Research Article
BibTex RIS Cite

Nevşehir İli Uygun Katı Atık Depolama Sahalarının Coğrafi Bilgi Sistemleri (CBS) ve Bulanık Analitik Hiyerarşi Süreci (BAHS) Yöntemlerinin Entegrasyonu ile Belirlenmesi

Year 2022, , 836 - 849, 31.08.2022
https://doi.org/10.35414/akufemubid.1105426

Abstract

Düzenli depolama, katı atıkların bertarafı için kullanılan en yaygın yöntemdir. Katı atık yönetimi bölgenin ekonomisi, ekolojisi ve çevre sağlığı üzerindeki muazzam etkisi nedeniyle şehir planlamasının önemli bir parçasıdır. Şehirlerde yaşama isteği ve şehirleşmenin artması ve ile birlikte daha fazla atık üretilmekte ve ne yazık ki atık sorunu her geçen gün daha da büyümektedir. Bu kapsamda yeni kurulacak depolama sahalarının optimal bir konuma inşa edilmesi katı atık yönetiminin en önemli konularından biridir. Bir depolama sahasının yerinin uygunluğu, genellikle sosyal, çevresel ve teknik kriterlerin eşzamanlı etkileri nedeniyle karmaşık bir süreçtir ve çeşitli kriterler ile düzenlemelere bağlıdır. Coğrafi Bilgi Sistemleri (CBS) tabanlı Çok Kriterli Karar Verme (ÇKKV) uygun yer seçimi gibi mekansal problemlerin çözümünde karar vericiler için önemli bir yöntemdir. Bu çalışmada Nevşehir ilinde katı atık depolama sahası için uygun yer seçimi yapmak amacı ile CBS ve ÇKKV yöntemlerinden Bulanık Analitik Hiyerarşi Süreci (BAHS) kullanılmıştır. Bu amaç doğrultusunda literatür çalışmaları ve uzman görüşleri dikkate alınarak dışlama ve değerleme kriterleri belirlenmiştir. Kriter önem dereceleri BAHS ile hesaplanarak katı atık depolama sahası için uygunluk haritası oluşturulmuş ve dokuz adet saha depolama için uygun bulunmuştur.

