; 113(5):507-14.
• Little RM, Riedel RA, Artun J. An evaluation of chan- ges in mandibular anterior alignment from 10 to 20 years postretention. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1988; 93(5):423-8.
• Proffit WR, Fields Jr HW, Sarver DM. Contemporary orthodontics, 4th ed. Louis: Elsevier Health Sciences, 2006.
• Angle E. Classification of malocclusion. Dental Cosmos. 3th ed. Philadelphia: 1899.
• Andrews LF. The six keys to normal occlusion. Am J Orthod 1972; 62(3):296-309.
• Roth RH. The maintenance system and occlusal dyna- mics. Dent Clin North Am 1976; 20(4):761-88.
• Lundstrom AF. Malocclusion of the teeth regarded as a problem in connection with the apical base. Int J Orthod and Oral Surg 1925; 11:1109-33.
• Rogers AP. Making facial muscles our allies in treatment and retention. Dental Cosmos 1922; 64:711-30.
• Proffıt WR. Equilibrium theory revisited: Factors influen- cing position of the teeth. The Angle Orthodontist 1978; 48(3):175-86.
• Littlewood SJ, Russell JS, Spencer RJ. Why do orthodon- tic cases relapse? Orthodontic Update 2009; 2(2):38-44.
• Jäderberg S, Feldmann I, Engström C. Removable ther- moplastic appliances as orthodontic retainers-a prospec- tive study of different wear regimens. The European Jour- nal of Orthodontics 2011; 34(4):475-9.
• Ramazanzadeh B, Ahrari F, Hosseini Z-S. The retention characteristics of Hawley and vacuum-formed retainers with different retention protocols. J Clin Exp Dent 2018; 10(3):224-31.
• Rinchuse DJ, Miles PG, Sheridan J. Orthodontic reten- tion and stability: A clinical perspective. J Clin Orthod 2007; 41(3):125-32.
• Sahoo KC, Pattanaik S. Modified wrap-around retainer: A quick tip to enhance the retention of the appliance. J Clin Diagn Res 2016; 10(7):ZH01.
• Forde K, Storey M, Littlewood SJ, Scott P, Luther F, Kang J. Bonded versus vacuum-formed retainers: A randomi- zed controlled trial. Part 1: Stability, retainer survival, and patient satisfaction outcomes after 12 months. Eur J Orthod 2018; 40(4):387-98.
• Mollov ND, Lindauer SJ, Best AM, Shroff B, Tufekci E. Patient attitudes toward retention and perceptions of treatment success. Angle Orthod 2010; 80(4):468-73.
• Ahn HW, Moon SC, Baek SH. Morphometric evaluation of changes in the alveolar bone and roots of the maxillary anterior teeth before and after en masse retraction using cone-beam computed tomography. Angle Orthod 2013; 83(2):212-21.
• Zafeiriadis AA, Karamouzos A, Athanasiou AE, Eliades T, Palaghias G. An in vivo spectrophotometric evaluation of Vivera and Essix clear thermoplastic retainer discolo- uration. Australasian Orthodontic Journal 2018; 34(1):3- 10.
• Sauget E, Covell Jr DA, Boero RP, Lieber WS. Compari- son of occlusal contacts with use of hawley and clear over- lay retainers. Angle Orthod 1997; 67(3):223-30.
• Kaya Y, Tunca M, Keskin S. Comparison of two reten- tion appliances with respect to clinical effectiveness. Turk J Orthod 2019; 32(2):72-8.
• Rinchuse DJ, Sassouni V. An evaluation of functional occlusal interferences in orthodontically treated and untreated subjects. Angle Orthod 1983; 53(2):122-30.
• Pravindevaprasad A, Therese BA. Tooth positioners and their effects on treatment outcome. J Nat Sci Biol Med
• Park Y, Hartsfield JK, Katona TR, Eugene Roberts W. Tooth positioner effects on occlusal contacts and treat- ment outcomes. Angle Orthod 2008; 78(6):1050-6.
• Zachrisson BU. Long-term experience with direct-bonded retainers: Update and clinical advice. J Clin Orthod 2007; 41(12):728-37.
• Artun J, Spadafora AT, Shapiro PA. A 3-year follow-up study of various types of orthodontic canine-to-canine retainers. Eur J Orthod 1997; 19(5):501-9.
• Sinclair PM, Little RM. Maturation of untreated normal occlusions. Am J Orthod 1983; 83(2):114-23.
• Cerny R. Permanent fixed lingual retention. J Clin Orthod 2001; 35(12):728-32.
• Pancherz H, Bjerklin K, Hashemi K. Late adult skeleto- facial growth after adolescent Herbst therapy: A 32-year longitudinal follow-up study. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2015; 147(1):19-28.
