Öğretmenlerin proaktivite, psikolojik iyi oluş ve mesleki doyumlarının incelenmesi

Öz

Araştırmanın amacı: öğretmenlerin proaktivite, psikolojik iyi oluş ve mesleki doyum düzeylerinin incelenmesi olarak belirlenmiştir. Belirlenen amaca ulaşabilmek için nicel araştırma yöntemlerinden ilişkisel tarama modeli kullanılmıştır. Belirlenen amaç kapsamında ilk olarak kıdem, yakın arkadaş sayısı, memlekette/gurbette çalışma, öğretmen/yönetici olma, medeni durum açısından anlamlı farklılık olup olmadığına bakılmıştır. İkinci olarak proaktivite, psikolojik iyi oluş ve mesleki doyum arasında anlamlı ilişki olup olmadığı araştırılmıştır. Araştırmanın çalışma grubu Kilis’te görev yapan 162 öğretmenden oluşmaktadır. Veri toplarken “Kısaltılmış Proaktivite Ölçeği”, “Psikolojik İyi Oluş ölçeği”, “Mesleki Doyum Ölçeği” ve “Kişisel Bilgi Formu” kullanılmıştır. Verilerin analizinde bağımsız örneklem t-testi, ANOVA, Pearson korelasyon katsayısı ve adımsal regresyon analizi kullanılmıştır. Araştırma sonucunda proaktivite, psikolojik iyi oluş ve mesleki doyum değişkenleri arasında pozitif yönlü anlamlı ilişkiler bulunmuştur. Demografik değişkenler açısından bakıldığında proaktivitenin kıdem ve yakın arkadaş sayısına göre farklılaştığı; psikolojik iyi oluşun yakın arkadaş sayısı ve öğretmen/yönetici olma durumuna göre farklılaştığı; mesleki doyum değişkeninin ise kıdem, yakın arkadaş sayısı ve memlekette/gurbette çalışma durumuna göre farklılaştığı belirlenmiştir. Medeni durum değişkenine göre araştırmanın hiçbir değişkeninde farklılık bulunmadığı görülmüştür.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• proaktivite
• psikolojik iyi oluş
• mesleki doyum

Examination of teachers' proactivity, psychological well-being and professional satisfaction

Abstract

The aim of the study was determined as: examining the proactivity, psychological well-being and professional satisfaction levels of teachers. In order to reach the determined purpose, relational survey model, one of the quantitative research methods, was used. Within the scope of the determined purpose, firstly, it was examined whether there was a significant difference in terms of seniority, number of close friends, working in hometown/abroad, being a teacher/administrator, marital status. Secondly, it was investigated whether there is a significant relationship between proactivity, psychological well-being and professional satisfaction. The study group of the research consists of 162 teachers working in Kilis. "Abbreviated Proactivity Scale", "Psychological Well-being Scale", "Professional Satisfaction Scale" and "Personal Information Form" were used to collect data. Independent sample t-test, ANOVA, Pearson correlation coefficient and stepwise regression analysis were used to analyse the data. As a result of the study, positive significant relationships were found between proactivity, psychological well-being and occupational satisfaction variables. In terms of demographic variables, it was determined that proactivity differed according to seniority and number of close friends; psychological well-being differed according to number of close friends and being a teacher/administrator; and professional satisfaction differed according to seniority, number of close friends and working in hometown/abroad. There was no difference in any variable of the study according to marital status.

Keywords

• Proactivity
• Psychological Well-Being
• Professional Satisfaction

References

1. Ağaçbacak, P. M. (2019). Pozitif Psikoloji bağlamında sınıf öğretmenlerinin psikolojik iyi oluş düzeyleri ile özyeterlik inançları ve örgütsel bağlılık davranışları arasındaki ilişkinin incelenmesi Examining the relationship between classroom teachers' psychological well-being levels, self-efficacy beliefs and organisational commitment behaviours in the context of Positive Psychology (Doctoral Dissertation). Marmara University.
2. Agaoğlu, O. (2011). Bilim ve sanat merkezlerinde görev yapan yönetici ve öğretmenlerin iş doyumu Job satisfaction of administrators and teachers working in science and art centres (Master Thesis). Ankara University.
