New Exercise Monitoring and Management Technologies in Post-Operative Orthopaedic Rehabilitation

Year 2020, , 244 - 250, 30.09.2020

Fatih Özden

https://doi.org/10.46237/amusbfd.604892

Abstract

Appropriate application of exercise protocols during post-operative orthopedic rehabilitation is of great importance for the improvement of the patient's clinical condition. With the introduction of telerehabilitation services in recent years, it is possible for clinicians to monitor and manage the exercise protocols of their patients in a more practical, cost-effective and time-saving manner. Telerehabilitation is used in post-operative period for many pathological conditions, especially total knee arthroplasty, and its effectiveness is investigated by randomized controlled studies. In this review, exercise monitoring and management technologies in post-operative orthopedic rehabilitation process are discussed. Differences, similarities, advantages and disadvantages of these applications compared to conventional methods will be examined.

Keywords

Orthopaedic rehabilitation, Telerehabilitation, Exercise, Post-Operative

Post-operatif Ortopedik Rehabilitasyonda Yeni Egzersiz İzlem ve Yönetim Teknolojileri

Abstract

Post-operatif ortopedik rehabilitasyon sürecinde, egzersiz protokollerinin uygun şekilde gerçekleştirilmesi, hastanın klinik durumunda elde edilecek iyileşme açısından büyük önem taşımaktadır. Son yıllarda telerehabilitasyon hizmetlerinin yaygınlaşmasıyla birlikte, klinisyenlerin hastalarına ait egzersiz protokollerini izlem ve yönetimi daha pratik, maliyeti düşük ve zamandan tasarruf edilecek şekilde mümkün olabilmektedir. Total diz artroplastisi başta olmak üzere birçok patolojik durumda post-operatif dönemde telerehabilitasyonun kullanıldığı, randomize kontrollü çalışmalarla etkinliğinin araştırıldığı görülmektedir. Bu derlemede post-operatif ortopedik rehabilitasyon sürecinde egzersiz izlem ve yönetim teknolojileri ele alınmıştır. Bu uygulamaların konvansiyonel yöntemlere göre farkları, benzerlikleri, avantajları ve dezavantajları incelenecektir.

