Macbeth Ve Multi-MOORA Yöntemlerine Dayalı Birleşik Çok Kriterli Karar Verme Yaklaşımı

Öz

Karar verme sürecini desteklemek için çeşitli Çok Kriterli Karar Verme (ÇKKV) yöntemleri geliştirilmiştir. ÇKKV yöntemlerinin temel amacı, alternatiflerin çelişen kriterler altında sıralamalarını elde etmek ve içlerinden en iyisini seçmektir. Bu çalışmada, MACBETH ve MULTI-MOORA yöntemlerine dayalı birleşik bir ÇKKV yaklaşımı önerilmiştir. Bu birleşik yaklaşımda, kriterlerin ağırlıkları MACBETH yöntemi ile belirlenirken, alternatiflerin sıralamasının elde edilmesinde MULTI-MOORA yöntemi kullanılmıştır. Çalışmanın sonunda önerilen yaklaşımın uygulanabilirliğini göstermek için bir mermer işletmesinin otomobil seçim uygulamasına yer verilmiştir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• ÇKKV,MACBETH,MULTI-MOORA,Otomobil seçimi

Combined Multi-Criteria Decision Making Approach Based On Macbeth And Multi-MOORA Methods

Abstract

Various Multi-Criteria Decision Making (MCDM) methods have been developed to support decision making process. The main aim of all MCDM methods is to obtain ranking of the alternatives and select the best one under conflicting criteria. In this paper, a combined MCDM approach is proposed based on MACBETH (Measuring Attractiveness by a Categorical Based Evaluation TecHnique) and MULTI-MOORA (Multi Objective Optimization on the basis of Ratio Analysis) methods. In this combined approach, the weights of the criteria are determined with MACBETH method and then MULTI-MOORA method is used to obtain the final ranking of the alternatives. At the end of the paper, to illustrate the applicability of the proposed approach an application of the automobile selection of a marble company is also given.

Keywords

• MCDM,MACBETH,MULTI-MOORA,Automobile selection

References

1. Güngör, İ., İşler D. B. (2004). Analitik Hiyerarşi Yaklaşimi İle Otomobil Seçimi, ZKÜ Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 1(2), 21-33.
2. Terzi, Ü., Hacaloğlu, S.E., Aladağ, Z. (2006). Otomobil Satın Alama Problem için Bir Karar Destek Modeli, İstanbul Ticaret Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Dergisi, 5(10), 43-49.
3. Soba, M. (2012). PROMETHEE Yöntemi Kullanarak En Uygun Panelvan Otomobil Seçimi ve Bir Uygulama, Journal of Yasar University, 28(7), 4708 – 4721.
4. Sakthivel, G. Ilangkumaran, M. Nagarajan, G. Raja, A. Ragunadhan P.M., Prakash, J. (2013.) A Hybrid MCDM Approach for Evaluating an Automobile Purchase Model, International Journal of Information and Decision Sciences, 5(1), 50-85.
5. Yavaş, M., Ersöz, T., Kabak, M. (2014). Otomobil Seçimine Çok Kriterli Yaklaşım Önerisi, İşletme ve İktisat Çalışmaları Dergisi, 2(4), 110-118.
6. Burgazoğlu, H, (2015). MACBETH, B.F. Yıldırım, E. Önder (Ed.), Çok Kriterli Karar Verme Yöntemleri, Bursa: Dora Yayınları.
7. Bana e Costa C.A., Chagas M. P. (2004). A Career Choice Problem: An Example of How to Use MACBETH to Build a Quantitative Value Model Based on Qualitative Value Judgments, European Journal of Operational Research, 153, 323–331.
8. Karande P., Chakraborty, S. (2014). A Facility Layout Selection Model Using MACBETH Method, Proceedings of the 2014 International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Operations Management, January 7 – 9, Bali, Indonesia.

