Research Article
BibTex RIS Cite

Identification Of River Retention Coefficients for Nutrients In Melen Watershed

Year 2016, Volume: 16 Issue: 3, 608 - 616, 31.12.2016

Muhammed Ernur Akıner

Abstract

Melen Watershed is the most recent and the leading drinking water source of Istanbul. According to The Ministry of Forest and Water Works of Turkey, regarding the pollution status, Melen River Basin should be primarily dealt with. Nutrient pollution such as nitrogen (N) and phosphorus (P) can cause water quality degradation in rivers, which are used as a source of drinking water. Buyuk Melen and Kucuk Melen rivers are existed on Melen Watershed. Water supplied from Buyuk Melen River is tranferred to Omerli Dam and supplies important percent of the water demand of the Istanbul. Hence, it is crucial to observe the water quality of the supplied water in Melen Watershed. Certain percent of the nutrients that cause the organic pollution are retained through the river route. River retention coefficient is the percent that reflects how many percent of the nutrients are retained during the river flow. River retention coefficient for the rivers on the Melen Watershed was calculated according to the several factors mentioned in this study. For this purpose geographical information systems (GIS) were also dealt with and digital elevation model (DEM) was prepared using raster images scaled 1/25000. This study is aimed to be an important precedent for other basins that are determined as in priority in terms of pollution by The Ministry of Forest and Water Works of Turkey.

Keywords

Melen Watershed Nutrient Water Quality GIS DEM River Retention Coefficient.

References

  • Arbuckle, J. L., 2009. AMOS 18 User's Guide, AMOS Development Corporation, 636.
  • Behrendt, H., and Opitz, D., 2000. Retention of Nutrientsin River Systems: Dependence on Specific Runoff and Hydraulic Load. Hydrobiologia, 410, 111-122.
  • Bere, T., 2007. The Assessment of Nutrient Loading and Retention in the Upper Segment of the Chinyika River, Harare: Implications for Eutrophication Control. Water SA, 33(2), 279-284.
  • Bukaveckas, P.A. and Isenberg, W.N., 2013. Loading, transformation, and retention of nitrogen and phosphorus in the tidal freshwater James River(Virginia). Estuaries and coasts, 36(6), 1219-1236.
  • de Klein, J. J. M., and Koelmans, A. A., 2011. Quantifying Seasonal Export and Retention of Nutrients in West European Lowland Rivers at Catchment Scale. Hydrological Processes, 25(13), 2102-2111.
  • Di Luzio, M., Arnold, J. G. and Srinivasan, R., 2005. Effect of GIS Data Quality on Small Watershed Stream Flowand Sediment Simulations. Hydrological Processes, 19(3), 629-650.
  • DSI (State Hydraulic Works), 2011. 1995-2010 Stream Pollution Parameters Measurements in the Melen Watershed, Ankara, Turkey, (Unpublished report).
  • DSI (State Hydraulic Works), 2010. 1/25000 Scale Topographic Maps and Vector Maps of the Melen Watershed Area, Ankara, Turkey.
  • Fakioglu, O., and Pulatsu, S., 2005. Mogan Gölü’nde (Ankara) Bazı Restorasyon Önlemleri Sonrası Dış Kaynaklı Fosfor Yükünün Belirlenmesi [In Turkish]. Yüzüncü Yıl Üniv. Ziraat Fakültesi Dergisi, 15(1), 63-69.
  • González‐Sanchis, M., Murillo, J., Cabezas, A., Vermaat, J.E., Comín, F.A. and García‐Navarro, P., 2015. Modelling sediment deposition and phosphorus retention in a river floodplain. HydrologicalProcesses, 29(3), 384-394.
  • Jayakrishnan, R., Srinivasan, R., Santhi, C. and Arnold, J.G., 2005. Advances in the Application of the SWAT Model For Water Resources Management. Hydrological Processes, 19(3), 749-762.
  • Niraula, R., Kalin, L., Srivastava, P. and Anderson, C.J., 2013. Identifying critical source areas of non point source pollution with SWAT and GWLF. Ecologicalmodelling, 268, 123-133.
  • NOAA (National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration), 2010. Düzce and Bolu Meteorological Data, http://www.noaa.gov/.
  • Peterson, B. J., Wollheim, W. M., Mulholland, P. J.,Webster, J. R., Meyer, J. L., Tank, J. L., Marti, E.,Bowden, W. B., Valett, H. M., Hershey, A. E.,McDowell, W. H., Dodds, W. K., Hamilton, S. K.,Gregory, S., and Morrall, D. D., 2001. Control ofNitrogen Export from Watersheds by Headwater Streams. Science, 292, 86-90.
  • Shilla, D., 2014. Fluxes and retention of nutrients and organic carbon in Manko estuary, Okinawa, Japan: influence of river discharge variations. Advances in Oceanography and Limnology, 5(2), 141-163.
  • Song, K., Hernandez, M.E., Batson, J.A. and Mitsch, W.J., 2014. Long-term denitrification rates in created riverine wetlands and their relationship with environmental factors. Ecological Engineering, 72, 40-46.
  • TMS (Turkish Meteorological Data Archive System), 2010. Düzce and Bolu Meteorological Data. Turkish State Meteorological Service, http://www.dmi.gov.tr/index.aspx.

