Brenda Cooper’ın For the Snake of Power Adlı Solarpunk Eserinde Gelecekçi Bir Kapitalist Ütopya Distopyası

Abstract

Brenda Cooper’ın For the Snake of Power (2018) adlı eseri, iklim değişikliğinin zorluklarıyla şekillenmiş geleceğin Phoenix, Arizona’sını tasvir eder. Hikâyenin merkezi unsuru, yenilenebilir enerji üreten ve çölün aşırı sıcaklarından şehri korumak için gölge sağlayan yılan benzeri bir güneş paneli yapısıdır. Bu teknolojik yenilik, insan ve doğanın uyum içinde birlikte var olma potansiyelini simgeleyerek çevresel felaketler karşısında dayanıklılık ve uyum vizyonu sunar. Ancak hikâye, yalnızca zenginlerin soğutma sisteminden faydalandığı, fakirlerin – özellikle yaşlıların – dayanılmaz sıcak nedeniyle acı çekip öldüğü distopik bir gerçeği ortaya koyar. Hikâye, kapitalist sistemi eleştirerek yüzeyde mükemmel görünen ancak derinlerde ciddi kusurlar barındıran bir “kapitalist ütopya distopyası” sunar. Anlatı, iklim değişikliğiyle harap olmuş bir dünyada zenginler ile fakirler arasındaki eşitsizliklere dikkat çekerek, daha fazla acının önlenmesi için adil bir yönetimin gerekliliğini vurgular. Yapay zekâ ve çevre dostu teknoloji gibi geleceğe yönelik unsurlar, iklim kaynaklı distopyanın sert gerçekliğiyle tezat oluşturarak, sistemik değişim olmaksızın teknolojik açıdan gelişmiş toplumların bile çevresel felaketler ve eşitsizlik tarafından şekilleneceği uyarısında bulunur. Sonuç olarak hikâye, sürdürülebilir ve adil bir gelecek sağlanması için kolektif eylemi teşvik eder.

Keywords

• Brenda Cooper
• For the Snake of Power
• Phoenix
• solarpunk
• ütopya distopya
• kapitalizm

A Futuristic Capitalist Utopian Dystopia in Brenda Cooper’s Solarpunk For the Snake of Power

Abstract

Brenda Cooper’s For the Snake of Power (2018) presents a future Phoenix, Arizona, shaped by the challenges of climate change. The story’s central feature is a snake-like solar panel structure that generates renewable energy while providing shade to protect the city from the desert’s extreme heat. This technological innovation symbolizes the potential for human and nature to coexist harmoniously, offering a vision of resilience and adaptability in the face of environmental disasters. However, the story reveals a dystopian reality where only the wealthy benefit from the cooling system, while the poor, particularly the elderly, suffer and die due to unbearable heat. The story critiques the capitalist system, presenting a “capitalist utopian dystopia,” where a society appears perfect on the surface but is deeply flawed beneath. The narrative highlights the disparities between the rich and poor in a world ravaged by climate change, emphasizing the need for fair governance to avoid further suffering. The futuristic elements, including AI and eco-friendly technology, contrast with the harsh reality of climate-induced dystopia, warning that without systemic change, even technologically advanced societies will be shaped by environmental catastrophe and inequality. Ultimately, the story urges collective action to ensure a sustainable and equitable future.

Keywords

• Brenda Cooper
• For the Snake of Power
• Phoenix
• solarpunk
• utopian dystopia
• capitalism

