Research Article

Diversification Strategy in Internet Industry: Case of Google Inc.

Volume: 20 Number: 3 December 27, 2018
EN TR

Diversification Strategy in Internet Industry: Case of Google Inc.

Abstract

One of the growth strategies for business is to buy other businesses. Growth either may be related to main business area of firm or different fields from different sectors. This study examines the buying strategy of Google Inc. which is an important company in the internet industry with an oligopolistic structure created by a limited number of operators (Amazon, Google, Microsoft, Facebook, etc.). Between the years of 2001 and 2017, 177 acquisitions were examined. As a result of this review, it appears that Google Inc. has acquired businesses that manufacture in different technological areas. However, those acquisitions increased abilities of generating revenues from its core business. Consequently, among 177 acquisitions, constrained-related diversification model is most frequently observed strategy which is aimed to increase performance of main business. 

Keywords

Acquisations,diversification strategy,internet sector

References

  1. Ansoff, H. (1958). A Model for Diversification. Management Science, 392-415.
  2. Arthur, E. (2017). Strategic Decision Making: Google’s Acquisitions, Partnerships and the “Toothbrush Test”. The 15th Annual Conference on Telecommunications and Information Technology (s. 1-11). Nashville, Tennessee: ITERA.
  3. Bhatia, A., & Thakur, A. (2016). Diversification Strategies of Multi-national and Domestic Companies in India: A Comparative Evaluation in the Dynamic Environment. Management and Labour Studies, 41(3), 199 - 215.
  4. Crookes, D. (2014, 1 30). The 142 Companies That Google Has Bought (And How It Affects You). Micro Mart, s. 1-6.
  5. Dolata, U. (2017). Apple, Amazon, Google, Facebook, Microsoft: Market concentration - competition - innovation strategies. Stuttgartt: University of Stuttgart.
  6. Dyck, B., & Mitchell J.Neubert. (2009). Management: Current Practices and New Directions. Boston: Houghton Mifflin Harcourt Publishin Company.
  7. Google (Yöneten). (2009). I/O 2009 - Keynot [Video].
  8. Google (Yöneten). (2012). Google I/O 2012 - Keynote [Video].
  9. Google (Yöneten). (2014). Google I/O 2014 - Keynote, [Video].
  10. Google (Yöneten). (2015). Google I/O 2015 - Keynote [Video].
APA
Şekerli, E. B., & Akçetin, E. (2018). Diversification Strategy in Internet Industry: Case of Google Inc. Afyon Kocatepe Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 20(3), 271-289. https://doi.org/10.32709/akusosbil.407405
AMA
1.Şekerli EB, Akçetin E. Diversification Strategy in Internet Industry: Case of Google Inc. AKUSBD. 2018;20(3):271-289. doi:10.32709/akusosbil.407405
Chicago
Şekerli, Eyüp Bayram, and Eyüp Akçetin. 2018. “Diversification Strategy in Internet Industry: Case of Google Inc”. Afyon Kocatepe Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi 20 (3): 271-89. https://doi.org/10.32709/akusosbil.407405.
EndNote
Şekerli EB, Akçetin E (December 1, 2018) Diversification Strategy in Internet Industry: Case of Google Inc. Afyon Kocatepe Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi 20 3 271–289.
IEEE
[1]E. B. Şekerli and E. Akçetin, “Diversification Strategy in Internet Industry: Case of Google Inc”., AKUSBD, vol. 20, no. 3, pp. 271–289, Dec. 2018, doi: 10.32709/akusosbil.407405.
ISNAD
Şekerli, Eyüp Bayram - Akçetin, Eyüp. “Diversification Strategy in Internet Industry: Case of Google Inc”. Afyon Kocatepe Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi 20/3 (December 1, 2018): 271-289. https://doi.org/10.32709/akusosbil.407405.
JAMA
1.Şekerli EB, Akçetin E. Diversification Strategy in Internet Industry: Case of Google Inc. AKUSBD. 2018;20:271–289.
MLA
Şekerli, Eyüp Bayram, and Eyüp Akçetin. “Diversification Strategy in Internet Industry: Case of Google Inc”. Afyon Kocatepe Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, vol. 20, no. 3, Dec. 2018, pp. 271-89, doi:10.32709/akusosbil.407405.
Vancouver
1.Eyüp Bayram Şekerli, Eyüp Akçetin. Diversification Strategy in Internet Industry: Case of Google Inc. AKUSBD. 2018 Dec. 1;20(3):271-89. doi:10.32709/akusosbil.407405