A Meta-Synthesis Study on Citizenship Education Research within the Scope of Social Studies Lesson in Turkey

Year 2021, Volume: 14 Issue: 3, 323 - 351, 15.07.2021

Burcu Sel

https://doi.org/10.30831/akukeg.879414

Cited By: 1

Abstract

In this research, the purpose is to develop a systematic perspective on the research on citizenship education within the scope of social studies field, to reveal the tendency of the studies, and to reach a synthesis in this direction. Meta-synthesis method was used for this purpose. Researches on "citizenship" were collected and reviewed according to certain criteria, and then the reading process was repeated in order to identify the relationships between the researches, similar, different aspects were identified by using perspective-based continuous comparison, and a synthesis has been reached based on the obtained findings. The researches were obtained from YÖK National Thesis Center and Ulakbim TRDizin. During the analysis of the data process, thematic synthesis and descriptive analysis were utilized. Three main themes were reached: citizenship types/approaches, citizenship perception, and components of citizenship education. Citizenship types/approaches are addressed as spatial, environmentally responsible, effective/effectual/active citizenship, global and digital citizenship. In the context of citizenship perception, it is seen that the subjects of meaning attributed to citizenship, citizenship awareness/identity construction, good/ideal citizen, patriotism are taken as a basis. Under the main theme of components of citizenship education, three sub-themes were generated: basic elements in citizenship education, approaches in citizenship education, and problems in citizenship education.

