Analytical Approach to Society 5.0 Phenomenon Studies with Scientometric Analysis Method

Year 2023, Volume: 7 Issue: 1, 147 - 167, 31.01.2023

Sergen Gürsoy , Ayten Yağmur

https://doi.org/10.29023/alanyaakademik.1077207

Cited By: 2

Abstract

As a result of the intense penetration of globalization into societies, the necessity of integrating technology with society has emerged. In this context, an increase in the tendency of researchers towards the phenomenon of Society 5.0 has been observed. Since the subject is current and affects future social sustainability, it has become important to examine the literature from a holistic perspective. The study aims to examine the studies on the phenomenon of Society 5.0 in the literature from a systematic and holistic perspective and to ensure that the study is a source for future research. Using the Scopus database, qualitative interpretations are made within the scope of a total of 151 bibliographic quantitative data. The fact that Scientometrics studies and CiteSpace analysis have never been done in the literature on this phenomenon has increased the originality of the study. Analysis of countries, intellectual analysis, keywords; burst point and cluster analyzes has been performed. As a result of the findings, an increase in the research tendency, an increase in the production and collaboration networks of the countries, and an increase in the diversity of keywords (especially sustainable society) have been observed as the trend towards the subject increased. Moreover, it will be important for social sustainability to increase the study orientation for future studies in areas that are lacking (sociology, psychology, gerontology, etc. social sciences).

Keywords

Society 5.0, Super-Smart Society, Scientometrics Analysis, CiteSpace

Analytical Approach to Society 5.0 Phenomenon Studies with Scientometric Analysis Method

Abstract

Küreselleşmenin toplumlara yoğun bir şekilde nüfuz etmesi sonucunda teknolojinin toplumla bütünleştirilmesi gerekliliği ortaya çıkmıştır. Bu bağlamda araştırmacıların Toplum 5.0 olgusuna yönelik eğilimlerinde artış gözlemlenmiştir. Konunun güncel olması ve gelecekteki sosyal sürdürülebilirliği etkilemesi nedeniyle literatürün bütüncül bir bakış açısıyla incelenmesi önemli hale gelmiştir. Çalışmanın amacı, literatürde Toplum 5.0 olgusu üzerine yapılan çalışmaları sistematik ve bütüncül bir bakış açısıyla incelemek ve çalışmanın ileride yapılacak araştırmalara kaynak olmasını sağlamaktır. Scopus veri tabanı kullanılarak toplam 151 bibliyografik nicel veri kapsamında nitel yorumlar yapılmaktadır. Bu olgu ile ilgili literatürde Scientometrics çalışmalarının ve CiteSpace analizinin hiç yapılmamış olması çalışmanın özgünlüğünü artırmıştır. Ülkelerin analizi, entelektüel analiz, anahtar kelimeler; patlama noktası ve küme analizleri yapılmıştır. Elde edilen bulgular sonucunda konuya yönelim arttıkça araştırma eğiliminde artış, ülkelerin üretim ve işbirliği ağlarında artış, anahtar kelime çeşitliliğinde (özellikle sürdürülebilir toplum) artış gözlemlenmiştir. Ayrıca, eksik olan alanlarda (sosyoloji, psikoloji, gerentoloji vb. sosyal bilimler) yapılacak çalışmalara yönelimin arttırılması sosyal sürdürülebilirlik açısından önemli olacaktır.