References

  • Afşin, M., 2002. CO2’ce zengin Çorak, Karakaya ve Gümüşkent (Nevşehir) mineralli sularının hidrojeokimyası. Yerbilimleri, 26, 1 - 14.
  • Akbari, V., Rajabi, M.A., Chavoshi, S.H. and Shams, R., 2008. Landfill site selection by combining GIS and fuzzy multi criteria decision analysis, case study: Bandar Abbas, Iran. World Applied Sciences Journal, 3(1), 39-47.
  • Aksu, O., ve İban, M. C. 2019. Considerations on the land management system approach in Turkey by the experiences of a case study. Survey review, 51(364), 87-96.
  • Akyol, E. ve Alkan, M., 2014. Coğrafi Bilgi Sistemleri ve Çoklu Karar Verme Tekniği ile Mahallelerin Yerleşime Uygunluğunun Seçimi: Denizli Kenti Örneği. Afyon Kocatepe Üniversitesi Fen ve Mühendislik Bilimleri Dergisi, 15(1), 1-9.
  • Al-Anbari, M.A., Al-Ansari, N. and Jasim, H.K., 2014. GIS and multicriteria decision analysis for landfill site selection in AL-HashimyahQadaa. Natural Science, 6(5), 282-304.
  • Alavi, N., Goudarzi, G., Babaei, A. A., Jaafarzadeh, N. and Hosseinzadeh, M., 2013. Municipal solid waste landfill site selection with geographic information systems and analytical hierarchy process: a case study in Mahshahr County, Iran. Waste Management & Research, 31(1), 98-105.
  • Atabey, E., 1989a. MTA Genel Müdürlüğü 1/100.000 ölçekli açınsama nitelikli Türkiye Jeoloji Haritaları Serisi, Kayseri-H 19 paftası.
  • Atabey, E., 1989b. MTA Genel Müdürlüğü 1/100.000 ölçekli açınsama nitelikli Türkiye Jeoloji Haritaları Serisi, Kayseri-İ 19 paftası.
  • Atabey, E., 1989c. MTA Genel Müdürlüğü 1/100.000 ölçekli açınsama nitelikli Türkiye Jeoloji Haritaları Serisi, Kayseri-H 18 paftası.
  • Ayaim, M.K., Fei-Baffoe, B., Sulemana, A., Miezah, K. and Adams, F. 2019. Potential sites for landfill development in a developing country: A case study of Ga South Municipality, Ghana. Heliyon, 5(10), e02537.
  • AYY, 2015. 2872. Sayılı Atık Yönetimi Yönetmeliğine ilişkin Kanun. (2015). T. C. Resmi Gazete, 29314, 02 Nisan 2015.
  • Bahrani, S., Ebadi, T., Ehsani, H., Yousefi, H. and Maknoon, R., 2016. Modeling landfill site selection by multi-criteria decision making and fuzzy functions in GIS, case study: Shabestar, Iran. Environmental Earth Sciences, 75(4), 1-14.
  • Barakat, A., Hilali, A., Baghdadi, M. E. and Touhami, F., 2017. Landfill site selection with GIS-based multi-criteria evaluation technique. A case study in Béni Mellal-Khouribga Region, Morocco. Environmental Earth Sciences, 76(12), 1-13.
  • Beyhan, H. C., Eren, G. ve Aktuğ, B., 2020. Perakende market lokasyonları için CBS tabanlı Çok Kriterli AHP yöntemi ile optimal yer seçimi analizi: İstanbul Örneği. Afyon Kocatepe Üniversitesi Fen ve Mühendislik Bilimleri Dergisi, 20(6), 1032-1050.
  • Bilgilioglu, S.S., Gezgin, C., Orhan, O. and Karakus, P. 2022. A GIS-based multi-criteria decision-making method for the selection of potential municipal solid waste disposal sites in Mersin, Turkey. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 29(4), 5313–5329.
  • Bilgilioğlu, S.S. 2021. Land suitability assessment for Olive cultivation using GIS and multi-criteria decision-making in Mersin City, Turkey. Arabian Journal of Geosciences, 14(22), 1-16.
  • Bilgilioğlu, S.S., 2022. Coğrafi Bilgi Sistemleri ve Bulanık Analitik Hiyerarşi Süreci ile Elektrikli Araç Şarj İstasyonu Yer Seçimi. Afyon Kocatepe Üniversitesi Fen ve Mühendislik Bilimleri Dergisi, 22 (1) , 165-174.
  • Bringi, S., 2007. Application of 3D principles to solid waste management on the Asian. M.Sc. thesis, Asian Institute of Technology School of Environment, Resources and Development, Thailand, 167.
  • Cay, T. ve Uyan, M., 2013. Evaluation of reallocation criteria in land consolidation studies using the analytic hierarchy process (AHP). Land Use Policy 30, 541–548.
  • Cetin, H. 1995. Design methods, technologies, and site selection in land disposal of waste in the United States. Geosound, 27, 23-40.
  • Chabok, M., Asakereh, A., Bahrami, H. and Jaafarzadeh, N.O., 2020. Selection of MSW landfill site by fuzzy-AHP approach combined with GIS: case study in Ahvaz, Iran. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 192(7), 1-15.
  • Chang, D.Y., 1996. Applications of the extent analysis method on fuzzy AHP. European Journal of Operational Research, 95(3), 649–655.
  • Charnpratheep, K., Zhou, Q. And Garner, B., 1997. Preliminary landfill site screening using fuzzy geographical information systems. Waste management & research, 15(2), 197-215.
  • Chen, W.Y. and Kao, J.J., 1997. Fuzzy DRASTIC for landfill siting. In: 13th international conference on solid waste technology and management, Philadelphia, PA.
  • Demesouka, O.E., Anagnostopoulos, K.P. and Siskos, E., 2019. Spatial multicriteria decision support for robust land-use suitability: The case of landfill site selection in Northeastern Greece. European Journal of Operational Research, 272(2), 574-586.
  • Demirkesen, A.C., 2008. Digital terrain analysis using Landsat‐7 ETM+ imagery and SRTM DEM: a case study of Nevsehir province (Cappadocia), Turkey. International Journal of Remote Sensing, 29(14), 4173-4188.
  • Effat, H.A. and Hegazy, M.N., 2012. Mapping potential landfill sites for North Sinai cities using spatial multicriteria evaluation. The Egyptian Journal of Remote Sensing and Space Science, 15(2), 125-133.
  • Erol, G., 2020. Kapadokya bölgesine gelen yerli ve yabancı turistler üzerine dönemsel bir inceleme. Üçüncü Sektör Sosyal Ekonomi Dergisi, 55(3), 1412-1431.
  • Eskandari, M., Homaee, M. and Mahmodi, S., 2012. An integrated multi criteria approach for landfill siting in a conflicting environmental, economic and socio-cultural area. Waste Management. 32(8), 1528-1538.
  • Ghosh, A., Ghorui, N., Mondal, S.P., Kumari, S., Mondal, B.K., Das, A. and Gupta, M.S. 2021. Application of hexagonal fuzzy MCDM methodology for site selection of electric vehicle charging station. Mathematics, 9(4), 393.
  • Gorsevski, P.V., Donevska, K.R., Mitrovski, C.D. and Frizado, J.P., 2012. Integrating multi-criteria evaluation techniques with geographic information systems for landfill site selection: a case study using ordered weighted average. Waste management, 32(2), 287-296.
  • Güler, D. ve Yomralıoğlu, T., 2017. Alternative suitable landfill site selection using analytic hierarchy process and geographic information systems: a case study in Istanbul. Environmental Earth Sciences, 76(20), 1-13.
  • Güler, D. and Yomralıoğlu, T., 2020. Suitable location selection for the electric vehicle fast charging station with AHP and fuzzy AHP methods using GIS. Annals of GIS, 26(2), 169-189.
  • Gülyaz, M.E. ve Ölmez, İ. 1997. Kapadokya, 1, Dünya Kitap, Nevşehir, 1-108.
  • Kahraman, C., Cebi, S., Onar, S.C. and Oztaysi, B., 2018. A novel trapezoidal intuitionistic fuzzy information axiom approach: An application to multicriteria landfill site selection. Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence, 67, 157-172.
  • KAKY. (1991). Katı Atıkların Kontrolü Yönetmeliği. 14.03.1991: Resmi Gazete.
  • Kamdar, I., Ali, S., Bennui, A., Techato, K. and Jutidamrongphan, W. 2019. Municipal solid waste landfill siting using an integrated GIS-AHP approach: a case study from Songkhla, Thailand. Resources, Conservation & Recycling, 149, 220–235.
  • Kao, J.J. and Lin, H.Y., 1996. Multifactor spatial analysis for landfill siting. Journal of Environmental Engineering, 122 (10), 902–908.
  • Kapilan, S. and Elangovan, K., 2018. Potential landfill site selection for solid waste disposal using GIS and multi-criteria decision analysis (MCDA). Journal of Central South University, 25(3), 570-585.
