Entropi ve Critic Yöntemlerine Göre 3PL Hizmet Sağlayıcılardan Beklenen Lojistik Performans Göstergelerinin Önem Sıralaması

Year 2023, Volume: 7 Issue: 1, 91 - 109, 31.01.2023

Gül Senir

https://doi.org/10.29023/alanyaakademik.1053365

Cited By: 1

Abstract

Bu araştırmanın amacı firmaların 3PL hizmet sağlayıcılarda dikkate aldıkları lojistik performans göstergelerinin önem düzeylerinin sıralamasının ikincil verilere (sektör, büyüklük, sermaye yapısı ve bölge) göre farklılaşan ya da benzeşen noktalarının ihracatçı firmalar bakış açısından belirlenmesidir. Çalışmada 2017 yılı Türkiye’nin ilk 1000 ihracatçı firmasından, anket yöntemi ile veri toplanmıştır. 33 göstergeden oluşan lojistik performans göstergeleri 6 boyut altında toplanmıştır. Buna göre birinci boyut “ilişkisel-teknolojik yeterlilikler ve müşteri memnuniyeti performans göstergeleri”, ikinci boyut “katma değerli hizmetler performans göstergeleri”, üçüncü boyut “sevkiyat ve yükleme işlemlerinin etkinliği performans göstergeleri”, dördüncü boyut “gelişime ve inovasyona yönelik performans göstergeleri”, beşinci boyut “ulaştırma operasyon performans göstergeleri” ve altıncı boyut “sipariş işleme performans göstergeleri” olarak adlandırılmıştır. ENTROPİ ve CRITIC yöntemleriyle elde edilen lojistik performans göstergelerinin önem düzeyleri karşılaştırıldığında, firmaların 3PL hizmet sağlayıcılardan beklentileri farklılaşmakla birlikte genel olarak ulaştırma operasyonu ile sevkiyat ve yükleme işlemlerinin etkinliği ile ilgili beklentilerinin olduğu görülmüştür.

Keywords

3PL, Entropi, CRITIC

Significance Ranking of Logistic Performance Indicators Expected From 3PL Service Providers According to Entropy and Critic Methods

Abstract

The aim of this research is to determine the points of differentiation or similarity according to secondary data (sector, size, capital structure and region) of the order of importance of logistics performance indicators that companies consider in 3PL service providers from the point of view of exporting companies. In the study, data were collected from the top 1000 exporting companies of Turkey in 2017, using the survey method. Logistics performance indicators consisting of 33 indicators are grouped under 6 dimensions. Accordingly, the first dimension is “relational-technological competencies and customer satisfaction performance indicators”, the second dimension is “value-added services performance indicators”, the third dimension is “performance indicators for the efficiency of shipping and loading operations”, the fourth dimension is “performance indicators for development and innovation”, and the fifth dimension is “performance indicators for development and innovation”. dimension "transport operation performance indicators" and the sixth dimension "order processing performance indicators". When the importance levels of the logistics performance indicators obtained by the ENTROPI and CRITIC methods are compared, it is seen that the expectations of the companies from the 3PL service providers differ, but in general, they have expectations about the efficiency of the transportation operation and shipping and loading processes.

