Ortodontik Mini Vidalar ile İlgili Youtube Videolarının İçeriklerinin Değerlendirilmesi

Year 2025, Volume: 9 Issue: 3, 290 - 298, 30.09.2025

Sercan Taşkın , Mine Geçgelen Cesur

https://doi.org/10.46237/amusbfd.1492494

Abstract

Amaç: Bu çalışma YouTube üzerindeki ortodontik mini vidalar hakkında yayınlanan videoların içeriklerinin güvenilirliğini ve kalitesini değerlendirmeyi amaçlamaktadır.
Yöntem: YouTube video platformuna “temporary anchorage devices” terimi girilerek 15 Nisan 2024 tarihine kadar tarama yapıldıktan sonra arama sonucunda çıkan ilk 75 videonun URL’leri kopyalanmış ve dahil edilme kriterlerine göre toplam 23 video değerlendirilmiştir. Video içerik kalitesini düşük ve yüksek olarak sınıflandırmak için 7 parametreden oluşan bir puanlama sistemi kullanılmıştır. Videoların kalitesini evrensel olarak değerlendirmek için Video Bilgileri ve Kalite İndeksi (VBKİ) uygulanmıştır.
Bulgular: Değerlendirmeye alınan videoların izlenme sayısı ortalaması 25689 (±37101), beğeni sayısı ortalaması 208.7 (±391.6), yorum sayısı ortalaması 52.6 (±131.2), video uzunluğu (dk) ortalaması 2.85 (±3.20), videonun yüklenmesinin üzerinden geçen zaman (gün) ortalaması 1561 (±1146), etkileşim indeksi ortalaması 0.89 (±1.19), izlenme oranı ortalaması 2133 (±3140) olarak tespit edilmiştir. Videoların kalitesi ise değerlendirilen VBKİ indeksine göre ortalama 10.74 (±4.85) olarak bulunmuştur.
Sonuç: YouTube’da ortodontik mini vidalar hakkında geniş bir bilgi yelpazesi mevcuttur. Zengin içerikli video sayısını düşük içeriğe göre daha yüksek bulunmuş olsa da YouTube hala ortodontik mini vidalar konusunda hastalar için güvenilir bir bilgi kaynağı olarak kabul edilememektedir.

Keywords

Youtube , Mini vida , Sosyal Medya

Evaluation of The Content of YouTube Videos Related to Orthodontic Mini Screws

Abstract

Objective: This study aims to evaluate the reliability and quality of the content of videos published on YouTube about orthodontic mini screws.
Method: Videos were searched on YouTube using the keywords of “temporary anchorage devices” in the Google Trends application. From the first 75 results, after discarding the ones immediately deemed insufficient, 23 videos were selected for analysis. To classify the video content as high or low, a scoring system formed of 7 parameters was used. For the global evaluation of the video quality, the video information and quality index (VIQI) was applied.
Results: The average number of views for the videos evaluated was 25.689 (±37.101), the average number of likes was 208.7 (±391.6), the average number of comments was 52.6 (±131.2), the average video length (minutes) was 2.85 (±3.20), the average number of days since the video was uploaded was 1.561 (±1.146), the average engagement index was 0.89 (±1.19), and the average view rate was 2.133 (±3.140). The quality of the videos, as evaluated by the VIQI index, was found to be an average of 10.74 (±4.85).
Conclusion: A wide range of information about orthodontic mini screws is available on YouTube. Orthodontists should be aware of the information available on the internet and direct their patients to appropriate and professional sources where they can obtain accurate and up-to-date information to prevent them from receiving incorrect or incomplete information.

