Research Article

Ground Truth in Network Communities and Metadata-Aware Community Detection: A Case of School Friendship Network

Volume: 9 Number: 1 June 30, 2021
EN

Ground Truth in Network Communities and Metadata-Aware Community Detection: A Case of School Friendship Network

Abstract

Real-world networks are everywhere and can represent biological, technological, and social interactions. They constitute complicated structures in terms of type of things and their relations. Understanding the network requires better examination of the network structure that can be achieved at various scales including macro, meso, and micro. This research is concerned with meso scale for a student best friendship network where sub-structures in which groups of entities (students) take different functions. In this study we address the following research questions: To what extent would NeoSBM as a stochastic process underlie best friendship interaction and in -turn ground truth interactions (i.e. reported best friendship)? Do metadata such as gender or class contribute to this understanding? How can one support school managers from a meta-data aware community detection perspective? Our findings suggest that metadata aware community detection can be an effective method in supporting decision-making for class formation and group formation for in and out school activities.

Keywords

References

  1. Allaire, J. (2012). RStudio: integrated development environment for R. Boston, MA, 537, 538.
  2. Aytac, T. (2015). The relationship between teachers’ perception about school managers’ talent management leadership and the level of organizational commitment. Eurasian Journal of Educational Research, 15(59), 165-180. Bui, T. N., & Jones, C. (1992). Finding good approximate vertex and edge partitions is NP-hard. Information Processing Letters, 42(3), 153-159
  3. Barabási, Albert-László (2009) “"Scale-free networks: a decade and beyond.”" science 325, no. 5939 412-413
  4. Chen, H., Chiang, R. H., & Storey, V. C. (2012). Business intelligence and analytics: from big data to big impact. MIS quarterly, 1165-1188.
  5. Chau, M., & Xu, J. (2012). Business intelligence in blogs: Understanding consumer interactions and communities. MIS quarterly, 1189-1216.
  6. Fortunato, S., & Barthelemy, M. (2007). Resolution limit in community detection. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 104(1), 36-41.
  7. Golbeck, J., Gerhard, J., O’Colman, F., & O’Colman, R. (2017). Scaling Up Integrated Structural and Content-Based Network Analysis. Information Systems Frontiers, 1-12.
  8. Hopkins, M. (2017). A Review of social network analysis and education: Theory, methods, and applications.

Details

Primary Language

English

Subjects

Operation

Journal Section

Research Article

Publication Date

June 30, 2021

Submission Date

February 14, 2020

Acceptance Date

May 6, 2021

Published in Issue

Year 2021 Volume: 9 Number: 1

APA
Kafkas, K., Perdahçı, Z. N., & Aydın, M. (2021). Ground Truth in Network Communities and Metadata-Aware Community Detection: A Case of School Friendship Network. Alphanumeric Journal, 9(1), 49-62. https://doi.org/10.17093/alphanumeric.688660

Alphanumeric Journal is hosted on DergiPark, a web based online submission and peer review system powered by TUBİTAK ULAKBIM.

Alphanumeric Journal is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License