Research Article
BibTex RIS Cite

Evaluation of the Track Geometry Quality with Standard Deviation Method and Quality Indices: Case study of Kütahya-Afyonkarahisar Railway Line

Year 2020, Volume: 20 Issue: 6, 1068 - 1078, 31.12.2020
https://doi.org/10.35414/akufemubid.684336

Abstract

In this paper, a specific part of the railway line between Kütahya and Afyonkarahisar cities was investigated. The track geometry parameters alignment, cant, longitudinal level, track gauge and twist investigated at this track section in accordance with the related standard EN:13848-5 and evaluations conducted about the track geometry defects. A fatal train accident occurred on the Kütahya-Afyonkarahisar railway line in 2008, besides the line was completely renewed in 2013. For this reason, measurements were carried out by the help of track geometry measuring devices on the Kütahya-Afyonkarahisar railway line having the opportunity to compare the improvements at the track geometry quality, within four years period. Owing to measurements performed on the track section, improvements, degradations and degradation trends were determined using the standard deviation method mentioned in the standard EN:13848-5. In addition, the effects of the track renewal performed on the railway line discussed by the help of the Track Quality Indices (TQI), Overall Quality Indices (OQI) and Tamping Indices (TI) concepts. In light of the case study conducted at this paper, the quality of the track renewal and maintenance works performed by Turkish State Railways (TCDD) was examined.

Thanks

T.C.D.D.

References

  • Andrade, A. R. and Teixeira, P.F., 2014. Unplanned-Maintenance Needs Related To Rail Track Geometry. Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineer- Transport, 167(6), 400-410.
  • Berawi, A.B., 2013. Improving Railway Track Maintenance Using Power Spectral Density (PSD). Doctoral Thesis, Faculdade De Engenharia Universidade Do Porto, Portugal, 260.
  • CEN, 2008. EN 13848:2008 Railway applications - Track - Track geometry quality - part 5: Geometric quality levels, European Committee For Standardization, Avenue Marnix 17, B-1000 Brussels, 7-18.
  • El-Sibaie, M. and Zhang, Y., 2004. Objective track quality indices. Transportation Research Record, 1863(1), 81–87. Izvolta, L. And Smalo, M., 2015. Assessment of the track geometry quality from the aspect of safe and reliable operation of the railway track. Procedia Engineering, 111, 344-350.
  • İça, S., 2015. The investigation of the railway track geometry defects and suggested solutions: case study of Kütahya-Afyon Railway Line, Master of Science Thesis, Kütahya Dumlupınar University Institute Of Science Studies, Kütahya, 128.
  • Khouy, I.A., Juntti, U., Nissen, A. and Schunnesson, H., 2012. Evaluation of track geometry degradation in Swedish heavy haul railroad - A Case Study. International Journal of COMADEM, 15(1), 11-16.
  • Komerční železniční výzkum s.r.o. (KZV), 2002. Krab 8.1 Evaluation Software Manual Theoretical Overview, Komerční železniční výzkum s.r.o. ul. U kapličky, Praha, Czech Republic,10-31.
  • Lasisi, A., Attoh-Okine, N., 2019. An Unsupervised Learning Framework for Track Quality Index and Safety. Transportation Infrastructure Geotechnology, 7, 1-12.
  • Quiroga, L.M., Schnieder, E., 2011. Monte Carlo simulation of railway track geometry deterioration and restoration. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers - Part O: Journal of Risk and Reliability, 226, 274–282.
  • Sasidharan, M., Burrow, M.P.N., Ghataora, G.S., 2020. A whole life cycle approach under uncertainty for economically justifiable ballasted railway track maintenance. Research in Transportation Economics, 80.
  • Sato, Y., Conference Paper: Optimum Track Structure Considering Track Deterioration in Ballasted Track, Proceedings Sixth International Heavy Haul Railway Conference, Cape Town, South Africa, 6-10 April 1997.
  • Sharma, S., Cui, Y., He, Q., Mohammadi, R., Li, Z., 2018. Data-driven optimization of Railway maintenance for track geometry. Transport, Research Part C, 90, 34–58.
  • Soleimanmeigouni, I., Ahmadi, A., Kumar, U. 2018. Track geometry degradation and maintenance modelling: A review. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers - Part F: Journal of Rail and Rapid Transit, 232(1), 73–102.
  • Taciroğlu, M.V., Karaşahin, M., Tığdemir, M., Işıker, H., 2020. Fractal analysis of high speed rail geometry data: A case study of Ankara-Eskişehir high speed rail. Measurement, 165.
  • Zhao, J., Chan A.H.C., Stirling A.B. and Madelin K.B., 2006. Optimizing policies of railway ballast tamping and renewal. Transportation Research Record, 1943(1), 50–56.
  • 1-https://www.bbc.com/turkce/haberler-turkiye-46551115, (02.02.2020)
  • 2- https://i2.wp.com/rayhaber.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/02/tcdd-demiryollari-haritasi-2019-guncel.jpg?ssl=1, (07.10.2020)