9. Bana e Costa C.A., Ensslin, L., Correa E.C., Vansnick, J.C. (1999). Decision Support Systems in Action: Integrated Application in a Multicriteria Decision Aid Process, European Journal of Operational Research, 113, 315-335.
10. Bana e Costa C.A, Nunes da Silva, F.,Vansnick, J.C. (2001). Conflict Dissolution in the Public Sector: A case-study, European Journal of Operational Research, 130, 388-401.
11. Bana e Costa, C.A. (2001). The Use of Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis to Support the Search for Less Conflicting Policy Options in a Multi-Actor Context: Case Study, Journal of Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis, 10, 111–125.
12. Bana e Costa C.A., Oliveira R.C. (2002). Assigning Priorities for Maintenance, Repair and Refurbishment in Managing a Municipal Housing Stock, European Journal of Operational Research, 138, 380–391.
13. Bana e Costa C.A, Costa-Lobo M.L., Ramos, I.A., Vansnic, J.C. (2002a). Multicriteria Approach for Strategic Town Planning. In D. Bouyssou et al. (Ed.), Aiding Decisions with Multiple Criteria, Kluwer Academic Publishers.
14. Bana e Costa, C.A., Barroso, L.A., Soares, J.O. (2002b). Qualitative Modelling of Credit Scoring: A Case Study in Banking, European Research Studies, 5 (1-2), 37–51.
15. Bana e Costa C.A., Correa, E.C., De Corte, J.-M.,Vansnic , J.C. (2002c). Facilitating Bid Evaluation in Public Call for Tenders: A Socio-Technical Approach, Omega, 30, 227 – 242.
16. Roubens, M., Rusinowska, A., De Swart, H. (2006). Using MACBETH to Determine Utilities of Governments to Parties in Coalition Formation, European Journal of Operational Research, 172, 588–603.
17. Cliville V., Berrah L., Mauris, G. (2007). Quantitative Expression and Aggregation of Performance Measurements Based on the MACBETH Multi-Criteria Method, International Journal of Production Economics, 105, 171–189.
18. Montignac, F., Noirot, I., Chaudourne, S. (2009). Multi-Criteria Evaluation of On-Board Hydrogen Storage Technologies Using the MACBETH Approach, International Journal hydrogen energy, 34, 4561 – 4568.
19. Fakhfakh, N., Verjus, H., Pourraz, F., Moreaux, P. (2011). Measuring the Satisfaction Degree of Quality Attributes Requirements for Services Orchestrations, Proceedings of 4th International Conference on Communication Theory, Reliability, and Quality of Service, Hungary, pp. 89-94.
20. Karande, P., Chakraborty, S. (2013). Using MACBETH Method for Supplier Selection in Manufacturing Environment, International Journal of Industrial Engineering Computations, 4, 259–272.
21. Rodrigues, T.C. (2014). The MACBETH Approach to Health Value Measurement: Building a Population Health Index in Group Processes, Procedia Technology, 16, 1361 – 1366.
22. Brauers, W.K.M., Zavadskas, E.K. (2006). The MOORA Method and Its Application to Privatization in a Transition Economy. Control and Cybernetics, 35(2), 445-469.
23. Brauers, W.K.M., Zavadskas, E.K., Turskis, Z. Vilutiene, T. (2008). Multi-Objective Contractor’s Ranking by Applying the MOORA Method. Journal of Business Economics and Management, 9(4), 245-255.
24. Brauers, W.K.M., Zavadskas, E.K., Peldschus, F., Turskis, Z. (2008). Multi-Objective Decision Making for Road Design, Transport, 23(3), 183-193.
25. Kalibatas, D., Turskis Z. (2008). Multicriteria Evaluation of Inner Climate by Using MOORA Method. Information Technology and Control, 37(1), 79-83.
26. Brauers, W.K.M., Ginevičius, R. (2009). Robustness in Regional Development Studies: The Case of Lithuania. Journal of Business Economics and Management, 10(2), 121–140.
27. Brauers, W.K.M., Ginevičius, R., Podvezko, V. (2010). Regional Development in Lithuania Considering Multiple Objectives by The MOORA Method. Technological and Economic Development of Economy, 16(4), 613-640.
28. Brauers, W.K.M., Zavadskas, E.K. (2010). Project Management by Multimoora as an Instrument for Transition Economies. Technological and Economic Development of Economy, 16(1), 5-24.
29. Gadakh, V. S. (2011). Application of MOORA Method for Parametric Optimization of Milling Process. International Journal of Applied Engineering Research, 1 (4), 743-758.
30. Archana, M., Sujatha, V. (2012). Application of Fuzzy MOORA and GRA in Multi Criterion Decision Making Problems, International Journal of Computer Applications, 53(9), 46-50.
31. Karaca, T. (2011). Proje Yönetiminde Çok Kriterli Karar Verme Teknikleri Kullanarak Kritik Yolun Bulunması. (Yayımlanmamış yüksek lisans tezi). Gazi Üniversitesi/ Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü, Ankara.
