Research Article

An Investigation into In-service and Pre-service English Teachers’ Conception of Assessment

Volume: 13 Number: 2 April 17, 2020
TR EN

An Investigation into In-service and Pre-service English Teachers’ Conception of Assessment

Abstract

Although the importance of assessment on education is undebatable, the intentions of assessors while conducting assessment haven’t been studied yet in detail. To this end, this study aimed to disclose pre-service and in-service English teachers’ conceptions of assessment. In the study, conception of assessment was categorized under four main titles; improvement, school accountability, student accountability and irrelevance. A total of 97 pre-service and in-service teachers participated in the study. Descriptive results indicated that conception of improvement held the highest agreement level among participants. On the other hand, school accountability got the lowest agreement level. Correlation results showed that improvement, school and student accountability conceptions were positively correlated. A MANOVA analysis was applied to scrutinize any effects of gender and grade level/teaching differences on participants’ conceptions. Analysis results indicated that both gender and grade level/teaching factors made significant difference on participants’ conceptions of assessment. A follow up ANOVA analysis indicated significant gender difference on school accountability, with males had higher value than females. Also, there was a significant difference among grade level/teaching groups on school and student accountabilities. Teachers held the highest value for school accountability, and fourth graders held the highest mean value for student accountability.

Keywords

References

  1. Azis, A. (2012). Teachers’ conceptions and use of assessment in student learning. Indonesian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 2(1), 40-52.
  2. Azis, A. (2015). Conceptions and practices of assessment: A case of teachers representing improvement conception. Teflin Journal, 26(2), 129-154.
  3. Black, P., & Wiliam, D. (1998). Inside the black box: Raising standards through classroom assessment. Phi Delta Kappan, 80(2), 139-148.
  4. Brown, G.T.L. (2002). Teachers’ conceptions of assessment (Unpublished doctoral dissertation), University of Auckland, New Zealand.
  5. Brown, G. T. (2004). Teachers' conceptions of assessment: Implications for policy and professional development. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 11(3), 301-318.
  6. Brown, G. T. L. (2006). Teachers' conceptions of assessment inventory--Abridged (TCoA-IIIA-Version 3-Abridged). Unpublished test. Auckland, NZ: University of Auckland.
  7. Brown, G. T., & Hirschfeld, G. H. (2008). Students’ conceptions of assessment: Links to outcomes. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 15(1), 3-17.
  8. Brown, G. T., Kennedy, K. J., Fok, P. K., Chan, J. K. S., & Yu, W. M. (2009). Assessment for student improvement: Understanding Hong Kong teachers’ conceptions and practices of assessment. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 16(3), 347-363.

Details

Primary Language

English

Subjects

Other Fields of Education

Journal Section

Research Article

Publication Date

April 17, 2020

Submission Date

June 26, 2019

Acceptance Date

March 24, 2020

Published in Issue

Year 2020 Volume: 13 Number: 2

APA
Yetkin, R., & Özer, Z. (2020). An Investigation into In-service and Pre-service English Teachers’ Conception of Assessment. Journal of Theoretical Educational Sciences, 13(2), 384-396. https://doi.org/10.30831/akukeg.582886