Digital transformation in public universities: BPMN-based process automation and enterprise architecture redesign

Mustafa Kaya

doi:10.17093/alphanumeric.1660978

Digital transformation in public universities: BPMN-based process automation and enterprise architecture redesign

Abstract

The primary objective of this study is to analyze the impact of digital transformation on process management in universities and to propose process improvement strategies. Within this scope, approximately 100 processes carried out in the Strategy Development, Student Affairs, and Information Technologies departments were examined, with specific processes analyzed in detail. The study identified key challenges such as inefficiencies, administrative delays, and lack of financial integration. In the student registration process, while academic and administrative procedures are well-defined, financial components (such as tuition fees, scholarships, and payments) are insufficiently integrated. In the server request process, the absence of procurement, budget planning, and supply chain management may contribute to resource shortages and delays. In the budget distribution process, lengthy approval stages and the absence of strategic performance indicators (KPIs) make it difficult to align budget allocations with institutional goals. As part of the study, process improvement recommendations were developed. Threshold-based approval mechanisms, automated budget tracking systems, and financial process integration are proposed. The use of e-signature systems, electronic document management, and Robotic Process Automation (RPA) can help reduce administrative delays and accelerate processes. Quantitative analyses reveal differences in processes based on processing time, error rate, and efficiency scores. The IT department has a low error rate but a limited efficiency score. The Strategy Development department has a long processing time but a high efficiency score, whereas approval steps in Student Affairs slow down the processes. In conclusion, this study demonstrates that BPMN-based modeling, automation systems, and process integration can enable faster, more transparent, and strategically aligned decision-making mechanisms in universities. Improved data sharing between departments, automation-driven process optimization, and financial management integration is expected to contribute to more effective management of institutional workflows.

Keywords

Ethical Statement

Ethical approval for this study was obtained from the Hacettepe University Social and Human Sciences Research Ethics Committee (Meeting Date: February 11, 2025; Decision No: 2025/03).

References

Ammirato, S., Cutrì, L., Felicetti, A. M., & Di Maio, F. (2024). Business process management and digital transition. The case study of an Italian Public University. Transforming Government: People, Process and Policy, 18(4), 825–855. https://doi.org/10.1108/tg-04-2024-0087
Ardito, C., Caivano, D., Colizzi, L., & Verardi, L. (2020). BPMN Extensions and Semantic Annotation in Public Administration Service Design. In Human-Centered Software Engineering (pp. 118–129). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-64266-2_7
Charalabidis, Y., Lachana, Z., Alexopoulos, C., & Loutsaris, M.-A. (2023). An algorithmic method for business process reengineering and service automation in the public sector. Proceedings of the 16th International Conference on Theory and Practice of Electronic Governance, 119–126. https://doi.org/10.1145/3614321.3614336
Dijkman, R. M., Dumas, M., & Ouyang, C. (2008). Semantics and analysis of business process models in BPMN. Information and Software Technology, 50(12), 1281–1294. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.infsof.2008.02.006
Hindarto, D. (2023). Supporting University Management System Digital Transformation with Enterprise Architecture. Jurnal JTIK (Jurnal Teknologi Informasi Dan Komunikasi), 7(4), 696–706. https://doi.org/10.35870/jtik.v7i4.1830
Iswahyudi, I., Hindarto, D., & Indrajit, R. E. (2023). Digital Transformation in University: Enterprise Architecture and Blockchain Technology. Sinkron, 8(4), 2501–2512. https://doi.org/10.33395/sinkron.v8i4.12977
Josay, A. (2018). The TOGAF® standard, version 9.2: A pocket guide. Van Haren.
Kane, G. C., Palmer, D., Phillips, A. N., Kiron, D., & Buckley, N. (2015). Strategy, not Technology, Drives Digital Transformation. MIT Sloan Management Review and Deloitte University Press. https://sloanreview.mit.edu/projects/strategy-drives-digital-transformation/