• Moffitt AH, Raina J. Long-term bonded retention after closure of maxillary midline diastema. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2015; 148(2):238-44.
• Egli F, Bovali E, Kiliaridis S, Cornelis MA. Indirect vs direct bonding of mandibular fixed retainers in ortho- dontic patients: Comparison of retainer failures and post- treatment stability. A 2-year follow-up of a single-center randomized controlled trial. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2017; 151(1):15-27.
• Gunay F, Oz AA. Clinical effectiveness of 2 orthodon- tic retainer wires on mandibular arch retention. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2018; 153(2):232-8.
• Watted N, Wieber M, Teuscher T, Schmitz N. Compari- son of incisor mobility after insertion of canine-to-canine lingual retainers bonded to two or to six teeth a clinical study. J Orofac Orthop 2001; 62(5):387-96.
• Renkema A-M, Renkema A, Bronkhorst E, Katsaros C. Long-term effectiveness of canine-to-canine bonded flexible spiral wire lingual retainers. Am J Orthod Dento- facial Orthop 2011; 139(5):614-21.
• Arnold DT, Dalstra M, Verna C. Torque resistance of different stainless steel wires commonly used for fixed retainers in orthodontics. Journal of Orthodontics 2016; 43(2):121-9.
• Maddalone M, Rota E, Mirabelli L, Venino PM, Porcaro G. Clinical evaluation of bond failures and survival of mandibular canine-to-canine bonded retainers during a 12-year time span. Int J Clin Pediatr Dent 2017; 10(4):330- 4.
• Al-Moghrabi D, Johal A, O’Rourke N, Donos N, Pandis N, Gonzales-Marin C, Fleming PS. Effects of fixed vs remo- vable orthodontic retainers on stability and periodontal health: 4-year follow-up of a randomized controlled trial. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2018; 154(2):167-74
• Habegger M, Renkema A-M, Bronkhorst E, Fudalej PS, Katsaros C. A survey of general dentists regarding ortho- dontic retention procedures. Eur J Orthod 2017; 39(1):69- 75.
• Rose E, Frucht S, Jonas IE. Clinical comparison of a multistranded wire and a direct-bonded polyethylene ribbon--reinforced resin composite used for lingual reten- tion. Quintessence Int 2002; 33(8):579-83.
• Ferreira ZA, de Carvalho EK, Mitsudo RS, Bergamo PMdS. Bondable reinforcement ribbon: Clinical applica- tions. Quintessence Int 2000; 31(8):547-52.
• Sfondrini MF, Fraticelli D, Castellazzi L, Scribante A, Gandini P. Clinical evaluation of bond failures and survi- val between mandibular canine-to-canine retainers made of flexible spiral wire and fiber-reinforced composite. J Clin Exp Dent 2014; 6(2):145-9.
• Freilich MA, Meiers JC, Duncan JP, Goldberg AJ. Fiber- reinforced composites in clinical dentistry. Carol Stream, Quintessence Publishing (IL), 2000.
• Cacciafesta V, Sfondrini MF, Lena A, Scribante A, Vallittu PK, Lassila LV. Force levels of fiber-reinforced composites and orthodontic stainless steel wires: A 3-point bending test. American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics 2008; 133(3):410-3.
• Oshagh M, Heidary S, Nazhvani AD, Koohpeima F, Hosseinabadi OK. Evaluation of histological impacts of three types of orthodontic fixed retainers on periodontium of rabbits. J Dent (Shiraz) 2014; 15(3):104-11.
• Amundsen O, Wisth P. Clinical pearl: LingLockTM-the flossable fixed retainer. J Orthod 2005; 32(4):241-3.
• Aycan M, Goymen M. Comparison of the different reten- tion appliances produced using CAD/CAM and conven- tional methods and different surface roughening methods. Lasers Med Sci 2019; 34(2):287-96.
• Edwards JG. A surgical procedure to eliminate rotational relapse. Am J Orthod 1970; 57(1):35-46.
• Meng M, Lv C, Yang Q, He S, Wu S, Liu Y, Zou J, Zhou X, Chen S. Expression of proteins of elastic fibers and collagen type I in orthodontically rotated teeth in rats. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2018; 154(2):249-59.
• Reitan K. Tissue rearrangement during retention of orthodontically rotated teeth. The Angle Orthodontist 1959; 29(2):105-13.
• Brain WE. The effect of surgical transsection of free gingi- val fibers on the regression of orthodontically rotated teeth in the dog. Am J Orthod 1969; 55(1):50-70.