Keywords

Toplum 5.0, Süper Akıllı Toplum, Bilimetrik Analiz, CiteSpace

References

• BURRELL, G., & MORGAN, G. (1979). Sociological Paradigms And Organizational Analysis: Elements Of The Sociology Of Corporate Life. Heinemann Educational Books Inc.
• BUTER, R. K., NOYONS, E. C. M., & VAN RAAN, A. F. (2004). A combination of quantitative and qualitative maps in an evaluative bibliometric context. In Proceedings. Eighth International Conference on Information Visualisation,.
• BUTER, R. K., NOYONS, E. C. M., VAN MACKELENBERGH, M., & LAINE, T. (2006). Combining concept maps and bibliometric maps: First explorations. Scientometrics, 66(2), 377-387.
• CAPGEMINI-PROGNOS (2018). Gesellschaft 5.0. https://www.capgemini.com/de-de/resources/studie-gesellschaft-5-0/
• CHEN, C. (2006). “Citespace II: Detecting And Visualizing Emerging Trends And Transient Patterns İn Scientific Literature”. Journal Of The American Society For Information Science And Technology 57 (3): 359-377.
• CHEN, C. (2014). The citespace manual. College of Computing and Informatics, 1, 1-84.
• CHEN, C. (2016). CiteSpace: A Practical Guide for Mapping Scientific Literature. Nova Science Publishers.
• COLLINS, H. (2010) “Creative Research: The Theory and Practice of Research for the Creative Industries” AVA Publications.
• DANG, Q., LUO, Z., OUYANG, C., & WANG, L. (2021). First Systematic Review on Health Communication Using the CiteSpace Software in China: Exploring Its Research Hotspots and Frontiers. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 18(24), 13008.
• DEETZ, S. “Describing Differences in Approaches to Organization Science: Rethinking Burrell and Morgan and their Legacy,” Organization Science (7:2), 1996, pp. 191–207
• ELLITAN, L. (2020). Competing in the Era of Industrial Revolution 4.0 and Society 5.0. Jurnal Maksipreneur: Manajemen, Koperasi, dan Entrepreneurship,10(1), 1-12.
• FALAGAS, M. E., PITSOUNI, E. I., MALIETZIS, G. A., & PAPPAS, G. (2008). Comparison Of Pubmed, Scopus, Web Of Science, And Google Scholar: Strengths And Weaknesses. The FASEB Journal, 22(2), 338-342.
• FUKUYAMA, M. (2018). Society 5.0: Aiming for a New Human-Centered Society. Japan Economic Foundation Special Article 2, 4.
• GLÄSER, J., & LAUDEL, G. (2001). Integrating scientometric indicators into sociological studies: methodical and methodological problems. Scientometrics, 52(3), 411-434.
• GUBA, E. G., & LINCOLN, Y. S. (2001). Evaluation Paradigms: Worldviews Or Belief Systems That Guide Evaluators.
• GÜNBAYI, I., & SORM, S. (2018). Social Paradigms in Guiding Social Research Design: The Functional, Interpretive, Radical Humanist And Radical Structural Paradigms. International Journal On New Trends in Education and Their Implications. 9(2). 57-76.
• GÜNBAYI, I. (2019). Liderlik ve Toplumsal Degisme [Leadership and Social Development]. In N. Guclu & S. Kosar. Egitim Yonetiminde Liderlik; Teori, Araştırma ve Uygulama. Pegem Akademi. Ankara.
• HAMDANUNSERA, H. (2018). Industri 4.0: Pengaruh Revolusi Industri pada Kewirausahaan Demi Kemandirian Ekonomi. Jurnal Nusamba, 3(2), 2–4.
• HOLLOWAY, I., & WHEELER, S. (2010). Qualitative Research in Nursing and Healthcare. Blackwell Publishing Ltd.
• HOOD, W. W., & WILSON, C. S. (2001). The Literature Of Bibliometrics, Scientometrics, And Informetrics. Scientometrics, 52(2), 291-314.
• ILMA, A.Z., ADHELACAHYA, K., & EKAWATI, E. Y. (2021). Assessment for learning model in competency assessment of 21stcentury student assisted by google classroom. 2020 National Physics Seminar, SNF 2020.
• JABALI, K.A., ASHIQ, M., AHMAD, S., & REHMAN, S.U. (2020). A Bibliometric Analysis of Research Productivity on Diabetes Modeling andArtificial Pancreas 2001 to 2020.Libr. Philos. Pract. 1–19.
• KEIDANREN. (2018). Society 5.0 -Co-Creating the future-. 2.