Lamsin, C., & Tangkeko, M. (2023). Redesigning and Building a Business Process Architecture: The Case of De La Salle University's Digital Transformation Journey. 2023 IEEE 15th International Conference on Humanoid, Nanotechnology, Information Technology, Communication and Control, Environment, And Management (HNICEM), 1–5. https://doi.org/10.1109/hnicem60674.2023.10589202
Nalbantoğlu, C. B. (2021). Reflections of digital transformation on organizational culture. Karamanoğlu Mehmetbey University Journal of Social and Economic Research, 23(40), 193–207.
Oberhauser, R., & Pogolski, C. (2019). VR-EA: Virtual Reality Visualization of Enterprise Architecture Models with ArchiMate and BPMN. In Business Modeling and Software Design (pp. 170–187). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-24854-3_11
Object Management Group. (2014). Business Process Model and Notation (BPMN), Version 2.0.2. https://www.omg.org/spec/BPMN/2.0.2/
Perez Gama, J. A., Vega Vega, A., & Neira Aponte, M. (2018, ). University Digital Transformation Intelligent Architecture: A Dual Model, Methods and Applications. Proceedings of the 16th LACCEI International Multi-Conference for Engineering, Education, And Technology: ``innovation in Education and Inclusion''. https://doi.org/10.18687/laccei2018.1.1.274
Polančič, G., & Orban, B. (2023). An experimental investigation of~BPMN-based corporate communications modeling. Business Process Management Journal, 29(8), 1–24. https://doi.org/10.1108/bpmj-08-2022-0362
Recker, J. (2010). Opportunities and constraints: the current struggle with BPMN. Business Process Management Journal, 16(1), 181–201. https://doi.org/10.1108/14637151011018001
Reijers, H. A., & Mendling, J. (2011). A Study Into the Factors That Influence the Understandability of Business Process Models. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, And Cybernetics - Part A: Systems and Humans, 41(3), 449–462. https://doi.org/10.1109/tsmca.2010.2087017
Rogers, D. L. (2016). The Digital Transformation Playbook: Rethink Your Business for the Digital Age. Columbia University Press. https://doi.org/10.7312/roge17544
Ross, J. W., Weill, P., & Robertson, D. (2006). Enterprise architecture as strategy: Creating a foundation for business execution. Harvard Business Press.
Silver, B. (2009). BPMN Method and Style. Cody-Cassidy Press.
Tamm, T., Seddon, P. B., Shanks, G., & Reynolds, P. (2011). How Does Enterprise Architecture Add Value to Organisations?. Communications of the Association for Information Systems, 28. https://doi.org/10.17705/1cais.02810
Tsakalidis, G., Vergidis, K., Kougka, G., & Gounaris, A. (2019). Eligibility of BPMN Models for Business Process Redesign. Information, 10(7), 225. https://doi.org/10.3390/info10070225
Valdez-de-Leon, O. (2016). A Digital Maturity Model for Telecommunications Service Providers. Technology Innovation Management Review, 6(8), 19–32. https://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/1008
van der Aalst, W. M. P. (2013). Business Process Management: A Comprehensive Survey. ISRN Software Engineering, 2013, 1–37. https://doi.org/10.1155/2013/507984
van der Aalst, W. M. P., Bichler, M., & Heinzl, A. (2018). Robotic Process Automation. Business & Information Systems Engineering, 60(4), 269–272. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12599-018-0542-4
vom Brocke, J., & Rosemann, M. (2015). Handbook on Business Process Management 1: Introduction, Methods, and Information Systems. Springer Berlin Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-45100-3
Westerman, G., Bonnet, D., & McAfee, A. (2014). Leading digital: Turning technology into business transformation. Harvard Business Press.
Winter, R., & Fischer, R. (2006). Essential Layers, Artifacts, and Dependencies of Enterprise Architecture. 2006 10th IEEE International Enterprise Distributed Object Computing Conference Workshops (Edocw\ensuremath{'}06), 30. https://doi.org/10.1109/edocw.2006.33
Yıldırım, N., & Tunçalp, D. (2023). A Policy Design Framework on the Roles of S&T Universities in Innovation Ecosystems: Integrating Stakeholders' Voices for Industry 4.0. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 70(7), 2608–2625. https://doi.org/10.1109/tem.2021.3106834
Zachman, J. A. (1987). A framework for information systems architecture. IBM Systems Journal, 26(3), 276–292. https://doi.org/10.1147/sj.263.0276

Details

Primary Language

English

Subjects

Management Information Systems

Journal Section

Research Article

Authors

Mustafa Kaya ^*
0000-0002-3054-3108
Türkiye

Publication Date

July 1, 2026

Submission Date

March 19, 2025

Acceptance Date

February 10, 2026

Published in Issue

Year 2026 Volume: 14 Number: 1

DOI

https://doi.org/10.17093/alphanumeric.1660978

IZ

https://izlik.org/JA69WA73EZ

Cite

RIS / Bibtex

APA

Kaya, M. (2026). Digital transformation in public universities: BPMN-based process automation and enterprise architecture redesign. Alphanumeric Journal, 14(1), 13-40. https://doi.org/10.17093/alphanumeric.1660978

AMA

1.Kaya M. Digital transformation in public universities: BPMN-based process automation and enterprise architecture redesign. Alphanumeric. 2026;14(1):13-40. doi:10.17093/alphanumeric.1660978

Chicago

Kaya, Mustafa. 2026. “Digital Transformation in Public Universities: BPMN-Based Process Automation and Enterprise Architecture Redesign”. Alphanumeric Journal 14 (1): 13-40. https://doi.org/10.17093/alphanumeric.1660978.

EndNote

Kaya M (July 1, 2026) Digital transformation in public universities: BPMN-based process automation and enterprise architecture redesign. Alphanumeric Journal 14 1 13–40.

IEEE

[1]M. Kaya, “Digital transformation in public universities: BPMN-based process automation and enterprise architecture redesign”, Alphanumeric, vol. 14, no. 1, pp. 13–40, July 2026, doi: 10.17093/alphanumeric.1660978.

ISNAD

Kaya, Mustafa. “Digital Transformation in Public Universities: BPMN-Based Process Automation and Enterprise Architecture Redesign”. Alphanumeric Journal 14/1 (July 1, 2026): 13-40. https://doi.org/10.17093/alphanumeric.1660978.

JAMA

1.Kaya M. Digital transformation in public universities: BPMN-based process automation and enterprise architecture redesign. Alphanumeric. 2026;14:13–40.

MLA

Kaya, Mustafa. “Digital Transformation in Public Universities: BPMN-Based Process Automation and Enterprise Architecture Redesign”. Alphanumeric Journal, vol. 14, no. 1, July 2026, pp. 13-40, doi:10.17093/alphanumeric.1660978.

Vancouver

1.Mustafa Kaya. Digital transformation in public universities: BPMN-based process automation and enterprise architecture redesign. Alphanumeric. 2026 Jul. 1;14(1):13-40. doi:10.17093/alphanumeric.1660978