İlkokul Sosyal Bilgiler Derslerinde Ders Kitabına Dayalı Öğretmen Konuşması

Öz

Bu çalışma, bir öğretmenin ilkokul sosyal bilgiler dersinde ders kitabı kullanımını incelemektedir. Öğretmenin sınıf içi etkileşim sırasında ders kitabına baktığı anlara ve bu uygulamanın etkileşimi nasıl teşvik edip, şekillendirdiğine odaklanmaktadır. Konuşma çözümlemesini kullanarak, ders kitabının öğretmenin konuşmasını nasıl desteklediğine atıfta bulunarak sınıf söylemine dair yeni içgörüler sağlamaktadır. Veri, 17 saatlik video kaydı yapılmış, doğal olarak gerçekleşen sınıf etkileşiminden oluşmaktadır. Yapılan analiz, öğretmenin ders kitabının içeriğini soru-cevap dizisi ve ders anlatımı dizisi gibi etkileşimin farklı anlarında kullanarak söz sırasını genişlettiğini göstermektedir. Ayrıca öğretmenin bir yandan ders kitabını takip ederken bir yandan da başka bir sınıf etkinliğine devam ederek sınıfta çoklu görev deneyimi yaşadığını göstermektedir. Genel olarak bu çalışma, sınıf içi etkileşimin düzenlenmesinde ders kitabının kullanımına odaklanarak alandaki bir boşluğu doldurmaktadır.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Ders kitabı
• ilkokul
• sosyal bilgiler dersi
• sınıf söylemi
• konuşma çözümlemesi

Textbook-Mediated Teacher Talk in Social Studies Lessons at Primary School

Abstract

This study investigates a teacher's use of a textbook in a primary school social studies course. It focuses on the moments when the teacher looks at the textbook during classroom interaction and how this practice promotes and shapes the interaction. Using conversation analysis, it provides new insights into the classroom discourse with reference to how the textbook supports the teacher talk. The corpus consists of 17 hours of video-recorded, naturally occurring classroom interaction. The analysis shows that the teacher extends her turn by using the content of the textbook at different moments of the interaction, such as the question and answer sequence and the lecture sequence. It also shows that the teacher experiences multitasking in the classroom by following the textbook while continuing with another classroom activity. Overall, this study fills a gap in the field by focusing on the use of the textbook in organizing classroom interaction.

Keywords

• Textbook
• primary school
• social studies course
• classroom discourse
• conversation analysis

References

1. Amar, C., & Hauser, E. (2024). On the predictability of action: Student gaze shift in anticipation of teacher selection. Social Interaction: Video-Based Studies of Human Sociality, 7(2). https://doi.org/10.7146/si.v7i2.136142
2. Auer, P. (2021). Turn-allocation and gaze: A multimodal revision of the “current-speaker-selects-next” rule of the turn-taking system of conversation analysis. Discourse Studies, 23(2) 117-140. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461445620966922
3. Brante, G. (2009). Multitasking and synchronous work: Complexities in teacher work. Teaching and Teacher Education, 25(3), 430-436.
4. Breakell, J. (2001). An analysis of mathematics textbooks and reference textbooks in use in primary and secondary schools in England and Wales in the 1960s. Paradigm: Journal of the Textbook Colloquium, 2(3), 19–30.
5. Carvalho, A., & Amaral, R. (2025). Influences on teacher-textbook relationship. In C. Cornejo et al. (Eds.). Proceedings of the 48th Conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education: Research Reports, 1(147-154). PME.
6. Chazal, K. C. (2015). Pedagogical artifacts in teacher-initiated response pursuits: A conversation analytic study of interaction in the French foreign language classroom. [Doctoral dissertation]. University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign.
7. Dole, S., & Shield, M. J. (2008). The capacity of two Australian eighth-grade textbooks for promoting proportional reasoning. Research in Mathematics Education, 10(1), 19–35.
8. Drew, P. and J. Heritage. (1992). Analysing talk at work: An introduction. In Drew, P. & Heritage, J. (Eds), Talk at work: Interaction in institutional settings (pp. 3-65). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