References

1. Aghasiyev, K. (2024). A practopic-ecocritical analysis: Exploring capitalist utopian dystopia in Brenda Cooper’s For the Snake of Power. In Erciyes University Faculty of Letters Language, Culture and Literature Student Symposium Proceedings (p. 44). Erciyes University, Türkiye.
2. Atasoy, E. (2019). Quest for utopian impulse in twentieth-century dystopian narrative: P. D. James’s critical dystopia, The Children of Men. CBÜ Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 17(1), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.18026/cbayarsos.524119
3. Atasoy, İ. (2015). Ütopyanın Sonu: Hindistancevizi İmparatorluğu - Christian Kracht’ın Imperium Romanında Ütopyacı Dürtüler. Alman Dili ve Edebiyatı Dergisi - Studien zur deutschen Sprache und Literatur, 2(34), 73-84.
4. Atasoy, İ. (2021a). Sağlığın Zorbalığı: Juli Zeh’in Temiz Havale Romanında Beden Ütopyası Kurgusu. In: A. Oktay (Ed.) Edebiyattan Pencereler. 107-128, Ankara: İKSAD Publishing House.
5. Atasoy, İ. (2021b). How can nothing be something? A multimodal analysis of the short film “Zero”. In: A.A. Mohammed & E. Lomia (Eds.) 4th International New York Conference on Evolving Trends in Interdisciplinary Research & Practices Full Texts Book. 201-206, New York: Liberty Publication.
6. Atasoy, İ. (2023a). New Perspectives on Turkish-German Relations in Literary History. In: İ. Atasoy & B. Konukman & A. Classen (Eds.) Turkish-German Relations in Literary History From the Fifteenth Through the Twenty-First Century, 1-7. İstanbul: Istanbul University Press.
7. Atasoy, İ. (2023b). Propaganda and Alliance: Visual and Verbal Representations of the Central Empires in Illustrated German Postcards During the First World War. In: İ. Atasoy & B. Konukman & A. Classen (Eds.) Turkish-German Relations in Literary History From the Fifteenth Through the Twenty-First Century, 61-75. İstanbul: Istanbul University Press, 2023.
8. Cooper, B. (2018). The snake of power. In J. Eschrich & C. A. Miller (Eds.), The weight of light: A collection of solar futures. Arizona State University.

9. Davidson, J. P. L. (2020). Looking laterally: The literary utopia and the task of critical social theory. Current Sociology, 69(7). https://doi.org/10.1177/0011392120969758
10. Ertuğrul, G., & Parlas, B. (2015). Education in Thomas More’s Utopia. Dumlupınar Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi.
11. Eschrich, J., & Miller, C. A. (Eds.). (2018). The weight of light: A collection of solar futures. Arizona State University.
12. Hamilton, J. (2015). Explainer: “Solarpunk,” or how to be an optimistic radical. The Conversation.
13. Kocka, J. (2018). Capitalism and its critics: A long-term view. In C. Niederberger & C. Köster (Eds.), The lifework of a labor historian: Essays in honor of Marcel van der Linden (pp. 71–89). Brill. https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004386617_005
14. Reina-Rozo, J. D. (2021). Art, energy and technology: The solarpunk movement. International Journal of Engineering, Social Justice and Peace, 8(1), 55–68. https://doi.org/10.24908/ijesjp.v8i1.14292
15. Tekin, H. (2024a). Esther Bejarano’s vision of unity and peace between Jews and Palestinians. In İ. Atasoy & H. Tekin (Eds.), Utopia and dystopia in German literature, film, and television. Interdisciplinary studies on German philology I (pp. 1–20). Istanbul: Istanbul University Press.
16. Tekin, H. (2024b). Einführung in das Konzept der Utopie. In İ. Atasoy & H. Tekin (Eds.), Utopia and dystopia in German literature, film, and television. Interdisciplinary studies on German philology I (pp. 1–8). Istanbul: Istanbul University Press.
17. Yadav, R. K., & Pandey, M. (2020). Artificial intelligence and its application in various fields. International Journal of Engineering and Advanced Technology, 9(5), 1336. https://doi.org/10.35940/ijeat.D9144.069520
18. Zhurkova, M. S., & Khomutnikova, E. A. (2019). The genesis of dystopian meaning structure and its relation to utopian literary tradition. In Advances in social science, education and humanities research: Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Education Science and Social Development (ESSD 2019) (Vol. 298). Atlantis Press.