Research Article

HOW TO UNDERSTAND MODERNITY?

Volume: 8 Number: 2 May 23, 2006
İbrahim Mazman
EN TR

HOW TO UNDERSTAND MODERNITY?

Abstract

This article deals with three different schools of thought in terms of the constitution of self and the public sphere in modern times. The first trend (e.g. Durkheim and Parsons) advocates that the self or individuality finds the best environment for its maximal realization within a rational-universal sphere that is the modern publicity. The second trend, “Marxian- Nietzschean radical-critical trend”, claims that individuality is oppressed by the modern public sphere and its socio-economic political environment. On the other hand, the third trend (e.g. Simmel and Habermas) insists that along with its disadvantages the modern socio-economic system brings its own advantages for the autonomy of self and individuality.

Keywords

Autonomy of Self, Modern Public Sphere, Parsons, Marx, Habermas, Communicative Action, Constitutional Democracy.

References

  1. Avineri, Shlomo, 1969, The Social and Political Thought of Karl Marx, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
  2. Berger, Peter, Luckmann, Thomas, 1966, The Social Construction of Reality; a Treatise in the Sociology of Knowledge, Doubleday, Garden City, N.Y.
  3. Coser Lewis A., 1977, Masters of Sociological Thought: Ideas in Historical and Social Context, Harcourt Brace Jovanovich, Inc., New York.
  4. Calhoun, Craig, 1992, Introduction to Habermas and the Public Sphere, edited by Craig Calhoun, MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass.
  5. Durkheim, Emile, 1949, Division of Labor in Society, translated from the French by George Simpson, The Free Press, Glencoe, Illinois.
  6. Durkheim, Emile, 1984, The Division of Labor in Society, translated by W.D. Halls, Free Press, New York.
  7. Foucault, Michel, 1979, Discipline and Punish: the Birth of the Prison, translated from the French by Alan Sheridan, Vintage Books, New York.
  8. Foucault, Michel, 1980, Power/ Knowledge: Selected Interviews and Other Writings,1972-1977, edited by Colin Gordon, translated by Colin Gordon, Pantheon Books, New York.
  9. Foucault, Michel, 1982, The Subject and Power, edited in Michel Foucault Beyond Structuralism and Hermeneutics, by H. L. Dreyfus and P.Rabinow, The University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
  10. Frisby, David, 1984, George Simmel, Ellis Horwood Limited, Chichester, Tavistock Publications, London, New York.
APA
Mazman, İ. (2006). HOW TO UNDERSTAND MODERNITY? Afyon Kocatepe Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 8(2), 231-248. https://izlik.org/JA75UW94UK
AMA
1.Mazman İ. HOW TO UNDERSTAND MODERNITY? AKUSBD. 2006;8(2):231-248. https://izlik.org/JA75UW94UK
Chicago
Mazman, İbrahim. 2006. “HOW TO UNDERSTAND MODERNITY?”. Afyon Kocatepe Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi 8 (2): 231-48. https://izlik.org/JA75UW94UK.
EndNote
Mazman İ (May 1, 2006) HOW TO UNDERSTAND MODERNITY? Afyon Kocatepe Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi 8 2 231–248.
IEEE
[1]İ. Mazman, “HOW TO UNDERSTAND MODERNITY?”, AKUSBD, vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 231–248, May 2006, [Online]. Available: https://izlik.org/JA75UW94UK
ISNAD
Mazman, İbrahim. “HOW TO UNDERSTAND MODERNITY?”. Afyon Kocatepe Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi 8/2 (May 1, 2006): 231-248. https://izlik.org/JA75UW94UK.
JAMA
1.Mazman İ. HOW TO UNDERSTAND MODERNITY? AKUSBD. 2006;8:231–248.
MLA
Mazman, İbrahim. “HOW TO UNDERSTAND MODERNITY?”. Afyon Kocatepe Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, vol. 8, no. 2, May 2006, pp. 231-48, https://izlik.org/JA75UW94UK.
Vancouver
1.İbrahim Mazman. HOW TO UNDERSTAND MODERNITY? AKUSBD [Internet]. 2006 May 1;8(2):231-48. Available from: https://izlik.org/JA75UW94UK