Yenilikçi İş Davranışı ve Öncülleri Üzerine Bir Araştırma

Year 2023, Volume: 25 Issue: 1, 275 - 293, 28.03.2023

Mustafa Ali Özay , Kurtuluş Kaymaz

https://doi.org/10.32709/akusosbil.1053063

Cited By: 1

Abstract

Bu çalışma, yenilik yönetiminin en kritik unsurlarından biri olan insan kaynağının “yenilikçi iş davranışı” olgusu üzerine odaklanmakta, bilgi paylaşma, bilgi gizleme, yenilikçi kültür, yenilikçi liderlik, eğitim ve geliştirme ile yenilikçi öz yeterlilik boyutlarının, yenilikçi iş davranışı üzerinde ne derecede etkili olduğunu ortaya koymayı amaçlamaktadır. Araştırmada anket tekniğinden yararlanılmıştır. Katılımcıların bir kısmına elektronik ortamda anketler uygulanırken bir kısmıyla yüz yüze olacak şekilde uygulama gerçekleştirilmiştir. Anket uygulanmadan önce şirketin insan kaynakları yetkilileri ile görüşülmüştür. Katılımcılara toplam 53 ifade yönetilmiştir. Araştırma nicel bir çalışmadır. Toplamda 289 katılımcı ile gerçekleştirilmiştir. Çalışmada doğrulayıcı faktör analizi, normallik ve varyansların homojenliği ve çoklu doğrusal regresyon analizi testleri yapılmıştır. Bilgi paylaşma, yenilikçi öz yeterlilik, eğitim ve geliştirme boyutlarının yenilikçi iş davranışı üzerinde pozitif ve anlamlı bir etkiye sahip olduğunu ortaya koymaktadır. Buna karşın, bilgi gizleme, yenilikçi kültür ve yenilikçi liderlik boyutlarının yenilikçi iş davranışı üzerinde herhangi bir anlamlı etkiye sahip olmadığı görülmektedir. Yenilik temelli birey davranışı, büyük ölçüde bilgi paylaşma, bilgi gizleme, yenilikçi kültür, yenilikçi liderlik, eğitim ve geliştirme ile yenilikçi öz yeterlilik öncüllerinin etkisi altında şekillenmektedir. Bu çerçevede, araştırma, yenilikçi çabaların ancak “davranış değişimi” ile mümkün olabileceğini ortaya koymak ve insan kaynakları uygulamalarının inovatif iş süreçlerinin en kritik unsuru olduğunu belirtmek açısından alana katkı sunma potansiyeli taşımaktadır.

Keywords

Yenilikçi iş davranışı, bilgi paylaşma, bilgi gizleme, yenilikçi kültür, yenilikçi öz-yeterlilik, yenilikçi liderlik

Thanks

Bu çalışmanın ilk hali, 25.08.2020 tarihinde Bursa Uludağ Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsünde yüksek lisans tezi olarak sunulmuştur.

A Research on Innovative Work Behavior and Its Antecedents

Abstract

This study aims to reveal the extent to which information sharing, information hiding, innovative culture, innovative leadership, training and development, and innovative self-efficacy have an impact on innovative work behavior. Survey methodology was used in the research. The survey was sent to participants via electronic platform and some of them were implemented face to face. Before implementing the survey, a meeting was conducted with human resources staff for assessing the items. A total of 53 statements were administered to the participants. The research is a quantitative study. It was held with a total of 289 participants. Confirmatory factor analysis, normality, homogeneity of variances and multiple linear regression analysis tests were performed in the study. The findings reveal that information sharing, innovative self-efficacy, training and development have a positive and significant effect on innovative work behavior. However, information hiding, innovative culture and innovative leadership do not seem to have any significant impact on innovative work behavior. Innovation-based individual behavior is shaped to a large extent under the influence of information sharing, information hiding, innovative culture, innovative leadership, training and development, innovative self-efficacy. The study carries potential value for related literature to show that innovative efforts could be more possible under “behavioral change” and to proof human resources practices are critical for innovative work processes.

