Research Article

An Investigation of Attitudes of Students Towards Privacy on Facebook

Number: 29 June 30, 2018

An Investigation of Attitudes of Students Towards Privacy on Facebook

Öz

The social media studies have frequently investigated the changes occurring in the
individual’s behaviors within the social network, and the cause-and-effect relationship
of these changes focuses on personality, but very little research has investigated
the relationship between Facebook and privacy within the theoretical framework of
individualism. In this study, it was aimed to determine whether there is a relationship
between the tendency of students to hide their problems and their attitudes towards
this tendency. This study is a descriptive one, and was evaluated by surveys. A
Likert-type online questionnaire including 36 items was answered by 568 high school
students from 26 classes (grades 9th, 10th, 11th, and 12th) in Ordu, Turkey (Male=279,
49.1%, Female=289, 50.9%) in March and April in 2016. Participants ranged from
14 to 18 years of age (M = 16.15, SD = 1.00). Mean and standard deviation values
were calculated for the obtained data and those were indicated in findings by making
interpretations of the tables. As to the results of t-test and One Way ANOVA test which
was conducted to determine the reasons of usage of social media by the students in
terms of gender, monthly income and family attitude, there was a significant difference
among variables. Findings point to the complex ways of the problems of privacy of
adolescents on Facebook. The study results will raise more questions for future studies
in terms of social media usage and privacy management.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Self-problems,Risky Behaviors,Privacy,Education,Social Media,Facebook

References

  1. Ahern, D., Eckles, D., Good, N., King, S., Naaman, M., Nair, R. (2007). Over –Exposed? Privacy Patterns and Considerations in online and Mobile Photo Sharing. Paper available on http: infolab. standford.edu.
  2. Allen, A. L. (1988). Uneasy access: Privacy for female in a free society. Totowa, NJ: Rowman & Littlefield.
  3. Almuhimedi, H., Schaub, F., Sadeh, N., Adjerid, I., Acquisti, A., Gluck, J., Cranor, L., F., Agarwal, Y. (2015). Your Location has been Shared 5,398 Times! Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems - CHI ’15. doi:10.1145/2702123.2702210.
  4. Barney, L. J., Griffiths, K. M., Christensen, H., & Jorm, A. F. (2010). The Self-Stigma of Depression Scale (SSDS): development and psychometric evaluation of a new instrument. International Journal of Methods in Psychiatric Research, 19(4), 243–254. doi:10.1002/mpr.325.
  5. Berkup, S. B. (2015). Individual privacy sharing in social networks: A comparative analysis between X and Y generations (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Ege University, Graduate School of Social Sciences, İzmir.
  6. Bowen, N. K., & Bowen, G. L. (1999). Effects of Crime and Violence in Neighborhoods and Schools on the School Behavior and Performance of Adolescents. Journal of Adolescent Research, 14(3), 319–342. doi:10.1177/0743558499143003.
  7. Boyd, D. M., & Ellison, N. B. (2007). Social Network Sites: Definition, History, and Scholarship. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 13(1), 210–230. doi:10.1111/j.1083- 6101.2007.00393.x.
  8. Chan, Y., E., and Greenaway, K., E. (2005). Theoretical Explanations for Firms’ Information Privacy Behaviors, Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 6(6), 171-198.
  9. Child, J. T., Pearson, J. C., & Petronio, S. (2009). Blogging, communication, and privacy management: Development of the Blogging Privacy Management Measure. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 60(10), 2079–2094. doi:10.1002/ asi.21122.
  10. Church, E. M., Thambusamy, R., & Nemati, H. (2017). Privacy and pleasure: A paradox of the hedonic use of computer-mediated social networks. Computers in Human Behavior, 77, 121–131. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2017.08.040.
APA
Bakan, U. (2018). An Investigation of Attitudes of Students Towards Privacy on Facebook. Akdeniz Üniversitesi İletişim Fakültesi Dergisi, 29, 368-384. https://doi.org/10.31123/akil.441782