Keywords

3PL, Entropi, CRITIC

References

• ADALI, E. A., & IŞIK, A. T. (2017). CRITIC and MAUT Methods for the Contract Manufacturer Selection Problem. European Journal of Multidisciplinary Studies, 2(5), 93-101.
• ALKHATIB, F.S., DARLINGTON, R., YANG, Z., & NGUYEN, T.T. (2015). A Novel Technique for Evaluating and Selecting Logistics Service Providers Based on the Logistics Resource View. Expert Systems with Applications 42, 6976-6989.
• AYÇİN, E. (2019). Çok Kriterli Karar Verme: Bilgisayar Uygulamalı Çözümler. Nobel Yayıncılık. Ankara.
• BAKAN, İ., & ŞEKKELİ, Z. (2016). Lojistik Koordinasyon Yeteneği, Lojistik İnovasyon Yeteneği ve Müşteri İlişkileri Yeteneği İle Rekabet Avantajı ve Lojistik Performans Arasındaki İlişki: Bir Alan Araştırması. Kahramanmaraş Sütçü İmam Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, 5(2), 39-68.
• BAKAR, M. A., & JAAFAR, H. S. (2016). Malaysian Logistics Performance: A Manufacturer’s Perspective. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences 224, pp. 571-578.
• BAKİ, B., & ŞİMŞEK, B. (2004). Lojistik Faaliyetlere Göre Performans Ölçütlerinin Belirlenmesi. Yöneylem Araştırması/ Endüstri Mühendisliği, 24. Ulusal Kongresi, 15-18 Haziran, Gaziantep- Adana.
• BHAGWAT, R., & SHARMA, M. K. (2009). An Application of the Integrated AHP-PGP Model for Performance Measurement of Supply Chain Management. Production Planning & Control, 20(8), 678-690.
• BHATNAGAR, R., SOHAL, A. S., & MILLEN, R. (1999). Third Party Logistics Services: A Singapore Perspective. International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management, 29(9), 569-587.
• BYRNES, J.L.S., COPACINO, W.C., & METZ, P. (1987). Forge Service into a Weapon with Logistics. Transportation & Distribution, September, pp. 42-8
• CABANIS, R.F. (1995). Comparing Domestic and International Distributors’ Performance, A Manufacturer’s Perspective. International Journal of Physical Distribution& Logistics Management, Vol.25, No.6, pp.41-53.
• CENGİZ, G. (2019). Bütünleşik Bir Yaklaşım ile Havayolu Hizmet Kalitesinin Cinsiyetler Açısından Değerlendirilmesi, Yüksek Lisans Tezi, Başkent Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü, Ankara.
• CHEN, Y.C. (2002). An Application of Fuzzy Set Theory to the External Performance Evaluation of Distribution Centers in Logistics. Soft Computing 6, 64-70.
• CHEN, M. F., & Tzeng, G. H. (2004). Combining Grey Relation and TOPSIS Concepts for Selecting an Expatriate Host Country. Mathematical and Computer Modelling, 40(13), 1473-1490.
• CHOW, G., HEAVER, T.D., & HENRIKSSON, L.E. (1994). Logistics Performance: Definition and Measurement. International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management, 24(1), 17-28.
• ÇAKIR, S., & PERÇİN, S. (2013). Çok Kriterli Karar Verme Teknikleriyle Lojistik Firmalarında Performans Ölçümü. Ege Akademik Bakış, Cilt:13, Sayı:4, Ekim, ss.449-459.
• DAUGHERTY, P.J., ELLINGER A. E., & GUSTIN, C.M.. (1996). Integrated Logistics: Achieving Logistics Performance Improvements. Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, Vol. 1, Iss 3, 25 – 33.
• FALSINI, D., FONDI, F., & SCHIRALDI, M. M. (2012). A Logistics Provider Evaluation and Selection Methodology Based on AHP, DEA and Linear Programming Integration. International Journal of Production Research, 50(17), 4822-4829.
• FAWCETT, S. E., & VELLENGA, D. B. (1990). Concentration and the Relevant Market in Air Transportation Since Deregulation. In Journal of the Transportation Research Forum, Vol. 30, No. 2.
• FAWCETT, S.E., & SMITH, S.R. (1995). Logistics Measurement and Performance for United States- Mexican Operations Under NAFTA. Transportation Journal, Vol. 34, No.3, Spring, pp. 25-34.
• FAWCETT, S.E., & COOPER, M.B. (1998). Logistics Performance Measurement and Customer Success. Industrial Marketing Management 27, pp. 341–357.
• GOPAL, P. R. C., & THAKKAR, J. (2012). A Review on Supply Chain Performance Measures and Metrics: 2000-2011. International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, 61(5), 518-547.
• GARSIDE, A.K., & SAPUTRO, T.E. (2017). Evaluation and Selection of 3PL Provider Using Fuzzy AHP and Grey TOPSIS in Group Decision Making. 3rd International Materials. Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering Conference (MIMEC2017).