  • Kara, H, 1997. MTA Genel Müdürlüğü 1/100.000 ölçekli açınsama nitelikli Türkiye Jeoloji Haritaları Serisi, Yozgat-G 19 paftası.
  • Karimi, H., Amiri, S., Huang, J. and Karimi, A., 2019. Integrating GIS and multi-criteria decision analysis for landfill site selection, case study: Javanrood County in Iran. International Journal of Environmental Science and Technology, 16(11), 7305-7318.
  • Karimi, N., Richter, A. and Ng, K.T.W. 2020. Siting and ranking municipal landfill sites in regional scale using nighttime satellite imagery. Journal of Environmental Management, 256, 109942.
  • Kavurmacı, M.M., 2010. Çorak, Karakaya Ve Gümüşkent (Nevşehir) Mineralli Sularının Ve Kaynak Alanlarındaki Travertenlerin Hidrojeokimyası. Aksaray Üniversitesi Fen Bİlimleri Enstitüsü, Yüksek Lisans Tezi, Aksaray, 106.
  • Khan, M.H., Vaezi, M. and Kuma, A., 2018. Optimal siting of solid wasteto-value-added facilities through a GIS-based assessment. Science of the total environment, 610, 1065-1075.
  • Kharat, M.G., Kamble, S.J., Raut, R.D., Kamble, S.S. and Dhume, S.M. 2016. Modeling landfill site selection using an integrated fuzzy MCDM approach. Modeling Earth Systems and Environment, 2(2), 1-16.
  • Khorram, A., Yousefi, M., Alavi, S.A. and Farsi, J. 2015. Convenient landfill site selection by using fuzzy logic and geographic information systems: a case study in Bardaskan, East of Iran. Health Scope, 4(1), e19383.
  • Kontos, T.D., Komilis, D.P. and Halvadakis, C.P., 2005. Siting MSW landfills with a spatial multiple criteria analysis methodology. Waste management, 25(8), 818-832.
  • Lin, M., Huang, C. and Xu, Z. 2020. MULTIMOORA based MCDM model for site selection of car sharing station under picture fuzzy environment. Sustainable cities and society, 53, 101873.
  • Malczewski, J., 1997. Propagation of errors in multicriteria location analysis: a case study. In: G. Fandel and T. Gal, eds. Multiple criteria decision making. New York: Springer, 154-155.
  • Mallick, J., 2021. Municipal solid waste landfill site selection based on fuzzy-AHP and geoinformation techniques in Asir Region Saudi Arabia. Sustainability, 13(3), 1538.
  • Mallick, J., Singh, C.K., Al‐Wadi, H., Ahmed, M., Rahman, A., Shashtri, S. and Mukherjee, S., 2015. Geospatial and geostatistical approach for groundwater potential zone delineation. Hydrological Processes, 29(3), 395-418.
  • Moeinaddini, M., Khorasani, N., Danehkar, A. and Darvishsefat, A.A., 2010. Siting MSW landfill using weighted linear combination and analytical hierarchy process (AHP) methodology in GIS environment (case study: Karaj). Waste management, 30(5), 912-920.
  • Nas, B., Cay, T., Iscan, F. and Berktay, A., 2010. Selection of MSW landfill site for Konya, Turkey using GIS and multi-criteria evaluation. Environmental monitoring and assessment, 160(1), 491-500.
  • Pan, C., Ng, K.T.W. and Richter, A. 2019. An integrated multivariate statistical approach for the evaluation of spatial variations in groundwater quality near an unlined landfill. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 26(6), 5724–5737.
  • Pasalari, H., Nodehi, R.N., Mahvi, A.H., Yaghmaeian, K. and Charrahi, Z., 2019. Landfill site selection using a hybrid system of AHP-Fuzzy in GIS environment: A case study in Shiraz city, Iran. MethodsX, 6, 1454-1466.
  • Pires, A., Martinho, G. and Chang, N.B., 2011. Solid waste management in European countries: A review of systems analysis techniques. Journal of environmental management, 92(4), 1033-1050.
  • Rahmat, Z.G., Niri, M.V., Alavi, N., Goudarzi, G., Babaei, A.A., Baboli, Z. and Hosseinzadeh, M., 2017. Landfill site selection using GIS and AHP: a case study: Behbahan, Iran. KSCE Journal of Civil Engineering, 21(1), 111-118.
  • Randazzo, L., Cusumano, A., Oliveri, G., Di Stefano, P., Renda, P., Perricone, M. and Zarcone, G., 2018. Landfill site selection for municipal solid waste by using AHP method in GIS environment: waste management decision-support in Sicily (Italy). Detritus, 2(1), 78.
  • Rezaeisabzevar, Y., Bazargan, A. and Zohourian, B. 2020. Landfill site selection using multi criteria decision making: Influential factors for comparing locations. Journal of Environmental Sciences, 93, 170-184.
  • Sener, B., Suzen, L. And Doyuran, V., 2006. Landfill site selection by using geographic information systems. Environmental Geology, 49, 376–388.
  • SHT-HES, 2018. Havaalanı Emniyet Standartları Talimatı, Sivil Havacılık Genel Müdürlüğü, Ankara, 2018.
  • Sisay, G., Gebre, S. L. And Getahun, K., 2021. GIS-based potential landfill site selection using MCDM-AHP modeling of Gondar Town, Ethiopia. African Geographical Review, 40(2), 105-124.
  • SKKY, 2004. Su Kirliliği Kontrol Yönetmeliği. Resmi Gazete Sayısı, 31 Aralık 2004, 25687.
  • Şener, Ş., Şener, E., Nas, B. and Karagüzel, R., 2010. Combining AHP with GIS for landfill site selection: a case study in the Lake Beyşehir catchment area (Konya, Turkey). Waste management, 30(11), 2037-2046.
  • Tadros, Z., 2009. Some aspects of solid waste disposal site selection: the case of Wadi Modaneh, Jordan. International Journal of Environmental Studies, 66(2), 207–219.
  • TCCS, 2020. Türkiye Cumhuriyeti Nevşehir Valiliği Çevre ve Şehircilik İl Müdürlüğü, Nevşehir İli 2020 Yılı Çevre Durum Raporu.
  • Tercan, E., Dereli, M. A. and Tapkın, S. 2020. A GIS-based multi-criteria evaluation for MSW landfill site selection in Antalya, Burdur, Isparta planning zone in Turkey. Environmental Earth Sciences, 79(10), 1-17.
  • Torabi-Kaveh, M., Babazadeh, R., Mohammadi, S. D. and Zaresefat, M., 2016. Landfill site selection using combination of GIS and fuzzy AHP, a case study: Iranshahr, Iran. Waste Management & Research, 34(5), 438-448.
  • Tulun, Ş., Gürbüz, E. and Arsu, T., 2021. Developing a GIS-based landfill site suitability map for the Aksaray province, Turkey. Environmental Earth Sciences, 80(8), 1-15.
  • Uyan, M. ve Yalpır, Ş., 2016. Çok kriterli karar verme modeli ve CBS entegrasyonu ile tıbbi atık sterilizasyon tesislerinin yer seçimi. Afyon Kocatepe Üniversitesi Fen ve Mühendislik Bilimleri Dergisi, 16(3), 642-654.
  • Uyan, M., 2014. MSW landfill site selection by combining AHP with GIS for Konya, Turkey. Environmental Earth Science, 71, 1629–1639.
  • Vučijak, B., Kurtagić, S. M. and Silajdžić, I., 2016. Multicriteria decision making in selecting best solid waste management scenario: a municipal case study from Bosnia and Herzegovina. Journal of cleaner production, 130, 166-174.
  • Wang, C.N., Nguyen, V.T., Thai, H.T.N. and Duong, D. H. 2018. Multi-criteria decision making (MCDM) approaches for solar power plant location selection in Vietnam. Energies, 11(6), 1504.
  • Yesilnacar, M.I., Süzen, M.L., Kaya, B.Ş. and Doyuran, V., 2012. Municipal solid waste landfill site selection for the city of Şanliurfa-Turkey: an example using MCDA integrated with GIS. International Journal of Digital Earth, 5(2), 147-164.
  • Zadeh, L.A., 1965. Fuzzy sets. Information and Control, 8(3), 338–353.
  • Zadeh, L.A., 1971. Quantitative fuzzy semantics. Information sciences, 3(2), 159-176.
  • Zahari, M.S., Ishak, W.M.F.W. and Samah, M.A.A., 2010. Study on solid waste generation in Kuantan, Malaysia: Its potential for energy generation. International Journal of Engineering Science and Technology, 2(5), 1338- 1344.
  • Zamorano, M., Molero, E., Hurtado, A., Grindlay, A. and Ramos, A., 2008. Evaluation of a municipal landfill site in Southern Spain with GIS-aided methodology. Journal of hazardous materials, 160(2-3), 473-481.