• KEIDANREN (JAPAN BUSINESS FEDERATION). (2016). Toward realization of the new economy and society. Reform of the economy and society by the deepening of “Society 5.0”.
• MATSUDA, K., UESUGI, S., NARUSE, K., & MORITA, M. (2019). Toplumla Üretim Teknolojileri 5.0. 2019 6. Uluslararası Davranışsal, Ekonomik ve Sosyo-Kültürel Hesaplama Konferansı (BESC), 1-4.
• MAVRODIEVA, A., & RAJIB, S. (2020). Disaster and climate change issues in Japan's society 5.0-a discussion. Sustainability (Switzerland).
• MIŚKIEWICZ, R., & WOLNIAK, R. (2020). Practical Application of the Industry 4.0 Concept in a Steel Company. Sustainability. 12(14):5776.
• NAGPAUL, P. S., GARG, K. C., & GUPTA, B. M. (1999). (Eds), Emerging Trends in Scientometrics. New Delhi, Allied Publishers Ltd, New Delhi.
• NATALIA, I., & ELLITAN, L. (2019). Srategies to Achieve Competitive Advantage in Industrial Revolution 4.0. International Journal of Research Culture Society, 3(6), 10–16.
• PERAKOVIĆ, D., PERIŠA, M., CVITIĆ, I., & ZORIĆ, P. (2020). Information and Communication Technologies for the Society 5.0 Environment. XXXVIII Simpozijum o novim tehnologijama u poštanskom i telekomunikacionom saobraćaju – PosTel 2020, Beograd.
• PRANCKUTĖ, R. (2021). Web of Science (WoS) and Scopus: The Titans of Bibliographic Information in Today’s Academic World. Publications, 9(1), 12.
• RASHID, S., REHMAN, S. U., ASHIQ, M., & KHATTAK, A. (2021). A Scientometric Analysis of Forty-Three Years of Research in Social Support in Education (1977–2020). Education Sciences, 11(4), 149.
• REEVES, T., & HEDBERG, J. (2003). Interactive learning systems evaluation, Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey: Educational Technology Publications.
• REKER, J., & BÖHM, K. (2013). Digitalisierung im Mittelstand. Deloitte.
• RITCHIE, J., LEWIS, J., NICHOLLS, C. M., & ORMSTON, R. (Eds.). (2013). Qualitative Research Practice: A Guide For Social Science Students And Researchers. Sage.
• SALGUES, B. (2018). Society 5.0: Industry of the future, technologies, methods, First Edition. New York: ISTE Ltd and John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
• TAKASE, J., FUKUI, M., HONDA, A., OURA, Y., & SHIMURA, T. (2018) Care training robot joint load material of basic consideration technical introduction. Transactions of Japanese Society for Medical and Biological Engineering.
• TERRE BLANCHE, M., & DURRHEIM, K. (1999). Research in practice. Cape Town: UCT Press.
• WALDENBERGER, F. (2018). The Digital Future, Society 5.0: Japanese Ambitions and Initiatives. International Reports.
• WILSON, C. S. (2001). Informetrics. In: M. E. Williams, (Ed.), Annual Review of Information Science and Technology, Vol.34, Medford, NJ: Information Today, Inc. For the American Society for Information Science, pp. 3–143.
• WORLD ECONOMIC FORUM (WEF) (2020). The Future of Jobs Report 2020 (ss. 1-163).
• SHIROISHI, Y., UCHIYAMA, K., & SUZUKI, N. (2018). Society 5.0: For Human Security And Well-Being. Computer, 51(7), 91-95. doi:10.1109/MC.2018.3011041
• ZAVARAQI, R., & FADAIE, G. R. (2012). Scientometrics or science of science: quantitative, qualitative or mixed one. Collnet Journal of Scientometrics and Information Management, 6(2), 273-278.
• Internet Resources
• ELSEVIER. (2020). Scopus. Expertly Curated Abstract and Citation Database. https://www.elsevier.com/solutions/scopus?dgcid=RN_AGCM_Sourced_300005030
• ELSEVIER. (t.y.). Why choose Scopus—Scopus benefits | Elsevier solutions. Elsevier.Com. Geliş tarihi 23 Mayıs 2021, gönderen https://www.elsevier.com/solutions/scopus/why-choose-scopus
• GOOGLE TRENDLER. (t.y.). Google Trends. Geliş tarihi 23 Mayıs 2021, gönderen https://trends.google.com/trends/explore?date=today%205-y&q=Society%205.0
• PARTICIPATION IN CEBIT 2017 WITH LARGEST PAVILION EVER | Archive 2017—JETRO Topics—About Us—Japan External Trade Organization—JETRO. (t.y.). Geliş tarihi 23 Mayıs 2021, gönderen https://www.jetro.go.jp/en/jetro/topics/2017/1703_topics3.html