3. Akın, A., Abacı, R., Kaya, M. & Arıcı, N. (2011). Kısaltılmış proaktif kişilik ölçeği’nin (KPÖ) Türkçe formunun geçerlik ve güvenirliği. Validity and reliability of the Turkish version of the abbreviated proactive personality scale (APS) Paper presented at the ICES11 International Conference on Educational Sciences, June, 22-25, Famagusta, Cyprus.
4. Akıtıcı, S., & Öztürk, M. (2014). Araştırma görevlilerinin iş doyumlarının bireysel ve demografik açıdan incelenmesi: Süleyman Demirel Üniversitesi örneği. Investigation of job satisfaction of research assistants in terms of individual and demographic aspects: The case of Süleyman Demirel University Journal of Süleyman Demirel University Faculty of Economics and Administrative Sciences, 21(2), 667-692.
5. Alanoğlu, M. & Karabatak, S. (2018). Aday öğretmenlerin proaktif kişilik özellikleri ile örgütsel bağlılıkları arasındaki ilişkinin incelenmesi. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/333106155_ADAY_OGRETMENLERIN_PROAKTIF_KISILIK_OZELLIKLERI_ILE_ORGUTSEL_BAGLILIKLARI_ARASINDAKI_ILISKI
6. Altınkurt, Y., & Yılmaz, K. (2014). Öğretmenlerin mesleki profesyonelliği ile iş doyumları arasındaki ilişki. The relationship between teachers' professionalism and job satisfaction Sakarya University Journal of Education, 4(2), 57-71. https://doi.org/10.19126/suje.46033
7. Anderson, A. R., & Fowers, B. J. (2020). An exploratory study of friendship characteristics and their relations with hedonic and eudaimonic wellbeing. J. Soc. Pers. Relat. 37, 260–280. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265407519861152 Arfianto, M.A., Mustikasari, M., & Wardani, I.Y. (2020). Is social support related to psychological wellbeing in working mother? Jurnal Keperawatan Jiwa (JKJ): Persetuan Perawat Nasional Indonesia, 8(4), 505-514. https://doi.org/10.26714/jkj.8.4.2020.505-514
8. Aslan, Ş., & Uyar, S. (2020). Çalışma yaşam kalitesi ve proaktif çalışma davranışının bireysel ve kurumsal değişkenlerle ilişkileri. The relationships of quality of work life and proactive work behaviour with individual and institutional variables Bolu Abant Izzet Baysal University Journal of Institute of Social Sciences, 20(3), 779-811. https://doi.org/10.11616/basbed.v20i56819.787410

9. Atan, A. (2020). 5-6 yaş çocuklarda psı̇kolojı̇k ı̇yı̇ oluş: bı̇r model önerı̇sı̇ ve ebeveynler ı̇le öğretmenlerı̇n kı̇şı̇lı̇k tı̇plerı̇, ego durumları ve psı̇kolojı̇k ı̇yı̇ oluş düzeylerı̇nı̇n yordayıcı rolü. Psychological well-being in 5-6 year old children: a model proposal and the predictive role of personality types, ego states and psychological well-being levels of parents and teachers (Doctoral Dissertation). Pamukkale University.
10. Aydoğan, İ. (2019). Öğretmenlerin psikolojik iyi oluş düzeylerinin yordayıcısı olarak okul iklimi algıları Teachers' perceptions of school climate as a predictor of their psychological well-being levels (Master Thesis). İstanbul Sabahattin Zaim University.
11. Başaran, İ. E. (2008). Örgütsel davranış ve insanın üretim gücü. Organisational behaviour and human production power Siyasal Bookstore.
12. Bateman, T. S., & Crant, J. M. (1993). The proactive component of organizational behavior: A measure and correlates. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 14(2), 103–118. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.4030140202
13. Bertolino, M., Truxillo, D. M., & Fraccaroli, F. (2011). Age as moderator of the relationship of proactive personality with training motivation, perceived career development from training, and training behavioral intentions. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 32(2), 248-263. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.670
14. Bil, E. (2018). Ortaöğretim okullarının öğrenen örgüt, örgütsel güven ve iş doyumu düzeyleri arasındaki ilişki. The relationship between learning organisation, organisational trust and job satisfaction levels of secondary schools (Doctoral Dissertation). Ankara University.