Suitable Site Selection for Landfill with the Integration of Geographic Information Systems (GIS) and Fuzzy Analytical Hierarchy Process (FAHP) Methods in Nevşehir

Year 2022, , 836 - 849, 31.08.2022
https://doi.org/10.35414/akufemubid.1105426

Abstract

Landfilling is the most ordinary technique used for the disposal of solid waste. Solid waste management is an essential section of city planning due to its immense effect on the economy, ecology and environment of the region. With the increase in urbanization and the desire to live in cities, more waste is produced and unfortunately the waste problem is getting worse rapidly. In this context, the construction of new repository areas in an optimal location is one of the most essential issues of solid waste management. The suitability of a landfill site is often a complex process and relies on various criteria and regulations, due to the simultaneous effects of social, environmental and technical criteria. Geographic Information Systems (GIS)-based Multi-Criteria Decision Making (MCDM) is an important method for decision makers in solving spatial problems such as appropriate site selection. In this study, Fuzzy Analytical Hierarchy Process (FAHP), one of the GIS and MCDM methods, were used in order to select the appropriate site for the solid waste landfill in Nevşehir province. For this purpose, exclusion and evaluation criteria were determined by conducting literature studies and taking expert opinions. By calculating the criterion importance levels with FAHP, a suitability map was produced for the solid waste landfill and up to nine areas were found suitable for storage.