Keywords

Innovative work behavior, information sharing, information hiding, innovative culture, innovative self-efficacy, innovative leadership

References

• Abstein, A., and Spieth, P. (2014). Exploring HRM meta‐features that foster employees' innovative work behaviour in times of increasing work–life conflict. Creativity and innovation management, 23(2), 211-225.
• Acemoglu, D., and Pischke, J. S. (1999). Beyond Becker: Training in imperfect labour markets. The economic journal, 109(453), 112-142.
• Afsar, B., Badir, Y. F., and Saeed, B. B. (2014). Transformational leadership and innovative work behavior. Industrial Management and Data Systems. 114 (8), 1270-1300.
• Albrecht, S. (2005). Leadership climate in the public sector: Feelings matter too!. Intl Journal of Public Administration, 28(5-6), 397-416.
• Anderson, N., De Dreu, C. K., and Nijstad, B. A. (2004). The routinization of innovation research: A constructively critical review of the state‐of‐the‐science. Journal of organizational Behavior, 25(2), 147-173.
• Aslam, H., Aslam, B., Ismail, L., and Cheema, H. (2017). The effect of employee’s innovative work behaviour on innovative output. Global Journal of Research in Business and Management, 6(2), 461-468.
• Bandura, A. (1989). Social Cognitive TheoryAnnals of Child Development, Volume 6. Six theories of child development R. Vasta Greenwich, CT. 1-60.
• Basim, H. N., Korkmazyürek, H., and Tokat, A. O. (2008). Çalışanların Öz Yeterlilik Algılamasının Yenilikçilik Ve Risk Alma Üzerine Etkisi: Kamu Sektöründe Bir Araştırma. Selçuk Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, (19), 121-130.
• Bauernschuster, S., Falck, O., and Heblich, S. (2009). Training and innovation. Journal of Human Capital, 3(4), 323-353.
• Becker, G. S. (2009). Human capital: A theoretical and empirical analysis, with special reference to education. University of Chicago press.
• Cerne, M., Nerstad, C., Dysvik, A., and Skerlavaj, M. (2014). The Negative Effects of Knowledge Hiding on Organizational Trust and Creativity. Academy of Management, 57(1), 172-192.
• Contreras, F., Cuero Acosta, Y. A., Espinosa, J. C., and Dornberger, U. (2012). Leadership and employees’ innovative work behavior: Test of a mediation and moderation model. Canadian Center of Science and Education., 13 (9), 9-25.
• Csikszentmihalyi, M., and Seligman, M. (2000). Positive psychology. American psychologist, 55(1), 5-14.
• De Jong, D. D. H., and Hartog, D. N. (2010). Measuring Innovative Work Behaviour, Creativity and Innovative Management. Journal of Management, 19, 23-36.
• De Jong, J. P., and Den Hartog, D. N. (2007). How leaders influence employees' innovative behaviour. European Journal of innovation management. 10 (1), 41-64.
• Demirel, Y., and Seçkin, Z. (2008). Bilgi ve bilgi paylaşımının yenilikçilik üzerine etkileri. Çukurova Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 17(1), 189-202.
• Dostie, B. (2018). The impact of training on innovation. ILR Review, 71 (1), 64-87.
• Dyer, J. H., and Nobeoka, K. (2000). Creating and managing a high‐performance knowledge‐sharing network: the Toyota case. Strategic management journal, 21(3), 345-367.
• Güle, H. K., and Bülbül, H. (2004). Yenilikçilik İşletmeler için Stratejik Rekabet Araci. Ankara: Nobel Yayın Dağıtım., Ankara.
• Güzel, F. Ö., and Papatya, N. (2014). Deneyim Pazarlaması ve Satın Alma Sonrası Eğilimlere Etkisi: Konaklama İşletmeleri Üzerine Bir Araştırma. Uluslararası Hakemli Pazarlama ve Pazar Araştırmaları Dergisi, 31.
• Hashim, M. K., Ali, J., and Fawzi, D. A. (2005). Relationship between human resource practices and innovation activity in Malaysian SMEs. Jurnal Manajemen and Bisnis Sriwijaya, 3(6), 1-12.
• Hooper, D., Coughlan, J., and Mullen, M. R. (2008). Structural equation modelling: Guidelines for determining model fit. Electronic journal of business research methods, 6(1), (pp. 53-60).