9. Eisenwine, M. J., & Hadley, N. J. (2011). Multitasking teachers: Mistake or missing link? The Educational Forum, 75(1), 4-16. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131725.2010.528551
10. Fan, L., Turnau, S., Dole, S., Gelfman, E., & Li, Y. (2004). DG 14: Focus on the development and research of mathematics textbooks. In M. Niss (Ed.), Proceedings of the 10th International Congress on Mathematical Education (pp. 485–489). Roskilde, Denmark: Roskilde University. Scientific.
11. Fan, L., Zhu, Y., & Miao, Z. (2013). Textbook research in mathematics education: Development status and directions. ZDM Mathematics Education,45, 633-646.
12. Fuchs, E., & Henne, K. (2018). History of textbook research. In E. Fuchs & A. Bock (Eds.), The Palgrave handbook of textbook studies (pp. 25-56). Palgrave Macmillan.
13. Gak, D. M. (2011). Textbook-An important element in the teaching process. Hatchaba Journal, 19(2), 78-82. Gardner, R. (2004). Conversation analysis. In Alan Davies & Catherine Elder (Eds.), The handbook of applied linguistics (pp. 262-284). Wiley Online Library.
14. Gautschi, P. (2018). Ideas and concepts for using textbooks in the context of teaching and learning in the social sciences and humanities. In E. Fuchs & A. Bock (Eds.), The Palgrave handbook of textbook studies (pp. 127-139). Palgrave Macmillan.
15. Haas, M. E., & Laughlin, M. A. (2000). Teaching current events: Its status in social studies today. Annual Conferences of the American Educational Research Association New Orleans.
16. Haggarty, L., & Pepin, B. (2002). An investigation of mathematics textbooks and their use in English, French and German classrooms: Who gets an opportunity to learn what? British Educational Research Journal, 28(4), 567–590. https://doi.org/10.1080/0141192022000005832
17. Haulle, E., & Kabelege, E. (2021). Relevance and quality of textbooks used in primary education in Tanzania: A case of social studies textbooks. Contemporary Education Dialogue, 18(1), 12-28.
18. Heath, C., & Luff, P. (2013). Embodied action and organizational activity. In J. Sidnell & T. Stivers (Eds.), The handbook of conversation analysis (pp. 283–307). Wiley-Blackwell.
19. Horsley, M., Knight, B. & Huntly, H. (2010). The role of textbooks and other teaching and learning resources in higher education in Australia: change and continuity in supporting learning. IARTEM e-Journal, 3(2), 43-61.
20. Hutchby, I., & Wooffitt, R. (2008). Conversation analysis. Cambridge: Polity Press.
21. Im, H. (2024). Affective and social competencies of elementary school students in the use of digital textbooks: A longitudinal study. Behavioral Sciences, 14, 179. https://doi.org/10.3390/bs14030179
22. Jakonen, T. (2015). Handling knowledge: Using classroom materials to construct and interpret information requests. Journal of Pragmatics, 89, 100-112. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2015.10.001
23. Jamil, M., Bokhari, T. B., & Ahmad, D. (2024). Evaluation of critical thinking elements: A qualitative content analysis of physics textbook grade IX. Qlantic Journal of Social Sciences, 5(1), 344-350.
24. Jefferson, G. (2004). Glossary of transcript symbols with an introduction. In G. H. Lerner (Ed.), Conversation analysis: Studies form first generation (pp. 13–34). Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
25. Johansson, M. (2006). Teaching mathematics with textbooks. a classroom and curricular perspective. [Doctoral dissertation]. Luleå University of Technology, Sweden.
26. Kardaş İşler, N., Gosen, M. N., & Willemsen, A. (2024). Hypothetical situations as a pedagogical resource in social studies and history lessons at primary school. International Journal of Educational Research, 125, 102315. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2024.102315
27. Karvonen, U., Tainio, L., & Routarinne, S. (2018). Uncovering the pedagogical potential of texts: Curriculum materials in classroom interaction in first language and literature education. Learning, Culture and Social Interaction, 17, 38-55. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lcsi.2017.12.003
28. Kendrick, K. H., Holler, J., & Levinson, S. C. (2023). Turn-taking in human face-to-face interaction is multimodal: Gaze direction and manual gestures aid the coordination of turn transitions. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B, 378, 20210473. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2021.0473
29. Koole, T. (2015). Classroom interaction. In K. Tracy (Ed.), International encyclopedia of language and social interaction. Wiley-Blackwell. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118611463.wbielsi092
30. Kuzu, E. S. (2023). Bir kültür olarak kitap tasarimlarinin dijitale dönüşümü: E-kitaplar. Avrasya Sosyal ve Ekonomi Araştırmaları Dergisi, 10(4), 1004-1014.
31. Labov, W. (1972). Some principles of linguistic methodology. Language in Society, 1(1), 97–120.
32. Lee, S.; Lee, J. H.; Jeong, Y. (2023). The effects of digital textbooks on students’ academic performance, academic interest, and learning skills. Journal of Marketing Research, 60(4), 792–811. https://doi.org/10.1177/00222437221130712
