Research Article
BibTex RIS Cite

İçmimarlık ve Sürdürülebilirlik İlişkisi: Ekolojik, Ekonomik ve Sosyal/Kültürel Açıdan İnceleme

Year 2019, Volume: 21 Issue: 1, 191 - 201, 20.03.2019
https://doi.org/10.32709/akusosbil.427062

Abstract

Toplumsal yaşamda
insanları sosyal medya kullanımına yönelten birçok neden bulunmaktadır. Bu
iletişim ortamında kullanıcı, kendi kişisel sayfası üzerinden ilgilerini ortaya
koyabilmekte, e-maile benzeyen mesaj bölümü gibi çeşitli uygulamalar sayesinde
karşılıklı iletişim kurabilmekte, enformasyon elde etmekte, arkadaşlıklar
kurabilmekte, insanların iletişim bilgisine ulaşabilmekte, fotoğraf ve
görüntülerini diğer insanlarla paylaşabilmekte ya da kişisel bilgileri hakkında
insanlara veri sunabilmektedir. Sosyal medya farklı kimliklerle kullanıcıların
kendilerini ifade edebildikleri bir mecradır. Öyle ki sosyal görünürlük kaygısı
yaşayan ve kendini gizleme duygusuna sahip insanlar için, sosyal medya çeşitli
imkânlar sunmaktadır.
Sosyal medyanın sağlamış olduğu bu
olumlu ya da olumsuz olanak, aynı zamanda kullanıcıların yaşam doyumları ile
ilişkilendirilmeye başlanmıştır.
İşte bu araştırma üniversite öğrencileri
örneğinde, gençlerin sosyal medya kullanım örüntüleri ile kendini gizleme ve
yaşam doyumu arasındaki ilişkiyi ortaya koymak amacıyla yürütülmüştür. Saha
araştırması yöntemi ile 333 katılımcıdan veriler toplanmıştır. Araştırma
sonucunda sosyal medya kullanım süresi ile kendini gizleme ve yaşam doyumu
arasında bir ilişki tespit edilememiştir. Kendini gizleme yönündeki eğilimler,
sosyal medyada farklı isimle hesap açma ve kendini farklı tanıtma ya da
yansıtma isteğini artırmaktadır. Yine sosyal medyada farklı isimle hesap
açmayanların yaşam doyum düzeyleri daha yüksektir.