32. Önay, O., Çetin, E. (2012). Turistik Yerlerin Popülaritesinin Belirlenmesi: İstanbul Örneği. Yönetim: İstanbul Üniversitesi İşletme İktisadı Enstitüsü Dergisi, 23(72), 90-109.
33. Dey, B., Bairagi, B., Sarkar, B., Sanyal, S. (2012). A Moora Based Fuzzy Multi Criteria Decision Making Approach for Supply Chain Strategy Selection. International Journal of Industrial Engineering Computations, 3, 649-662.
34. Mandal, U. K.ve Sarkar, B. (2012). Selection of Best Intelligent Manufacturing System Under Fuzzy MOORA Conflicting MCDM Environment. International Journal of Engineering Technology and Advanced Engineering, 2(9), 301-310.
35. Balezantis, A., Balezantis, T., Brauers, W.K.M. (2012). Multimoora-FG: A Multi-Objective Decision Making Method for Linguistic Reasoning with an Application to Personnel Selection. Informatica, 23(2), 173-190.
36. Tepe, S., Görener, A. (2014). Analitik Hiyerarşi Süreci ve MOORA Yöntemlerinin Personel Seçiminde Uygulanması. İstanbul Ticaret Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Dergisi, 13(25), 1-14
37. Görener, A., Dinçer, H., Hacıoğlu, Ü. (2013). Application of Multi-Objective Optimization on the Basis of Ratio Analysis (MOORA) Method for Bank Branch Location Selection. International Journal of Finance & Banking Studies, 2(2), 41-52.
38. Yıldırım, B.F., Önay, O. (2013). Bulut Teknolojisi Firmalarının Bulanık AHP- MOORA Yöntemi Kullanılarak Sıralanması, İ.Ü.İşletme Fakültesi, İşletme İktisadı Enstitüsü Yönetim Dergisi, 24(75), 59-81.
39. Obayiuwana, E. Falowo, O. (2015) A Multimoora Approach to Access Network Selection Process in Heterogeneous Wireless Networks, AFRICON 2015, 14-17 September, Addis Ababa, IEEE, pp. 1-5, doi.10.1109/AFRCON. 2015.7331973
40. Brauers W. K. M., Zavadskas E.K. (2011). Multimoora Optimization Used to Decide on a Bank Loan to Buy Property, Technological and Economic Development of Economy, 17(1), 174-188.
41. Brauers, W.K.M., Ginevičius R. (2010). The Economy of The Belgian Regions Tested with Multimoora, Journal of Business Economics and Management, 11:2, 173-209.
42. Brauers, W. K. M., Baležentis A., Baležentis, T. (2011).Multimoora for the EU Member States Updated with Fuzzy Number Theory, Technological and Economic Development of Economy, 17:2, 259-290.
43. Baležentis A., Baležentis, T., Brauers W. K. M., (2012). MULTIMOORA-FG: A Multi-Objective Decision Making Method for Linguistic Reasoning with an Application to Personnel Selection, Informatica, 23(2), 173–190.
44. Brauers W. K. M., Zavadskas E.K. (2012). Robustness of MULTIMOORA: A Method for Multi-Objective Optimization, Informatica, 23(1), 1–25.
45. Datta S., Sahu, N., Mahapatra, S. (2013). Robot Selection Based on Grey-MULTIMOORA Approach, Grey Systems: Theory and Application, 3(2), 201 – 232.
46. Baležentis T., Baležentis, A. (2014). A Survey on Development and Applications of the Multi-criteria Decision Making Method MULTIMOORA, Journal Of Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis, 21, 209–222.
47. Aksoy, E. (2015). AHP Temelli MULTIMOORA ve COPRAS Yöntemi ile Türkiye Kömür İşletmeleri’nin Performans Değerlendirmesi , Hacettepe Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, 33(4), 1-28.
48. http://www.mercedes-benz.com.tr/content/turkey/mpc/mpc_ turkey_website/tr/home_mpc/passengercars/home/new_cars/models/c-class/c205/advice_sales/brosur.html [17.01.2016]
49. http://www.audi.com.tr/tr/brand/tr/models/a4/a4_sedan/teknik_veriler/boyutlar.html#source=http://www.audi.com.tr/tr/brand/tr/models/a4/a4_sedan/teknik_veriler/teknik_detay.html&container=page [17.01.2016]
50. http://binekarac.vw.com.tr/pdf/passat.pdf [17.01.2016]
51. http://www.volvocars.com/tr/modeller/new-models/s60/ ozellikler [17.01.2016]
52. http://www.opel.com.tr/content/dam/Opel/Europe/turkey/nscwebsite/tr/11_Brochure_Library/02_Specsheets/Insignia_MY16.5_FINAL.pdf [17.01.2016]
53. http://www.bmw.com.tr/content/dam/bmw/marketTR/bmw_com_tr/pdf/bmw_3_serisi_sedan_katalog_f30.pdf.asset.1457705813418.pdf [17.01.2016]
54. https://apps.ford.com.tr/ebrochure/brochurefiles/mondeo.pdf [17.01.2016]
55. https://www.toyota.com.tr/new-cars/avensis/index.json#/ publish/compare_engines/selection=2WW-20D1-1436M [17.01.2016]
56. http://www.peugeot.com.tr/media/deliacms/media//74/7412-88db21.pdf [17.01.2016]
57. http://www.euroncap.com/tr [18.01.2016]