Keywords

Youtube , Mini Screw , Social Media

References

• 1. Roberts-Harry, D., Sandy, J. (2004). Orthodontics: part 9: anchorage control and distal movement. Br Dent J, 196(5), 255–263.
• 2. Kokich, V.G. (1996). Managing complex orthodontic problems: the use of implants for anchorage. Semin Orthod, 2(2), 153–160.
• 3. Favero, L., Brollo, P., Bressan, E. (2002). Orthodontic anchorage with specific fixtures: related study analysis. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 122(1), 84–94.
• 4. Mazzocchi, A.R., Bernini, S. (1998). Osseointegrated implants for maximum orthodontic anchorage. J Clin Orthod, 32(7), 412–415.
• 5. Kalra, A., Jaggi, N., Jasoria, G., Shamim, W., Rathore, S., Manchanda, M. (2013). Miniscrew implants as temporary anchorage devices in orthodontics: a comprehensive review. J Contemp Dent Pract, 14(5), 993– 999.
• 6. Ramírez-Ossa, D.M., Escobar-Correa, N., Ramírez-Bustamante, M.A., Agudelo-Suárez, A.A. (2020). An umbrella review of the effectiveness of temporary anchorage devices and the factors that contribute to their success or failure. J Evid Based Dent Pract, 20(2), 101402.
• 7. Choi, S., Jeon, J.Y., Lee, K., Hwang, C. (2021). Clinical applications of miniscrews that broaden the scope of non-surgical orthodontic treatment. Orthod Craniofac Res, 24(S1), 48–58.
• 8. AlGhamdi, K.M., Moussa, N.A. (2012). Internet use by the public to search for health-related information. Int J Med Inform, 81(6), 363–373.
• 9. Noll, D., Mahon, B., Shroff, B., Carrico, C., Lindauer, S.J. (2017). Twitter analysis of the orthodontic patient experience with braces vs Invisalign. Angle Orthod, 87(3), 377–383.
• 10. Madathil, K.C., Rivera-Rodriguez, A.J., Greenstein, J.S., Gramopadhye, A.K. (2015). Healthcare information on YouTube: a systematic review. Health Informatics J, 21(3), 173–194.
• 11. Greene, J.A., Choudhry, N.K., Kilabuk, E., Shrank, W.H. (2011). Online social networking by patients with diabetes: a qualitative evaluation of communication with Facebook. J Gen Intern Med, 26(3), 287–292.
• 12. Aydın, M.N., Yılmaz, H. (2020). Youtube™ video content analysis on removable orthodontic appliance. Yeditepe Dental Journal, 16(3), 220– 225.
• 13. Hatipoğlu, Ş., Gaş, S. (2020). Is information for surgically assisted rapid palatal expansion available on YouTube reliable? J Oral Maxillofac Surg, 78(6), 1017.e1-1017.e10.
• 14. Yavuz, M.C., Buyuk, S.K., Genc, E. (2020). Does YouTube™ offer high quality information? Evaluation of accelerated orthodontics videos. Ir J Med Sci (1971 -), 189(2), 505–509.
• 15. Trulsson, U., Strandmark, M., Mohlin, B., Berggren, U. (2002). A qualitative study of teenagers’ decisions to undergo orthodontic treatment with fixed appliance. J Orthod, 29(3), 197–204.
• 16. Desai, T., Shariff, A., Dhingra, V., Minhas, D., Eure, M., Kats, M. (2013). Is content really king? An objective analysis of the public’s response to medical videos on YouTube. PLoS One, 8(12), e82469.
• 17. Nason, K., Donnelly, A., Duncan, H.F. (2016). YouTube as a patient‐ information source for root canal treatment. Int Endod J, 49(12), 1194–1200.
• 18. ElKarmi, R., Hassona, Y., Taimeh, D., Scully, C. (2017). YouTube as a source for parents’ education on early childhood caries. Int J Paediatr Dent, 27(6), 437–443.
• 19. Ho, A., McGrath, C., Mattheos, N. (2017). Social media patient testimonials in implant dentistry: information or misinformation? Clin Oral Implants Res, 28(7), 791–800.
• 20. Pandey, A., Patni, N., Singh, M., Sood, A., Singh, G. (2010). YouTube as a source of information on the H1N1 influenza pandemic. Am J Prev Med, 38(3), e1–e3.
• 21. Gao, X., Hamzah, S., Yiu, C.K.Y., McGrath, C., King, N.M. (2013). Dental fear and anxiety in children and adolescents: qualitative study using YouTube. J Med Internet Res, 15(2), e29.
• 22. Lena, Y., Dindaroğlu, F. (2018). Lingual orthodontic treatment: a YouTube™ video analysis. Angle Orthod, 88(2), 208–214.
• 23. Al-Silwadi, F.M., Gill, D.S., Petrie, A., Cunningham, S.J. (2015). Effect of social media in improving knowledge among patients having fixed appliance orthodontic treatment: a single-center randomized controlled trial. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 148(2), 231–237.
• 24. Knösel, M., Jung, K. (2011). Informational value and bias of videos related to orthodontics screened on a video-sharing web site. Angle Orthod, 81(3), 532–539.
• 25. Ustdal, G., Guney, A.U. (2020). YouTube as a source of information about orthodontic clear aligners. Angle Orthod, 90(3), 419–424.
• 26. Aksoy, M., Akbulut, A.S., Topsakal, K.G. (2021). Çocuklara uygulanan ortodontik tedavilere ilişkin YouTube videolarının içeriklerinin değerlendirilmesi. NEU Dent J, 3(3), 108–114.