References

  • Afşin, M., 2002. CO2’ce zengin Çorak, Karakaya ve Gümüşkent (Nevşehir) mineralli sularının hidrojeokimyası. Yerbilimleri, 26, 1 - 14.
  • Akbari, V., Rajabi, M.A., Chavoshi, S.H. and Shams, R., 2008. Landfill site selection by combining GIS and fuzzy multi criteria decision analysis, case study: Bandar Abbas, Iran. World Applied Sciences Journal, 3(1), 39-47.
  • Aksu, O., ve İban, M. C. 2019. Considerations on the land management system approach in Turkey by the experiences of a case study. Survey review, 51(364), 87-96.
  • Akyol, E. ve Alkan, M., 2014. Coğrafi Bilgi Sistemleri ve Çoklu Karar Verme Tekniği ile Mahallelerin Yerleşime Uygunluğunun Seçimi: Denizli Kenti Örneği. Afyon Kocatepe Üniversitesi Fen ve Mühendislik Bilimleri Dergisi, 15(1), 1-9.
  • Al-Anbari, M.A., Al-Ansari, N. and Jasim, H.K., 2014. GIS and multicriteria decision analysis for landfill site selection in AL-HashimyahQadaa. Natural Science, 6(5), 282-304.
  • Alavi, N., Goudarzi, G., Babaei, A. A., Jaafarzadeh, N. and Hosseinzadeh, M., 2013. Municipal solid waste landfill site selection with geographic information systems and analytical hierarchy process: a case study in Mahshahr County, Iran. Waste Management & Research, 31(1), 98-105.
  • Atabey, E., 1989a. MTA Genel Müdürlüğü 1/100.000 ölçekli açınsama nitelikli Türkiye Jeoloji Haritaları Serisi, Kayseri-H 19 paftası.
  • Atabey, E., 1989b. MTA Genel Müdürlüğü 1/100.000 ölçekli açınsama nitelikli Türkiye Jeoloji Haritaları Serisi, Kayseri-İ 19 paftası.
  • Atabey, E., 1989c. MTA Genel Müdürlüğü 1/100.000 ölçekli açınsama nitelikli Türkiye Jeoloji Haritaları Serisi, Kayseri-H 18 paftası.
  • Ayaim, M.K., Fei-Baffoe, B., Sulemana, A., Miezah, K. and Adams, F. 2019. Potential sites for landfill development in a developing country: A case study of Ga South Municipality, Ghana. Heliyon, 5(10), e02537.
  • AYY, 2015. 2872. Sayılı Atık Yönetimi Yönetmeliğine ilişkin Kanun. (2015). T. C. Resmi Gazete, 29314, 02 Nisan 2015.
  • Bahrani, S., Ebadi, T., Ehsani, H., Yousefi, H. and Maknoon, R., 2016. Modeling landfill site selection by multi-criteria decision making and fuzzy functions in GIS, case study: Shabestar, Iran. Environmental Earth Sciences, 75(4), 1-14.
  • Barakat, A., Hilali, A., Baghdadi, M. E. and Touhami, F., 2017. Landfill site selection with GIS-based multi-criteria evaluation technique. A case study in Béni Mellal-Khouribga Region, Morocco. Environmental Earth Sciences, 76(12), 1-13.
  • Beyhan, H. C., Eren, G. ve Aktuğ, B., 2020. Perakende market lokasyonları için CBS tabanlı Çok Kriterli AHP yöntemi ile optimal yer seçimi analizi: İstanbul Örneği. Afyon Kocatepe Üniversitesi Fen ve Mühendislik Bilimleri Dergisi, 20(6), 1032-1050.
  • Bilgilioglu, S.S., Gezgin, C., Orhan, O. and Karakus, P. 2022. A GIS-based multi-criteria decision-making method for the selection of potential municipal solid waste disposal sites in Mersin, Turkey. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 29(4), 5313–5329.
  • Bilgilioğlu, S.S. 2021. Land suitability assessment for Olive cultivation using GIS and multi-criteria decision-making in Mersin City, Turkey. Arabian Journal of Geosciences, 14(22), 1-16.
  • Bilgilioğlu, S.S., 2022. Coğrafi Bilgi Sistemleri ve Bulanık Analitik Hiyerarşi Süreci ile Elektrikli Araç Şarj İstasyonu Yer Seçimi. Afyon Kocatepe Üniversitesi Fen ve Mühendislik Bilimleri Dergisi, 22 (1) , 165-174.
  • Bringi, S., 2007. Application of 3D principles to solid waste management on the Asian. M.Sc. thesis, Asian Institute of Technology School of Environment, Resources and Development, Thailand, 167.
  • Cay, T. ve Uyan, M., 2013. Evaluation of reallocation criteria in land consolidation studies using the analytic hierarchy process (AHP). Land Use Policy 30, 541–548.
  • Cetin, H. 1995. Design methods, technologies, and site selection in land disposal of waste in the United States. Geosound, 27, 23-40.
  • Chabok, M., Asakereh, A., Bahrami, H. and Jaafarzadeh, N.O., 2020. Selection of MSW landfill site by fuzzy-AHP approach combined with GIS: case study in Ahvaz, Iran. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 192(7), 1-15.
  • Chang, D.Y., 1996. Applications of the extent analysis method on fuzzy AHP. European Journal of Operational Research, 95(3), 649–655.
  • Charnpratheep, K., Zhou, Q. And Garner, B., 1997. Preliminary landfill site screening using fuzzy geographical information systems. Waste management & research, 15(2), 197-215.
  • Chen, W.Y. and Kao, J.J., 1997. Fuzzy DRASTIC for landfill siting. In: 13th international conference on solid waste technology and management, Philadelphia, PA.
  • Demesouka, O.E., Anagnostopoulos, K.P. and Siskos, E., 2019. Spatial multicriteria decision support for robust land-use suitability: The case of landfill site selection in Northeastern Greece. European Journal of Operational Research, 272(2), 574-586.
  • Demirkesen, A.C., 2008. Digital terrain analysis using Landsat‐7 ETM+ imagery and SRTM DEM: a case study of Nevsehir province (Cappadocia), Turkey. International Journal of Remote Sensing, 29(14), 4173-4188.