33. Leshota, M. (2020). Teacher-textbook relationships in mathematics in contexts of limited resources. African Journal of Research in Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 24(3), 375-386.
34. Li, Z., & Xu, Y. (2022). Textbook-Mediated Teaching: A Case Study of Four Language Teachers in Higher Education in China. In New perspectives on material mediation in language learner pedagogy (pp. 17-35). Cham: Springer International Publishing.
35. Long, M. H. (1983). Native speaker/non-native speaker conversation in the second language classroom, 94-120. Margutti, P. (2006). “Are you human beings?” Order and knowledge construction through questioning in primary classroom interaction. Linguistics and Education, 17(4), 313-346.
36. Margutti, P., & Drew, P. (2014). Positive evaluation of student answers in classroom instruction. Language and Education, 28(5), 436-458. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500782.2014.898650
37. Markee, N. (1994). Toward an ethnomethodological respecification of second language acquisition studies. Research methodology in second language acquisition, 89-116.
38. Matsumoto, Y. (2019). Material moments: Teacher and student use of materials in multilingual writing classroom interactions. The Modern Language Journal, 103(1), 179-204. https://doi.org/10.1111/modl.12547
39. Maynard, D. W. (1980). Placement of topic changes in conversation. Semiotica, 30(3-4), 263-290.
40. Mesa, V., & Griffiths, B. (2012). Textbook mediation of teaching: An example from tertiary mathematics instructors. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 79, 85-107.
41. Ministry of National Education [MoNE]. (2018) Social studies course curriculum (primary and secondary school 4th, 5th, 6th and 7th grades). Ankara, Türkiye.
42. Ministry of National Education [MoNE]. (2024). Social studies course curriculum (primary and secondary school 4th, 5th, 6th and 7th grades). Ankara, Türkiye.
43. Mlynář, J. (2023). Lifting the pen and the gaze: embodied recruitment in collaborative writing. Text & Talk, 43(1), 69-91. https://doi.org/10.1515/text-2020-0148
44. Mondada, L. (2013). The conversation analytic approach to data collection. In J. Sidnell, & T. Stivers (Eds.), The handbook of conversation analysis (pp. 32–56). Blackwell Publishing.
45. Mondada, L. (2016). Conventions for multimodal transcription. In Basel: Romanisches Seminar der Universität.https://franzoesistik.philhist.unibas.ch/fileadmin/user_upload/franzoesistik/mondada_multimodal_conventions.pdf
46. Mondada, L. (2018). Multiple temporalities of language and body in interaction: Challenges for transcribing multimodality. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 51(1), 85-106. https://doi.org/10.1080/08351813.2018.1413878
47. Moore, C. R., & Robinson, J. D. (2024). An action-specific examination of the role of answerers’ gaze orientation in managing transition relevance. Discourse Processes, 61(3), 142-163. https://doi.org/10.1080/0163853X.2024.2305528
48. Muhonen, H., Pakarinen, E., Rasku-Puttonen, H., & Lerkkanen, M. K. (2020). Dialogue through the eyes: Exploring teachers’ focus of attention during educational dialogue. International journal of educational research, 102, 101607. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2020.101607
49. Newton, D., & Newton, L. (2007). Could elementary mathematics textbooks help give attention to reasons in the classroom? Educational Studies in Mathematics, 64(1), 69–84.
50. Orena, Z., & Gamutan, L. (2025). Extent of workload challenges and multitasking skills among teachers and their performance. Psychology and Education: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 42(3), 514-517.
51. Remillard, J. T. (2005). Examining key concepts in research on teachers’ use of mathematics curricula. Review of Educational Research, 75(2), 211–246.
52. Remillard, J. T. (2012). Modes of engagement: Understanding teachers’ transactions with mathematics curriculum resources. From text to 'lived' resources: Mathematics curriculum materials and teacher development, 105-122. DOI 10.1007/978-94-007-1966-86
53. Rezat, S. (2013). The textbook-in-use: students’ utilization schemes of mathematics textbooks related to self-regulated practicing. ZDM, Mathematics Education, 45, 659-670.
54. Risager, K. (2018). Representations of the world in language textbooks. Multilingual Matters.
55. Risager, K. (2021). Language textbooks: windows to the world. Language, Culture and Curriculum, 34(2), 119-132. DOI: 10.1080/07908318.2020.1797767
56. Rossano, F. (2013). Gaze in conversation. In J. Sidnell & T. Stivers (Eds.), The handbook of conversation analysis (pp. 308–329). Wiley-Blackwell.
57. Rossano, F., Brown, P., & Levinson, S. C. (2010). Gaze, questioning, and culture. Conversation analysis: Comparative perspectives, 27, 187-249.
58. Rowland, L., & Barrs, K. (2013). Working with textbooks: Reconceptualising student and teacher roles in the classroom. Innovation in Language Learning and teaching, 7(1), 57-71. https://doi.org/10.1080/17501229.2012.686499