15. Bindl, U. K., & Parker, S. K. (2011). Proactive work behavior: Forward-thinking and change-oriented action in organizations. In APA handbook of industrial and organizational psychology, Vol 2: Selecting and developing members for the organization. (pp. 567-598). American Psychological Association. https://doi.org/10.1037/12170-019
16. Bolino, M. C., Valcea, S., & Harvey, J. (2010). Employee, manage thyself: The potentiallynegative implications of expecting employees to behave proactively. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 83, 325-345. https://doi.org/10.1348/096317910X493134
17. Cambridge Dictionary. (2020). https://dictionary.cambridge.org/dictionary/turkish/proactive.
18. Chan, D. (2006). Interactive effects of situational judgment effectiveness and proactive personality on work perceptions and work outcomes. The Journal of applied psychology, 91(2), 475-81. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.91.2.475
19. Chan, S. H., & Qiu, H. H. (2011). Loneliness, job satisfaction, and organizational commitment of migrant workers: Empirical evidence from China. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 22(05), 1109-1127 https://doi.org/10.1080/09585192.2011.556785
20. Chen, X., Zou, Y., & Gao, H. (2021). Role of neighborhood social support in stress coping and psychological wellbeing during the COVID-19 pandemic: Evidence from Hubei, China. Health & Place, 69, 102532 - 102532. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.healthplace.2021.102532
21. Coombs, R.H. (1991). Marital status and personal well-being: a literature review. Family Relations, 40, 97-102. https://doi.org/10.2307/585665
22. Crant, J. M. (2000). Proactive behavior in organizations. Journal of Management, 26, 435-462. https://doi.org/10.1177/014920630002600304
23. Çanak, M. (2014). Ortaöğretim kurumlarında görev yapan öğretmenlerin iş doyumlarının incelenmesi. Investigation of job satisfaction of teachers working in secondary education institutions OPUS International Journal of Social Research, 4(7), 7-26.
24. Çelebi, E. (2016). Yaşlı ve çocuk grupları ile çalışan psikologlarda mesleki tükenmişlik, psikolojik iyi oluş ve yaşam kalitesi düzeylerinin incelenmesi Investigation of occupational burnout, psychological well-being and quality of life levels in psychologists working with elderly and children groups (Master Thesis). Beykent University.
25. Diener, E., Wirtz, D., Toy, W., Kim-Prieto, C., Choi, D., Oishi, S., & Biswas-Diener, R. (2010). New well-being measures: Short scales to assess flourishing and positive and negativefeelings. Social Indicators Research, 97, 143-156. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-009-9493-y
26. Dorociak, K.E., Rupert, P.A., & Zahniser, E. (2017). Work life, well-being, and self-care across the professional lifespan of psychologists. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 48, 429–437. https://doi.org/10.1037/pro0000160
27. Dost, M. T., & Cenkseven, F. (2008). Öğretim elemanlarının sosyodemografik değişkenlere ve üniversitelerini değerlendirmelerine göre iş doyumları. Job satisfaction of lecturers according to sociodemographic variables and their evaluation of their universities. Education and Science, 33(148), 28-39.
28. Dündar, Z., & Demirli, C. (2018). Medeni durumları farklı olan bireylerin psikolojik iyi olma düzeylerinin incelenmesi. Investigation of psychological well-being levels of individuals with different marital status Educational Reflections, 2(2), 1-10.
29. Emlek, S. (2005). İlköğretim okullarında görev yapan yönetici ve öğretmenlerin iş doyum ve mesleki tükenmişlik düzeyleri arasındaki ilişki The relationship between job satisfaction and professional burnout levels of primary school administrators and teachers (Master Thesis). Ege University.
30. Erdil, O., Keskin, H., İmamoğlu, S. Z. & Erat, S. (2004). Yönetim tarzı ve çalıma koşulları, arkadaşlık ortamı ve takdir edilme duygusu ile iş tatmini arasındaki ilişkiler: tekstil sektöründe bir uygulama. Relationships between management style and working conditions, friendship environment and sense of appreciation and job satisfaction: an application in textile industry Journal of Dogus University, 5 (1), 17-26. https://doi.org/10.31671/dogus.2019.303
31. Erdoğan, H. (2017). Ortaokul yöneticilerinin öğretim liderliği ile öğretmenlerin iş doyumu arasındaki ilişkinin incelenmesi. Examining the relationship between secondary school principals' instructional leadership and teachers' job satisfaction (Master Thesis). İstanbul Sabahattin Zaim University.