• GREEN, K. W., WHITTEN, D., & INMAN, R. A. (2008). The Impact of Logistics Performance on Organizational Performance in a Supply Chain Context. Supply Chain Management: An International Journal.
• GUNASEKARAN, A., PATEL, C., & TIRTIROGLU, E. (2001). Performance Measures and Metrics in a Supply Chain Environment. International Journal of Operations & Production Management.
• HAIR, F. J., BLACK, C. W., BABIN, B.J., & ANDERSON R.E. (2014). Multivariate Data Analysis, Prentice Hall, London.
• HILL, J.F. (1996). Monitoring Information and Materials to Enhance Logistics Performance. Logistics Information Management, Vol.9, No.2, pp.10-15.
• HUANG, J. H., & PENG, K. H. (2012). Fuzzy Rasch Model in TOPSIS: A New Approach for Generating Fuzzy Numbers to Assess the Competitiveness of the Tourism Industries in Asian Countries. Tourism Management, 33(2), 456-465.
• HUANG, W., SHUAI, B., SUN, Y., WANG, Y., & ANTWI, E. (2018). Using Entropy-TOPSIS Method to Evaluate Urban Rail Transit System Operation Performance: The China Case. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 111, 292-303.
• KAYABAŞI, A., & ÖZDEMİR, A. (2008). Üretim İşletmelerinde Lojistik Yönetimi Faaliyetlerinde Performans Yönetimine Bakış: Beklenti-Fayda Farkı Analizi Uygulaması. Atatürk Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Dergisi, 22(1), ss. 195-209.
• KAYAKUTLU, G., & BUYUKOZKAN, G. (2011). Assessing Performance Factors for a 3PL in a Value Chain. Int. J. Production Economics, 131, 441-452.
• KENGER, M. D., & ORGAN, A. (2017). Banka Personel Seçiminin Çok Kriterli Karar Verme Yöntemlerinden Entropi Temelli Aras Yöntemi ile Değerlendirilmesi. Adnan Menderes Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 4(4), 152-170.
• KESHAVARZ GHORABAEE, M., AMIRI, M., KAZIMIERAS ZAVADSKAS, E., & ANTUCHEVIČIENĖ, J. (2017). Assessment of Third-Party Logistics Providers Using a CRITIC-WASPAS Approach with Interval Type-2 Fuzzy Sets. Transport, 32(1), 66-78.
• KUCUKALTAN, B., IRANI, Z., & AKTAŞ, E. (2016). A Decision Support Model for Identification and Prioritization of Key Performance Indicators in The Logistics Industry. Computers in Human Behavior, 65, pp. 346-358.
• LEHTONEN, T.W. (2001). Performance Measurement in Construction Logistics. International Journal of Production Economics, Vol.69, pp.107-116.
• LI, Y., & LI, H. X. (2011). Study on Performance Measurement of Logistics Service Providers. In Advanced Materials Research, 271, 241-246.
• LIU, H.T., & WANG, W.K. (2009). An Integrated Fuzzy Approach for Provider Evaluation and Selection in Third-Party Logistics. Expert Systems with Applications, 36, 4387-4398.
• LIU, J., YUAN, C., HAFEEZ, M., & YUAN, Q. (2018). The Relationship Between Environment and Logistics Performance: Evidence from Asian Countries. Journal of Cleaner Production, 204, 282-291.
• LTIFI, M., & GHARBI, J. (2015). The Effect of Logistics Performance in Retail Store on the Happiness and Satisfaction of Consumers. Procedia Economics and Finance 23, pp. 1347-1353.
• MARR, N. E.. (1991). Management Sophistication and Service Performance. International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management, 21(4), 32-41.
• MCMULLAN, A. (1996). Supply Chain Management Practices in Asia Pacific Today. International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management, 26(10), 79-95.
• MINAHAN, T. (1997). Want to Outsource Logistics? Here's What You Should Know. Purchasing, 123(5), 59-60.
• MINGMING, H., XIONG, W., SHUN, L., YINGLIU, D., QINGQUAN, Y., & QUANFU, T. (2010, May). Research on Performance Evaluation of Logistics Enterprises Based on the Balanced Scorecard. In 2010 International Conference on Intelligent Computation Technology and Automation, 3, 65-68. IEEE.
• MOBERG, C. R., WHIPPLE, T. W., CUTLER, B.D., & SPEH, T.W. (2004). Do the Management Components of Supply Chain Management Affect Logistics Performance?. The International Journal of Logistics Management, Vol. 15, Issue:2, pp. 15-30.
• MORASH, E. A. (2001). Supply Chain Strategies, Capabilities, and Performance. Transportation Journal, 37-54.
• ÖMÜRBEK, N., & URMAK AKÇAKAYA, E. D. (2018). Forbes 2000 Listesinde Yer Alan Havacılık Sektöründeki Şirketlerin ENTROPİ, MAUT, COPRAS ve SAW Yöntemleri İle Analizi. Suleyman Demirel University Journal of Faculty of Economics & Administrative Sciences, 23(1).