References

  • Aktaş, G. G. (2013). “Design Parameters and Initiatives for Ecological and Green Design in Interior Architecture”, WSEAS Transactions on Environment and Development, 2(9):57-67.
  • Bergman, D. (2011). Sustainable Design: A critical guide for architects and interior, lighting and environmental designers. New York: Princeton Architectural Press
  • Cajias, M. ve Piazolo, D. (2013). “Green performs better: energy efficiency and financial return on buildings”, Journal of Corporate Real Estate, 15(1):53-72
  • Chiu, R. L. (2004). “Socio cultural sustainability of housing: a conceptual exploration”, Housing, Theory and Society, 21(2):65-76 doi: 10.1080/14036090410014999
  • Council for Interior Design Qualification (2004). “Definition of Interior Design”, https://www.cidq.org/definition-of-interior-design, (Erişim tarihi: 25.05.2018)
  • Feige, A., McAllister, P. ve Wallbaum, H. (2013). “Rental price and sustainability raitings: which sustainability criteria are really paying back?”, Construction Management and Economics, 31(4):322-334 doi: 10.1080/01446193.2013.769686
  • Fuerst, F., McAllister, P., Nanda, A. ve Wyatt, P. (2016). “Energy performance ratings and house prices in Wales: AN emprical study”, Energy Policy, 92: 20-33
  • Grobler, A. (2006). The Relation Between Spatial Definition and Place-Making: architectural and urban interiors. University of Pretoria, Master of Interior Architecture, Pretoria.
  • Han, H., Hsu, L-T., ve Sheu, C. (2010). “Application of the theory of planned behaviour to green hotel choice: Testing the effect of environmental friendly activities”, Tourism Management, 31(3):325–334. doi:10.1016/j.tourman.2009.03.013.
  • Hawkes, J. (2001). The Fourth Pillar of Sustainability: Culture’s essential role in public planning. Cultural Development Network (Vic)
  • International Federation of Interior Architects/Designers (2011). “IFI İç Mekan Deklerasyonu”, https://ifiworld.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/01/IFI-Interiors-Declaration_Turkish.pdf, (Erişim tarihi: 29.03.2018).
  • International Interior Design Association (1994). “Search Results”, http://www.iida.org/content.cfm/search?paramKeywords=sustainability&x=0&y=0, (Erişim tarihi: 29.03.2018).
  • Jackson, T. (2006). “Readings in Sustainable Consumption”, İçinde: The Earthscan Reader in Sustainable Consumption. (Ed. T. Jackson). London: Earthscan.
  • Jones, L. (2008). “Environmentally Responsible Interior Design”, İçinde: Environmentally Responsible Design: Green and Sustainable Design for Interior Designers. (Ed. L. Jones). New Jersey: John Wiley & Sons Inc,
  • Kang, M. (2009). “The Characteristics of Interior Designers Who Practice Environmentally Sustainable Interior Design”, Environment and Behaviour, 41(2):170-184
  • Küçükerman, Ö. (1988). Kendi Mekanının Arayışı içinde Türk Evi, İstanbul: Türkiye Turing ve Otomobil Kurumu
  • Leaman, A. ve Bordass, B. (2007). “Are Users More Tolerant of ‘green’ Buildings?”, Building Research and Informantion, 35(6):662-673 doi: 10.1080/09613210701529518.
  • Lee, J., Hsu, L., Han, H. ve Kim, Y. (2010). “Understanding How Consumers View Green Hotels: How a Hotel’s Green Image Can Influence Behavioural Intentions”. Journal of Sustainable Tourism, 18(7):901-914 doi: 10.1080/09669581003777747
  • Marshall-Baker, A. (2008). “Nature as a Model for Design”, İçinde: Environmentally Responsible Design: Green and Sustainable Design for Interior Designers. (Ed. L. Jones). New Jersey: John Wiley & Sons Inc.
  • Moxon, S. (2012). Sustainability in Interior Design, London: Laurence King Publinshing Ltd.
  • Olesen, Bodil. B. (2010). “Ethnic Objects in Domestic Interiors: space, atmosphere and the making of home”. Home Cultures. 7(1):25-41 doi: 10.2752/175174210X12572427063760
  • Rapoport, A. (1980). “Cross-Cultural Aspects of Environmental Design”, İçinde: Human, Behaviour and Environment: Advances in Theory and Research (Ed. I. Altman, A. Rapoport, ve J. F. Wohwill). New York: Pleanum
  • Rapoport, A. (1969). House Form and Culture, Upper Saddle River, N.J.: Prentice Hall
  • Stitt, F. A. (1999). Ecological Design Handbook: Sustainable design strategies for architeture, landscape architecture, interior design and planning, London: McGraw Hill.
  • Tabb, P. J. ve Deviren, A. S. (2013). The Greening of Architecture: A critical history and survey of contemporary sustainable architecture and urban design, Surrey: Ashgate
  • Thorpe, A. (2010).”Design’s Role in Sustainable Consumption”. Design Issues. 2(26):3-16
  • Thorsby, D. (2008). “Linking Ecological and Cultural Sustainability” International Journal of Diverse Organizations Communities Nations. 8(1):15-20
  • WCED (1987). “Our Common Future”, The World Commision on Environment and Development. http://www.un-documents.net/our-common-future.pdf (Erişim tarihi: 25.05.2018)
  • Wu, S. R., Fan, P. ve Chen, J. (2016). “Incorporating Culture Into Sustainable Development: A cultural sustainability index framework for green buildings”, Sustainable Development, 24:64-76
  • Yeang, K. (1995). Designing with Nature: The ecological basis for architectural design, New York: McGraw Hill.
  • Yılmaz, T. (2015). Sürdürülebilirlik ile ilgili Ölçütlerin Endüstri Ürünleri Tasarımı Bölümlerinin Öğretim Programlarına Entegrasyonu, İstanbul Teknik Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Enstitütsü, Doktora Tezi, İstanbul.