32. Ertürk, A., Kara, S. B. K., & Güneş, D. Z. (2016). Duygusal emek ve psikolojik iyi oluş: bir yordayıcı olarak yönetsel destek algısı. Emotional labour and psychological well-being: perception of managerial support as a predictor Abant Izzet Baysal University Journal of Faculty of Education, 16(4), 1723-1744.
33. Fredrickson, B. L. (1998). What good are positive emotions? Review of General Psychology, 2, 300–319. https://doi.org/10.1037/1089-2680.2.3.300
34. Frese, M., Kring, W., Soose, A., & Zempel, J. (1996). Personal initiative at work: Differences between East and West Germany. Academy of Management Journal, 39, 37–63. https://doi.org/10.2307/256630
35. Frese, M., & Fay, D. (2001). Personal initiative: An active performance concept for work in the 21st century. Research in organizational behavior, 23, 133–187.
36. Gafa, İ. & Dikmenli, Y. (2019). Sınıf öğretmenlerinin iş doyumu ve iş yaşamındaki yalnızlık düzeylerinin incelenmesi. Investigation of classroom teachers' job satisfaction and loneliness levels in work life Ahi Evran University Journal of Institute of Social Sciences, 5(1), 131-150. https://doi.org/10.31592/aeusbed.567562
37. Gowan, M.A. (2012). Employability, well‐being and job satisfaction following a job loss. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 27, 780-798. https://doi.org/10.1108/02683941211280157
38. Göçen, A. (2019). Öğretmenlerin yaşam anlamı, psikolojik sermaye ve cinsiyetinin psikolojik iyi oluşlarına etkisi. The effect of teachers' meaning of life, psychological capital and gender on their psychological well-being Cumhuriyet International Journal of Education, 8 (1), 135-153. https://doi.org:/10.30703/cije.457977
39. Gümüştaş, Z. & Gülbahar, B. (2022) Öğretmenlerin Mesleki Motivasyonunu Etkileyen Etkenler. Pearson Journal of Social Sciences & Humanities, 7(20), 180-200. https://doi.org/10.46872/pj.538
40. Gündoğdu, G. B. (2013). Sınıf öğretmenlerinin iş doyumu ve mesleki tükenmişlik düzeyleri üzerine bir çalışma: Mersin ili örneği. A study on job satisfaction and professional burnout levels of classroom teachers: Mersin province case (Master Thesis). Çağ University.
41. Güneş, B. (2020). Psikolojik danışmanların mesleki doyum düzeylerinin incelenmesi. Investigation of professional satisfaction levels of psychological counsellors. Bartın University Journal of Educational Research, 4(2), 58-70.
42. Hahn, V.C., Frese, M., Binnewies, C., & Schmitt, A. (2012). Happy and proactive? the role of hedonic and eudaimonic well–being in business owners’ personal initiative. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 36, 114-97. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6520.2011.00490.x
43. Hatipoğlu, A. Y. (2019). İlköğretim okulu öğretmenlerinin psikolojik sermaye algıları ile proaktif davranış düzeyleri arasındaki ilişki. The relationship between primary school teachers' perceptions of psychological capital and proactive behaviour levels (Master Thesis). Bolu Abant İzzet Baysal University.
44. Holman, D., Johnson, S., & O'Connor, E. (2018). Stress management interventions: Improving subjective psychological well-being in the workplace. Handbook of well-being. Salt Lake City, UT: DEF Publishers, 2.
45. Hua, J., Zheng, L., Zhang, G., & Fan, J. (2019). Proactive personality and cross-cultural adjustment: A moderated mediation model. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 72, 36-44. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijintrel.2019.06.003
46. Jackman, P., Henderson, H., Clay, G., & Coussens, A.H. (2020). The relationship between psychological wellbeing, social support, and personality in an English police force. International Journal of Police Science & Management, 22, 183-193. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461355720907620
47. Jawahar, I. M., Kisamore, J. L., Stone, T. H., & Rahn, D. L. (2012). Differential effect of inter-role conflict on proactive individual’s experience of burnout. Journal of Business and Psychology, 27, 243-254. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10869-011-9234-5
48. Jawahar, I. M., & Liu, Y. (2017). Why are proactive people more satisfied with their job, career, and life? An examination of the role of work engagement. Journal of Career Development, 44(4), 344-358. https://doi.org/10.1177/0894845316656070
49. Jeon, L., Buettner, C. K., & Grant, A. A. (2018). Early childhood teachers’ psychological well-being: Exploring potential predictors of depression, stress, and emotional exhaustion. Early Education and Development, 29(1), 53-69. https://doi.org/10.1080/10409289.2017.1341806
50. Jones, N., Hill, C., & Henn, C. (2015). Personality and job satisfaction: their role in work-related psychological well-being. Journal of Psychology in Africa, 25, 297-304. https://doi.org/10.1080/14330237.2015.1078086
51. Kalkan, H. (2019). Resmi ve özel ortaokullarda görev yapan öğretmenlerin proaktif davranış sergileme düzeyleri ile özyeterlik algıları arasındaki ilişkinin analizi. Analysis of the relationship between proactive behaviour and self-efficacy perceptions of teachers working in public and private secondary schools (Master Thesis). İnönü University.