• ÖZTEMİZ, H.H., & KARA, İ.E. (2017). Lojistik Firmalarında Performans Ölçümü: Tek Skorlu Dengelenmiş Skor Kart ve Markov Zincirleri Analizi: Sertel Lojistik Örneği. Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 19(2), 249-286.
• QURESHI, M.N., KUMAR, D., & KUMAR, P. (2008). An Integrated Model to Identify and Classify the Key Criteria and Their Role in the Assessment of 3PL Services Providers. Asia Pacific Journal of Marketing and Logistics, 20(2), 227-249.
• RAJESH, R., PUGAZHENDHI, S., GANESH, K., DUCQ, Y., & KOH, S. L. (2012). Generic Balanced Scorecard Framework for Third Party Logistics Service Provider. International Journal of Production Economics, 140(1), 269-282.
• RAMANATHAN. R. (2010). The Moderating Roles of Risk and Efficiency on the Relationship Between Logistics Performance and Customer Loyalty in E-commerce. Transportation Research Part E 46, pp. 950–962.
• RUSKE, K. D., KAUSCHKE, P., REUTER, J., VON DER GRACHT, H., GNATZY, T., & DARKOW, I. L. (2010). Transportation & Logistics 2030, 3, Emerging Markets-New Hubs, New Spokes, New Industry Leaders. Price Waterhouse Coopers http://www. pwc. com/gr/en/publications/assets/transportation-logistics-2030-vol3. pdf.
• SAHU, N. K, DATTA, S., & MAHAPATRA, S. S. (2015). Fuzzy Based Appraisement Module for 3PL Evaluation and Selection. Benchmarking: An International Journal, 22(3), 354-392.
• SCHRAMM-KLEIN, H., & MORSCHETT, D. (2006). The Relationship Between Marketing Performance, Logistics Performance and Company Performance for Retail Companies. International Review of Retail, Distribution and Consumer Research, 16(02), 277-296.
• SHEMSHADI, A., SHIRAZI, H., TOREIHI, M., & TAROKH, M. J. (2011). A Fuzzy VIKOR Method for Supplier Selection Based on Entropy Measure for Objective Weighting. Expert Systems with Applications, 38(10), 12160-12167.
• STANK, T. P., GOLDSBY, T. J., VICKERY, S. K., & SAVITSKIE, K. (2003). Logistics Service Performance: Estimating Its Influence on Market Share. Journal of Business Logistics, 24(1), 27-55.
• ŞENGEL, S. (2012). Lojistik İşletmelerde Performans Değerlemede Lojistik Raşyoların Önemi ve Bir Araştırma, Detay Yayıncılık, Ankara.
• TILOKAVICHAI, V., SOPHATSATHIT, P., & CHANDRACHAI, A. (2012). An Emprical Analysis of the Impact of Information Systems in Logistics Performance Management of Retail Firms. Journal of Business and Retail Management Research, Vol. 7, Issue 1, pp. 74-85.
• TJADER, Y., MAY, J. H., SHANG, J., VARGAS, L. G., & GAO, N. (2014). Firm-Level Outsourcing Decision Making: A Balanced Scorecard-Based Analytic Network Process Model. International Journal of Production Economics, 147, 614-623.
• TÖYLI, J., HAKKINEN, L., OJALA, L., & NAULA, T. (2008). Logistics and Financial Performance An Analysis of 424 Finnish Small and Medium-Sized Enterprises. International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management, 38(1), 57-80.
• TUŞ, A., & ADALI, E. A. (2019). The New Combination with CRITIC and WASPAS Methods for the Time and Attendance Software Selection Problem. Opsearch, 56(2), 528-538.
• TYWORTH, E., & ZENG, A. Z. (1998). Estimating the Effects of Carrier Transit-Time Performance on Logistics Cost and Service. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 32(2), 89-97.
• ULUTAŞ, A., & KARAKÖY, Ç. (2019). CRITIC ve ROV Yöntemleri İle Bir Kargo Firmasının 2011-2017 Yılları Sırasındaki Performansının Analiz Edilmesi. Manas Sosyal Araştırmalar Dergisi, 8(1), 223-230.
• WANG, T. C., & LEE, H. D. (2009). Developing a Fuzzy TOPSIS Approach Based on Subjective Weights and Objective Weights. Expert Systems with Applications, 36(5), 8980-8985.
• WANG, L., ZHANG, H., & ZENG, Y. R. (2012). Fuzzy Analytic Hierarchy Process (FAHP) and Balanced Scorecard Approach for Evaluating Performance of Third-Party Logistics (TPL) Enterprises in Chinese Context. African Journal of Business Management, 6(2), 521.
• WATERS, D. (2003). Logistics: An Introduction to Supply Chain Management. Palgrave Macmillan.
• WOOD, D.F., BARONE, A., MURPHY, P., & WARDLOW, D. (2002). International Logistics, New York-USA: American Management Association.
• ZAWAWI, N.F. WAHAB, S.A., & MAMUN, A. A. (2017). Logistics Capability, Logistics Performance, and the Moderating Effect of Firm Size: Empirical Evidence from East Coast Malaysia. The Journal of Developing Areas, 51(2), 172-182.
• https://www.tim.org.tr/tr/raporlar-ilk-1000-ihracatci-arastirmasi-dosyalar-2017, 08.07.2018.