Yol Geometrisi Kalitesinin Standart Sapma Yöntemi ve Kalite Endeksleri İle Değerlendirilmesi: Kütahya-Afyonkarahisar Hattı Örneği

Year 2020, Volume: 20 Issue: 6, 1068 - 1078, 31.12.2020
https://doi.org/10.35414/akufemubid.684336

Abstract

Bu çalışmada, Kütahya-Afyonkarahisar şehirleri arasındaki konvansiyonel taşımacılık yapılan demiryolu hattı üzerinde belirli bir bölüm incelenmiştir. Söz konusu yol kesiminde, yol geometrisi parametreleri olan dever, ekartman, nivelman, fleş ve burulma hataları ilgili EN:13848-5 normu çerçevesinde incelenmiş ve bu yol geometrisi kusurları ile ilgili değerlendirilmeler yapılmıştır. Kütahya-Afyonkarahisar demiryolu hattında 2008 yılında ölümlü tren kazasının meydana gelmiş olup, ayrıca bu hatta 2013 yılında ise poz çalışması yapılarak hat tamamen yenilenmiştir. Bu nedenle hattaki iyileşmelerin karşılaştırılma imkanı bulunan Kütahya-Afyonkarahisar demiryolu hattında dört yıllık zaman dilimi içerisinde yol geometrisi ölçüm aletleri ile ölçüm çalışmaları yapılmıştır. Yapılan ölçümler sayesinde yol bölümündeki iyileşmeler, bozulmalar ve bozulma eğilimleri EN:13848-5 normunda da yer alan standart sapma yöntemi kullanılarak belirlenmiştir. Ayrıca Kütahya- Afyonkarahisar demiryolu hattı üzerinde yapılan poz çalışmasının yol geometrisi kalitesine etkileri yol kalite endeksleri (QI), toplam yol kalite endeksi (OQI) ve buraj endeksi (TI) kavramları ile irdelenmiştir. Bu çalışmada yapılan örnek olay incelemesi sayesinde, TCDD tarafından yapılmış olan yol yenileme ve bakım çalışmalarının kalitesi araştırılmıştır.

References

  • Andrade, A. R. and Teixeira, P.F., 2014. Unplanned-Maintenance Needs Related To Rail Track Geometry. Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineer- Transport, 167(6), 400-410.
  • Berawi, A.B., 2013. Improving Railway Track Maintenance Using Power Spectral Density (PSD). Doctoral Thesis, Faculdade De Engenharia Universidade Do Porto, Portugal, 260.
  • CEN, 2008. EN 13848:2008 Railway applications - Track - Track geometry quality - part 5: Geometric quality levels, European Committee For Standardization, Avenue Marnix 17, B-1000 Brussels, 7-18.
  • El-Sibaie, M. and Zhang, Y., 2004. Objective track quality indices. Transportation Research Record, 1863(1), 81–87. Izvolta, L. And Smalo, M., 2015. Assessment of the track geometry quality from the aspect of safe and reliable operation of the railway track. Procedia Engineering, 111, 344-350.
  • İça, S., 2015. The investigation of the railway track geometry defects and suggested solutions: case study of Kütahya-Afyon Railway Line, Master of Science Thesis, Kütahya Dumlupınar University Institute Of Science Studies, Kütahya, 128.
  • Khouy, I.A., Juntti, U., Nissen, A. and Schunnesson, H., 2012. Evaluation of track geometry degradation in Swedish heavy haul railroad - A Case Study. International Journal of COMADEM, 15(1), 11-16.
  • Komerční železniční výzkum s.r.o. (KZV), 2002. Krab 8.1 Evaluation Software Manual Theoretical Overview, Komerční železniční výzkum s.r.o. ul. U kapličky, Praha, Czech Republic,10-31.
  • Lasisi, A., Attoh-Okine, N., 2019. An Unsupervised Learning Framework for Track Quality Index and Safety. Transportation Infrastructure Geotechnology, 7, 1-12.
  • Quiroga, L.M., Schnieder, E., 2011. Monte Carlo simulation of railway track geometry deterioration and restoration. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers - Part O: Journal of Risk and Reliability, 226, 274–282.
  • Sasidharan, M., Burrow, M.P.N., Ghataora, G.S., 2020. A whole life cycle approach under uncertainty for economically justifiable ballasted railway track maintenance. Research in Transportation Economics, 80.
  • Sato, Y., Conference Paper: Optimum Track Structure Considering Track Deterioration in Ballasted Track, Proceedings Sixth International Heavy Haul Railway Conference, Cape Town, South Africa, 6-10 April 1997.
  • Sharma, S., Cui, Y., He, Q., Mohammadi, R., Li, Z., 2018. Data-driven optimization of Railway maintenance for track geometry. Transport, Research Part C, 90, 34–58.
  • Soleimanmeigouni, I., Ahmadi, A., Kumar, U. 2018. Track geometry degradation and maintenance modelling: A review. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers - Part F: Journal of Rail and Rapid Transit, 232(1), 73–102.
  • Taciroğlu, M.V., Karaşahin, M., Tığdemir, M., Işıker, H., 2020. Fractal analysis of high speed rail geometry data: A case study of Ankara-Eskişehir high speed rail. Measurement, 165.
  • Zhao, J., Chan A.H.C., Stirling A.B. and Madelin K.B., 2006. Optimizing policies of railway ballast tamping and renewal. Transportation Research Record, 1943(1), 50–56.
  • 1-https://www.bbc.com/turkce/haberler-turkiye-46551115, (02.02.2020)
  • 2- https://i2.wp.com/rayhaber.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/02/tcdd-demiryollari-haritasi-2019-guncel.jpg?ssl=1, (07.10.2020)
There are 17 citations in total.

