Current Practice in Robotic Gastrointestinal Surgery / Robotik Gastrointestinal Cerrahide Güncel Uygulama

Year 2016, Volume: 21 Issue: 2, 153 - 161, 30.04.2016

Orhan Alimoğlu Jülide Sağıroğlu Moaath Alsmadi Tamador Shamaileh Mutaz Albrezat Mohammad Nayfeh Neyaf Almajali Sara Alsauod Ali Abualhayja’a Tunç Eren

https://doi.org/10.21673/anadoluklin.180742

Cited By: 1

Abstract

General surgical diseases have been long treated via conventional (open) or laparoscopic operations. With the advances in technology, there is a paradigm shift from conventional laparoscopy. As a result, single incision laparoscopic surgery (SILS), natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (NOTES), and robotic surgery have evolved as new treatment options for minimal invasive surgery. It has been shown in many series that a wide variety of procedures of general surgery can be managed safely and effectively by robot assisted laparoscopic surgery (RALS). In this review, current advances and practice in robotics in the most commonly applied gastrointestinal surgical procedures will be emphasized.

Keywords

general surgery, gastrointestinal, robotics

Robotik Gastrointestinal Cerrahide Güncel Uygulama

Abstract

Cerrahi tedavi gerektiren hastalıklar için, uzun zamandır konvansiyonel (açık) veya laparoskopik
ameliyatlar uygulanabilmektedir. Günümüzde teknolojideki hızlı ilerlemeler, bu konudaki araştırmalarda
konvansiyonel laparoskopiden farklı yöntemlere de odaklanılmasına neden olmuştur.
Bunlar arasında tek kesiden laparoskopik cerrahi (single incision laparoscopic surgery—SILS),
doğal menfezden translüminal endoskopik cerrahi (natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery—NOTES)
ve robotik cerrahi, minimal invaziv cerrahi için yeni seçeneklerdir. Birçok çalışmada
çeşitli genel cerrahi ameliyatlarının robot yardımlı laparoskopik (ROYAL) cerrahi ile güvenli
ve etkin bir şekilde uygulanabildiği gösterilmiştir. Bu derlemede, genel cerrahi alanında en sık
uygulanan gastrointestinal operasyonlara yönelik robotik cerrahideki güncel gelişmeler ve uygulamalar
irdelenecektir

