Türkiye’de ve Avrupa Birliği’nde E-Devlet Üzerine Yazılan Çalışmaların Bibliyometrik Analiz ile Karşılaştırılması

Year 2025, Volume: 27 Issue: 2, 503 - 517, 18.06.2025

Senem Demirkıran

https://doi.org/10.32709/akusosbil.1324128

Abstract

Teknolojik gelişmeler ile birlikte kamu yöneticileri önce kamu kurumlarında dijital dönüşümü ardından kamu hizmetlerinin sunumunda dijitalleşmeyi amaç edinmiştir. Elektronik devlet (e-Devlet) kavramı bu amaçlar doğrultusunda ortaya çıkmış ve gelişmiştir. Kamu hizmetlerinin dijital sunumu ile ilgili çalışmalar dijital çağ ile birlikte klasik anlayıştan sıyrılarak hem dijital yönetişim hem de dijital devlet kavramları içinde gelişmeye devam etmektedir. Bu nedenle, e-Devlet çalışmaları giderek artan bir öneme sahiptir. Bu makalede, Türkiye (TR) ve Avrupa Birliği (AB) üyesi ülkelerde kamu yönetimi disiplini çerçevesinde yapılan elektronik devlet (e-Devlet) çalışmalarının bibliyometrik analizi sunulmaktadır. 2005 ile 2023 yılları arasında Türkiye ve AB üyesi ülkelerde yayınlanan toplam 180 makaleye ilişkin Web of Science (WoS) veritabanındaki veriler kullanılmıştır. Sunulan analizler, Türkiye ve AB üyesi ülkelerdeki araştırmacıları ve kurumları içermektedir. Araştırmanın belirleyicisi “e-Devlet” anahtar sözcüğüyle “kamu yönetimi” alanında yazılan makalelerdir. Ulaşılan veri; yazar, atıf, ülke, kurum, anahtar sözcük ve tam metin üzerinden incelenmektedir.

Keywords

E-Devlet , Kamu Yönetimi , Türkiye , AB , Dijitalleşme. , Bibliyometrik Analiz

Comparison Of Studies On E-Government Between Türkiye And The European Union States Using Bibliometric Analysis

Abstract

Public administrators first targeted digital transformation in public institutions with the development of technology, and later digitalization in the provision of public services. In keeping with these goals, the idea of electronic government (or "e-Government") has originated and grown. Studies on the digital presentation of public services are still being developed, leaving the traditional notion with the digital age, within the conceptions of both digital governance and digital state. Consequently, e-Government studies are becoming more and more important. This paper provides a bibliometric analysis of studies on electronic government (e-Government) carried out within the context of public administration discipline in Türkiye (TR) and member countries of the European Union (EU). 180 publications that were published in Türkiye and EU member nations between 2005 and 2023 were analyzed using data from the Web of Science (WoS) database. The presented analyses included researchers and institutions in Türkiye and EU member states. The determinant of the research was the articles published in the field of "public administration" with the keyword "e-Government". The author, citation, country, institution, keywords, and full text of the retrieved data were examined.