52. Karaaslan, İ., Uslu, T., & Esen, S. (2020). Beden eğitimi öğretmenlerinin mesleki tükenmişlik, iş doyumu ve yaşam doyumlarının incelenmesi. Investigation of occupational burnout, job satisfaction and life satisfaction of physical education teachers. Journal of Health and Sport Sciences, 3(1), 7-18.
53. Karabatak, S. H. (2018). Öğretmenlerin proaktif davranış düzeyleri ile beş faktör kişilik özellikleri arasındaki ilişkinin incelenmesi. Examining the relationship between teachers' proactive behaviour levels and five factor personality traits. Mecmua, (5), 48-64. https://doi.org/10.32579/mecmua.381993
54. Karaçam, A., & Pulur, A. (2016). Beden eğitimi öğretmenlerinin başarı algısı, akademık iyimserlik, psikolojik iyi oluş ve fiziksel saygı düzeylerinin incelenmesi. Investigation of physical education teachers' achievement perception, academic optimism, psychological well-being and physical esteem levels. Uşak University Journal of Educational Research, 3(1), 1-22. https://doi.org/10.29065/usakead.287684
55. Karadeniz, G., & Zabcı, N. (2020). Pandemi döneminde uzaktan eğitim veren öğretmenlerin çalışma koşulları ve algıladıkları stres ile psikolojik iyi oluşları arasındaki ilişki. The relationship between working conditions and perceived stress and psychological well-being of distance education teachers during the pandemic period. Journal of Mimar Sinan Fine Arts University Institute of Social Sciences, 2(22), 301-314.
56. Karasar, N. (2014). Bilimsel araştırma yöntemi. Scientific research method. Nobel Publisher.
57. Kitapçı, H. (2001). Thy içinde özdeğerleme kavramı ve çalışanların tatminini belirleyici unsurlar üzerine bir araştırma. A research on the concept of self-evaluation and determinants of employee satisfaction in THY. Journal of Suggestion, 4(16), 203-209. https://doi.org/10.14783/Maruoneri.728745
58. Koçak, R., & Eves, S. (2010). Okul yöneticilerinin iş doyumları ile problem çözme becerileri arasındaki ilişki. The relationship between school administrators' job satisfaction and problem solving skills. International Journal of Human Sciences, 7(1), 193-212.
59. Köylü, D., & Gündüz, Y. (2019). Öğretmenlerin karar alma sürecine katılım düzeylerinin örgütsel bağlılık ve psikolojik iyi oluş ile ilişkisi. The relationship between teachers' level of participation in decision-making process and organisational commitment and psychological well-being. Journal of Ufuk University Institute of Social Sciences, 8(15), 279-299.
60. Kundi, Y. M., Aboramadan, M., Elhamalawi, E. M., & Shahid, S. (2021). Employee psychological well-being and job performance: exploring mediating and moderating mechanisms. International Journal of Organizational Analysis, 29(3), 736-754. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJOA-05-2020-2204
61. Kuzgun, Y., Aydemir-Sevim, S., & Hamamcı, Z. (1999). Mesleki Doyum Ölçeği'nin geliştirilmesi. Development of Professional Satisfaction Scale. Turkish Journal of Psychological Counselling and Guidance, 2(11), 14-18.
