POST-CARTESIAN IDEA OF PHILOSOPHY BETWEEN REPRESENTATION AND MOVEMENT / Temsil ve Hareket Arasımla Post-Kartezyen Felsefe Tasarımı

Year 2007, Volume: 9 Issue: 2, 87 - 99, 01.08.2007

Şefik Deniz

Abstract

Since the early Greek, philosophical thinking has the difficulty relating permanent conception of being with the temporal world. The continuous one and the change have ever been considered to be contradicting with each other. The objective in this paper is to follow this problematic in post-Cartesian philosophy. It will be argued that the ancient difficulty of conjoining the permanent with the temporal, which principally sustains itself in all philosophical discussions, has turned over the problem of logic and freedom in post-Cartesian thought as the dilemma between representational ism and the idea of movement.

İlk Grek düşüncesinden günümüze değin felsefi düşünce, varlık kavramı ile zamansa! dünyayı birlikte açıklamakta güçlük yaşamıştır. Sürekli olan ile değişen hep birbirine çelişik olarak görülmüştür. Bu makalede amaç bu problemin post- Kartezycn felsefedeki izlerini çözümlemeye çalışmaktır. Pek çok felsefi tartışmada kendisini yineleyen ve Antik düşüncede varlık ve oluş problemi olarak kavramsallaştırılan, sürekli olan ile zamansa! olanın bağdaştırılmasındaki güçlük olarak ortaya çıkan problemin post-Kartczycn felsefede özellikle mantık ve özgürlük kavramları etrafında yeniden şekillendiği tartışılacaktır.

Keywords

Being , becoming , logic , freedom , time. , Varlık , oluş , mantık , özgürlük , zaman.

POST-CARTESIAN IDEA OF PHILOSOPHY BETWEEN REPRESENTATION AND MOVEMENT

Abstract

Since the early Greek, philosophical thinking has the difficulty relating permanent conception of being with the temporal world. The continuous one and the change have ever been considered to be contradicting with each other. The objective in this paper is to follow this problematic in post-Cartesian philosophy. It will be argued that the ancient difficulty of conjoining the permanent with the temporal, which principally sustains itself in all philosophical discussions, has turned over the problem of logic and freedom in post-Cartesian thought as the dilemma between representational ism and the idea of movement.

İlk Grek düşüncesinden günümüze değin felsefi düşünce, varlık kavramı ile zamansa! dünyayı birlikte açıklamakta güçlük yaşamıştır. Sürekli olan ile değişen hep birbirine çelişik olarak görülmüştür. Bu makalede amaç bu problemin post- Kartezycn felsefedeki izlerini çözümlemeye çalışmaktır. Pek çok felsefi tartışmada kendisini yineleyen ve Antik düşüncede varlık ve oluş problemi olarak kavramsallaştırılan, sürekli olan ile zamansa! olanın bağdaştırılmasındaki güçlük olarak ortaya çıkan problemin post-Kartczycn felsefede özellikle mantık ve özgürlük kavramları etrafında yeniden şekillendiği tartışılacaktır.

Keywords

Being , becoming , logic , freedom , time.

References

• ARENDT, Hannah. (1978), The Life of the Mind: Thinking and Willing, USA: Harcourt Brace Company.
• ARISTOTLE. (1991), The Complete Works of Aristotle, The Revised Oxford Translation, Princeton University Press.
• BUBER, Martin. (1975), Between Man and Man, New York Mcmillan Pub. Co.
• CAPUTO, John D. (1987), Radical Hermeneutics: Repetition, Deconstruction and Hermeneutic Project. Indiana: Indiana University Press.
• COLE, J. Preston. (1971), The Problematic Self in Kierkegaard and Freud. New Haven: University Press.
• DELEUZE, Gilles. (1990), Kant’s Critical Philosophy: The Doctrine of the Faculties, Trans., H. Hamilton and D. Hebberjen, Minnesotapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
• DERRIDA, Jacques. (1990), On Representation, “Transforming the Hermeneutic Context: From Nietzsche to Nancy", ed., G. L. Ormiston and A.D. Schrift, New York: State University of New York Press.
• DICKERSON, A.B. (2003), Kant on Representation and Objectivity, West Nyack, NY, USA: Cambridge University Press.
• GADAMER, Hans-George. (1976), Hegel’s Dialectic: Five Hermeneutical Studies, trans., P.C. Smith, New Haven: Yale University Press.
• GILSON, Etinne. (1950), The spirit of the Medieval Philosophy, trans by, A. H. C. Downes, Sheed & Ward, London.
• HABERMAS, Jurgen, (VTH),Knowledge and Human, Trans. J. J. Shapiro, Boston: Beacon Press.
• HINCHMAN, Lewis. (1984), Hegel’s Critique of the Enlightenment. Miami: University of Florida.
• HEIDEGGER, Martin. (1968), What is Called Thinking, Trans., J. G. Gray, New York: Harper and Row.
• (1949), Existence and Being, ed. Wemer Brock, Chicago: Henry Regnery Co.
• (1962), Being and Time, Trans., J. Macquire and E. Robinson, New York: Harper and Row.(1969), Identity and Difference, Trans., J. Stambaugh, New York: Harper and Row.
• (1977), The Age of the World Picture, “The question Concerning Technology and Other Essays”, cd., and trans., W. Lovitt, New York: Harper & Torchbooks (1984), The Metaphysical Foundations of Logic, trans., by Michael Heim, Indiana University Press. Bloomington, Indianapolis,
• (1998), Pathmarks, ed. by William McNeill, Cambridge University Press, printed in United States of America.
• HOFFMAN, Hans. (1968), Order and Chaos: A Plea for Flexibility, “The Concept of Order” Washington: University of Washington Press.
• KIERKEGAARD, Sorcn. (1983), Fear and Trembling: Repetition ed., and trans., H.V. Hong and E. H. Hong, Princeton, NJ. Princeton University Press.
• KANT, Immanuel. (1993), Critique of Practical Reason, trans., L.W. Duck, New York: Macmillan Publishing Co.
• LOVEJOY, Arthur O. (1961a) The Reason, The Understanding and Time, Baltimore: The John Hopkins Press.
• (1961a), The Great Chain of Being: A Study of the History an Idea. Massachusetts: Harvard University Press.
• LOUIS, De Racymaerker. (1961), The Philosophy of Being: A Synthesis of Metaphysics, trans., E. H. Ziegelmeyer, London: Herder Brack Co.
• NIETZSCHE, Friedrich. (1968), The Will to Power, ed. by Walter Kaufmann, trans, by Walter Kaufmann and R. J. Hollingdale, Vintage Books, New York.
• POGGELER, Otto. (1990), Martin Heidegger’s Path of Thinking, trans., D., Magurshak and S., Barber, USA: Humanities Press.
• PHILIPSE, Herman. (1994), Towards a Postmodern Conception on Metaphysics: On the Genealogy and Successor Disciplines of Modern Philosophy. Metaphilosophy, Vol. 25, No: 1.
• ROOCHNICK, David. (1990), The Tragedy of Reason, Toward a Platonic Conception of Logos, New York: Routledge.
• RORTY, Richard, (1980), Philosophy and the Mirror of Nature, Princeton: Princeton University Press.
• RUSSELL, Bertrand. (1964), Logic as the Essence of Philosophy, “Readings on Logic”, ed., Irving M. Copi, James A. Gould, The Mcmillan Company, New York, Collier-Mcmillan, London.