Year 2016, Volume: 16 Issue: 3, 608 - 616, 31.12.2016

Muhammed Ernur Akıner

Abstract

References

  • Arbuckle, J. L., 2009. AMOS 18 User's Guide, AMOS Development Corporation, 636.
  • Behrendt, H., and Opitz, D., 2000. Retention of Nutrientsin River Systems: Dependence on Specific Runoff and Hydraulic Load. Hydrobiologia, 410, 111-122.
  • Bere, T., 2007. The Assessment of Nutrient Loading and Retention in the Upper Segment of the Chinyika River, Harare: Implications for Eutrophication Control. Water SA, 33(2), 279-284.
  • Bukaveckas, P.A. and Isenberg, W.N., 2013. Loading, transformation, and retention of nitrogen and phosphorus in the tidal freshwater James River(Virginia). Estuaries and coasts, 36(6), 1219-1236.
  • de Klein, J. J. M., and Koelmans, A. A., 2011. Quantifying Seasonal Export and Retention of Nutrients in West European Lowland Rivers at Catchment Scale. Hydrological Processes, 25(13), 2102-2111.
  • Di Luzio, M., Arnold, J. G. and Srinivasan, R., 2005. Effect of GIS Data Quality on Small Watershed Stream Flowand Sediment Simulations. Hydrological Processes, 19(3), 629-650.
  • DSI (State Hydraulic Works), 2011. 1995-2010 Stream Pollution Parameters Measurements in the Melen Watershed, Ankara, Turkey, (Unpublished report).
  • DSI (State Hydraulic Works), 2010. 1/25000 Scale Topographic Maps and Vector Maps of the Melen Watershed Area, Ankara, Turkey.
  • Fakioglu, O., and Pulatsu, S., 2005. Mogan Gölü’nde (Ankara) Bazı Restorasyon Önlemleri Sonrası Dış Kaynaklı Fosfor Yükünün Belirlenmesi [In Turkish]. Yüzüncü Yıl Üniv. Ziraat Fakültesi Dergisi, 15(1), 63-69.
  • González‐Sanchis, M., Murillo, J., Cabezas, A., Vermaat, J.E., Comín, F.A. and García‐Navarro, P., 2015. Modelling sediment deposition and phosphorus retention in a river floodplain. HydrologicalProcesses, 29(3), 384-394.
  • Jayakrishnan, R., Srinivasan, R., Santhi, C. and Arnold, J.G., 2005. Advances in the Application of the SWAT Model For Water Resources Management. Hydrological Processes, 19(3), 749-762.
  • Niraula, R., Kalin, L., Srivastava, P. and Anderson, C.J., 2013. Identifying critical source areas of non point source pollution with SWAT and GWLF. Ecologicalmodelling, 268, 123-133.
  • NOAA (National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration), 2010. Düzce and Bolu Meteorological Data, http://www.noaa.gov/.
  • Peterson, B. J., Wollheim, W. M., Mulholland, P. J.,Webster, J. R., Meyer, J. L., Tank, J. L., Marti, E.,Bowden, W. B., Valett, H. M., Hershey, A. E.,McDowell, W. H., Dodds, W. K., Hamilton, S. K.,Gregory, S., and Morrall, D. D., 2001. Control ofNitrogen Export from Watersheds by Headwater Streams. Science, 292, 86-90.
  • Shilla, D., 2014. Fluxes and retention of nutrients and organic carbon in Manko estuary, Okinawa, Japan: influence of river discharge variations. Advances in Oceanography and Limnology, 5(2), 141-163.
  • Song, K., Hernandez, M.E., Batson, J.A. and Mitsch, W.J., 2014. Long-term denitrification rates in created riverine wetlands and their relationship with environmental factors. Ecological Engineering, 72, 40-46.
  • TMS (Turkish Meteorological Data Archive System), 2010. Düzce and Bolu Meteorological Data. Turkish State Meteorological Service, http://www.dmi.gov.tr/index.aspx.
There are 17 citations in total.