  • Effat, H.A. and Hegazy, M.N., 2012. Mapping potential landfill sites for North Sinai cities using spatial multicriteria evaluation. The Egyptian Journal of Remote Sensing and Space Science, 15(2), 125-133.
  • Erol, G., 2020. Kapadokya bölgesine gelen yerli ve yabancı turistler üzerine dönemsel bir inceleme. Üçüncü Sektör Sosyal Ekonomi Dergisi, 55(3), 1412-1431.
  • Eskandari, M., Homaee, M. and Mahmodi, S., 2012. An integrated multi criteria approach for landfill siting in a conflicting environmental, economic and socio-cultural area. Waste Management. 32(8), 1528-1538.
  • Ghosh, A., Ghorui, N., Mondal, S.P., Kumari, S., Mondal, B.K., Das, A. and Gupta, M.S. 2021. Application of hexagonal fuzzy MCDM methodology for site selection of electric vehicle charging station. Mathematics, 9(4), 393.
  • Gorsevski, P.V., Donevska, K.R., Mitrovski, C.D. and Frizado, J.P., 2012. Integrating multi-criteria evaluation techniques with geographic information systems for landfill site selection: a case study using ordered weighted average. Waste management, 32(2), 287-296.
  • Güler, D. ve Yomralıoğlu, T., 2017. Alternative suitable landfill site selection using analytic hierarchy process and geographic information systems: a case study in Istanbul. Environmental Earth Sciences, 76(20), 1-13.
  • Güler, D. and Yomralıoğlu, T., 2020. Suitable location selection for the electric vehicle fast charging station with AHP and fuzzy AHP methods using GIS. Annals of GIS, 26(2), 169-189.
  • Gülyaz, M.E. ve Ölmez, İ. 1997. Kapadokya, 1, Dünya Kitap, Nevşehir, 1-108.
  • Kahraman, C., Cebi, S., Onar, S.C. and Oztaysi, B., 2018. A novel trapezoidal intuitionistic fuzzy information axiom approach: An application to multicriteria landfill site selection. Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence, 67, 157-172.
  • KAKY. (1991). Katı Atıkların Kontrolü Yönetmeliği. 14.03.1991: Resmi Gazete.
  • Kamdar, I., Ali, S., Bennui, A., Techato, K. and Jutidamrongphan, W. 2019. Municipal solid waste landfill siting using an integrated GIS-AHP approach: a case study from Songkhla, Thailand. Resources, Conservation & Recycling, 149, 220–235.
  • Kao, J.J. and Lin, H.Y., 1996. Multifactor spatial analysis for landfill siting. Journal of Environmental Engineering, 122 (10), 902–908.
  • Kapilan, S. and Elangovan, K., 2018. Potential landfill site selection for solid waste disposal using GIS and multi-criteria decision analysis (MCDA). Journal of Central South University, 25(3), 570-585.
  • Kara, H, 1997. MTA Genel Müdürlüğü 1/100.000 ölçekli açınsama nitelikli Türkiye Jeoloji Haritaları Serisi, Yozgat-G 19 paftası.
  • Karimi, H., Amiri, S., Huang, J. and Karimi, A., 2019. Integrating GIS and multi-criteria decision analysis for landfill site selection, case study: Javanrood County in Iran. International Journal of Environmental Science and Technology, 16(11), 7305-7318.
  • Karimi, N., Richter, A. and Ng, K.T.W. 2020. Siting and ranking municipal landfill sites in regional scale using nighttime satellite imagery. Journal of Environmental Management, 256, 109942.
  • Kavurmacı, M.M., 2010. Çorak, Karakaya Ve Gümüşkent (Nevşehir) Mineralli Sularının Ve Kaynak Alanlarındaki Travertenlerin Hidrojeokimyası. Aksaray Üniversitesi Fen Bİlimleri Enstitüsü, Yüksek Lisans Tezi, Aksaray, 106.
  • Khan, M.H., Vaezi, M. and Kuma, A., 2018. Optimal siting of solid wasteto-value-added facilities through a GIS-based assessment. Science of the total environment, 610, 1065-1075.
  • Kharat, M.G., Kamble, S.J., Raut, R.D., Kamble, S.S. and Dhume, S.M. 2016. Modeling landfill site selection using an integrated fuzzy MCDM approach. Modeling Earth Systems and Environment, 2(2), 1-16.
  • Khorram, A., Yousefi, M., Alavi, S.A. and Farsi, J. 2015. Convenient landfill site selection by using fuzzy logic and geographic information systems: a case study in Bardaskan, East of Iran. Health Scope, 4(1), e19383.
  • Kontos, T.D., Komilis, D.P. and Halvadakis, C.P., 2005. Siting MSW landfills with a spatial multiple criteria analysis methodology. Waste management, 25(8), 818-832.
  • Lin, M., Huang, C. and Xu, Z. 2020. MULTIMOORA based MCDM model for site selection of car sharing station under picture fuzzy environment. Sustainable cities and society, 53, 101873.
  • Malczewski, J., 1997. Propagation of errors in multicriteria location analysis: a case study. In: G. Fandel and T. Gal, eds. Multiple criteria decision making. New York: Springer, 154-155.
  • Mallick, J., 2021. Municipal solid waste landfill site selection based on fuzzy-AHP and geoinformation techniques in Asir Region Saudi Arabia. Sustainability, 13(3), 1538.
  • Mallick, J., Singh, C.K., Al‐Wadi, H., Ahmed, M., Rahman, A., Shashtri, S. and Mukherjee, S., 2015. Geospatial and geostatistical approach for groundwater potential zone delineation. Hydrological Processes, 29(3), 395-418.
  • Moeinaddini, M., Khorasani, N., Danehkar, A. and Darvishsefat, A.A., 2010. Siting MSW landfill using weighted linear combination and analytical hierarchy process (AHP) methodology in GIS environment (case study: Karaj). Waste management, 30(5), 912-920.