62. Kuzgun, Y. & Bacanlı, F. (2012). Rehberlik ve psikolojik danışmada kullanılan ölçekler. Scales used in guidance and psychological counselling. Nobel Publication Distribution. Lauring, J., Selmer, J., & Kubovcikova, A. (2019). Personality in context: effective traits for expatriate managers at different levels. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 30(6), 1010-1035. https://doi.org/10.1080/09585192.2017.1381137
63. LePine, J. A., & Van Dyne, L. (1998). Predicting voice behavior in work groups. Journal of Applied Psychology, 83, 853–868. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.83.6.853
64. Li, M., Wang, Z., Gao, J., & You, X. (2017). Proactive personality and job satisfaction: the mediating effects of self-efficacy and work engagement in teachers. Current Psychology, 36, 48-55. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-015-9383-1
65. Liu, H., & Shuzhuo, L. (2011). Social Change and psychological well-being in urban and rural China. Health Economics eJournal. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1943808
66. Lorente, L., Tordera, N., & Peiró, J. M. (2018). How work characteristics are related to European workers’ psychological well-being. A comparison of two age groups. International Journal Of Environmental Research And Public Health, 15(1), 127. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph15010127
67. Loretto, W., Popham, F., Platt, S., Pavis, S., Hardy, G., Macleod, L., & Gibbs, J. (2005). Assessing psychological well-being: A holistic investigation of NHS employees. International Review of Psychiatry, 17, 329-336. https://doi.org/10.1080/09540260500238371
68. Manzano-García, G., & Ayala, J. C. (2017). Relationship between psychological capital and psychological well-being of direct support staff of specialist autism services. The mediator role of burnout. Frontiers in Psychology, 8, 2277. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.02277
69. Ministry of National Education (MoNE). (2017). Öğretmenlik mesleği genel yeterlikleri. General competences for teaching profession Ankara: General Directorate of Teacher Training and Development.
70. Milyavskaya, M., Philippe, F.L., & Koestner, R. (2013). Psychological need satisfaction across levels of experience: Their organization and contribution to general well-being. Journal of Research in Personality, 47, 41-51. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2012.10.013
71. Morrison, E. W., & Phelps, C. C. (1999). Taking charge at work: Extrarole efforts to initiate workplace change. Academy of Management Journal, 42, 403-419. https://doi.org/10.2307/257011
72. Neto, R. D. C. A. (2015). Teachers feel lonely too: A study of teachers’ personal and professional characteristics associated with loneliness. Psico, 46(3), 321-330. https://doi.org/10.15448/1980-8623.2015.3.18265
73. Öztürk, A., & Özdemir, F. (2010). İşletmelerde personel güçlendirmeye dayalı iş doyumunun artırılması. Increasing job satisfaction based on staff empowerment in enterprises. Atatürk University Journal of Economics and Administrative Sciences, 17(1-2), 189-202.
74. Öztürk, M., & Şahbudak, E. (2015). Akademisyenlikte iş doyumu. Job satisfaction in academics Journal of International Social Research, 8(40). https://doi.org/10.17719/jisr.20154013922
75. Parker, S. K., & Collins, C. G. (2010). Taking stock: Integrating and differentiating multiple proactive behaviors. Journal of Management, 36(3), 633-662. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206308321554
76. Pezirkianidis, C., Galanaki, E., Raftopoulou, G., Moraitou, D., & Stalikas, A. (2023). Adult friendship and wellbeing: A systematic review with practical implications. Frontiers in Psychology, 14. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1059057
77. Polat, D. D. (2019). Öğretmenlerin yılmazlık düzeyleri ile iş doyumu, mesleki tükenmişlik, örgütsel bağlılık düzeyleri ve örgüt iklimi algilari arasindaki ilişkilerin incelenmesi Examining the relationship between teachers' levels of resilience and job satisfaction, professional burnout, organisational commitment levels and perceptions of organisational climate. (Master Thesis). Sakarya University.
78. Roberts, S. G., Dunbar, R. I., Pollet, T. V., & Kuppens, T. (2009). Exploring variation in active network size: Constraints and ego characteristics. Social Networks, 31(2), 138-146. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socnet.2008.12.002
79. Roothman, B., Kirsten, D. K. & Wissing, M. P. (2003). Gender differences in aspects of psychological well-being. South African Journal of Psychology, 33(4), 212-218. https://doi.org/10.1177/008124630303300403
80. Ryff, C. D. (2014). Psychological well-being revisited: Advances in the science and practice of eudaimonia. Psychotherapy and psychosomatics, 83(1), 10-28. https://doi.org/10.1159/000353263
81. Satuf, C., Monteiro, S., Pereira, H., Esgalhado, G., Marina Afonso, R., & Loureiro, M. (2018). The protective effect of job satisfaction in health, happiness, well-being and self-esteem. International Journal of Occupational Safety and Ergonomics, 24, 181-189. https://doi.org/10.1080/10803548.2016.1216365
82. Sharma, R. D. & Jyoti, J. (2009). Job Satısfactıon Of Unıversıty Teachers: An Empırıcal Study. Journal Of Services Research, 9(2), 51-80.
