Reporting Of Settlement Process In Turkish Press

Year 2015, , 62 - 78, 15.06.2015

Faruk Temel Onur Önürmen , Osman Utkan

https://doi.org/10.31123/akil.436864

Abstract

The initiatives for the solution of the terror problem ongoing for many years in Turkey, has attracted

significant media interest. It was observed that media was not unconcerned with the developments

in the settlement process and they made news about the subject with different perspectives. That

situation puts forward the media’s efforts to dominate especially over the developments related to

national matters. In this process, the attitude of the media is determined by economical, political

and ideological factors. So much that, the news contents of different newspapers about the same

subjects related to the settlement process differentiated and their news texts had ideological

signs. That status shows that; ideological positions of the media organizations are effective on

the process of news formation.

In this study, it has been attempted to put forward how an attitude was adapted by the newspapers

towards the developments in the process. In this direction, the newspapers of Yeni Şafak,

Cumhuriyet, Habertürk, Radikal, Evrensel and Zaman; which are assumed to have different

ideologically positions, has been examined in the context of the study. Among the news involving

settlement process, the articles on the front pages of newspapers (headlines, subheadings and

other news on the front page) have been examined in terms of biasness, and the media have

been found to present a biased viewpoint contrary to the objectivity principles. The study, which

is based on qualitative and quantitative content analysis, has revealed that; the news, which deal

with the settlement process, were formatted according to a biased perspective, in terms of the

language used; words and news sources selected.

Keywords

Settlement Process, Media, Politics, News, Bias

References

• Akbayrak, Murat (2013). “Devlet PKK Çözüm Süreci Kronolojisi”.Süreç Analiz, (4): İstanbul
• Almagor, R. C. (2002). İfade, Medya ve Etik (Translated by: S. N. Şad). Ankara: Phoenix Yayınevi.
• Arslan, Yeğen U.T. (2004). “Haberde Yeni Olan Nedir? ”. Haber, Hakikat ve İktidar İlişkisi. Çiler Dursun (der.) içinde. Elips Yayınları: Ankara.
• Atabek, Gülseren Şendur ve Atabek ,Ümit,(2007). Medya Metinlerini Çözümlemek İçerik, Göstergebilim ve Söylem Çözümleme Yöntemleri. Siyasal Kitabevi: Ankara.
• “Cumhuriyet” Newspaper (January 4 -18, February 24-March 3, March 12 - April 6; 2013)
• Dağtaş, Erdal and Yaylagül, Levent (2005). 11 Eylül Saldırısının Türkiye Yazılı Basınındaki Sunumu. Kurgu
• Dergisi. 21: 1-23.
• Dursun, Çiler (2004). Haber, Hakikat ve İktidar ilişkisi. Elips Kitap: Ankara.
• “Evrensel” Newspaper (January 4 -18, February 24-March 3, March 12 - April 6; 2013)
• Fairclough Norman (2004). Analysing Discourse Textual Analysis for Social Research, Routledge: NewYork.
• “Habertürk” Newspaper (January 4 -18, February 24-March 3, March 12 - April 6; 2013)
• Hall, Stuart (1997). “Kodlama, Kodaçımlama”. Medya ve İzleyici içinde. 85-97. Çev.,Şahinde Yavuz. Vadi Yayınları: Ankara.
• Herman, E.S. and Chomsky, N. (2002). Manufacturing Consent, Pantheon: New York.
• İnal, A. (1999). “Medya, Dil ve İktidar Sorunu: İletişim Çalışmalarında Medya ve Siyaset İlişkisini Nasıl Tartışmalıyız?”. İletişim. 99 (3): 13-36.
• İnal, Ayşe (1993). Haber Üretim Sürecine İki Farklı Yaklaşım. İLEF Yıllık. Ankara Üniversitesi: Ankara.
• İnal, Ayşe (1995). Yazılı Basın Haberlerinde “Yapısal” Yanlılık Sorunu. Toplum ve Bilim. 67: 111–135.
• Kuyucu,Michael. (2012) Türkiye’de Medya Ekonomisi. Esenkitap: İstanbul.
• Lull, James (2001). Medya İletişim Kültür. Çev., Nazife Güngör. Vadi Yayınları: Ankara.
• Prasad, D. (2008). ‘Content analysis: A method of Social Science Research’. Research Methods for Social
• Work. D. K. Lal Das (der.) içinde. Rawat Publications: New Delhi. pp.174-193.
• “Radikal” Newspaper (January 4 -18, February 24-March 3, March 12 - April 6; 2013)
• Richardson John E. (2007). Analysing Newspapers An Approach from Critical Discourse Analysis. Palgrave Macmillan: New York.
• Riffe Daniel, Lacy Stephen, Fico G. Frederick (2005). Analyzing Media Messages Using Quantitative Content Analysis. 1-23. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers: New Jersey.
• Schiller, H. (1993). Zihin Yönlendirenler. Çev., Cevdet Cerit. Pınar Yayınları: İstanbul.
• Schudson, M. (1997). Haber Üretiminin Sosyolojisi,. Çev., Abdülrezak Altun and Meltem Ağduk Gevrek. A.Ü. İletişim Fakültesi Yıllık 1994: 307-325.
• Shoemaker, P. and Reese, S. D. (1997). “İdeolojinin Medya İçeriği Üzerine Etkisi”. Medya Kültür Siyaset. Çev., Süleyman İrvan. Ark Yayınevi: Ankara. pp. 99-136.
• Sholle, David J. (2005). Eleştirel Çalışmalar: İdeoloji Teorisinden İktidar/Bilgiye, Medya, İktidar, İdeoloji. Çev., Mehmet Küçük, Ark Yayınevi: Ankara. pp. 255-284.
• Uzun, Ruhdan, (2011). İletişim Etiği Sorunlar ve Sorumluluklar, Dipnot Yayınları, Ankara.
• Van Dijk, T. A. (2005). Söylem ve İdeoloji Mitoloji,Din,İdeoloji , Söylem ve İdeoloji çok alanlı yaklaşım. Çev.,
• Özarslan Zeynep and Barış Çoban. Su Yayınevi: İstanbul, pp. 13-112.
• Yaylagül Levent (2005). 11 Eylül Saldırısının Türkiye Yazılı Basınındaki Sunumu. Kurgu Dergisi. 21: 1-23
• “Yeni Şafak” Newspaper (January 4 -18, February 24-March 3, March 12 - April 6; 2013)
• “Zaman” Newspaper (January 4 -18, February 24-March 3, March 12 - April 6; 2013)
• Zang Yhang ; Wildemuth M. Barbara. 2009. “Qualitative Analysis of Content“. Applications of Social Research Methods to Questions in İnformation and Library Science. B. Wildemuth (der.) içinde. pp.308-319. Westport,CT: Libraries Unlimited