Abstract
Although the original idea of Hans Kelsen on Verfassungsberichtkeit excluded the possibility of individual access to the Constitutional Court, recent tendencies in constitutional adjudication can rightly be described as a path from the review of the constitutionality of laws to the review of the application of laws.7 This means a shift from the review of legislature to the review of the judiciary. A similar line of development can be outlined in opening up the possibility of individual access to constitutional courts.
Abstract
Verfassungsberichtkeit konusunda Hand Kelsen’in özgün düşüncesinin, Anayasa Mahkemesine kişisel ulaşım olanağını dışlamış olmasına karşın, anayasal kararlar konusunda son zamanlardaki eğilimler, haklı olarak yasaların Anayasaya uygunluk denetiminden yargısal denetime bir geçiş olarak tanımlanabilir. 1 Bu durum yasama denetiminden yargısal denetime geçiş anlamına gelmektedir.
Details
| Primary Language | Turkish |
|---|---|
| Journal Section | Supreme Court Rules |
| Authors | |
| Publication Date | June 1, 2004 |
| Published in Issue | Year 2004 Volume: 20 Issue: 1 |