Research Article

Morphological and Biochemical Responses of Pomegranate Cultivars to PEG-Induced Drought Stress Under In-Vitro Conditions

Volume: 36 Number: 1 June 29, 2026
EN TR

Morphological and Biochemical Responses of Pomegranate Cultivars to PEG-Induced Drought Stress Under In-Vitro Conditions

Abstract

Drought stress is one of the major abiotic factors limiting plant growth and agricultural productivity, and its impact is expected to intensify under climate change conditions. Understanding plant physiological and biochemical responses to water deficit is therefore essential for improving drought tolerance in economically important fruit crops such as pomegranate (Punica granatum L.). In this study, the morphological and biochemical responses of three pomegranate cultivars (‘Hicaznar’, ‘Wonderful’, and ‘Acco’) were evaluated under polyethylene glycol (PEG)-induced osmotic stress in in-vitro conditions. Increasing PEG concentrations significantly reduced shoot and root growth in all cultivars, indicating the inhibitory effect of osmotic stress on plant development. In contrast, osmotic stress stimulated the accumulation of stress-related metabolites and antioxidant responses. Total phenolic content increased from 132.4 to 205.3 mg GAE 100 g⁻¹ FW in ‘Hicaznar’, 138.7 to 214.6 mg GAE 100 g⁻¹ FW in ‘Wonderful’, and 129.8 to 198.4 mg GAE 100 g⁻¹ FW in ‘Acco’ with increasing PEG concentrations. Similarly, DPPH radical scavenging activity increased from 34.6% to 58.9%, 36.2% to 61.3%, and 33.9% to 55.7%, respectively. Proline accumulation, lipid peroxidation (MDA), and antioxidant enzyme activities (SOD, CAT, and GR) were also enhanced under PEG-induced stress. These results indicate that PEG-induced osmotic stress triggers significant physiological defense responses and reveals cultivar-dependent differences in drought tolerance in pomegranate.

Keywords

Pomegranate, Punica granatum L., PEG-induced osmotic stress, drought stress, antioxidant activity, phenolic compounds, in-vitro culture

References

  1. Adiba, A., A. Haddioui, A. Boutagayout, I. Zayani, L. Hssaini, A. Hamdani, and R. Razouk. 2024. Growth and physiological responses of various pomegranate (Punica granatum L.) cultivars to induced drought stress. Vegetos 37(3): 887-899.
  2. Adiba, A., L. Hssaini, A. Haddioui, A. Hamdani, and R. Razouk. 2022. Biochemical properties of pomegranate (Punica granatum L.) juice as influenced by severe water stress. Scientia horticulturae 304: 111286.
  3. Aebi, H. 1984. Catalase in-vitro. In Methods in enzymology 105: 121-126.
  4. Bandurska, H. 2022. Drought stress responses: coping strategy and resistance. Plants 11(7): 922.
  5. Bates, L. S., R. P. A.Waldren, and I. D. Teare. 1973. Rapid determination of free proline for water-stress studies. Plant and soil 39(1): 205-207.
  6. Batool, M., A. M. El-Badri, M. U. Hassan, Y. Haiyun, W. Chunyun, Y. Zhenkun, and G. Zhou. 2023. Drought stress in Brassica napus: effects, tolerance mechanisms, and management strategies. Journal of Plant Growth Regulation 42(1): 21-45.
  7. Beauchamp, C., and I. Fridovich. 1971. Superoxide dismutase: improved assays and an assay applicable to acrylamide gels. Analytical Biochemistry 44(1): 276-287.
  8. Bradford, M. M. 1976. A rapid and sensitive method for the quantitation of microgram quantities of protein utilizing the principle of protein-dye binding. Analytical Biochemistry 72(1-2): 248-254.
  9. Brand-Williams, W. 1999. Use of a free radical method to evaluate antioxidant activity. Food Sci. Technol. 28: 1231-1237.
  10. Catola, S., G. Marino, G. Emiliani, T. Huseynova, M. Musayev, Z. Akparov, and B. E. Maserti. 2016. Physiological and metabolomic analysis of Punica granatum (L.) under drought stress. Planta 243(2): 441-449.
APA
Kaya, Ç. (2026). Morphological and Biochemical Responses of Pomegranate Cultivars to PEG-Induced Drought Stress Under In-Vitro Conditions. ANADOLU Journal of Aegean Agricultural Research Institute, 36(1), 27-40. https://doi.org/10.18615/anadolu.1907124
AMA
1.Kaya Ç. Morphological and Biochemical Responses of Pomegranate Cultivars to PEG-Induced Drought Stress Under In-Vitro Conditions. ANADOLU. 2026;36(1):27-40. doi:10.18615/anadolu.1907124
Chicago
Kaya, Çağlar. 2026. “Morphological and Biochemical Responses of Pomegranate Cultivars to PEG-Induced Drought Stress Under In-Vitro Conditions”. ANADOLU Journal of Aegean Agricultural Research Institute 36 (1): 27-40. https://doi.org/10.18615/anadolu.1907124.
EndNote
Kaya Ç (June 1, 2026) Morphological and Biochemical Responses of Pomegranate Cultivars to PEG-Induced Drought Stress Under In-Vitro Conditions. ANADOLU Journal of Aegean Agricultural Research Institute 36 1 27–40.
IEEE
[1]Ç. Kaya, “Morphological and Biochemical Responses of Pomegranate Cultivars to PEG-Induced Drought Stress Under In-Vitro Conditions”, ANADOLU, vol. 36, no. 1, pp. 27–40, June 2026, doi: 10.18615/anadolu.1907124.
ISNAD
Kaya, Çağlar. “Morphological and Biochemical Responses of Pomegranate Cultivars to PEG-Induced Drought Stress Under In-Vitro Conditions”. ANADOLU Journal of Aegean Agricultural Research Institute 36/1 (June 1, 2026): 27-40. https://doi.org/10.18615/anadolu.1907124.
JAMA
1.Kaya Ç. Morphological and Biochemical Responses of Pomegranate Cultivars to PEG-Induced Drought Stress Under In-Vitro Conditions. ANADOLU. 2026;36:27–40.
MLA
Kaya, Çağlar. “Morphological and Biochemical Responses of Pomegranate Cultivars to PEG-Induced Drought Stress Under In-Vitro Conditions”. ANADOLU Journal of Aegean Agricultural Research Institute, vol. 36, no. 1, June 2026, pp. 27-40, doi:10.18615/anadolu.1907124.
Vancouver
1.Çağlar Kaya. Morphological and Biochemical Responses of Pomegranate Cultivars to PEG-Induced Drought Stress Under In-Vitro Conditions. ANADOLU. 2026 Jun. 1;36(1):27-40. doi:10.18615/anadolu.1907124