• Hornsby, J. S., Kuratko, D. F., and Zahra, S. A. (2002). Middle managers' perception of the internal environment for corporate entrepreneurship: assessing a measurement scale. Journal of business Venturing, 17(3), 253-273.
• Hu, L. T., and Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural equation modeling: a multidisciplinary journal, 6(1), 1-55.
• Hurley, R. F., and Hult, G. T. M. (1998). Innovation, market orientation, and organizational learning: an integration and empirical examination. Journal of marketing, 62(3), 42-54.
• Işık, C., and Aydın, E. (2016). Bilgi paylaşımının yenilikçi iş davranışına etkisi: Ayder Yaylası konaklama işletmeleri üzerine bir uygulama. Girişimcilik ve İnovasyon Yönetim Dergisi, 5(2), 75-103.
• Jaberi, E. (2016). The effect of knowledge sharing on innovative behavior among employee of Besat hospital in city of Hamedan. International Academic Journal of Accounting and Financial Management, 3(4), 41-47.
• Janssen, O. (2000). Job demands, perceptions of effort‐reward fairness and innovative work behaviour. Journal of Occupational and organizational psychology, 73(3), 287-302.
• Janssen, O. (2005). The joint impact of perceived influence and supervisor supportiveness on employee innovative behaviour. Journal of occupational and organizational psychology, 78(4), 573-579.
• Jassawalla, A. R., and Sashittal, H. C. (2002). Cultures that support product-innovation processes. Academy of Management Perspectives, 16(3), 42-54.
• Kenny, B., and Reedy, E. (2006). The impact of organisational culture factors on innovation levels in SMEs: An empirical investigation. Irish Journal of Management, 27(2). 1-17.
• Kline, R. B. (2015). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling. Guilford publications.
• Kroes, B. (2015). The Relationship Between Transformational Leadership and Innovative Work Behavior. Tilburg University, Sosyal ve Davranış Bilimleri Enstitüsü, Yüksek Lisans Tezi, 1-47.
• Labafi, S. (2017). Knowledge hiding as an obstacle of innovation in organizations a qualitative study of software industry. AD-minister, (30), 131-148.
• Mete, G. (2007). Örgütsel öğrenme ve yenilikçi iş davranışı (Master's thesis, Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü)., Gebze Yüksek Teknoloji Enstitüsü Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü, Gebze.
• Michael, H. K., Christopher, J. N., John, N., and William, L. (2005). Applied linear statistical models. 5th ed. Boston: McGraw-Hil.
• Michael, L. H., HOU, S. T., and FAN, H. L. (2011). Creative self‐efficacy and innovative behavior in a service setting: Optimism as a moderator. The Journal of Creative Behavior, 45(4), 258-272.
• Momeni, M., Ebrahimpour, H., and Ajirloo, M. B. (2014). The Effect Of Employees'self-Efficacy On Innovative Work Behavior At Social Security Organization Employees in Ardabil Province. Kuwait Chapter of the Arabian Journal of Business and Management Review, 3(8), 29.
• Montgomery, D. C., and Runger, G. C. (2010). Applied statistics and probability for engineers. John wiley and sons.
• OECD, F. M. (1981). The measurement of scientific and technical activities. Frascati Manual. Paris: OECD, 15-16.
• Ong, C. H., Wan, D., and Chng, S. H. (2003). Factors affecting indivual innovation: an examination within a Japanese subsidiary in Singapore. Technovation, 23(7), 617-631.
• Orçan, F. (2018). Açımlayıcı ve doğrulayıcı faktör analizi: İlk hangisi kullanılmalı. Eğitimde ve Psikolojide Ölçme ve Değerlendirme Dergisi, 9(4), 413-421.
• Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2011). Skills for innovation and research. Paris: OECD. 1-144.
• Öğüt, A., and AKSAY, K. (2011). Yenilikçilik kültürünün örgütsel yenilikçilik üzerine etkisi: Konya ilinde faaliyet gösteren özel hastanelerde bir uygulama. Selçuk Üniversitesi Sosyal ve Teknik Araştırmalar Dergisi, 1(2), 39-63.