Keywords

genel cerrahi, gastrointestinal, robot

References

• Alimoglu O, Atak İ, Eren T, Kılıç A. Robot assisted la- paroscopic (RAL) gastrectomy: case series and a review of the literature. Turkish J Surgery. 2013;29(4):187–91.
• Ballantyne GH. Robotic surgery, telerobotic surgery, te- lepresence, and telementoring. Review of early clinical results. Surg Endosc. 2002;16(10): 1389–402.
• Alimoglu O, Çalışkan M, Atak İ, Tekeşin K. Robot-as- sisted laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Turkish J Surgery. 2010;26(3):165–7.
• Shehzad K, Mohiuddin K, Nizami S, Sharma H, Khan IM, Memon B, et al. Current status of minimal access surgery for gastric cancer. Surg Oncol. 2007;16(2):85–98.
• Kang CM, Chi HS, Hyeung WJ, Kim KS, Choi JS, Lee WJ, et al. The first Korean experience of telemanipula- tive robot-assisted laparoscopic cholecystectomy using the da Vinci system. Yonsei Med J. 2007; 48(3):540–5.
• Himpens J, Leman G, Cadiere GB. Telesurgical laparos- copic cholecystectomy. Surg Endosc. 1998;12(8):1091.
• Vidovsky TJ, Smith W, Ghosh J, Ali MR. Robotic cho- lecystectomy: learning curve, advantages, and limitati- ons. J Surg Res. 2006;136(2):172–8.
• Breitenstein S, Nocito A, Puhan M, Held U, Weber M, Clavien PA. Robotic-assisted versus laparoscopic cho- lecystectomy: outcome and cost analyses of a case-matc- hed control study. Ann Surg. 2008;247(6):987–93.
• Nio D, Bemelman WA, Bush OR, Vrouenraets BC, Go- uma DJ. Robot-assisted laparoscopic cholecystectomy versus conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a comparative study. Surg Endosc. 2004;18(3):379–82.
• Gurusamy KS, Samraj K, Fusai G, Davidson BR. Robot assistant for laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2009;1:CD006578.
• Marescaux J, Smith MK, Fölscher D, Jamali F, Malassag- ne B, Leroy J. Telerobotic laparoscopic cholecystectomy: Initial clinical experience with 25 patients. Ann Surg. 2001;234(1):1–7.
• Cadiere GB, Himpens J, Germay O, Izizaw R, Degueldre M, Vandromme J, etl al. Feasibility of robotic laparosco- pic surgery: 146 cases. World J Surg. 2001;25(11):1467– 77.
• Idrees K, Bartlett DL. Robotic liver surgery. Surg Clin North Am. 2010;90(4):761–74.
• Giulianotti PC, Coratti A, Sbrana F, Addeo P, Bianco FM, Buchs NC, et al. Robotic liver surgery: results for 70 re- sections. Surgery. 2011;149(1):29–39.
• Choi GH, Choi SH, Kim SH, Hwang HK, Kang CM, Choi JS, et al. Robotic liver resection: technique and results of 30 consecutive procedures. Surg Endosc. 2012;26(8):2247–58.
• Chan OC, Tang CN, Lai EC, Yang GP, Li MK, et al. Ro- botic hepatobiliary and pancreatic surgery: a cohort study. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci. 2011;18(4):471–80.
• Reggiani P, Antonelli B, Rossi G. Robotic surgery of the liver: Italian experience and review of the literature. ecancermedicalscience. 2013;7:358.
• Giulianotti PC, Sbrana F, Coratti A, Bianco FM, Ad- deo P, Buchs NC, et al. Totally robotic right hepatec- tomy: surgical technique and outcomes. Arch Surg. 2011;146(7):844–50.
• Giulianotti PC, Sbrana F, Bianco FM, Addeo P, et al. Ro- bot assisted laparoscopic extended right hepatectomy with biliary reconstruction. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2011;20(2)159–63.
• Giulianotti PC, Addeo P, Bianco FM. Robotic right hepa- tectomy for giant hemangioma in a Jehovah’s Witness. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci. 2011;18(1):112–8.
• Packiam V, Bartlett DL, Tohme S, Reddy S, Marsh JW, Geller DA, et al. Minimally invasive liver resection: ro- botic versus laparoscopic left lateral sectionectomy. J Gastrointest Surg. 2012;16(12):2233–8.
• Ji WB, Wang HG, Zhao ZM, Duan WD, Lu F, Dong JH. Robotic-assisted laparoscopic anatomic hepatectomy in China: initial experience. Ann Surg. 2011;253(2):342–8.
• Yu YD, Kim KH, Jung DH, Namkoong JM, Yoon SY, Jung SW, et al. Robotic versus laparoscopic liver resec- tion: a comparative study from a single center. Langen- becks Arch Surg. 2014;399(8):1039–45.
• Kleeff J, Diener MK, Z’graggen K, Hinz U, Wagner M, Bachmann J, et al. Distal pancreatectomy: risk factors for surgical failure in 302 consecutive cases. Ann Surg 2007;245(4):573–82.
• Winter JM, Cameron JL, Campbell KA, Arnold MA, Chang DC, Coleman J, et al. 1423 pancreaticoduode- nectomies for pancreatic cancer: a single-institution experience. J Gastrointest Surg. 2006;10(9):1199–1210 (discussion 1210–1).
• dosc. 1994;4(2):146–8.
• H, Kennedy RH, et al. The current status of robotic pel- vic surgery: results of a multinational interdisciplinary consensus conference. Surg Endosc. 2009;23(2):438–43.
• Baik SH. Robotic colorectal surgery. Yonsei Med J. 2008;49(6):891–6.
• Alimoglu O, Atak I, Orhun K, Eren T. Robot-assis- ted laparoscopic colorectal surgery. Minerva Chir. 2013;68(5):471–8.
• Hellan M, Anderson C, Ellenhorn JD, Paz B, Pigaz- zi A. Short-term out comes after robotic-assisted total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer. Ann Surg Oncol. 2007;14(11):3168–73.
• Balch GC. Emerging role of laparoscopic and ro- botic surgery for rectal cancers. Ann Surg Oncol. 2009;16(6):1451–3.
• Bonjer HJ, Hop WC, Nelson H, Sargent DJ, Lacy AM, Castells A, et al.; Transatlantic Laparoscopically Assisted vs Open Colectomy Trials Study Group. Laparoscopi- cally assisted vs open colectomy for colon cancer: a meta analysis. Arch Surg. 2007;142(3):298–303.
• Jayne DG, Guillou PJ, Thorpe H, Quirke P, Copeland J, Smith AM, et al.; UK MRC CLA SICC Trial Group. Ran- domized trial of laparoscopic assisted resection of co- lorectal carcinoma: 3-year results of the UK MRC CLA SICC Trial Group. J Clin Oncol. 2007;25(21):3061–8.
• Thorpe H, Jayne DG, Guillou PJ, Quirke P, Copeland J, Brown JM; Medical Research Council Conventional ver- sus Laparoscopic-Assisted Surgery In Colorectal Cancer Trial Group. Patient factors influencing conversion from laparoscopically assisted to open surgery for colorectal cancer. Br J Surg. 2008;95(2):199–205.
• Breukink S, Pierie J, Wiggers T. Laparoscopic versus open total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer. Cochra- ne Database Syst Rev. 2006;(4):CD005200.
• Pigazzi A, Luca F, Patriti A, Valvo M, Ceccarelli G, Casci- ola L, et al. Multicentric study on robotic tumor-specific mesorectal excision for the treatment of rectal cancer. Ann Surg Oncol. 2010;17(6):1614–20.
• Baik SH, Kwon HY, Kim JS, Hur H, Sohn SK, Cho CH, et al. Robotic versus laparoscopic low anterior resecti- on of rectal cancer: short term outcome of a prospective comparative study. Ann Surg Oncol. 2009;16(6):1480–7.
• Cho MS, Kim CW, Baek SJ, Hur H, Min BS, Baik SH, et al. Minimally invasive versus open total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer: Long-term results from a case-matched study of 633 patients. Surgery. 2015;157(6):1121–9.
• Hellan M, Ouellette J, Lagares-Garcia JA, Rauh SM, Kennedy HL, Nicholson JD, et al. Robotic rectal cancer resection: a retrospective multicenter analysis. Ann Surg Oncol. 2015;22(7):2151–8.
• Alimoglu O, Sagiroglu J, Atak İ, Kılıc A, Eren T, Caliskan M, et al. Robotic assisted laparoscopic (RAL) procedures in general surgery. Int J Med Robot. 2015. Doi: 10.1002/ rcs.1706. [Epub ahead of print].