  • Nas, B., Cay, T., Iscan, F. and Berktay, A., 2010. Selection of MSW landfill site for Konya, Turkey using GIS and multi-criteria evaluation. Environmental monitoring and assessment, 160(1), 491-500.
  • Pan, C., Ng, K.T.W. and Richter, A. 2019. An integrated multivariate statistical approach for the evaluation of spatial variations in groundwater quality near an unlined landfill. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 26(6), 5724–5737.
  • Pasalari, H., Nodehi, R.N., Mahvi, A.H., Yaghmaeian, K. and Charrahi, Z., 2019. Landfill site selection using a hybrid system of AHP-Fuzzy in GIS environment: A case study in Shiraz city, Iran. MethodsX, 6, 1454-1466.
  • Pires, A., Martinho, G. and Chang, N.B., 2011. Solid waste management in European countries: A review of systems analysis techniques. Journal of environmental management, 92(4), 1033-1050.
  • Rahmat, Z.G., Niri, M.V., Alavi, N., Goudarzi, G., Babaei, A.A., Baboli, Z. and Hosseinzadeh, M., 2017. Landfill site selection using GIS and AHP: a case study: Behbahan, Iran. KSCE Journal of Civil Engineering, 21(1), 111-118.
  • Randazzo, L., Cusumano, A., Oliveri, G., Di Stefano, P., Renda, P., Perricone, M. and Zarcone, G., 2018. Landfill site selection for municipal solid waste by using AHP method in GIS environment: waste management decision-support in Sicily (Italy). Detritus, 2(1), 78.
  • Rezaeisabzevar, Y., Bazargan, A. and Zohourian, B. 2020. Landfill site selection using multi criteria decision making: Influential factors for comparing locations. Journal of Environmental Sciences, 93, 170-184.
  • Sener, B., Suzen, L. And Doyuran, V., 2006. Landfill site selection by using geographic information systems. Environmental Geology, 49, 376–388.
  • SHT-HES, 2018. Havaalanı Emniyet Standartları Talimatı, Sivil Havacılık Genel Müdürlüğü, Ankara, 2018.
  • Sisay, G., Gebre, S. L. And Getahun, K., 2021. GIS-based potential landfill site selection using MCDM-AHP modeling of Gondar Town, Ethiopia. African Geographical Review, 40(2), 105-124.
  • SKKY, 2004. Su Kirliliği Kontrol Yönetmeliği. Resmi Gazete Sayısı, 31 Aralık 2004, 25687.
  • Şener, Ş., Şener, E., Nas, B. and Karagüzel, R., 2010. Combining AHP with GIS for landfill site selection: a case study in the Lake Beyşehir catchment area (Konya, Turkey). Waste management, 30(11), 2037-2046.
  • Tadros, Z., 2009. Some aspects of solid waste disposal site selection: the case of Wadi Modaneh, Jordan. International Journal of Environmental Studies, 66(2), 207–219.
  • TCCS, 2020. Türkiye Cumhuriyeti Nevşehir Valiliği Çevre ve Şehircilik İl Müdürlüğü, Nevşehir İli 2020 Yılı Çevre Durum Raporu.
  • Tercan, E., Dereli, M. A. and Tapkın, S. 2020. A GIS-based multi-criteria evaluation for MSW landfill site selection in Antalya, Burdur, Isparta planning zone in Turkey. Environmental Earth Sciences, 79(10), 1-17.
  • Torabi-Kaveh, M., Babazadeh, R., Mohammadi, S. D. and Zaresefat, M., 2016. Landfill site selection using combination of GIS and fuzzy AHP, a case study: Iranshahr, Iran. Waste Management & Research, 34(5), 438-448.
  • Tulun, Ş., Gürbüz, E. and Arsu, T., 2021. Developing a GIS-based landfill site suitability map for the Aksaray province, Turkey. Environmental Earth Sciences, 80(8), 1-15.
  • Uyan, M. ve Yalpır, Ş., 2016. Çok kriterli karar verme modeli ve CBS entegrasyonu ile tıbbi atık sterilizasyon tesislerinin yer seçimi. Afyon Kocatepe Üniversitesi Fen ve Mühendislik Bilimleri Dergisi, 16(3), 642-654.
  • Uyan, M., 2014. MSW landfill site selection by combining AHP with GIS for Konya, Turkey. Environmental Earth Science, 71, 1629–1639.
  • Vučijak, B., Kurtagić, S. M. and Silajdžić, I., 2016. Multicriteria decision making in selecting best solid waste management scenario: a municipal case study from Bosnia and Herzegovina. Journal of cleaner production, 130, 166-174.
  • Wang, C.N., Nguyen, V.T., Thai, H.T.N. and Duong, D. H. 2018. Multi-criteria decision making (MCDM) approaches for solar power plant location selection in Vietnam. Energies, 11(6), 1504.
  • Yesilnacar, M.I., Süzen, M.L., Kaya, B.Ş. and Doyuran, V., 2012. Municipal solid waste landfill site selection for the city of Şanliurfa-Turkey: an example using MCDA integrated with GIS. International Journal of Digital Earth, 5(2), 147-164.
  • Zadeh, L.A., 1965. Fuzzy sets. Information and Control, 8(3), 338–353.
  • Zadeh, L.A., 1971. Quantitative fuzzy semantics. Information sciences, 3(2), 159-176.
  • Zahari, M.S., Ishak, W.M.F.W. and Samah, M.A.A., 2010. Study on solid waste generation in Kuantan, Malaysia: Its potential for energy generation. International Journal of Engineering Science and Technology, 2(5), 1338- 1344.
  • Zamorano, M., Molero, E., Hurtado, A., Grindlay, A. and Ramos, A., 2008. Evaluation of a municipal landfill site in Southern Spain with GIS-aided methodology. Journal of hazardous materials, 160(2-3), 473-481.
There are 78 citations in total.

