ÇALIŞAN SES DAVRANIŞI ÇALIŞMALARI ÜZERİNE BİBLİYOMETRİK BİR ARAŞTIRMA

Year 2024, Volume: 25 Issue: 2, 114 - 134, 30.06.2024

Hayri Cengiz

https://doi.org/10.53443/anadoluibfd.1343767

Abstract

Bu çalışmanın amacı uluslararası literatürde çalışan ses davranışı konusuyla ilgili yapılan araştırmaları bibliyometrik analizlerle incelemektedir. Bu doğrultuda Web of Science veri tabanından 2008-2023 yılları arasında gerçekleştirilmiş 431 yayın araştırmaya dahil edilmiş ve R Stüdyo programı kullanılarak bibliyometrik analiz gerçekleştirilmiştir. Ortaya çıkan sonuçlara göre konuya olan ilginin 2017 yılının sonrasında daha fazla arttığı ve en etkili yılın ise 2022 olduğu görülmüştür. Çalışan ses davranışı konusuna en çok ilgi gösteren dergiler ise “Frontiers in Psychology” ve “Social Behavior and Personality” olmuştur. Kavramla ilgili en yoğun kullanılan kelimelerin ise performans, ses davranışının öncülleri, liderlik stilleri ve kişilik özellikleri olduğu ortaya çıkmıştır. En üretken ülkenin Çin olduğu, en üretken yazarların da Çin’li oldukları ve en çok atıf alan çalışmalarında bu yazarlara ait olduğu görülmektedir. Son yıllarda ses davranışı konusuyla birlikte araştırılan trend konuların ise yasaklayıcı ses, liderlik stilleri, işe bağlılık, iş performansı olduğu ve bu araştırmalarda düzenleyici etki analizlerine olan ilginin arttığı ortaya çıkmıştır.

Keywords

Çalışan Ses Davranışı, Çalışan Sesliliği, Pozitif Ses Davranışı

A BIBLIOMETRIC RESEARCH ON EMPLOYEE VOICE BEHAVIOR STUDIES

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to examine the researches on employee voice behavior in the international literature with bibliometric analyses. In this direction, 431 publications from the Web of Science database between 2008-2023 were included in the research and bibliometric analysis was performed using the R Studio software. According to the results, it was seen that the interest in the subject increased more after 2017 and the most effective year was 2022. The journals that showed the most interest in employee voice behavior were Frontiers in Psychology and Social Behavior and Personality. It has been revealed that the most frequently used words related to the concept are performance, voice behavior antecedents, leadership styles and personality traits. It is seen that the most productive country is China, the most productive authors are from China and the most cited papers belong to these authors. In recent years, it has been revealed that the trend topics that have been researched together with the voice behavior are prohibitive voice, leadership styles, work commitment, work performance, and the interest in moderator impact analyzes has increased in these studies.