Keywords

E-Government , Public Administration , Türkiye , EU , bibliometric analysis

References

• Altin, M., & Yilmaz, R. (2022). Adoption of Cloud-Based Accounting Practices in Turkey: An Empirical Study, International Journal of Public Administration, 45(11), 819-833.
• Balci, A., & Medeni, T. D. (2011). E-government gateway development in Turkey: Some challenges and future directions for citizen focus, In E-Government Website Development: Future Trends and Strategic Models, (pp.153-173), IGI Global
• Bradier, A. (2004). Le gouvernement électronique: une priorité européenne, Revue française d’administration publique, (2), 337-347.
• Bhatti, Y., Olsen, A. L., & Pedersen, L. H. (2011). Administrative professionals and the diffusion of innovations: The case of citizen service centres, Public Administration, 89(2), 577-594.
• Brown, D. (2005). Le gouvernement électronique et l’administration publique, Revue Internationale des Sciences Administratives, 71(2), 251-266.
• Criado, J. I., Dias, T. F., Sano, H., Rojas-Martín, F., Silvan, A., & Filho, A. I. (2021),.Public innovation and living labs in action: A comparative analysis in post-new public management contexts, International Journal of Public Administration, 44(6), 451-464.
• Cucciniello, M., Porumbescu, G. A., & Grimmelikhuijsen, S. (2017). 25 years of transparency research: Evidence and future directions, administration review, 77(1), 32-44.
• Cuadrado-Ballesteros, B., Bisogno, M., & Vaia, G. (2022). Public-Sector Accounting Reforms and Governmental Efficiency: A Two-Stage Approach,The International Journal of Accounting, 57(04), 2250017.
• Çarıkçı, O. (2010). Türkiye’de e-devlet uygulamalari üzerine bir araştirma, Süleyman Demirel Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, (12), 95-122.
• Demirbas, T. (2012). Using Web Sites to Improve Fiscal Transparency: The Case of Turkish Municipalities,In Cases on Public Information Management and E-Government Adoption, (pp.232-260), IGI Global.
• Demirbaş, T., Eroglu, E., & Çetinkaya, Ö. (2013). The benefits and barriers of electronic public procurement system: A case study on public hospitals in Turkey,In E-Procurement Management for Successful Electronic Government Systems (pp. 131-146),IGI Global.
• Dempsey, J.X. (2003). What E-Government Means for Those of Us Who Cannot Type, Local Government Brief, Winter 2003, 22.
• De Vries, H., Tummers, L., & Bekkers, V. (2018). The diffusion and adoption of public sector innovations: A meta-synthesis of the literature, Perspectives on Public Management and Governance, 1(3), 159-176.
• Di Giulio, M. and Vecchi,G. (2021). Implementing digitalization in the public sector. Technologies, agency, and governance, Public Policy and Administration, 38 (2) , 133-158.
• Giest, S. (2017), Big data for policymaking: fad or fasttrack?. Policy Sciences, 50(3), 367-382.
• Gökalp, E., Demirörs, O., & Eren, P. E. (2020). Public personnel management process capabilityassessment. Public Personnel Management, 49(1), 111-140.
• Hammerschmidt, J., Calabuig, F., Kraus, S., & Uhrich, S. (2024). Tracing the state of sport management research: a bibliometric analysis. Management Review Quarterly, 74(2), 1185-1208.
• Hancu-Budui, A., & Zorio-Grima, A. (2021), Supreme audit institutions in Europe: synergies, institutional transparency, gender equality and sustainability engagement. Journal of Public Budgeting, Accounting & Financial Management.  Vol. ahead-of-print No. ahead-of-print. https://doi.org/10.1108/JPBAFM-07-2021-0116
• Jalonen, H., Kokkola, J., Laihonen, H., Kirjavainen, H., Kaartemo, V., & Vähämaa, M. (2021). Reaching hard-to-reach people through digital means–Citizens as initiators of co-creation in public services, International Journal of Public Sector Management, 34(7), 799-816.
• Karkın, N. (2014). Barriers for sustainable e-participation process: The case of Turkey., Government e-Strategic Planning and Management: Practices, Patterns and Roadmaps, 227-243.
• María del Carmen, C. A. B. A., Bolivar, M. P. R., & Hernandez, A. M. L. (2014). The determinants of government financial reports online, Transylvanian Review of Administrative Sciences, 10(42), 5-31.
• Megder, E., Cherkaoui, C., Sbihi, B., & Mammass, D. (2005). Le e-Gouvernement et la Modernisation du Secteur Public, In 3rd International Conference: Sciences of Electronic Technologies of Information and Telecommunications, Tunisia.
• Meijer, A., & Boon, W. (2021). Digital platforms for the co-creation of public value, Policy & Politics, 49(2), 231-248. Osborne, S. P., Radnor, Z., & Nasi, G. (2013). A new theory for public service management? Toward a (public) service-dominant approach, The American Review of Public Administration, 43(2), 135-158.
• Pina, V., Torres, L., & Royo, S. (2010). Is e-government promoting convergence towards more accountable local governments?,International public management journal, 13(4), 350-380.
• Randma-Liiv, T., & Drechsler, W. (2017). Three decades, four phases: Public administration development in Central and Eastern Europe, 1989-2017, International Journal of Public Sector Management, 30(6-7), 595-605.
• Raudla, R. (2021). Estonian response to COVID-19 pandemic: learning, cooperation, and the advantages of being a small country, Revista de Administração Pública, 55, 111-121.
• Saylan, İ. (2009. Internet: a gateway to democracy? A comparative analysis of Turkish and Italian e-Government experiences, Amme Idaresi Dergisi, 42(3), 141-162.
• Serrano-Cinca, C., Rueda-Tomás, M., & Portillo-Tarragona, P. (2009). Factors influencing e-disclosure in local public administrations. , Environment and planning C: Government and Policy, 27(2), 355-378.
• Sobacı, M. Z., & Eryigit, K. Y. (2015). Determinants of e-democracy adoption in Turkish municipalities: An analysis for spatial diffusion effect, Local Government Studies, 41(3), 445-469.
• Tummers, L., & Rocco, P. (2015). Serving clients when the server crashes: how frontline workers cope with E‐government challenges, Public Administration Review, 75(6), 817-827.
• Tutar, H., Parlak, İ. H., & Tuzcuoğlu, F. (2023). Analyzing the Web Sites of Metropolitan Municipalities in Turkey in Terms of Digital Access Indicators., Lex Localis, 21(2), 471-494.
• van den Berg, AC.(2021). Participation in Online Platforms: Examining Variations in Intention to Participate across Citizens from Diverse Sociodemographic Groups, Perspectives on Public Management and Governance,4 (3) , pp.259-276.
• Yıldız, M. (2007). Impact of the International Organizatons 39 On The E-Government Policies Of Turkiye,Amme Idaresi Dergisi, 40(2).