Details

Primary Language English
Journal Section Articles
Authors

Muhammed Ernur Akıner

Publication Date December 31, 2016
Submission Date March 28, 2016
Published in Issue Year 2016 Volume: 16 Issue: 3

Cite

APA Ernur Akıner, M. (2016). Identification Of River Retention Coefficients for Nutrients In Melen Watershed. Afyon Kocatepe Üniversitesi Fen Ve Mühendislik Bilimleri Dergisi, 16(3), 608-616.
AMA Ernur Akıner M. Identification Of River Retention Coefficients for Nutrients In Melen Watershed. Afyon Kocatepe Üniversitesi Fen Ve Mühendislik Bilimleri Dergisi. December 2016;16(3):608-616.
Chicago Ernur Akıner, Muhammed. “Identification Of River Retention Coefficients for Nutrients In Melen Watershed”. Afyon Kocatepe Üniversitesi Fen Ve Mühendislik Bilimleri Dergisi 16, no. 3 (December 2016): 608-16.
EndNote Ernur Akıner M (December 1, 2016) Identification Of River Retention Coefficients for Nutrients In Melen Watershed. Afyon Kocatepe Üniversitesi Fen Ve Mühendislik Bilimleri Dergisi 16 3 608–616.
IEEE M. Ernur Akıner, “Identification Of River Retention Coefficients for Nutrients In Melen Watershed”, Afyon Kocatepe Üniversitesi Fen Ve Mühendislik Bilimleri Dergisi, vol. 16, no. 3, pp. 608–616, 2016.
ISNAD Ernur Akıner, Muhammed. “Identification Of River Retention Coefficients for Nutrients In Melen Watershed”. Afyon Kocatepe Üniversitesi Fen Ve Mühendislik Bilimleri Dergisi 16/3 (December 2016), 608-616.
JAMA Ernur Akıner M. Identification Of River Retention Coefficients for Nutrients In Melen Watershed. Afyon Kocatepe Üniversitesi Fen Ve Mühendislik Bilimleri Dergisi. 2016;16:608–616.
MLA Ernur Akıner, Muhammed. “Identification Of River Retention Coefficients for Nutrients In Melen Watershed”. Afyon Kocatepe Üniversitesi Fen Ve Mühendislik Bilimleri Dergisi, vol. 16, no. 3, 2016, pp. 608-16.
Vancouver Ernur Akıner M. Identification Of River Retention Coefficients for Nutrients In Melen Watershed. Afyon Kocatepe Üniversitesi Fen Ve Mühendislik Bilimleri Dergisi. 2016;16(3):608-16.