Keywords

Employee Voice Behavior, Employee Voice, Positive Voice Behavior

References

• Aria, M. & Cuccurullo, C. (2017). Bibliometrix: An R tool for comprehensive science mapping analysis. Journal of Informetrics, 11(4), 959-975.
• Avery, D., McKay, P., Wilson, D., Volpone, S. & Killham, E. (2011). Does voice go flat? How tenure diminishes the impact of voice. Human Resource Management, 50(1), 147-158.
• Bashshur, M. R., & Oc, B. (2015). When voice matters: A multilevel review of the impact of voice in organizations. Journal of Management, 41(5), 1530-1554.
• Belter, C. (2015). Bibliometric indicators: opportunities and limits.. Journal of the Medical Library Association : JMLA, 103(4), 219-21 .
• Brinsfield, C. T., Edwards, M. S. & Greenberger, J. (2009). Voice and silence in organizations. J. Greenberg & M. Edwards (Ed.), Voice and silence in organizations: Historical review and current conceptualizations (s.3-33) içinde. Bingley, U.K.: Emerald.
• Burris, E.R., Detert, J.R. & Chiaburu, D.S. (2008). Quitting before leaving: The mediating effects of psychological attachment and detachment on voice. Journal of Applied Psychology, 93, 912-922.
• Du, Y. & Wang, Z. (2021). How does emotional labor influence voice behavior? The roles of work Engagement and Perceived Organizational Support. Sustainability, 13, 1-14.
• Guzman, F. & Espejo, A. (2018). Introducing changes at work: How voice behavior relates to management innovation. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 40(1), 73-90.
• Hirschman, A.O. (1970). Exit, voice, and loyalty: Responses to decline in firms, organizations, and states (25. Baskı). Cambrigde, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press.
• Hsiung, H.H. (2012). Authentic leadership and employee voice behavior: A multi-level psychological process. Journal of Business Ethics, 107, 349-361.
• Knoll, M. & Redman, T. (2016). Does the presence of voice imply the absence of silence? The necessity to consider employees’ affective attachment and job engagement. Human Resource Management, 55, 829–844.
• Landau, J. (2009). To speak or not to speak: Predictors of voice propensity. Journal of Organizational Culture, Communications and Conflict, 13, 35-54.
• LePine, J.A. & Van Dyne, L. (2001), Voice and cooperative behavior as contrasting forms of contextual performance: evidence of differential relationships with big five personality characteristics and cognitive ability, Journal of Applied Psychology, 86(2), 326-336.
• Liang, H.L. & Yeh, T.K. (2020). The effects of employee voice on workplace bullying and job satisfaction: The mediating role of leader–member exchange. Management Decision, 58(3), 569-582.
• Liang, J., Farh, C. I. C. & Farh, J.L. (2012). Psychological antecedents of promotive and prohibitive voice: A two-wave examination. Academy of Management Journal, 55, 71-92.
• Lin, S. & Johnson, R. (2015). A suggestion to improve a day keeps your depletion away: Examining promotive and prohibitive voice behaviors within a regulatory focus and ego depletion framework. The Journal of Applied Psychology, 100(5), 1381-97.
• Liu, W., Zhu, R. & Yang, Y. (2010). I warn you because I like you: Voice behavior, employee identifications, and transformational leadership. Leadership Quarterly, 21, 189-202.
• Maynes, T. D. & Podsakoff, P. M. (2014). Speaking more broadly: an examination of the nature, antecedents, and consequences of an expanded set of employee voice behaviors. Journal of applied psychology, 99(1), 87-112.
• Miles, S. J. & Mangold, W. G. (2014). Employee voice: Untapped resource or social media time bomb?. Business Horizons, 57(3), 401-411.
• Milliken, F.J., Schipani, C.A., Bishara, N.D. & Prado, A.M. (2015), Linking workplace practices to community engagement: the case for encouraging employee voice, Academy of Management Perspectives, 29(4), 405-421.
• Mohadab, M., Bouikhalene, B. & Safi, S. (2020). Bibliometric method for mapping the state of the art of scientific production in Covid-19. Chaos, Solitons, and Fractals, 139, 1-16.
• Morrison, E. W. (2011). Employee voice behavior: Integration and directions for future research. Academy of Management Annals, 5(1), 373-412.
• Morrison, E. W., Wheeler-Smith, S. L. & Kamdar, D. (2011). Speaking up in groups: A cross-level study of group voice climate and voice. Journal of Applied Psychology, 96, 183-191.
• Morrison, E.W. & Milliken, F.J. (Eds.). (2000). Organizational silence: A barrier to change and development in a pluralistic world. Academy of Management Review, 25, 706-725.
• Ng, T. W. H. & Feldman, D. C. (2012). Employee voice behavior: A meta-analytic test of the conservation of resources framework. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 33(2), 216-234.
• Oliveira, O., Silva, F., Juliani, F., Barbosa, L. & Nunhes, T. (2019). Bibliometric method for mapping the state-of-the-art and identifying research gaps and trends in literature: An essential instrument to support the development of scientific projects. S. Kunosic & E. Zerem (Ed.), Scientometrics Recent Advances (s.1-20) içinde. London: IntechOpen.
• Oral Ataç, L. (2020). Çalışan sesliliğinin öncülleri ve sonuçları: Türkiye örnekleminde gerçekleştirilen araştırmalar bağlamında ilgili yazının genel değerlendirmesi ve bir meta-analiz çalışması. Journal of Business Research - Turk, 12(2), 1739-1755.
• Prucell, J., Kinnie, N., Hutchinson, S., Rayton, B. & Swart, J. (2003), Understanding the people and performance link: Unlocking the black box, CIPD, London.
• Qing M. & JinHua Z. (2023). The influence of participative leadership on the voice behavior of public servants. Public Personnel Management. 52(3), 291–316.
• Serrano, L., Sianes, A. & Ariza-Montes, A. (2019). Using bibliometric methods to shed light on the concept of sustainable tourism. Sustainability. 11, 1-25.
• Song, J., He, C., Wu, W. & Zhai, X. (2020). Roles of self-efficacy and transformational leadership in explaining voice-job satisfaction relationship. Current Psychology, 39(3), 975-986.
• Song, J., Wu, J. & Gu, J. (2017). Voice behavior and creative performance moderated by stressors. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 32, 177-192.
• Takeuchi, R., Chen, Z. & Cheung, S. Y. (2012). Applying uncertainty management theory to employee voice behavior: An integrative investigation. Personnel Psychology, 65(2), 283-323.
• Thomas, W. H. NG. & Feldman, D. C. (2012). Employee voice behavior: A meta‐analytic test of the conservation of resources framework. Journal of Organizational behavior, 33(2), 216-234.
• Um-e-Rubbab & Naqvi S.M.M.R., (2020). Employee voice behavior as a critical factor for organizational sustainability in the telecommunications industry. Plos One, 15(9), 1-17.
• Van Dyne, L. & LePine, J. (1998). Helping and voice extra-role behaviors: Evidence of construct and predictive validity. Academy of Management Journal, 41(1), 108-119.
• Walumbwa, F.O. & Schaubroeck, J. (2009). Leader personality traits and employee voice behavior: Mediating roles of ethical leadership and work group psychological safety. Journal of Applied Psychology, 94, 1275–1286.
• Wang, Q. & Waltman, L. (2015). Large-scale analysis of the accuracy of the journal classification systems of Web of Science and Scopus. Journal of Informetrics, 10, 347-364.
• Weiss, M. & Morrison, E. W. (2019). Speaking up and moving up: How voice can enhance employees' social status. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 40, 5-19.
• Withey, M. J. & Cooper, W. H. (1989). Predicting exit, voice, loyalty, and neglect. Administrative Science Quarterly, 34, 521–539.
• Wu, W., Tang, F., Dong, X. & Liu, C. (2015). Different identifications cause different types of voice: A role identity approach to the relations between organizational socialization and voice. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 32, 251-287.