• Boese LR. Fiberotomy and reproximation without lower retention, nine years in retrospect: Part I. Angle Orthod
• Nase JB, Suzuki JB. Osteonecrosis of the jaw and oral bisphosphonate treatment. J Am Dent Assoc 2006; 137(8):1115-9
• Affairs ADACoS. Dental management of patients recei- ving oral bisphosphonate therapy: Expert panel recom- mendations. J Am Dent Assoc 2006; 137(8):1144-50.
• Rinchuse DJ, Rinchuse DJ, Sprecher R. Clinical pharma- cology for the orthodontist. Am J Orthod 1981; 79(3):273- 81.
• Zahrowski JJ. Bisphosphonate treatment: An orthodontic concern calling for a proactive approach. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2007; 131(3):311-20.
• Liu L, Igarashi K, Haruyama N, Saeki S, Shinoda H, Mitani H. Effects of local administration of clodronate on orthodontic tooth movement and root resorption in rats. Eur J Orthod 2004; 26(5):469-73.
• Rinchuse DJ, Rinchuse DJ, Sosovicka MF, Robison JM, Pendleton R. Orthodontic treatment of patients using bisphosphonates: A report of 2 cases. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2007; 131(3):321-6.
• Lotwala RB, Greenlee GM, Ott SM, Hall SH, Huang GJ. Bisphosphonates as a risk factor for adverse orthodontic outcomes: A retrospective cohort study. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2012; 142(5):625-34.
• Krishnan S, Pandian S, Kumar A. Effect of bisphospho- nates on orthodontic tooth movement-an update. J Clin Diagn Res 2015; 9(4):ZE01-5.
• Khasraw M, Ashley D, Wheeler G, Berk M. Using lithium as a neuroprotective agent in patients with cancer. BMC medicine 2012; 10(1):131.
• Vestergaard P, Rejnmark L, Mosekilde L. Reduced rela- tive risk of fractures among users of lithium. Calcif Tissue Int 2005; 77(1):1-8.
• Pan J, He S, Yin X, Li Y, Zhou C, Zou S. Lithium enhan- ces alveolar bone formation during orthodontic retention in rats. Orthod Craniofac Res 2017; 20(3):146-51.
• Stepan JJ. Strontium ranelate: In search for the mecha- nism of action. J Bone Miner Metab 2013; 31(6):606-12.
• Brennan TC, Rybchyn MS, Green W, Atwa S, Conigrave AD, Mason RS. Osteoblasts play key roles in the mecha- nisms of action of strontium ranelate. Br J Pharmacol 2009; 157(7):1291-300.
• European Medicines Agency, 2013. PRAC recom- mends restriction in the use of Protelos/Osseor. (Acces- sed en_GB/document_library/ WC500142507.pdf).
• Press_release/2013/04/
• Chung H, Dai T, Sharma SK, Huang Y-Y, Carroll JD, Hamblin MR. The nuts and bolts of low-level laser (light) therapy. Ann Biomed Eng 2012; 40(2):516-33.
• Young SR, Dyson M, Bolton P. Effect of light on calcium uptake by macrophages. Laser Therapy 1990; 2(2):53-7.
• Swidi AJ, Taylor RW, Tadlock LP, Buschang PH. Recent advances in orthodontic retention methods: A review article. Journal of the World Federation of Orthodontists 2018; 7(1):6-12.
• Kim SJ, Moon SU, Kang SG, Park YG. Effects of low-level laser therapy after Corticision on tooth move- ment and paradental remodeling. Lasers Surg Med 2009; 41(7):524-33.
• Lau E, Al-Dujaili S, Guenther A, Liu D, Wang L, You L. Effect of low-magnitude, high-frequency vibration on osteocytes in the regulation of osteoclasts. Bone 2010; 46(6):1508-15.
• Schaffler MB, Kennedy OD. Osteocyte signaling in bone. Curr Osteoporos Rep 2012; 10(2):118-25.
• Yadav S, Assefnia A, Gupta H, Vishwanath M, Kalajzic Z, Allareddy V, Nanda R. The effect of low-frequency mechanical vibration on retention in an orthodontic relapse model. Eur J Orthod 2016; 38(1):44-50.
• Maylia E, Nokes LD. The use of ultrasonics in orthopaedics-a review. Technol Health Care 1999; 7(1):1- 28.
• Tanzer M, Harvey E, Kay A, Morton P, Bobyn J. Effect of noninvasive low intensity ultrasound on bone growth into porous‐coated implants. J Orthop Res 1996; 14(6):901-6.
• Siska PA, Gruen GS, Pape HC. External adjuncts to enhance fracture healing: What is the role of ultrasound? Injury 2008; 39(10):1095-105.
• Jawad MM, Husein A, Alam MK, Hassan R, Shaari R. Overview of non-invasive factors (low level laser and low intensity pulsed ultrasound) accelerating tooth movement during orthodontic treatment. Lasers Med Sci 2014; 29(1):367-72.