Details

Primary Language Turkish
Subjects Engineering
Journal Section Articles
Authors

Süleyman Sefa Bilgilioğlu 0000-0002-0881-0396

Cemil Gezgin 0000-0002-5951-0107

Publication Date August 31, 2022
Submission Date April 18, 2022
Published in Issue Year 2022

Cite

APA Bilgilioğlu, S. S., & Gezgin, C. (2022). Nevşehir İli Uygun Katı Atık Depolama Sahalarının Coğrafi Bilgi Sistemleri (CBS) ve Bulanık Analitik Hiyerarşi Süreci (BAHS) Yöntemlerinin Entegrasyonu ile Belirlenmesi. Afyon Kocatepe Üniversitesi Fen Ve Mühendislik Bilimleri Dergisi, 22(4), 836-849. https://doi.org/10.35414/akufemubid.1105426
AMA Bilgilioğlu SS, Gezgin C. Nevşehir İli Uygun Katı Atık Depolama Sahalarının Coğrafi Bilgi Sistemleri (CBS) ve Bulanık Analitik Hiyerarşi Süreci (BAHS) Yöntemlerinin Entegrasyonu ile Belirlenmesi. Afyon Kocatepe Üniversitesi Fen Ve Mühendislik Bilimleri Dergisi. August 2022;22(4):836-849. doi:10.35414/akufemubid.1105426
Chicago Bilgilioğlu, Süleyman Sefa, and Cemil Gezgin. “Nevşehir İli Uygun Katı Atık Depolama Sahalarının Coğrafi Bilgi Sistemleri (CBS) Ve Bulanık Analitik Hiyerarşi Süreci (BAHS) Yöntemlerinin Entegrasyonu Ile Belirlenmesi”. Afyon Kocatepe Üniversitesi Fen Ve Mühendislik Bilimleri Dergisi 22, no. 4 (August 2022): 836-49. https://doi.org/10.35414/akufemubid.1105426.
EndNote Bilgilioğlu SS, Gezgin C (August 1, 2022) Nevşehir İli Uygun Katı Atık Depolama Sahalarının Coğrafi Bilgi Sistemleri (CBS) ve Bulanık Analitik Hiyerarşi Süreci (BAHS) Yöntemlerinin Entegrasyonu ile Belirlenmesi. Afyon Kocatepe Üniversitesi Fen Ve Mühendislik Bilimleri Dergisi 22 4 836–849.
IEEE S. S. Bilgilioğlu and C. Gezgin, “Nevşehir İli Uygun Katı Atık Depolama Sahalarının Coğrafi Bilgi Sistemleri (CBS) ve Bulanık Analitik Hiyerarşi Süreci (BAHS) Yöntemlerinin Entegrasyonu ile Belirlenmesi”, Afyon Kocatepe Üniversitesi Fen Ve Mühendislik Bilimleri Dergisi, vol. 22, no. 4, pp. 836–849, 2022, doi: 10.35414/akufemubid.1105426.
ISNAD Bilgilioğlu, Süleyman Sefa - Gezgin, Cemil. “Nevşehir İli Uygun Katı Atık Depolama Sahalarının Coğrafi Bilgi Sistemleri (CBS) Ve Bulanık Analitik Hiyerarşi Süreci (BAHS) Yöntemlerinin Entegrasyonu Ile Belirlenmesi”. Afyon Kocatepe Üniversitesi Fen Ve Mühendislik Bilimleri Dergisi 22/4 (August 2022), 836-849. https://doi.org/10.35414/akufemubid.1105426.
JAMA Bilgilioğlu SS, Gezgin C. Nevşehir İli Uygun Katı Atık Depolama Sahalarının Coğrafi Bilgi Sistemleri (CBS) ve Bulanık Analitik Hiyerarşi Süreci (BAHS) Yöntemlerinin Entegrasyonu ile Belirlenmesi. Afyon Kocatepe Üniversitesi Fen Ve Mühendislik Bilimleri Dergisi. 2022;22:836–849.
MLA Bilgilioğlu, Süleyman Sefa and Cemil Gezgin. “Nevşehir İli Uygun Katı Atık Depolama Sahalarının Coğrafi Bilgi Sistemleri (CBS) Ve Bulanık Analitik Hiyerarşi Süreci (BAHS) Yöntemlerinin Entegrasyonu Ile Belirlenmesi”. Afyon Kocatepe Üniversitesi Fen Ve Mühendislik Bilimleri Dergisi, vol. 22, no. 4, 2022, pp. 836-49, doi:10.35414/akufemubid.1105426.
Vancouver Bilgilioğlu SS, Gezgin C. Nevşehir İli Uygun Katı Atık Depolama Sahalarının Coğrafi Bilgi Sistemleri (CBS) ve Bulanık Analitik Hiyerarşi Süreci (BAHS) Yöntemlerinin Entegrasyonu ile Belirlenmesi. Afyon Kocatepe Üniversitesi Fen Ve Mühendislik Bilimleri Dergisi. 2022;22(4):836-49.


Bu eser Creative Commons Atıf-GayriTicari 4.0 Uluslararası Lisansı ile lisanslanmıştır.