Details

Primary Language English
Subjects Engineering
Journal Section Articles
Authors

Polat Yalınız 0000-0003-0373-9727

Sezgin İça This is me 0000-0001-5194-7059

Publication Date December 31, 2020
Submission Date February 4, 2020
Published in Issue Year 2020 Volume: 20 Issue: 6

Cite

APA Yalınız, P., & İça, S. (2020). Evaluation of the Track Geometry Quality with Standard Deviation Method and Quality Indices: Case study of Kütahya-Afyonkarahisar Railway Line. Afyon Kocatepe Üniversitesi Fen Ve Mühendislik Bilimleri Dergisi, 20(6), 1068-1078. https://doi.org/10.35414/akufemubid.684336
AMA Yalınız P, İça S. Evaluation of the Track Geometry Quality with Standard Deviation Method and Quality Indices: Case study of Kütahya-Afyonkarahisar Railway Line. Afyon Kocatepe Üniversitesi Fen Ve Mühendislik Bilimleri Dergisi. December 2020;20(6):1068-1078. doi:10.35414/akufemubid.684336
Chicago Yalınız, Polat, and Sezgin İça. “Evaluation of the Track Geometry Quality With Standard Deviation Method and Quality Indices: Case Study of Kütahya-Afyonkarahisar Railway Line”. Afyon Kocatepe Üniversitesi Fen Ve Mühendislik Bilimleri Dergisi 20, no. 6 (December 2020): 1068-78. https://doi.org/10.35414/akufemubid.684336.
EndNote Yalınız P, İça S (December 1, 2020) Evaluation of the Track Geometry Quality with Standard Deviation Method and Quality Indices: Case study of Kütahya-Afyonkarahisar Railway Line. Afyon Kocatepe Üniversitesi Fen Ve Mühendislik Bilimleri Dergisi 20 6 1068–1078.
IEEE P. Yalınız and S. İça, “Evaluation of the Track Geometry Quality with Standard Deviation Method and Quality Indices: Case study of Kütahya-Afyonkarahisar Railway Line”, Afyon Kocatepe Üniversitesi Fen Ve Mühendislik Bilimleri Dergisi, vol. 20, no. 6, pp. 1068–1078, 2020, doi: 10.35414/akufemubid.684336.
ISNAD Yalınız, Polat - İça, Sezgin. “Evaluation of the Track Geometry Quality With Standard Deviation Method and Quality Indices: Case Study of Kütahya-Afyonkarahisar Railway Line”. Afyon Kocatepe Üniversitesi Fen Ve Mühendislik Bilimleri Dergisi 20/6 (December 2020), 1068-1078. https://doi.org/10.35414/akufemubid.684336.
JAMA Yalınız P, İça S. Evaluation of the Track Geometry Quality with Standard Deviation Method and Quality Indices: Case study of Kütahya-Afyonkarahisar Railway Line. Afyon Kocatepe Üniversitesi Fen Ve Mühendislik Bilimleri Dergisi. 2020;20:1068–1078.
MLA Yalınız, Polat and Sezgin İça. “Evaluation of the Track Geometry Quality With Standard Deviation Method and Quality Indices: Case Study of Kütahya-Afyonkarahisar Railway Line”. Afyon Kocatepe Üniversitesi Fen Ve Mühendislik Bilimleri Dergisi, vol. 20, no. 6, 2020, pp. 1068-7, doi:10.35414/akufemubid.684336.
Vancouver Yalınız P, İça S. Evaluation of the Track Geometry Quality with Standard Deviation Method and Quality Indices: Case study of Kütahya-Afyonkarahisar Railway Line. Afyon Kocatepe Üniversitesi Fen Ve Mühendislik Bilimleri Dergisi. 2020;20(6):1068-7.