Keywords

citizenship education, mmeta-synthesis, social studies

References

• Abowitz, K. K., & Harnish, J. (2006). Contemporary discourses of citizenship. Review of educational research, 76(4), 653-690.
• Banks, J. A. (2001). Citizenship education and diversity: Implications for teacher education. Journal of teacher education, 52(1), 5-16.
• Banks, J. A., & Nguyen, D. (2008). Diversity and citizenship education. In L., S. Levstik & C., A. Tyson (Eds.), Handbook of research in social studies education (pp.137-154). New York: Routledge.
• Banks, J. A., & Nguyen, D. (2008). Diversity and citizenship education. Historical, theoretical and philosophical issues. A Levstik, LS; Tyson, CA Handbook of Research in Social Studies Education (pp. 137-154)
• Bauböck, R. (1994). Transnational citizenship: Membership and rights in international migration. Göttingen: Edward Elgar Publishing.
• Battistoni, R. M. (1997). Service learning and democratic citizenship. Theory into practice, 36(3), 150-156.
• Bondas, T., & Hall, E. O. (2007). Challenges in approaching metasynthesis research. Qualitative health research, 17(1), 113-121.
• Brandell, M. E., & Hinck, S. (1997). Service learning: Connecting citizenship with the classroom. NASSP Bulletin, 81(591), 49-56.
• Brooks, R. M., & Holford, J. A. (2009). Citizenship, learning and education: Themes and issues. 13(2), 85-103.
• Clark, P., & Case, R. (1999). Four purposes of citizenship education. In P. Clark & R. Case (Eds.), The Canadian Anthology of Social Studies (pp. 17-27). Vancouver, BC: Simon Fraser University Press.
• Dağ, N. (2013). A descriptive study: The qualitative transformation of citizenship and citizenship education Vatandaşlığın niteliksel dönüşümü ve vatandaşlık eğitimi üzerine bir betimleme çalışması. Eskişehir Osmangazi Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 13(1), 105-118.
• Davies, I., Gorard, S. ve McGuinn, N. (2005). Citizenship education and character education: Similarities and contrasts. British Journal of Educational Studies, 53(3), 341-358.
• Eidhof, B. B., ten Dam, G. T., Dijkstra, A. B., & van de Werfhorst, H. G. (2016). Consensus and contested citizenship education goals in Western Europe. Education, Citizenship and Social Justice, 11(2), 114-129.
• Evans, M. (2006). Educating for citizenship: What teachers say and what teachers do. Canadian Journal of Education/Revue canadienne de l'éducation, 410-435.
• Finfgeld, D. L. (2003). Metasynthesis: The state of the art—so far. Qualitative health research, 13(7), 893-904.
• Fischman, G. E. ve Haas, E. (2012). Beyond idealized citizenship education: Embodied cognition, metaphors, and democracy. Review of Research in Education, 36, 169-196.
• Geboers, E., Geijsel, F., Admiraal, W., & ten Dam, G. (2013). Review of the effects of citizenship education. Educational Research Review, 9, 158-173.
• Hammar, T. (1996). Transnational citizenship: Membership and rights in international migration. International Migration Review, 30(3), 813-814.
• Hebert, Y. (1997). Citizenship education: towards a pedagogy of social participation and identity formation. Canadian Ethnic Studies, 29(2), 82–97.
• Hébert, Y. M., & Sears, A. (2001). Citizenship education. Canadian Education Association.
• Hettne, B. (2000). The fate of citizenship in post-Westphalia. Citizenship Studies, 4(1), 35-46.
• Hoge, J. D. (2002). Character education, citizenship education, and the social studies. The Social Studies, 93(3), 103-108.
• Homana, G., Barber, C., & Torney-Purta, J. (2006). Assessing School Citizenship Education Climate: Implications for the Social Studies. https://circle.tufts.edu/sites/default/files/2019-12/WP48_SchoolCitizenshipImplicationsfortheSocialStudies_2006.pdf
• Hutchings, K. & Dannreuther, R. (1999). Cosmopolitan citizenship. New York: St. Martin's Press.
• Johnson, L. & Morris, P. (2010) Towards a framework for critical citizenship education. The Curriculum Journal, 21(1), 77-96.
• Keating, A., Ortloff, D. H., & Philippou, S. (2009). Citizenship education curricula: the changes and challenges presented by global and European integration. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 41(2), 145-158.
• Keating, A. (2016). Educating tomorrow’s citizens: what role can schools play?. Foro de Educación, 14(20), 35-47.
• Kerr, D. (1999). Citizenship education in the curriculum: An international review. School Field, 10(3/4), 5-32.
• Keyman (2004). Türkiye’de ve Avrupa’da Sivil Toplum. Retrieved from: https://stk.bilgi.edu.tr/media/uploads/2015/02/01/keyman_std_3.pdf.
• Kim, S., & Yang, J. (2013). Patterns of citizenship and political action in Korea, Germany and the United States: An analysis of the 2004 ISSP data. In Citizenship and migration in the era of globalization (pp. 181-208). Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg.
• Leighton, R. (2004). The nature of citizenship education provision: an initial study. The Curriculum Journal, 15(2), 167–181.
• Linklater, A. (1998). Cosmopolitan citizenship. Citizenship studies, 2(1), 23-41.
• McLaughlin, T. H. (1992). Citizenship, diversity and education: A philosophical perspective. Journal of Moral Education, 21(3), 235‐247.
• MEB (2018). Sosyal Bilgiler Öğretim Programı. Retrieved from: https://mufredat.meb.gov.tr/Dosyalar/201812103847686-SOSYAL%20B%C4%B0LG%C4%B0LER%20%C3%96%C4%9ERET%C4%B0M%20PROGRAMI%20.pdf
• Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A.M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: an expanded sourcebook. California: SAGE.
• Mohammed, M. A., Moles, R. J., & Chen, T. F. (2016). Meta-synthesis of qualitative research: the challenges and opportunities. International journal of clinical pharmacy, 38(3), 695-704.
• Nabavi, M. (2010). Constructing the ‘citizen’in citizenship education. Canadian Journal for New Scholars in Education/Revue canadienne des jeunes chercheures et chercheurs en éducation, 3(1), 1-10.
• NCSS (2001). Creating effective citizens. Position Statement from the National Council for the Social Studies. https://www.socialstudies.org/sites/default/files/publications/se/6505/650511.html
• Noblit, G., & Hare, R. (1999). Chapter 5: Meta-Ethnography: Synthesizing Qualitative Studies. Counterpoints, 44, 93-123.
• Osler, A. & Starkey, H. (2004). Citizienship education and culturel diversity in France and England. In J. Demaine (Ed.), Citizenship and Political Education Today (pp: 1-23). Palgrawe MacMillian.
• Osler, A., & Starkey, H. (2005). Changing citizenship: Democracy and inclusion in education. Maidenhead: Open University Press.
• Osler, A. (2011). Teacher interpretations of citizenship education: National identity, cosmopolitan ideals, and political realities. Journal of curriculum studies, 43(1), 1-24.
• Rapoport, A. (2009). A forgotten concept: Global citizenship education and state social studies standards. Journal of Social Studies Research, 33(1), 91-112.
• Ross, E. W. (2004). Negotiating the politics of citizenship education. PS: Political Science and Politics, 37(2), 249-251.
• Sandelowski, M., & Barroso, J. (2003). Classifying the findings in qualitative studies. Qualitative Health Research, 13(7), 905-923.
• Sandelowski, M., Docherty, S., & Emden, C. (1997). Qualitative metasynthesis: Issues and techniques. Research In Nursing & Health, 20(4), 365-371.
• Schugurensky, D., & Myers, J. P. (2003). Citizenship education: Theory, research and practice. Encounters in Theory and History of Education, 4, 1-10.
• Schwarz, B., Claros-Salinas, D., & Streibelt, M. (2018). Meta-synthesis of qualitative research on facilitators and barriers of return to work after stroke. Journal of occupational rehabilitation, 28(1), 28-44.
• Sears, A. M., & Hughes, A. S. (1996). Citizenship education and current educational reform. Canadian Journal of Education/Revue canadienne de l'education, 21(2), 123-142.
• Sim, J. B. Y., & Print, M. (2005). Citizenship education and social studies in Singapore: A national agenda. International Journal of Citizenship and Teacher Education, 1(1), 58-73.
• Sim, J. B. Y. (2008). What does citizenship mean? Social studies teachers' understandings of citizenship in Singapore schools. Educational Review, 60(3), 253-266.
• Ünal, F. (2019). Vatandaşlık yaklaşımları. Vatandaşlık bilinci karma araştırma örneği. Ankara: Pegem.
• Walsh, D., & Downe, S. (2005). Meta‐synthesis method for qualitative research: a literature review. Journal of advanced nursing, 50(2), 204-211.
• Veugelers, W., & de Groot, I. (2019). Theory and Practice of Citizenship education. In Education for Democratic Intercultural Citizenship (pp. 14-41). Brill Sense.
• Veugelers, W. (2011). Theory and practice of citizenship education. The case of policy, science and education in the Netherlands. Revista de Educacion, (1), 209-224.
• Zimmer, L. (2006). Qualitative meta-synthesis: a question of dialoguing with texts. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 53(3), 311-318.