• Özkan, G. V. (2017). Çalışanların özyeterlilik düzeyinin yaratıcı ve yenilikçi iş davranışlarına etkisi: Farklı sektörlerde faaliyet gösteren örgütler üzerinden karşılaştırmalı bir değerlendirme. Yaşar Üniversitesi E-Dergisi, 12(47), 181-191.
• Pelz, D. C., and Andrews, F. M. (1966). Scientists in organizations: Productive climates for research and development. Industrial and Labor Relations Review, 17 (6), 1-317
• Phung, V. D., Hawryszkiewycz, I., Chandran, D., and Ha, B. M. (2017). Knowledge sharing and innovative work behaviour: A case study from Vietnam. Australasian Conference on Information Systems, Australia, 1-11.
• Pukienė, A., and Škudienė, V. (2016). Innovative work behavior-the role of human resource management and affective commitment (Master's thesis, ISM University of Management and Economics). 1-112
• Radaelli, G., Lettieri, E., Mura, M., and Spiller, N. (2014). Knowledge sharing and innovative work behaviour in healthcare: A micro‐level investigation of direct and indirect effects. Creativity and Innovation Management, 23(4), 400-414.
• Ruhnke, M., and Mulder, R. H. (2016). Ambidextrous Leadership and Innovative Work Behaviour. Working paper. 1-15. Retrieved from: https://www. ufhrd. co. uk/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2016/10/paper_86. pdf.
• Scott, S. G., and Bruce, R. A. (1994). Determinants of innovative behavior: A path model of individual innovation in the workplace. Academy of management journal, 37(3), 580-607.
• Steiger, J. H. (1980). Statistically based tests for the number of common factors. In the annual meeting of the Psychometric Society. Iowa City, IA. 1980.
• Stoffers, J., Neessen, P., and van Dorp, P. (2015). Organizational culture and innovative work behavior: A case study of a manufacturer of packaging machines. American Journal of Industrial and Business Management, 5(04), 198-207.
• Sung, S. Y., and Choi, J. N. (2014). Do organizations spend wisely on employees? Effects of training and development investments on learning and innovation in organizations. Journal of organizational behavior, 35(3), 393-412.
• Tabachnick, B.G., and Fidell, L.S. (2001). Using multivariate statistics (4th ed.) Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
• Takala, T., and Urpilainen, J. (1999). Managerial work and lying: A conceptual framework and an explorative case study. Journal of Business Ethics, 20(3), 181-195.
• Tekin, M., Güleş, H. K., and Ögüt, A. (2003). Değişim Çağında Teknoloji Yönetimi, Nobel Yayın Dağıtım, 2. Baskı, Ankara, 139.
• Tierney, P., and Farmer, S. M. (2002). Creative self-efficacy: Its potential antecedents and relationship to creative performance. Academy of Management journal, 45(6), 1137-1148.
• Ural, A., and Kiliç, İ. (2005). Bilimsel araştırma süreci ve SPSS ile veri analizi.
• Uygun, H. (2015). İnsan kaynakları yönetiminde eğitim ve geliştirme faaliyetlerinin çalışan motivasyonuna etkileri ve sağlık sektöründen bir vaka analizi (Master's thesis, İstanbul Gelişim Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü).
• Van de Ven, A. H. (1986). Central problems in the management of innovation. Management science, 32(5), 590-607.
• Van Den Hooff, B., and De Ridder, J. A. (2004). Knowledge sharing in context: the influence of organizational commitment, communication climate and CMC use on knowledge sharing. Journal of knowledge management.
• Vemić, J. (2007). Employee training and development and the learning organization. Facta universitatis-series: Economics and Organization, 4(2), 209-216.
• Wallach, E. J. (1983). Organizations: The cultural match. Training and development journal, 37(2), 29-36.
• West, M. A., and Farr, J. L. (1989). Innovation at work: Psychological perspectives. Social behaviour.