83. Sheykhangafshe, F.B., & Shabahang, R. (2020). Prediction of psychological wellbeing of elderly people based on spirituality, social support, and optimism. Journal of Religion & Health, 7, 22-32.
84. Strauss, K., Griffin, M. A., Parker, S. K., & Mason, C. M. (2015). Building and sustaining proactive behaviors: The role of adaptivity and job satisfaction. Journal of Business and Psychology, 30, 63-72. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10869-013-9334-5
85. Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (2013). Using multivariate statistics. Boston, Pearson. Telef, B. B. (2013). Psikolojik İyi Oluş Ölçeği: Türkçeye uyarlama, geçerlik ve güvenirlik çalışması. Psychological Well-Being Scale: Turkish adaptation, validity and reliability study. Hacettepe University Journal of Faculty of Education, 28(3), 374-384.
86. Thompson, A., Smith, M.A., McNeill, A.R., & Pollet, T.V. (2022). Friendships, loneliness and psychological wellbeing in older adults: a limit to the benefit of the number of friends. Ageing and Society. 1-26. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0144686X22000666
87. Turkish Statistical Institute (TurkStat). (2020). Hayat Tabloları, Life Tables 2017-2019. https://data.tuik.gov.tr/Bulten/Index?p=Hayat-Tablolari-2017-2019-33711
88. Ünal, A. (2015). İş Doyumu, Yaşam doyumu ve yaşam anlamı değişkenlerinin ilkokul ve ortaokul öğretmenlerinin mesleki bağlılıkları üzerine etkisi. The effect of job satisfaction, life satisfaction and meaning of life variables on professional commitment of primary and secondary school teachers. (Master Thesis). Ondokuz Mayıs University. Viswanathan, R., Mohammed, M., & Parveen, J. (2019). Cross cultural adjustment-a catalyst to enhance psychological well being and work performance of indian IT expatriates in USA. International Journal of Recent Technology and Engineering 8, 533-542. https://doi.org/10.35940/ijrte.B1105.0782S419
89. Wang, S., Li, Y., & Tu, Y. (2018). Linking proactive personality to life satisfaction in the chinese context: the mediation of interpersonal trust and moderation of positive reciprocity beliefs. Journal of Happiness Studies, 1-18. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10902-018-0056-2
90. Williams, K. (2003). Has the future of marriage arrived? A contemporary examination of gender, marriage, and psychological well-being. Journal of health and social behavior, 44(4), 470-87. https://doi.org/10.2307/1519794
91. Yavuzkurt, T. (2017). Ortaöğretim öğretmenlerinin iş yeri arkadaşlık algısı ve iş doyumu ile ilişkisi (Aydın ili örneği). Secondary school teachers' perception of workplace friendship and its relationship with job satisfaction (The case of Aydın province). (Master Thesis). Adnan Menderes University.
92. Yıldız, İ. (2021). Özel eğitim kurumu yönetici ve öğretmenlerinin örgütsel adalet algıları ile iş doyumu arasındaki ilişkide iş motivasyonunun aracılık rolü The mediating role of work motivation in the relationship between organisational justice perceptions and job satisfaction of administrators and teachers of private education institutions. (Master Thesis). Karamanoğlu Mehmetbey University.
93. Yılmaz, A., Yelda, U., Kızılırmak, E., Aktepe, H., Petek, S., & Gündüz, H. (2023). Çeşitli eğitim kademelerinde görevli öğretmenlerin psikolojik iyi oluş düzeylerinin çeşitli değişkenlere göre incelenmesi. Investigation of psychological well-being levels of teachers working at various educational levels according to various variables. Socrates Journal of Interdisciplinary Social Studies, 9(27), 13-23.
94. Yolcu, İ. U. & Çakmak, A. F. (2017). Proaktif kişilik ile proaktif çalışma davranışı ilişkisi üzerinde psikolojik güçlendirmenin etkisi. The effect of psychological empowerment on the relationship between proactive personality and proactive work behaviour. International Journal of Management Economics and Business, 13 (2), 425-438. https://doi.org/10.17130/ijmeb.2017228692