Interior Architecture And Sustainability: A Review in terms of Ecological, Economical And Social/Cultural

Year 2019, Volume: 21 Issue: 1, 191 - 201, 20.03.2019
https://doi.org/10.32709/akusosbil.427062

Abstract

The interior architecture profession influences human
beings physically, psychologically, culturally and socially by using the
natural and economic resources required by nature. The interior architect
should have the ability to foresee the consequences of these uses and effects
from all sides and should not move away from ethical principles. On the other
hand sustainability can be defined as the thinking of conservation of natural,
economic and social/cultural resources and related activities. The purpose of
this study is to examine in detail the relationship between sustainability and
interior architecture, which can be seen clearly but is rarely studied.
Moreover this relationship is both conceptual and practical.The evaluation
systems that emphasize the ecological dimension, preferences related to the
indoor environment, usage habits, etc., the preferences of the green design and
sustainability labels that emphasize the economic dimension, and the long term
benefits etc., social relations that emphasize social/cultural dimension and
protection of common values ​​etc. will be evaluated on the basis of the
studies carried out in the field of interior architecture profession
discipline. As a result it is determined that obligations and responsibilities
of interior architecture and the duties for the sake of our common future.

References

  • Aktaş, G. G. (2013). “Design Parameters and Initiatives for Ecological and Green Design in Interior Architecture”, WSEAS Transactions on Environment and Development, 2(9):57-67.
  • Bergman, D. (2011). Sustainable Design: A critical guide for architects and interior, lighting and environmental designers. New York: Princeton Architectural Press
  • Cajias, M. ve Piazolo, D. (2013). “Green performs better: energy efficiency and financial return on buildings”, Journal of Corporate Real Estate, 15(1):53-72
  • Chiu, R. L. (2004). “Socio cultural sustainability of housing: a conceptual exploration”, Housing, Theory and Society, 21(2):65-76 doi: 10.1080/14036090410014999
  • Council for Interior Design Qualification (2004). “Definition of Interior Design”, https://www.cidq.org/definition-of-interior-design, (Erişim tarihi: 25.05.2018)
  • Feige, A., McAllister, P. ve Wallbaum, H. (2013). “Rental price and sustainability raitings: which sustainability criteria are really paying back?”, Construction Management and Economics, 31(4):322-334 doi: 10.1080/01446193.2013.769686
  • Fuerst, F., McAllister, P., Nanda, A. ve Wyatt, P. (2016). “Energy performance ratings and house prices in Wales: AN emprical study”, Energy Policy, 92: 20-33
  • Grobler, A. (2006). The Relation Between Spatial Definition and Place-Making: architectural and urban interiors. University of Pretoria, Master of Interior Architecture, Pretoria.
  • Han, H., Hsu, L-T., ve Sheu, C. (2010). “Application of the theory of planned behaviour to green hotel choice: Testing the effect of environmental friendly activities”, Tourism Management, 31(3):325–334. doi:10.1016/j.tourman.2009.03.013.
  • Hawkes, J. (2001). The Fourth Pillar of Sustainability: Culture’s essential role in public planning. Cultural Development Network (Vic)
  • International Federation of Interior Architects/Designers (2011). “IFI İç Mekan Deklerasyonu”, https://ifiworld.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/01/IFI-Interiors-Declaration_Turkish.pdf, (Erişim tarihi: 29.03.2018).
  • International Interior Design Association (1994). “Search Results”, http://www.iida.org/content.cfm/search?paramKeywords=sustainability&x=0&y=0, (Erişim tarihi: 29.03.2018).