Keywords

Ortopedik rehabilitasyon, Telerehabilitasyon, Egzersiz, Post-operatif

References

• 1. Artz, N., Elvers, K. T., Lowe, C. M., Sackley, C., Jepson, P., & Beswick, A. D. (2015). Effectiveness of physiotherapy exercise following total knee replacement: systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders, 16(1), 15.
• 2. Henderson, K. G., Wallis, J. A., & Snowdon, D. A. (2018). Active physiotherapy interventions following total knee arthroplasty in the hospital and inpatient rehabilitation settings: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Physiotherapy, 104(1), 25-35.
• 3. Van Egmond, M. A., Van Der Schaaf, M., Vredeveld, T., Vollenbroek-Hutten, M. M. R., Van Berge Henegouwen, M. I., Klinkenbijl, J. H. G., et al. (2018). Effectiveness of physiotherapy with telerehabilitation in surgical patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Physiotherapy, 104(3), 277-298.
• 4. Ruiz-Fernandez, D., Marín-Alonso, O., Soriano-Paya, A., & García-Pérez, J. D. (2014). eFisioTrack: a telerehabilitation environment based on motion recognition using accelerometry. The Scientific World Journal, 2014(1), 1-11.
• 5. Pastora-Bernal, J. M., Martín-Valero, R., Barón-López, F. J., & Estebanez-Pérez, M. J. (2017). Evidence of benefit of telerehabitation after orthopedic surgery: a systematic review. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 19(4), 1-13.
• 6. Agostini, M., Moja, L., Banzi, R., Pistotti, V., Tonin, P., Venneri, A., et al. (2015). Telerehabilitation and recovery of motor function: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare, 21(4), 202-213.
• 7. Rogante, M., Kairy, D., Giacomozzi, C., & Grigioni, M. (2015). A quality assessment of systematic reviews on telerehabilitation: what does the evidence tell us? SciELO Public Health, 51(1), 11-18.
• 8. Dinesen, B., Nielsen, G., Andreasen, J. J., & Spindler, H. (2019). Integration of rehabilitation activities into everyday life through telerehabilitation: qualitative study of cardiac patients and their partners. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 21(4), 1-14.
• 9. Theodoros, D., Russell, T., & Latifi, R. (2008). Telerehabilitation: current perspectives. Studies in Health Technology and Informatics, 131(1), 191-210.
• 10. Scheideman-Miller, C., Clark, P. G., Moorad, A. L., Post, M. L., Hodge, B. G., & Smeltzer, S. (2003). Efficacy and sustainability of a telerehabilitation program. Proceedings of the 36th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, 1(1), 1-11.
• 11. Hoogeboom, T. J., Dronkers, J. J., Hulzebos, E. H. J., & van Meeteren, N. L. U. (2014). Merits of exercise therapy before and after major surgery. Current Opinion in Anaesthesiology, 27(2), 161.
• 12. Laver, K. E., Schoene, D., Crotty, M., George, S., Lannin, N. A., & Sherrington, C. (2013). Telerehabilitation services for stroke. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, 1(12), 3-20.
• 13. Ihrig, C. (2019). Travel cost savings and practicality for low-vision telerehabilitation. Telemedicine and e-Health, 25(7), 649-654.
• 14. Rogante, M., Grigioni, M., Cordella, D., & Giacomozzi, C. (2010). Ten years of telerehabilitation: a literature overview of technologies and clinical applications. NeuroRehabilitation, 27(4), 287-304.
• 15. Beaver, K., Tysver-Robinson, D., Campbell, M., Twomey, M., Williamson, S., Hindley, A., et al. (2009). Comparing hospital and telephone follow-up after treatment for breast cancer: randomised equivalence trial. BMJ, 338(1), 1-9.
• 16. Huijgen, B. C. H., Vollenbroek-Hutten, M. M. R., Zampolini, M., Opisso, E., Bernabeu, M., Van Nieuwenhoven, J., et al. (2008). Feasibility of a home-based telerehabilitation system compared to usual care: arm/hand function in patients with stroke, traumatic brain injury and multiple sclerosis. Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare, 14(5), 249-256.
• 17. Cottrell, M. A., Galea, O. A., O’Leary, S. P., Hill, A. J., & Russell, T. G. (2017). Real-time telerehabilitation for the treatment of musculoskeletal conditions is effective and comparable to standard practice: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Clinical Rehabilitation, 31(5), 625-638.
• 18. Bashshur, R., Shannon, G., Krupinski, E., & Grigsby, J. (2011). The taxonomy of telemedicine. Telemedicine and e-Health, 17(6), 484-494.
• 19. Kim K, Pham D, Schwarzkopf R. (2016). Mobile application use in monitoring patient adherence to perioperative total knee arthroplasty protocols. Surg Technol Int, 28(1), 253-60.
• 20. Nelson, M., Bourke, M., Crossley, K., & Russell, T. (2017). Telerehabilitation versus traditional care following total hip replacement: a randomized controlled trial protocol. JMIR Research Protocols, 6(3), 1-9.
• 21. Levinger, P., Hallam, K., Fraser, D., Pile, R., Ardern, C., Moreira, B., et al. (2017). A novel web-support intervention to promote recovery following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a pilot randomised controlled trial. Physical Therapy in Sport, 27(1), 29-37.
• 22. Bini, S. A., & Mahajan, J. (2017). Clinical outcomes of remote asynchronous telerehabilitation are equivalent to traditional therapy following total knee arthroplasty: a randomized control study. Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare, 23(2), 239-247.
• 23. Esparza, W., Aladro-Gonzalvo, A. R., Baldeon, J., & Ortiz, S. (2019). Toward a design of a telerehabilitation program for the functional recovery in post-hip arthroplasty patients. E-book: IntechOpen.
• 24. Pastora-Bernal, J.-M., Martín-Valero, R., Barón-López, F. J., & García-Gómez, O. (2017). Effectiveness of telerehabilitation programme following surgery in shoulder impingement syndrome (SIS): study protocol for a randomized controlled non-inferiority trial. Trials, 18(1), 82.
• 25. Pastora-Bernal, J. M., Martín-Valero, R., Barón-López, F. J., Moyano, N. G., & Estebanez-Pérez, M. J. (2018). Telerehabilitation after arthroscopic subacromial decompression is effective and not inferior to standard practice: preliminary results. Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare, 24(6), 428-433.
• 26. Ortiz‐Piña, M., Salas‐Fariña, Z., Mora‐Traverso, M., Martín‐Martín, L., Galiano‐Castillo, N., García‐Montes, et al. (2019). A home‐based tele‐rehabilitation protocol for patients with hip fracture called @ctivehip. Research in Nursing & Health, 42(1), 29-38.
• 27. Tousignant, M., Moffet, H., Nadeau, S., Mérette, C., Boissy, P., Corriveau, H., et al. (2015). Cost analysis of in-home telerehabilitation for post-knee arthroplasty. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 17(3), 1-12.
• 28. Correia, F. D., Nogueira, A., Magalhães, I., Guimarães, J., Moreira, M., Barradas, I., et al. (2018). Home-based rehabilitation with a novel digital biofeedback system versus conventional in-person rehabilitation after total knee replacement: a feasibility study. Scientific Reports, 8(1), 1-12.
• 29. Correia, F. D., Nogueira, A., Magalhães, I., Guimarães, J., Moreira, M., Barradas, I., et al. (2019). Digital versus conventional rehabilitation after total hip arthroplasty: a single-center, parallel-group pilot study. JMIR Rehabilitation and Assistive Technologies, 6(1), 1-18.
• 30. Doiron-Cadrin, P., Kairy, D., Vendittoli, P. A., Lowry, V., Poitras, S., & Desmeules, F. (2016). Effects of a tele-prehabilitation program or an in-person prehabilitation program in surgical candidates awaiting total hip or knee arthroplasty: protocol of a pilot single blind randomized controlled trial. Contemporary Clinical Trials Communications, 4(1), 192- 198.
• 31. Doiron-Cadrin, P., Kairy, D., Vendittoli, P. A., Lowry, V., Poitras, S., & Desmeules, F. (2020). Feasibility and preliminary effects of a tele-prehabilitation program and an in- person prehablitation program compared to usual care for total hip or knee arthroplasty candidates: a pilot randomized controlled trial. Disability and Rehabilitation, 42(7), 989- 998.
• 32. Ramkumar, P. N., Haeberle, H. S., Ramanathan, D., Cantrell, W. A., Navarro, S. M., Mont, M. A., et al. (2019). Remote patient monitoring using mobile health for total knee arthroplasty: validation of a wearable and machine learning–based surveillance platform. The Journal of Arthroplasty, 34(10), 2253-2259.
• 33. Haeberle, H. S., Helm, J. M., Navarro, S. M., Karnuta, J. M., Schaffer, J. L., Callaghan, J. J., et al. (2019). Artificial intelligence and machine learning in lower extremity arthroplasty: a review. The Journal of Arthroplasty, 34(10), 2201-2203.