59. Schuh, K. L., Van Horne, S., & Russell, J. E. (2018). E-textbook as object and mediator: Interactions between instructor and student activity systems. Journal of Computing in Higher Education, 30, 298-325. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12528-018-9174-4
60. Seedhouse, P. (1996). Learning talk: A study of the interactional organisation of the L2 classroom from a CA institutional discourse perspective. [Doctoral dissertation]. University of York: York.
61. Seedhouse, P. (2005). Conversation analysis as research methodology. In K. Richards, & P. Seedhouse (Eds.), Applying conversation analysis (pp. 251–266). Palgrave Macmillan.
62. Sert, O. (2019). Mutual gaze, embodied go-aheads and their interactional consequences in second language classrooms. In J. K. Hall & S. D. Looney (Eds.), The embodied work of teaching (pp. 142-159). UK: Multilingual Matters. https://doi.org/10.21832/HALL5495
63. Sevimli, E. (2022). The utilization of current mathematics textbooks in online classrooms: perspectives from middle school mathematics teachers. Çukurova University. Faculty of Education Journal, 51(1), 473-500.
64. Stoneman P. (2007) The sociology and efficacy of multitasking. Chimera Working Paper, 05/2007.
65. Tainio, L. (2012). The role of textbooks in Finnish mother tongue and literature classrooms. In Skriftpraktiker hos barn och unga (pp. 11-33). Åbo Akademi.
66. ten Have, P. (2007). Doing conversation analysis. A practical guide. London: Sage Publications.
67. Törnroos, J. (2001). Mathematics textbooks and students’ achievement in the 7th grade: What is the effect of using different textbooks. In J. Novotna Ed., European research in mathematics education II (pp. 518–527). Charles University.
68. Törnroos, J. (2005). Mathematics textbooks, opportunity to learn and student achievement. Studies in educational evaluation, 31(4), 315-327.
69. Tsui, A. B. M. (2005). Expertise in teaching: Perspectives and issues. In K. Johnson Ed., Expertise in second language learning and teaching (pp. 167-189). Palgrave Macmillan.
70. Tůma, F. (2022). “Okay, so, moving on to question two”: Achieving transitions from one item to another in paired EFL speaking tasks. Slovo a slovesnost, 83(3), 163-187.
71. Tůma, F., & Lojdová, K. (2021). ‘There are two gaps, so’: teaching materials as resources for correction in pre-service teachers’ EFL classes. Classroom Discourse, 12(1-2), 15-34. https://doi.org/10.1080/19463014.2020.1856697
72. Tůma, F., Obrovská, J., & Svojanovský, P. (2023). Changes in orientations among pre-service EFL teachers’ correction practices: From teaching materials to underlying knowledge structures. Linguistics and Education, 76, 101186. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.linged.2023.101186
73. Uysal, S. (2024). Yabancı dil öğretiminde Z-kitap uygulamalarının öğrenmeye etkisi. In Ersin Çilek (Ed.), Yabancı dil öğretiminde güncel yaklaşımlar, (pp. 135-144). Efe Akademi.
74. Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological Processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
75. Vänttinen, M. (2022). Eye gaze as a resource in handling trouble around mobile devices in classroom interaction. AFinLA: n vuosikirja, 79, 395-413.
76. Wang, Y., & Fan, L. (2021). Investigating students’ perceptions concerning textbook use in mathematics: A comparative study of secondary schools between Shanghai and England. Journal of curriculum studies, 53(5), 675-691. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220272.2021.1941265
77. Waring, H. Z. (2002). Displaying substantive recipiency in seminar discussion. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 35(4), 453–479. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327973RLSI3504_3
78. Waring, H. Z., & Carpenter, L. B. (2019). Gaze shifts as a resource for managing attention and recipiency. In J. K. Hall & S. D. Looney (Eds.), The embodied work of teaching (pp. 122-141). UK: Multilingual Matters. https://doi.org/10.21832/HALL5495
79. Weninger, C. (2021). Multimodality in critical language textbook analysis. Language, Culture and Curriculum, 34(2), 133-146. https://doi.org/10.1080/07908318.2020.1797083
80. Willemsen, A., Gosen, M., Koole, T., & De Glopper, K. (2019). Gesture, gaze and laughter: teacher conduct facilitating whole-class discussions among students. Social Interaction Video-Based Studies of Human Sociality, 2(2). DOI: 10.7146/si.v2i2.118045
81. Woodward, A., & Elliott, D. L. (1990). Textbooks: Consensus and controversy. Teachers College Record, 91(5), 146-161.
82. Yang, J., Liu, C., Zhang, Y., Yu, Q., & Pi, Z. (2023). The teacher’s eye gaze in university classrooms: Evidence from a field study. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 60(1), 4-14. https://doi.org/10.1080/14703297.2021.1951808
83. Yuen, K. M. (2011). The representation of foreign cultures in English textbooks. ELT Journal, 65(4), 458-466. https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/ccq089
84. Zakai, S. (2019). “Bad things happened”: How children of the digital age make sense of violent current events. The Social Studies, 110(2), 67-85. https://doi.org/10.1080/00377996.2018.1517113