  • Jackson, T. (2006). “Readings in Sustainable Consumption”, İçinde: The Earthscan Reader in Sustainable Consumption. (Ed. T. Jackson). London: Earthscan.
  • Jones, L. (2008). “Environmentally Responsible Interior Design”, İçinde: Environmentally Responsible Design: Green and Sustainable Design for Interior Designers. (Ed. L. Jones). New Jersey: John Wiley & Sons Inc,
  • Kang, M. (2009). “The Characteristics of Interior Designers Who Practice Environmentally Sustainable Interior Design”, Environment and Behaviour, 41(2):170-184
  • Küçükerman, Ö. (1988). Kendi Mekanının Arayışı içinde Türk Evi, İstanbul: Türkiye Turing ve Otomobil Kurumu
  • Leaman, A. ve Bordass, B. (2007). “Are Users More Tolerant of ‘green’ Buildings?”, Building Research and Informantion, 35(6):662-673 doi: 10.1080/09613210701529518.
  • Lee, J., Hsu, L., Han, H. ve Kim, Y. (2010). “Understanding How Consumers View Green Hotels: How a Hotel’s Green Image Can Influence Behavioural Intentions”. Journal of Sustainable Tourism, 18(7):901-914 doi: 10.1080/09669581003777747
  • Marshall-Baker, A. (2008). “Nature as a Model for Design”, İçinde: Environmentally Responsible Design: Green and Sustainable Design for Interior Designers. (Ed. L. Jones). New Jersey: John Wiley & Sons Inc.
  • Moxon, S. (2012). Sustainability in Interior Design, London: Laurence King Publinshing Ltd.
  • Olesen, Bodil. B. (2010). “Ethnic Objects in Domestic Interiors: space, atmosphere and the making of home”. Home Cultures. 7(1):25-41 doi: 10.2752/175174210X12572427063760
  • Rapoport, A. (1980). “Cross-Cultural Aspects of Environmental Design”, İçinde: Human, Behaviour and Environment: Advances in Theory and Research (Ed. I. Altman, A. Rapoport, ve J. F. Wohwill). New York: Pleanum
  • Rapoport, A. (1969). House Form and Culture, Upper Saddle River, N.J.: Prentice Hall
  • Stitt, F. A. (1999). Ecological Design Handbook: Sustainable design strategies for architeture, landscape architecture, interior design and planning, London: McGraw Hill.
  • Tabb, P. J. ve Deviren, A. S. (2013). The Greening of Architecture: A critical history and survey of contemporary sustainable architecture and urban design, Surrey: Ashgate
  • Thorpe, A. (2010).”Design’s Role in Sustainable Consumption”. Design Issues. 2(26):3-16
  • Thorsby, D. (2008). “Linking Ecological and Cultural Sustainability” International Journal of Diverse Organizations Communities Nations. 8(1):15-20
  • WCED (1987). “Our Common Future”, The World Commision on Environment and Development. http://www.un-documents.net/our-common-future.pdf (Erişim tarihi: 25.05.2018)
  • Wu, S. R., Fan, P. ve Chen, J. (2016). “Incorporating Culture Into Sustainable Development: A cultural sustainability index framework for green buildings”, Sustainable Development, 24:64-76
  • Yeang, K. (1995). Designing with Nature: The ecological basis for architectural design, New York: McGraw Hill.
  • Yılmaz, T. (2015). Sürdürülebilirlik ile ilgili Ölçütlerin Endüstri Ürünleri Tasarımı Bölümlerinin Öğretim Programlarına Entegrasyonu, İstanbul Teknik Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Enstitütsü, Doktora Tezi, İstanbul.
There are 31 citations in total.

Details

Primary Language Turkish
Journal Section Articles
Authors

Meryem Geçimli

B. Burak Kaptan This is me

Publication Date March 20, 2019
Submission Date May 25, 2018
Published in Issue Year 2019 Volume: 21 Issue: 1

Cite

APA Geçimli, M., & Kaptan, B. B. (2019). İçmimarlık ve Sürdürülebilirlik İlişkisi: Ekolojik, Ekonomik ve Sosyal/Kültürel Açıdan İnceleme. Afyon Kocatepe Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 21(1), 191-201. https://doi.org/10.32709/akusosbil.427062

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.


Please Click for all Issues of the Journal.